Re: [dns-operations] Bind 9.8.0 intermittent problem with non-recursive responses

2011-05-29 Thread Doug Barton

On 5/28/2011 4:18 PM, Michael Sinatra wrote:

This will be in BIND 9.8.1 final. BIND 9.8.1b1 is already cut
and will need this to be applied.


I just noticed that the patch for query.c has been added as an extra
patch to the FreeBSD port for 9.8.0-P2, so if you build the bind98 port
from the latest FreeBSD ports collection, you'll get the bugfix now.
(Thanks, dougb)


Glad to help. :)


--

Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go

Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: bind 9.8.0 with openssl 1.0.0d in chroot Bug

2011-05-29 Thread Doug Barton

On 5/28/2011 7:25 AM, Martin Wismer wrote:

Hello together,

I'm try to use bind 9.8.0 with openssl 1.0.0d under chroot.


Not sure where solaris puts its openssl libraries, but you want to copy 
engines/libgost.so into the equivalent location in your chroot 
directory. For example, if it's in /usr/local/lib/engines/libgost.so in 
the base system them copy it to 
${CHROOT}/usr/local/lib/engines/libgost.so. Then you should be fine.



Doug

--

Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much.
-- OK Go

Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Maren S. Leizaola


DNS-Racing is a method of load balancing access to servers which are 
multi homed and provides lowest latency access to users and network 
resilience to ISP/routing failure.

*
**What does it do?*
It permits a server which is connected to two ISPs to use the optimal 
ISP when transferring data to a user regardless of TCP/UDP protocol. 
When a user does a DNS look up it will select the IP address of the 
server to which is closest. If one of the two ISPs is down or there is a 
routing problem the user will only be offered the IP address of the 
server it has access to. It also means that traffic will have the lowest 
latency.


DNS Racing can be done with 2 or more providers and permits to scale 
network bandwidth horizontally by adding more providers. In theory up to 
14 different ISPs/IPs could be used to do the delivery.


IT is a poor man’s replacement for BGP multihoming and IP anycast.

For those that want a full explanation and an implementation guide.
http://blog.hk.com/index.php?/archives/84-DNS-Racing.-Multi-ISP-load-balancing-with-failover-using-DNS..html

Hey it is Free and you can implement it using BIND.

Regards,
Maren.
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Alan Clegg
On 5/29/2011 5:12 PM, Maren S. Leizaola wrote:

 IT is a poor man’s replacement for BGP multihoming and IP anycast.

 Hey it is Free and you can implement it using BIND.

And you've just broken DNSSEC.

AlanC



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Mark Andrews

And if people used happy-eyeballs[1] or similar[2] in the applications
this would not be needed.  Chrome already does this with their
latest browser.  It uses a 300ms timer to switch to the next address.

Happy-eyeballs was primarially written to deal with broken 6to4
links but the techniques are applicable to any multi-homed service
be it IPv4 only, IPv6 only or a mixture of IPv4 and IPv6.

Mark

[1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wing-v6ops-happy-eyeballs-ipv6-01
[2] 
https://www.isc.org/community/blog/201101/how-to-connect-to-a-multi-homed-server-over-tcp

In message 4de2c00b.6090...@isc.org, Alan Clegg writes:
 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
 --===2705591056810672531==
 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
   protocol=application/pgp-signature;
   boundary=enig46D823F06B8505CC93187062
 
 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
 --enig46D823F06B8505CC93187062
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 On 5/29/2011 5:12 PM, Maren S. Leizaola wrote:
 
  IT is a poor man=92s replacement for BGP multihoming and IP anycast.
 
  Hey it is Free and you can implement it using BIND.
 
 And you've just broken DNSSEC.
 
 AlanC
 
 
 --enig46D823F06B8505CC93187062
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
 Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc
 
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (MingW32)
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAk3iwA0ACgkQcKpYUrUDCYdMXwCgmIsTehj06i1fsZtJmCaPEHIi
 JqcAoJPhcXKDf/QgPK06MkkYt2N9gZPB
 =nLtA
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
 
 --enig46D823F06B8505CC93187062--
 
 --===2705591056810672531==
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 MIME-Version: 1.0
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 --===2705591056810672531==--
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Warren Kumari


Warren Kumari
--
Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard.

On May 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Alan Clegg acl...@isc.org wrote:

 On 5/29/2011 5:12 PM, Maren S. Leizaola wrote:
 
 IT is a poor man’s replacement for BGP multihoming and IP anycast.
 
 Hey it is Free and you can implement it using BIND.
 
 And you've just broken DNSSEC.
 

Um, how?

Surely you can just sign the responses, same as any others?

Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but this just looks like normal DNS LB...

W


 AlanC
 
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Mark Andrews

In message 2c591af8-860d-45a5-9f3a-3603f3733...@kumari.net, Warren Kumari 
writes:
 
 Um, how?
 
 Surely you can just sign the responses, same as any others?
 
 Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but this just looks like normal 
 DNS LB...
 
 W

It depends on who is doing the modification.  From the description
it looks like this would be being done in the recursive nameserver
as it has view into site reachability which won't work with DNSSEC.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNS Racing -Multi ISP load balancing with failover using DNS.

2011-05-29 Thread Warren Kumari


Warren Kumari
--
Please excuse typing, etc -- This was sent from a device with a tiny keyboard.

On May 29, 2011, at 9:32 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:

 
 In message 2c591af8-860d-45a5-9f3a-3603f3733...@kumari.net, Warren Kumari 
 writes:
 
 Um, how?
 
 Surely you can just sign the responses, same as any others?
 
 Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but this just looks like normal 
 DNS LB...
 
 W
 
 It depends on who is doing the modification.  From the description
 it looks like this would be being done in the recursive nameserver
 as it has view into site reachability which won't work with DNSSEC.
 

Oh, well, yeah, there you go then...

Thanks,
W



 Mark
 -- 
 Mark Andrews, ISC
 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
 PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org
 
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Split DNS Configuration in BIND

2011-05-29 Thread babu dheen
Hi,
 
 Would like to know how to configure split DNS in BIND running in RHEL 5.0 
version. Below is our setup and requirement.
 
  We have a zone called mycompany.com . So whenever my company users sitting 
in LAN try to access mycompany.com domain in explorer, they should get internal 
IP address(private IP address) whereas whenever users from internet should get 
public IP for mycompany.com domain
 
 Kindly let me know the guide or procedure for configuring it.
 
Regards
Babu
 ___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Hosting my company DNS server in Internet

2011-05-29 Thread babu dheen
Hi,
 
  Can anyone have any idea as to how we can host our own autherative DNS server 
for my company. For example if my company domain is mycompany.com, we want to 
maintain our own DNS server so that users across world should contact our DNS 
server for name resolution for mycompany.com domain.
 
Regards
babu___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users