Question about resolver

2024-04-24 Thread J Doe

Hello,

I run BIND 9.18.26 as a recursive, validating resolver.  In my logs, I
noticed the following:

22-Apr-2024 19:25:59.614 lame-servers: info: chase DS servers
resolving '180.96.34.in-addr.arpa/DS/IN': 216.239.34.102#53

What does "chase DS servers" mean ?

Thanks,

- J
--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Observation: BIND 9.18 qname-minimization strict vs dig +trace

2024-04-24 Thread Fred Morris

They've got a number of problems. click-network.com is one of them.

https://dnsviz.net/d/click-network.com/dnssec/

There is some backstory. The City of Tacoma used to run broadband, 
and that was Click! Network. The origin story is that this had something 
to do with SCADA or power distribution, but who knows? They have a /16, 
and it appears half of it is available to broadband customers. Anyway they 
privatized it and subsequently sole-sourced that.


Like many businesses today, IT appears to be outsourced and the suppliers 
for various services do strange things sometimes.


Here's the verbose log that 9.18.21 spits out in conjunction with the 
SERVFAIL:


24-Apr-2024 08:43:35.587 resolver: notice: DNS format error from 
131.191.7.194#53 resolving 85.191.131.in-addr.arpa/NS for : Name 
191.131.in-addr.arpa (SOA) not subdomain of zone 85.191.131.in-addr.arpa 
-- invalid response
24-Apr-2024 08:43:35.587 lame-servers: info: FORMERR resolving 
'85.191.131.in-addr.arpa/NS/IN': 131.191.7.194#53
24-Apr-2024 08:43:35.603 resolver: notice: DNS format error from 
131.191.7.12#53 resolving 85.191.131.in-addr.arpa/NS for : Name 
191.131.in-addr.arpa (SOA) not subdomain of zone 85.191.131.in-addr.arpa 
-- invalid response
24-Apr-2024 08:43:35.603 lame-servers: info: FORMERR resolving 
'85.191.131.in-addr.arpa/NS/IN': 131.191.7.12#53


I'm not saying it's the wrong thing to do, although to borrow someone 
else's line that may be like arguing over the particular weasels chosen 
rather than the decision to stuff rabid weasels down your pants in the 
first place.


--

Fred Morris

On Wed, 24 Apr 2024, tale wrote:


Hmm, I wonder if qname-minimisation is at issue here.

--
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Observation: BIND 9.18 qname-minimization strict vs dig +trace

2024-04-24 Thread tale via bind-users
Hmm, I wonder if qname-minimisation is at issue here.   My trace dies with:

85.191.131.in-addr.arpa. 1800   IN  NS  fs838.click-network.com.
85.191.131.in-addr.arpa. 1800   IN  NS  ns102.click-network.com.
couldn't get address for 'fs838.click-network.com': not found
couldn't get address for 'ns102.click-network.com': not found
-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Observation: BIND 9.18 qname-minimization strict vs dig +trace

2024-04-24 Thread Fred Morris
While BIND 9.18.21 with "qname-minimization strict;" SERVFAILs on the
following query, dig with +trace resolves it. Just a data point, and if
they fix their s**t and stop impersonating a signed zone then presumably
the example will resolve itself (pun intended).

dig -x 131.191.85.31

dig -x 131.191.85.31 +trace

--

Fred Morris


-- 
Visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from 
this list

ISC funds the development of this software with paid support subscriptions. 
Contact us at https://www.isc.org/contact/ for more information.


bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users