DNSSEC / DLV for 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481

2010-06-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1


I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
registering it with dlv.isc.org.  Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.

Everything seems to be working well, but when I test using the Sandia
Labs dnsviz.net tool I get inconsistent results.

My mail, etc. server on 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481 appears as
'bogus'

http://dnsviz.net/d/1.8.4.6.6.2.e.f.f.f.e.4.b.c.2.e.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

Yet my personal laptop on 2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb is all good:

http://dnsviz.net/d/b.b.0.c.a.d.e.f.f.f.f.d.e.1.a.f.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

What am I doing wrong?

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwGWkEACgkQ8Mjk52CukIyFlwCgiaFHI4yzaZBNreBCo3RUCh93
0pUAn0nzjDwmNv+c4OKNoQmHD1ueQS7v
=Ncbf
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNSSEC / DLV for 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481

2010-06-02 Thread Chris Thompson

On Jun 2 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:


I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
registering it with dlv.isc.org.  Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.

Everything seems to be working well, but when I test using the Sandia
Labs dnsviz.net tool I get inconsistent results.

My mail, etc. server on 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481 appears as
'bogus'

http://dnsviz.net/d/1.8.4.6.6.2.e.f.f.f.e.4.b.c.2.e.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

Yet my personal laptop on 2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb is all good:

http://dnsviz.net/d/b.b.0.c.a.d.e.f.f.f.f.d.e.1.a.f.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

What am I doing wrong?


Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)

--
Chris Thompson
Email: c...@cam.ac.uk

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNSSEC / DLV for 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481

2010-06-02 Thread Casey Deccio
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 8:40 AM, Paul Vixie vi...@isc.org wrote:

 Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk writes:

  Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
  records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
  handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)

 to be fair, multiple PTR RRs is something we added in BIND gethostbyaddr()
 in more or less direct contravention to RFC 1034. if dnsviz doesn't handle
 it (and i don't know if it doesn't) then it's not dnsviz's fault at all
 since the DNS RFC's say that there will only be one PTR RR at an in-addr.


Not to take this off topic, but RFC 2181 (sec 10.2) clarifies that a PTR
RRset *may* have multiple RRs, but each must point to a canonical name, as
opposed to an alias.

That being said, DNSViz is intended to consider multiple RRs in the PTR
RRset, but I'm still trying to track down the issue that is causing it to
report a bogus signature.  I'll report back when I have an answer.

Regards,
Casey
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNSSEC / DLV for 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481

2010-06-02 Thread Casey Deccio
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Chris Thompson c...@cam.ac.uk wrote:

 On Jun 2 2010, Matthew Seaman wrote:

  I'm DNSSEC enabling the .ip6.arpa zone for my IPv6 allocation and
 registering it with dlv.isc.org.  Using bind-9.7.0-p2 dnssec tools.

 Everything seems to be working well, but when I test using the Sandia
 Labs dnsviz.net tool I get inconsistent results.

 My mail, etc. server on 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481 appears as
 'bogus'


 http://dnsviz.net/d/1.8.4.6.6.2.e.f.f.f.e.4.b.c.2.e.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

 Yet my personal laptop on 2001:8b0:151:1:fa1e:dfff:feda:c0bb is all good:


 http://dnsviz.net/d/b.b.0.c.a.d.e.f.f.f.f.d.e.1.a.f.1.0.0.0.1.5.1.0.0.b.8.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa/dnssec/

 What am I doing wrong?


 Nothing that I can see. Maybe dnsviz can't cope with multiple PTR
 records in an RRset, as your first case has? (On the other hand it
 handles multiple A records in forward zones OK.)


This has been fixed.  The problem had to do with establishing a canonical
ordering of RRs within an RRset for the purposes of verifying an RRSIG.
dnspython's default comparison operators don't follow canonical ordering
from RFC 4034, so I had to make some provisions to order properly.  This
didn't affect A RRsets with multiple RRs because the order of A-type rdata
was the same using both orderings.

Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Regards,
Casey
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: DNSSEC / DLV for 2001:8b0:151:1:e2cb:4eff:fe26:6481

2010-06-02 Thread Matthew Seaman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On 02/06/2010 18:49:44, Casey Deccio wrote:
 This has been fixed.  The problem had to do with establishing a canonical
 ordering of RRs within an RRset for the purposes of verifying an RRSIG.
 dnspython's default comparison operators don't follow canonical ordering
 from RFC 4034, so I had to make some provisions to order properly.  This
 didn't affect A RRsets with multiple RRs because the order of A-type rdata
 was the same using both orderings.
 
 Thanks for bringing this to my attention.

Excellent. Thank you very much indeed -- I'm glad to have been of service.

Cheers,

Matthew

- -- 
Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil.   7 Priory Courtyard
  Flat 3
PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate
JID: matt...@infracaninophile.co.uk   Kent, CT11 9PW
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwGoNIACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzVVwCfTOVmg0meReYFd389TP1D+D96
25EAnRFSXO7JIcaGic1ME49upIkPq+lR
=VZlY
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users