Re: Dig 9.9.1 AD-bit

2012-08-04 Thread Tony Finch
On 3 Aug 2012, at 02:25, Marco Davids (SIDN) marco.dav...@sidn.nl wrote:

 Dig 9.9.1 is setting the AD-bit in queries by default.
 Does anyone know why?

It means I want the results of DNSSEC validation but not all the RRSIG and 
NSEC records I would get from DO=1.

Tony.
--
f.anthony.n.finch  d...@dotat.at  http://dotat.at/
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Dig 9.9.1 AD-bit

2012-08-02 Thread Marco Davids (SIDN)
Hi,

Dig 9.9.1 is setting the AD-bit in queries by default.

Does anyone know why?

Took me a while to figure out, among other things because Wireshark has
a little bug that prevents the AD-bit being shown in queries.

(reported as bug 2472 and 7555 on https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/)

Thanks.

Regards,

-- 
Marco
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Dig 9.9.1 AD-bit

2012-08-02 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote:

 Dig 9.9.1 is setting the AD-bit in queries by default.
 
 Does anyone know why?


3205.   [func]  Upgrade dig's defaults to better reflect modern
nameserver behaviour.  Enable dig +adflag and
dig +edns=0 by default.  Enable +dnssec when
running dig +trace. [RT #23497]


 Took me a while to figure out, among other things because Wireshark has
 a little bug that prevents the AD-bit being shown in queries.
 
 (reported as bug 2472 and 7555 on https://bugs.wireshark.org/bugzilla/)
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users