Re: ipv6 implementation in an ipv4 camp
In message 4c89fcd5.4050...@paz.bz, Jim Pazarena writes: I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp? If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by the ISP, need they be concerned with ipv6? would the ipv4 /23 subnet be 'translatable' to a corresponding ipv6 number? Any source documents would be greatly appreciated. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users I would not bring up IPv6 internally without having external IPv6 connectivity. As others have mentioned HE provides a good tunnel service (I've been using them for ~7 years at home automatically reconfiguring the tunnel when my IPv4 address changes). Mark -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
ipv6 implementation in an ipv4 camp
I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp? If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by the ISP, need they be concerned with ipv6? would the ipv4 /23 subnet be 'translatable' to a corresponding ipv6 number? Any source documents would be greatly appreciated. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: ipv6 implementation in an ipv4 camp
Jim Pazarena wrote: I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp? If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by the ISP, need they be concerned with ipv6? would the ipv4 /23 subnet be 'translatable' to a corresponding ipv6 number? Any source documents would be greatly appreciated. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users I used http://ipv6.he.net and http://www.sixxs.net for use to do a trial implementation of IPv6 in our network. Our upstream ISP has since provided us with native IPv6 and we are working on full implementation here. We have the infrastructure in place and are working on adding IPv6 addresses to all websites as time allows. It's not a high priority at this time. IMHO, it's good for an ISP operation to get on board and figure out how to implement IPv6. End users don't have that pressing of a need unless/until they are forced to by their upstream providers. There is a lot of good info at http://ipv6.he.net and at http://www.sixxs.net for getting a working IPv6 tunnel into their network and how to implement IPv6. Lyle Giese LCR Computer Services, Inc. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: ipv6 implementation in an ipv4 camp
Although its not perfect, you can look into IP protocol 41 which is IPv6 in IPv4. Helps provide some functionality in a last resort case. Jim Pazarena b...@paz.bz wrote: I am curious if anyone can point out articles or deeper instructions regarding an implementation and launch of ipv6 in a fully ipv4 camp? If the upstream ISP still provides the end user an ipv4 number as a gateway, and the end user still has a /24 or /23 assigned by the ISP, need they be concerned with ipv6? would the ipv4 /23 subnet be 'translatable' to a corresponding ipv6 number? Any source documents would be greatly appreciated. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
