Re: [Bioc-devel] data extension preference

2023-01-04 Thread Hervé Pagès
Agree with Lori. If you have tabulated data, csv is better than rda 
because it's plain text and can easily be imported by many software, not 
just R. People can also use an editor or command line tool like grep or 
head to inspect the file. OTOH rda/rds files are R specific so can only 
be used within the R ecosystem. Furthermore these are binary formats so 
not as practical as plain text. If size is an issue, you can always 
compress the csv file (-> csv.gz).


H.

On 03/01/2023 08:24, Kern, Lori wrote:

Personally:  I think it depends on the use case and the type of data being 
provided as well as the size.  Raw data is probably more adaptable for various 
usage even extending beyond expected use however it can be large;  processed 
data can be saved compressed and greatly reduce package/data size.  Again it 
will largely depend on what you are doing with the data provided.



Lori Shepherd - Kern

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Park, Adam Keebum 

Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:42 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org 
Subject: [Bioc-devel] data extension preference

Dear whom it may concern,

I want to check if reviewers have a preference in data formats for data 
included in a package.
Is rda strongly recommended over csv?

Sincerely,
Adam.

 [[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1TPdwAVqVZuSe4StGWM5cZ069tkkEd2TzRyilsxSECEjqUKvno8Zdb1ADlxRO16lYeghEAcxQKUbYlHrN2KDXvokdAcDZyHHQnbzpmvtEdR5-LnOnPQTBydfgzsrqt_wvHLCCkfIR2dca1h0yDT6Tx8KsV-vXAoxjLyP0YTvVpcrOsqRabwJF7P7y5ntz29eeFVAqTNjXA6XilRqlKO8HMidxVRRAWSypOTO7X1oscKhmxUKWQgBLGrn9p8rF7XA9tjsaOAg5-1kEcC4Cbqu0T7qqPX0bGD1spEdDqAv2q2Vz-Cpwm-xniK7e7w7xeI5J/https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fbioc-devel



This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


--
Hervé Pagès

Bioconductor Core Team
hpages.on.git...@gmail.com

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] data extension preference

2023-01-03 Thread Kern, Lori
Personally:  I think it depends on the use case and the type of data being 
provided as well as the size.  Raw data is probably more adaptable for various 
usage even extending beyond expected use however it can be large;  processed 
data can be saved compressed and greatly reduce package/data size.  Again it 
will largely depend on what you are doing with the data provided.



Lori Shepherd - Kern

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Park, Adam 
Keebum 
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2022 11:42 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org 
Subject: [Bioc-devel] data extension preference

Dear whom it may concern,

I want to check if reviewers have a preference in data formats for data 
included in a package.
Is rda strongly recommended over csv?

Sincerely,
Adam.

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://secure-web.cisco.com/1TPdwAVqVZuSe4StGWM5cZ069tkkEd2TzRyilsxSECEjqUKvno8Zdb1ADlxRO16lYeghEAcxQKUbYlHrN2KDXvokdAcDZyHHQnbzpmvtEdR5-LnOnPQTBydfgzsrqt_wvHLCCkfIR2dca1h0yDT6Tx8KsV-vXAoxjLyP0YTvVpcrOsqRabwJF7P7y5ntz29eeFVAqTNjXA6XilRqlKO8HMidxVRRAWSypOTO7X1oscKhmxUKWQgBLGrn9p8rF7XA9tjsaOAg5-1kEcC4Cbqu0T7qqPX0bGD1spEdDqAv2q2Vz-Cpwm-xniK7e7w7xeI5J/https%3A%2F%2Fstat.ethz.ch%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Fbioc-devel



This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] data extension preference

2022-12-25 Thread Park, Adam Keebum
Dear whom it may concern,

I want to check if reviewers have a preference in data formats for data 
included in a package.
Is rda strongly recommended over csv?

Sincerely,
Adam.

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel