Indeed, Signet is no less (or more) Bitcoin than a seed format or BIP 32. It’s
“not Bitcoin” but it’s certainly “interoperability for how to build good
testing for Bitcoin”.
> On Oct 14, 2019, at 19:55, Karl-Johan Alm via bitcoin-dev
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> The pull request to the bips repository for Signet has stalled, as the
> maintainer isn't sure Signet should have a BIP at all, i.e. "is Signet
> Bitcoin?".
>
> My argument is that Signet is indeed Bitcoin and should have a BIP, as
> this facilitates the interoperability between different software in
> the Bitcoin space.
>
> Feedback welcome, here or on the pull request itself:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/803
> ___
> bitcoin-dev mailing list
> bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
> https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
___
bitcoin-dev mailing list
bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
