Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
I was just looking into the conventions around this yesterday! It seems like this proposal is mostly just formalizing stuff that is already a tacit standard. I'm glad to see that someone is documenting it somewhere more "official". It appears consistent with https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253, However, due to historical timing, the PR you linked doesn't include any standards around segwit conventions. In the review thread you had mentioned that you needed an ACK from prusnak, but he explicitly gave a NACK in favor of a separate proposal for BIP 48, which seems like it could be something like the OP. Reading the proposal it seems consistent with the pull request that you linked, as well. At the end of the thread the author of PR#253 said they would open a separate proposal, but it appears that it never materialized. Was there a reason for this? Keagan On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:17 AM Luke Dashjr via bitcoin-dev < bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers. > > Is this intended to be compatible with > https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ? > > Luke > > > > On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > Here is the repo instead of a static link: > > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki > > > > Fontaine > > > > Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. > > > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > > > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via > bitcoin-dev > wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the > > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations. > > > > > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input > > > welcome. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Fontaine > > ___ > bitcoin-dev mailing list > bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev > ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Re: [bitcoin-dev] New PSBT version proposal
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 10:25:37PM +, Andrew Chow via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to propose a new PSBT version that addresses a few > deficiencies in the current PSBT v0. As this will be backwards > incompatible, a new PSBT version will be used, v1. > > The primary change is to truly have all input and output data for each > in their respective maps. Instead of having to parse an unsigned > transaction and lookup some data from there, and other data from the > correct map, all of the data for an input will be contained in its map. > Doing so also disallows PSBT_GLOBAL_UNSIGNED_TX in this new version. > Thus I propose that the following fields be added: > > Global: > * PSBT_GLOBAL_TX_VERSION = 0x02 > ?? * Key: empty > ?? * Value: 32-bit little endian unsigned integer for the transaction > version number. Must be provided in PSBT v1 and omitted in v0. All of these changes sound great. It would definitely make working with PSBTs easier if all data was accessible in the same format, rather than being split between the global unsigned tx and the main body. One minor quibble is the version numbering -- you mention "v1" in this post but set GLOBAL_TX_VERSION to 2. I think we should consistently use 2 everywhere; probably nobody thinks of the existing PSBT as "version 0". -- Andrew Poelstra Director of Research, Blockstream Email: apoelstra at wpsoftware.net Web: https://www.wpsoftware.net/andrew The sun is always shining in space -Justin Lewis-Webster signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
BIP number 48 has not been assigned. Do not self-assign BIP numbers. Is this intended to be compatible with https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/pull/253 ? Luke On Wednesday 16 December 2020 14:10:28 dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Here is the repo instead of a static link: > https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki > > Fontaine > > Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. > > ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ > > On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the > > purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations. > > > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input > > welcome. > > > > Regards, > > Fontaine ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
Re: [bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
Here is the repo instead of a static link: https://github.com/Fonta1n3/bips/blob/master/bip-0048.mediawiki Fontaine Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Email. ‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:43 PM, dentondevelopment via bitcoin-dev wrote: > Hello, > > I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the purpose > of documenting modern multi-sig derivations. > > Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input welcome. > > Regards, > Fontaine___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
[bitcoin-dev] bip48 proposal
Hello, I would like to propose bip48 (taking bip44 as inspiration), with the purpose of documenting modern multi-sig derivations. Please see a rough draft of the proposed bip attached, comments/input welcome. Regards, Fontaine bip-0048.mediawiki Description: Binary data ___ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
