Re: [blfs-dev] Misspellings
William Harrington wrote: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/misspellings I've used this a lot with our CLFS book. It may help with the LFS book. Thanks, Tried it and it seems to work well. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Misspellings
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/misspellings I've used this a lot with our CLFS book. It may help with the LFS book. Sincerely, William Harrington -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Typo in make-ca.sh-20170425
On 05/13/2017 10:17 PM, 大橋 洋平 wrote: Hello, I found a typo in the script `make-ca.sh-20170425`. diff -ru a/make-ca.sh-20170425 b/make-ca.sh-20170425 --- a/make-ca.sh-20170425 2017-05-14 12:07:28.524637448 +0900 +++ b/make-ca.sh-20170425 2017-05-14 12:07:50.059828885 +0900 @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ echo "-addtrust codeSigning" ;; ca) - echo "-addtust clientAuth" + echo "-addtrust clientAuth" ;; esac ;; In short: sed -i -e 's/addtust/addtrust/' make-ca.sh-20170425 Best regards, Ohashi Yes, is a little used addition, hard to spot. Good catch! Will be fixed in a few. Thanks. --DJ -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] typo: epiphany-extensions: 'debuging' .
On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:20:44AM +0100, akhiezer wrote: > BOOK/archive/gnome/epiphany-extensions.xml > 'is an extension for debuging the Soup session' > > > akh > It has been archived, it is no longer built. ĸen -- I live in a city. I know sparrows from starlings. After that everything is a duck as far as I'm concerned. -- Monstrous Regiment -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Typo in make-ca.sh-20170425
Hello, I found a typo in the script `make-ca.sh-20170425`. diff -ru a/make-ca.sh-20170425 b/make-ca.sh-20170425 --- a/make-ca.sh-20170425 2017-05-14 12:07:28.524637448 +0900 +++ b/make-ca.sh-20170425 2017-05-14 12:07:50.059828885 +0900 @@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ echo "-addtrust codeSigning" ;; ca) - echo "-addtust clientAuth" + echo "-addtrust clientAuth" ;; esac ;; In short: sed -i -e 's/addtust/addtrust/' make-ca.sh-20170425 Best regards, Ohashi -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] typos: 'docummentation' .
trunk/BOOK/general/genlib/libassuan.xml Optional, to fix the docummentation build: trunk/BOOK/archive/webkitgtk2.xml docummentation also applies here: trunk/BOOK/pst/scanning/xsane.xml (for the help docummentation at runtime) (Yes, the webkit... is arkv now). akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] typo: 'documention' .
trunk/BOOK/general/graphlib/jasper.xml (needed to regnerate the pdf documention) trunk/BOOK/multimedia/videoutils/ffmpeg.xml --disable-doc: Disables building html documention. -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] typo: gnumeric: ot to
trunk/BOOK/xsoft/office/gnumeric.xml 'The valgrind tests are known ot fail.' (These 'typo' msgs are by-products of some testing of aspell to spellcheck b/lfs src (xml) trees; incl aut reporting/) akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] typo: developper*
trunk/BOOK/lxqt/desktop/post-install.xml: 'developpers) or another Display Manager,' trunk/BOOK/postlfs/security/sudo.xml: 'See the developper note above before the configure command' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] typo: epiphany-extensions: 'debuging' .
BOOK/archive/gnome/epiphany-extensions.xml 'is an extension for debuging the Soup session' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] small typo: llvm: 'to an binary' .
trunk/BOOK/general/prog/llvm.xml 'to an binary file' akh -- -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] New gcc7 entity
On Fri, May 12, 2017 at 02:23:58PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > One issue I found with gcc7 is that it seems to be much slower than gcc6 > when building packages. My -j1 time for binutils has gone from 107 seconds > to 140 seconds, about a 30% increase. If others have a different result, I > would like to hear about it. > You're not kidding. I haven't built binutils pass 1 *from* 7.1 yet (just got to the end of chapter 6). Earlier this week I did a build of LFS svn 2017-05-01 from the same version, without tests, using -j8 except for binutils pass 1 (trying one of the symlinks that DJ has now added to LFS), so a really minimal build. That took 19m04 for my chapter 5 script (now 20m00), and 23m22 for chroot (now a net time of 24m02. More details might follow if it builds enough of BLFS to try booting (but this time I'll definitely go back to chroot for most of BLFS, and I'm in no rush - this has to fit in when I'm not *using* the current system -- I live in a city. I know sparrows from starlings. After that everything is a duck as far as I'm concerned. -- Monstrous Regiment -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
