Re: [blfs-dev] Libunique still needed ?
Em 12-01-2016 14:59, Gen escreveu:
> Ah, OK - Sorry.
>
> But as this library is no longer used to buil xfce, your proposition to
> move it to a more general chapter makes sense.
>
> --
> Nico
>
> On 16-01-12 18:09, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Em 12-01-2016 12:57, Gen escreveu:
>>> In the Xfce Applications chapter Libunique-1.6.6 was needed only by the
>>> xfce4 mixer...
>>
>> Yes, it is still needed.
>>
>> That was not the only application needing it. A couple of applications
>> do use it.
>>
>> Perhaps (and I have thought that many times, for that reason) it could
>> be moved to a more general chapter, probably "9. General Libraries".
Done.
Thanks for trimming. Please don't top post. Example: I am "bottom"
posting. You can also use inline (between previous post lines. These are
the formats used in the (B)LFS lists.
Citation from the lfs-support list footer, added by Bruce Dubbs:
{{{
Do not top post on this list.
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail?
}}}
--
[]s,
Fernando, aka Sísifo
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Libunique still needed ?
On 16-01-13 17:36, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 12-01-2016 14:59, Gen escreveu: Do not top post on this list. Er... slip, sorry. Of course I should have known better since I am following the BLFS project since more than ten years now, although I did'nt used to post a lot. Anyway, thank you for the reminder... -- Nico -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Libunique still needed ?
Ah, OK - Sorry. But as this library is no longer used to buil xfce, your proposition to move it to a more general chapter makes sense. -- Nico On 16-01-12 18:09, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: Em 12-01-2016 12:57, Gen escreveu: In the Xfce Applications chapter Libunique-1.6.6 was needed only by the xfce4 mixer (xfce4-mixer-4.10.0 based on GStreamer-0.10). Since this package has been withdrawn, libunique may be removed as well (IMO). Yes, it is still needed. That was not the only application needing it. A couple of applications do use it. Perhaps (and I have thought that many times, for that reason) it could be moved to a more general chapter, probably "9. General Libraries". -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Libunique still needed ?
In the Xfce Applications chapter Libunique-1.6.6 was needed only by the xfce4 mixer (xfce4-mixer-4.10.0 based on GStreamer-0.10). Since this package has been withdrawn, libunique may be removed as well (IMO). -- Nico -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Libunique still needed ?
Em 12-01-2016 12:57, Gen escreveu: > In the Xfce Applications chapter Libunique-1.6.6 was needed only by the > xfce4 mixer (xfce4-mixer-4.10.0 based on GStreamer-0.10). Since this > package has been withdrawn, libunique may be removed as well (IMO). Yes, it is still needed. That was not the only application needing it. A couple of applications do use it. Perhaps (and I have thought that many times, for that reason) it could be moved to a more general chapter, probably "9. General Libraries". -- []s, Fernando, aka Sísifo -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
