Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 03/27/2018 11:58 AM, Armin K. wrote:
On 26.3.2018. 23:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/
=
#10461 ibus-1.5.18
-- This package now uses /usr/share/unicode/ucd/NamesList.txt by
default. It can be disabled with --disable-unicode-dict.
The file is available from
https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt. It also needs
Blocks.txt from the same location.
I need an opinion whether this is useful or not. We can set it up as a
download and just do:
mkdir -p /usr/share/unicode/ucd
cp ../{NamesList,Blocks}.txt /usr/share/unicode/ucd
Opinions?
You have the zipped file here, with lots of additional files:
https://www.unicode.org/Public/zipped/10.0.0/
gucharmap can also use them if they're installed, instead of downloading
during the build process.
Whether you should or should not add them is up to you however.
I suppose we could make the zipped file optional, but I don't know what
the additional files would do for the user. It would be nice to have a
sentence to help the user decide whether to add it or not.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 03/27/2018 02:35 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: #10549 About the pax utility We need to make a decision about this As I stated in the ticket, we should at least change to mirbsd pax utility, which is maintained. Now, I think a script + GNU tar (+ maybe cpio) could emulate pax. There are also plans to merge pax, cpio, and GNU tar into one set of tools, see https://www.gnu.org/software/paxutils/, but it does not seem to move much. I'd like to have a look at this in more details, so I do not agree with the "wontfix" option ;) As I said in the ticket, http://downloads.yoctoproject.org/mirror/sources/pax-3.4.tar.bz2 does NOT seem to be maintained. The files in there are all older than those in the heirloom pax we are using (Aug 2005 vs Jul 2007). To get pax-3.4 to work, Arch has 8 patches. AFAIAC our inclusion of pax is only filling an obsolete LSB requirement. If it was not in LSB, we would drop the package completely. We should only change if there is truly a new version released or a new gcc or binutils breaks the heirloom version. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pax_(Unix)#Standardization,_reception_and_popularity -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 26.3.2018. 23:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/
=
#10461 ibus-1.5.18
-- This package now uses /usr/share/unicode/ucd/NamesList.txt by
default. It can be disabled with --disable-unicode-dict.
The file is available from
https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt. It also needs
Blocks.txt from the same location.
I need an opinion whether this is useful or not. We can set it up as a
download and just do:
mkdir -p /usr/share/unicode/ucd
cp ../{NamesList,Blocks}.txt /usr/share/unicode/ucd
Opinions?
You have the zipped file here, with lots of additional files:
https://www.unicode.org/Public/zipped/10.0.0/
gucharmap can also use them if they're installed, instead of downloading
during the build process.
Whether you should or should not add them is up to you however.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 03/27/2018 02:04 AM, Pierre Labastie wrote: On 27/03/2018 02:59, Bruce Dubbs wrote: On 03/26/2018 07:15 PM, Brendan L wrote: Ok, so I downgraded to latest stable gnutls-3.5.18 (3.6 is the devel version) and rebuilt glib-networking-2.56.0. It passed all the tests for me: [0/1] Running all tests. 1/9 gnome OK 0.02 s 2/9 certificate OK 0.03 s 3/9 file-database OK 0.06 s 4/9 connection OK 3.05 s 5/9 dtls-connection OK 2.86 s 6/9 pkcs11-util OK 0.01 s 7/9 pkcs11-array OK 0.01 s 8/9 pkcs11-pin OK 0.02 s 9/9 pkcs11-slot OK 0.01 s OK, I suppose we ought to go back to the stable version of gnutls. I'll try to do that tomorrow. Just to check... have you run "export GIO_USE_TLS=gnutls-pkcs11"? I did not, but a quick test using GIO_USE_TLS without reverting gnutls still fails. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 26/03/2018 23:21, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at:
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/
>
> =
>
> #10461 ibus-1.5.18
> -- This package now uses /usr/share/unicode/ucd/NamesList.txt by default. It
> can be disabled with --disable-unicode-dict.
>
> The file is available from
> https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt. It also needs Blocks.txt
> from the same location.
>
> I need an opinion whether this is useful or not. We can set it up as a
> download and just do:
>
> mkdir -p /usr/share/unicode/ucd
> cp ../{NamesList,Blocks}.txt /usr/share/unicode/ucd
>
> Opinions?
>
> =
> #10506 glib-networking-2.56.0
> -- Using:
>
> mkdir build &&
> cd build &&
>
> CFLAGS=-I../tls \
> meson --prefix=/usr \
> -Dlibproxy_support=false \
> -Dpkcs11_support=false \
> -Dca_certificates_path=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt
>
> ninja -j1
>
> The package builds, but three of five tests fail:
>
> [0/1] Running all tests.
> 1/5 gnome OK 0.01 s
> 2/5 certificate FAIL 0.02 s
> 3/5 file-database FAIL 0.03 s
> 4/5 connection FAIL 0.12 s
> 5/5 dtls-connection OK 2.84 s
>
> OK: 2
> FAIL: 3
> SKIP: 0
> TIMEOUT: 0
>
> 2/5 certificate FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/certificate.c:381:test_verify_certificate_good:
> assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
>
> 3/5 file-database FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/file-database.c:119:test_verify_database_good:
> assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
>
> 4/5 connection FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/connection.c:529:test_verified_connection:
> assertion failed (test->read_error == NULL): Unacceptable TLS certificate
> (g-tls-error-quark, 2)
>
> These all look like related issues, but I am reluctant to update the book
> while I get these errors.
>
>
>
> #10462 xf86-video-amdgpu-18.0.0
> I do not have the HW for testing this.
>
>
>
> #10494 xf86-video-ati-10.0.0
> I do not have the HW for testing this.
>
>
>
> #10549 About the pax utility
> We need to make a decision about this
As I stated in the ticket, we should at least change to mirbsd pax utility,
which is maintained. Now, I think a script + GNU tar (+ maybe cpio) could
emulate pax. There are also plans to merge pax, cpio, and GNU tar into one set
of tools, see https://www.gnu.org/software/paxutils/, but it does not seem to
move much.
I'd like to have a look at this in more details, so I do not agree with the
"wontfix" option ;)
Pierre
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 27/03/2018 02:59, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > On 03/26/2018 07:15 PM, Brendan L wrote: >> Ok, so I downgraded to latest stable gnutls-3.5.18 (3.6 is the devel >> version) and rebuilt glib-networking-2.56.0. It passed all the tests >> for me: >> >> [0/1] Running all tests. >> 1/9 gnome OK 0.02 s >> 2/9 certificate OK 0.03 s >> 3/9 file-database OK 0.06 s >> 4/9 connection OK 3.05 s >> 5/9 dtls-connection OK 2.86 s >> 6/9 pkcs11-util OK 0.01 s >> 7/9 pkcs11-array OK 0.01 s >> 8/9 pkcs11-pin OK 0.02 s >> 9/9 pkcs11-slot OK 0.01 s > > OK, I suppose we ought to go back to the stable version of gnutls. I'll try > to do that tomorrow. > > -- Bruce > Just to check... have you run "export GIO_USE_TLS=gnutls-pkcs11"? Pierre -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 04:21:15PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at: > > http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/ > > > > #10494xf86-video-ati-10.0.0 > I do not have the HW for testing this. I've got the hardware, but at the moment I'm concentrating on trying to bring up a new machine using what used to be my normal method (build on something similar, back up, copy using a rescue CD, chroot, install, fix up whatever differs, use for a first native build). In this case, I got illegal instructions in ld-linux-2.27.so, currently retrying with -march=k8 (the new one is a ryzen). So it might be a while before I get to it. Will try to prioritize this after the new machine (nvidia) boots. ĸen -- Before the universe began, there was a sound. It went: "One, two, ONE, two, three, four" [...] The cataclysmic power chord that followed was the creation of time and space and matter and it does Not Fade Away. - wiki.lspace.org/mediawiki/Music_With_Rocks_In -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
On 03/26/2018 07:15 PM, Brendan L wrote: Ok, so I downgraded to latest stable gnutls-3.5.18 (3.6 is the devel version) and rebuilt glib-networking-2.56.0. It passed all the tests for me: [0/1] Running all tests. 1/9 gnome OK 0.02 s 2/9 certificate OK 0.03 s 3/9 file-database OK 0.06 s 4/9 connection OK 3.05 s 5/9 dtls-connection OK 2.86 s 6/9 pkcs11-util OK 0.01 s 7/9 pkcs11-arrayOK 0.01 s 8/9 pkcs11-pin OK 0.02 s 9/9 pkcs11-slot OK 0.01 s OK, I suppose we ought to go back to the stable version of gnutls. I'll try to do that tomorrow. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
Ok, so I downgraded to latest stable gnutls-3.5.18 (3.6 is the devel version) and rebuilt glib-networking-2.56.0. It passed all the tests for me: [0/1] Running all tests. 1/9 gnome OK 0.02 s 2/9 certificate OK 0.03 s 3/9 file-database OK 0.06 s 4/9 connection OK 3.05 s 5/9 dtls-connection OK 2.86 s 6/9 pkcs11-util OK 0.01 s 7/9 pkcs11-arrayOK 0.01 s 8/9 pkcs11-pin OK 0.02 s 9/9 pkcs11-slot OK 0.01 s OK: 9 FAIL: 0 SKIP: 0 TIMEOUT:0 On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 5:37 PM, wrote: > Hi all, > > On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at: >> >> #10506 glib-networking-2.56.0 >> -- Using: >> >>mkdir build && >>cdbuild && >> >>CFLAGS=-I../tls \ >>meson --prefix=/usr\ >> -Dlibproxy_support=false \ >> -Dpkcs11_support=false \ >> -Dca_certificates_path=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt >> >>ninja -j1 >> >> The package builds, but three of five tests fail: >> [...] >> >> These all look like related issues, but I am reluctant to update the book >> while I get these errors. > > Good idea! I was able to build glib-networking 2.55.x and 2.56.0 with pretty > similar settings, but instead of running the test suite just tried to use > it. It gets used by webkitgtk, which gets used by liferea (a feed reader), > BUT: TLS support is broken that way (all https sources error out). Just > reverting back to glib-networking-2.54.1 fixes this. So I'd say the test > suite is correct in stating that the certificate test fails. No idea whether > that is fixable by other configuration or patching, but without such, 2.56.0 > shouldn't be in the book. > > Uwe > > -- > http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html > Unsubscribe: See the above information page -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
Hi all, On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, Bruce Dubbs wrote: These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at: #10506 glib-networking-2.56.0 -- Using: mkdir build && cdbuild && CFLAGS=-I../tls \ meson --prefix=/usr\ -Dlibproxy_support=false \ -Dpkcs11_support=false \ -Dca_certificates_path=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt ninja -j1 The package builds, but three of five tests fail: [...] These all look like related issues, but I am reluctant to update the book while I get these errors. Good idea! I was able to build glib-networking 2.55.x and 2.56.0 with pretty similar settings, but instead of running the test suite just tried to use it. It gets used by webkitgtk, which gets used by liferea (a feed reader), BUT: TLS support is broken that way (all https sources error out). Just reverting back to glib-networking-2.54.1 fixes this. So I'd say the test suite is correct in stating that the certificate test fails. No idea whether that is fixable by other configuration or patching, but without such, 2.56.0 shouldn't be in the book. Uwe -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
Here's some info about the glib-networking issue:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=794286
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 4:21 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at:
>
> http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/
>
> =
>
> #10461 ibus-1.5.18
> -- This package now uses /usr/share/unicode/ucd/NamesList.txt by default.
> It can be disabled with --disable-unicode-dict.
>
> The file is available from
> https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt. It also needs
> Blocks.txt from the same location.
>
> I need an opinion whether this is useful or not. We can set it up as a
> download and just do:
>
> mkdir -p /usr/share/unicode/ucd
> cp ../{NamesList,Blocks}.txt /usr/share/unicode/ucd
>
> Opinions?
>
> =
> #10506 glib-networking-2.56.0
> -- Using:
>
> mkdir build &&
> cdbuild &&
>
> CFLAGS=-I../tls \
> meson --prefix=/usr\
> -Dlibproxy_support=false \
> -Dpkcs11_support=false \
> -Dca_certificates_path=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt
>
> ninja -j1
>
> The package builds, but three of five tests fail:
>
> [0/1] Running all tests.
> 1/5 gnome OK 0.01 s
> 2/5 certificate FAIL 0.02 s
> 3/5 file-database FAIL 0.03 s
> 4/5 connection FAIL 0.12 s
> 5/5 dtls-connection OK 2.84 s
>
> OK: 2
> FAIL: 3
> SKIP: 0
> TIMEOUT:0
>
> 2/5 certificate FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/certificate.c:381:test_verify_certificate_good:
> assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
>
> 3/5 file-database FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/file-database.c:119:test_verify_database_good:
> assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
>
> 4/5 connection FAIL
> GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/connection.c:529:test_verified_connection:
> assertion failed (test->read_error == NULL): Unacceptable TLS certificate
> (g-tls-error-quark, 2)
>
> These all look like related issues, but I am reluctant to update the book
> while I get these errors.
>
>
>
> #10462 xf86-video-amdgpu-18.0.0
> I do not have the HW for testing this.
>
>
>
> #10494 xf86-video-ati-10.0.0
> I do not have the HW for testing this.
>
>
>
> #10549 About the pax utility
> We need to make a decision about this
>
>
>
> Comments appreciated.
>
> -- Bruce
>
> --
> http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Tickets that need help
These tickets need some help or comments. Tickets are at:
http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/
=
#10461 ibus-1.5.18
-- This package now uses /usr/share/unicode/ucd/NamesList.txt by
default. It can be disabled with --disable-unicode-dict.
The file is available from
https://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/NamesList.txt. It also needs
Blocks.txt from the same location.
I need an opinion whether this is useful or not. We can set it up as a
download and just do:
mkdir -p /usr/share/unicode/ucd
cp ../{NamesList,Blocks}.txt /usr/share/unicode/ucd
Opinions?
=
#10506 glib-networking-2.56.0
-- Using:
mkdir build &&
cdbuild &&
CFLAGS=-I../tls \
meson --prefix=/usr\
-Dlibproxy_support=false \
-Dpkcs11_support=false \
-Dca_certificates_path=/etc/ssl/ca-bundle.crt
ninja -j1
The package builds, but three of five tests fail:
[0/1] Running all tests.
1/5 gnome OK 0.01 s
2/5 certificate FAIL 0.02 s
3/5 file-database FAIL 0.03 s
4/5 connection FAIL 0.12 s
5/5 dtls-connection OK 2.84 s
OK: 2
FAIL: 3
SKIP: 0
TIMEOUT:0
2/5 certificate FAIL
GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/certificate.c:381:test_verify_certificate_good:
assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
3/5 file-database FAIL
GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/file-database.c:119:test_verify_database_good:
assertion failed (errors == 0): (34 == 0)
4/5 connection FAIL
GLib-Net:ERROR:../tls/tests/connection.c:529:test_verified_connection:
assertion failed (test->read_error == NULL): Unacceptable TLS
certificate (g-tls-error-quark, 2)
These all look like related issues, but I am reluctant to update the
book while I get these errors.
#10462 xf86-video-amdgpu-18.0.0
I do not have the HW for testing this.
#10494 xf86-video-ati-10.0.0
I do not have the HW for testing this.
#10549 About the pax utility
We need to make a decision about this
Comments appreciated.
-- Bruce
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Tickets
OK, we are finally caught up after the 7.9 release. It only took a month and about 137 commits. Right now there are only 4 tickets outstanding for the 7.10 target, all assigned. Of course that will change tonight when we run the currency checks. I still need to update LFS. Hopefully later today. -- Bruce -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
[blfs-dev] Tickets have been created for posts "Dependency is missing (...)"
Hi, On 2/13, I sent four E-mails their subject began with "Dependency is missing" to this list. After that, I have created the following tickets revised those posts. Please add comments in the following tickets if someone has a further opinion on those posts. OLD: http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2016-February/031589.html NEW: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/7478 OLD: http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2016-February/031590.html NEW: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/7479 OLD: http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2016-February/031591.html NEW: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/7480 OLD: http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2016-February/031592.html NEW: http://wiki.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/ticket/7481 Thanks, -- Yukio Shiiya -- http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
