Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-19 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

Tom Davies wrote on 2011-06-18 21.33:

For things such as annual subscriptions and stuff it makes sense to deal with it
now so that the BoD don't have to worry about it until next year.  The OASIS
thing sounds like a lot of money to me but people that know what it offers are
all saying yes, by the sounds of it, so i think maybe just do it.


well, I would wait for the BoD, but seems I am alone with this position. 
:-) This is ok, but keep in mind, that at the moment we neither should 
spend the money nor make any contracts, so let's wait until the 
foundation really exists before acting legally.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-19 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello Dennis,

I guess I can answer as I also happen to be one of the directors of the
OASIS... :-)

2011/6/19 Dennis E. Hamilton dennis.hamil...@acm.org

 Since I am receiving reminders about my individual membership in OASIS, I
 can answer that question:

 No.  There is no specific enrollment period or fixed calendar of
 memberships.  Annual memberships are for the full year from the day a
 membership application is accepted.


Yes indeed. The membership registration phase is rather simple, but the time
to get the new member representative and/or the team acquainted with the
various tools, intranet, etc. usually takes some time.



 Since you are talking about an institutional membership, there will need to
 be an official who approves the participation of others on individual OASIS
 Technical Committees.

 Also, there are IP-policy conditions that apply to membership and
 contribution to each OASIS TC.  TC members affiliated with TDF should not
 have a conflict with requirements that they are subject to as a condition of
 their employment elsewhere.


The relevant page is here: http://oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/ipr  In
short, when it comes to ODF or CMIS the OASIS consortium requires anyone to
leave its patents at the door and renounce any claim to royalty. I think TDF
members will agree to it :)



 I also don't know how closely associated someone must be with the TDF to be
 able to participate under the TDF membership in OASIS.  If that is not clear
 from the application information for organizations, I am sure there are
 contacts who can answer any questions about that.



I would suggest that one should be a member of TDF/LibreOffice project. I
would also suggest that if the interested person would like to contribute
technical work to the OASIS TC(s) he/she should apply first to the ESC; if
it's for other (such as the Adoption TC or a more general role) he/she
should be appointed by the SC/Bod. That said, Dennis, am I to understand
you'd be interested in contributing to the OASIS under the TDF umbrella?

Best,
Charles.



  - Dennis

 -Original Message-
 From: drew [mailto:d...@baseanswers.com]
 Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:24
 To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

 On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 20:18 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
   I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time
 revoting
 on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
   clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not
 refrain
   from making them. (Although I understand the need not to rush anything
 - but
   joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).
 
  well, I have no problem with deciding, but still, decisions are not
  binding for the future BoD, so we should keep that in mind. :-)

 Hi,

 Just wondering, is there some membership window, a period of time each
 year when new memberships are accepted at OASIS? Is that an issue here?

 Thanks

 Drew


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
 steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive:
 http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


 --
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to
 steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive:
 http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be
 deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Florian Effenberger

Hi,

klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2011-06-16 08.18:

If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors
to determine this.

Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and
put it all in this direction put don't fix it.
So it will be a (first) decision of the new BoD.
Otherwise the BoD has to fix something they don't voted of (and maybe
don't want to do).


this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give our 
+1 as recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be hard 
to bind them on decisions they have not taken.


Florian

--
Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread sophie

Hi all,
On 18/06/2011 09:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Hi,

klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2011-06-16 08.18:

If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors
to determine this.

Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and
put it all in this direction put don't fix it.
So it will be a (first) decision of the new BoD.
Otherwise the BoD has to fix something they don't voted of (and maybe
don't want to do).


this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give 
our +1 as recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be 
hard to bind them on decisions they have not taken.

No problem for me as long as TDF is represented.

Kind regards
Sophie


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Tom Davies






From: sophie gautier.sop...@gmail.com
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 12:51:17
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

Hi all,
On 18/06/2011 09:58, Florian Effenberger wrote:
 Hi,
 
 klaus-jürgen weghorn ol wrote on 2011-06-16 08.18:
 If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors
 to determine this.
 
 Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and
 put it all in this direction put don't fix it.
 So it will be a (first) decision of the new BoD.
 Otherwise the BoD has to fix something they don't voted of (and maybe
 don't want to do).
 
 this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give our +1 
 as 
recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be hard to bind them 
on decisions they have not taken.
No problem for me as long as TDF is represented.

Kind regards
Sophie


Hi :)
Some organisations vote only a 3rd of positions each time.  Specific legally 
required roles such as Company Secretary, Finance/Treasurer and Chair are 
sometimes nominated from existing board members although often the newly 
elected 
board members are included.  


Since those elections are normally held annually it means each board member is 
committing to 3 years.  So, perhaps for TDF it might be better to have the 
rolling elections every 6months with the legally required posts being voted on 
annually.  


This system ensures that 2/3rd majority are stable, established, experienced 
board members that are already up to speed on relevant issues.  It gives 
external organisations confidence that agreements are not going to be suddenly 
over-turned just after the AGM.  It helps new board members to quickly learn 
their way around.  It helps to get fresh blood and a new perspective, a new 
energy into the board without compromising stability.

I think this first time all the positions need to be voted on but hopefully 
that 
will mostly be a case of voting in people that already do a great job.  Italo, 
Sophie, Cor and of course Florian are highly visible, well regarded and do an 
excellent job but i would guess there are others i don't notice that also do 
crucially important work.

It might be another thing that is good to discuss now to present 
recommendations 
to the BoD but it might be better to wait and let them discuss this sort of 
thing after elections.  

Regards from
Tom :)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Charles-H. Schulz
Hello everyone


  this is indeed a good point... what do the others think? We can give our
+1 as
 recommendation to the new BoD, but I guess it will indeed be hard to bind
them
 on decisions they have not taken.
 No problem for me as long as TDF is represented.

I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
 on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
from making them. (Although I understand the need not to rush anything - but
joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).

best,
Charles.

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Tom Davies






From: Florian Effenberger flo...@documentfoundation.org
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Sat, 18 June, 2011 19:18:40
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

Hi,

Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
 I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
   on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
 clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
 from making them. (Although I understand the need not to rush anything - but
 joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).

well, I have no problem with deciding, but still, decisions are not binding for 
the future BoD, so we should keep that in mind. :-)

Florian


Hi :)
For things such as annual subscriptions and stuff it makes sense to deal with 
it 
now so that the BoD don't have to worry about it until next year.  The OASIS 
thing sounds like a lot of money to me but people that know what it offers are 
all saying yes, by the sounds of it, so i think maybe just do it.  

Regards from
Tom :)

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Cor Nouws

Charles-H. Schulz wrote (18-06-11 16:50)


I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
on it.
The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
from making them.


Indeed.


(Although I understand the need not to rush anything - but
joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).


Plus that it is hard to imagine that the BOD would not consider joining 
the home of ODF important.


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted



RE: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread Dennis E. Hamilton
Since I am receiving reminders about my individual membership in OASIS, I can 
answer that question:

No.  There is no specific enrollment period or fixed calendar of memberships.  
Annual memberships are for the full year from the day a membership application 
is accepted.  

Since you are talking about an institutional membership, there will need to be 
an official who approves the participation of others on individual OASIS 
Technical Committees.  

Also, there are IP-policy conditions that apply to membership and contribution 
to each OASIS TC.  TC members affiliated with TDF should not have a conflict 
with requirements that they are subject to as a condition of their employment 
elsewhere.

I also don't know how closely associated someone must be with the TDF to be 
able to participate under the TDF membership in OASIS.  If that is not clear 
from the application information for organizations, I am sure there are 
contacts who can answer any questions about that.

 - Dennis

-Original Message-
From: drew [mailto:d...@baseanswers.com] 
Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:24
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 20:18 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
  I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time revoting
on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
  clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
  from making them. (Although I understand the need not to rush anything - but
  joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).
 
 well, I have no problem with deciding, but still, decisions are not 
 binding for the future BoD, so we should keep that in mind. :-)

Hi,

Just wondering, is there some membership window, a period of time each
year when new memberships are accepted at OASIS? Is that an issue here?

Thanks

Drew


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


RE: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-18 Thread drew
Thanks much for the details.

//drew

On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 15:42 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
 Since I am receiving reminders about my individual membership in OASIS, I can 
 answer that question:
 
 No.  There is no specific enrollment period or fixed calendar of memberships. 
  Annual memberships are for the full year from the day a membership 
 application is accepted.  
 
 Since you are talking about an institutional membership, there will need to 
 be an official who approves the participation of others on individual OASIS 
 Technical Committees.  
 
 Also, there are IP-policy conditions that apply to membership and 
 contribution to each OASIS TC.  TC members affiliated with TDF should not 
 have a conflict with requirements that they are subject to as a condition of 
 their employment elsewhere.
 
 I also don't know how closely associated someone must be with the TDF to be 
 able to participate under the TDF membership in OASIS.  If that is not clear 
 from the application information for organizations, I am sure there are 
 contacts who can answer any questions about that.
 
  - Dennis
 
 -Original Message-
 From: drew [mailto:d...@baseanswers.com] 
 Sent: Saturday, June 18, 2011 11:24
 To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
 Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium
 
 On Sat, 2011-06-18 at 20:18 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
  Hi,
  
  Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-06-18 16.50:
   I think that if we go down that path we'll lose some valuable time 
   revoting
 on it. The SC's mission ends when the BoD is elected and that is very
   clear, but until then, if decisions have to be made we should not refrain
   from making them. (Although I understand the need not to rush anything - 
   but
   joining the OASIS is not exactly a rushed decision).
  
  well, I have no problem with deciding, but still, decisions are not 
  binding for the future BoD, so we should keep that in mind. :-)
 
 Hi,
 
 Just wondering, is there some membership window, a period of time each
 year when new memberships are accepted at OASIS? Is that an issue here?
 
 Thanks
 
 Drew
 
 
 -- 
 Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to 
 steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
 Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
 List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
 All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
 
 



-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted


Re: [steering-discuss] Joining the OASIS Consortium

2011-06-16 Thread klaus-jürgen weghorn ol

Hi SC,
I'm no member of the SC so I only want to put a thought in the discussion.

Am 15.06.2011 19:32, schrieb Charles-H. Schulz:

Le Wed, 15 Jun 2011 17:19:44 +0200,
Thorsten Behrenst...@documentfoundation.org  a écrit :


Charles-H. Schulz wrote:

I remember we wanted to join the OASIS Consortium :-)
After checking within the OASIS, it appears the annual membership
cost for NGO is around 700 Euros (1100 USD).


Hi Charles, all,

wearing my TDF hat here (and not my OASIS one - with that, I'd
warmly welcome this move) - before starting to approve things like
this, I'd rather collect a few more things we may need to do this
year, and come up with a proper budget plan.

Before the foundation is formally setup, I don't think joining
somewhere is really possible, anyway?


I think it is, but on the other hand we can vote positively now, but
only proceed to join when we are properly set up. Even the membership
registration process takes time there. So we can decide now and execute
in 2 months or so.


If you do it in 2 months there will be (soon) a voted Board of Directors 
to determine this.


Maybe the SC - as non-voted - only give a recommendation for the BoD and 
put it all in this direction put don't fix it.

So it will be a (first) decision of the new BoD.
Otherwise the BoD has to fix something they don't voted of (and maybe 
don't want to do).



--
Grüße
k-j

--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to steering-discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/steering-discuss/
All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted