[boinc_dev] Sending e-mail to a certain range of User ID...
Wish list (mass_email.php): - Sending e-mail to a certain range of User IDs. - It would be cool to test the mass_email.php by sending email to all the admins. Henri. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC 7.2.11 doesn't detect AVX
Did this ever get fixed/added to boinc? If not, when? I have an IB i7, with the win7 64 and all the latest patches, and BOINC 7.2.42. But it still does not show AVX. 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Starting BOINC client version 7.2.42 for windows_x86_64 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Processor: 8 GenuineIntelIntel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz [Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9] 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes syscall nx lm vmx tm2 pbe 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) Thanks, Erik On Aug 25, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Jord van der Elst els...@gmail.com wrote: Rom Walton, from the other thread: I've held off putting this into 7.2 for now. It turns out that detecting the CPU instruction set is only half of the problem. We are in the process of getting an updated toolchain for building on Windows which will allow us to detect if the OS is properly saving/restoring the new registers on a thread context switch. (http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-August/020264.html) Rom Walton, from the other thread: We are in the process of updating our Windows toolchain to a more recent version of Visual Studio. It isn't enough to just check if the instruction set is present, we also need to check whether the OS is saving and restoring the registers as well. That required a more recent assembler than what we are currently using. Once we have the updated toolchain we will finish up with the rest of the detection and get it ported over to the 7.2 branch. (http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-August/020316.html) On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I know but because it was another problem it the mailing than I suppose that they solved this but forgot on these new CPUs. As I said, another problem so that is why I wrote about it. Dne 25.8.2013 13:41, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): BOINC can not report parts of the CPU that it isn't programmed to report. So when for instance in 2014 there will be CPUs available with FMA3 and FMA4, you'll first need a new BOINC capable of detecting those options before that same BOINC will report them. Even having code added to the source code does not automatically mean that any of the presently available BOINC versions is capable of reporting that CPU option. The BOINC with the code in it will first have to be built be available for download. Which in this case, it hasn't. On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I hope so, because in that mailing part there was problem with not reporting AVX on os that doesn't support it, but it doesn't report it even on os that does support it. Dne 25.8.2013 13:14, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): That's because 'the latest version' doesn't support it yet. It'll be in a 7.2 version, AFTER 7.2.11, as soon as the developers port it to the 7.2 branch. If you can't wait, you can build a newer BOINC from Master. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/9b2d0f992f6669d31d1996c4fc105ce22324445b/boinc-v2 shows that Rom added the change on the 22nd of July 2013 to the Master branch. It just hasn't been ported to the 7.0 or 7.2 branches yet. On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I have read it, but this is another problem. The processor has AVX support and OS also. It is Win 7 with SP1 64bit but it doesn't report AVX. Even with the latest version, but it doesn't report it on these type of processors. i7 reports it ok, but i5-3230M and other 3xxx doesn't report it. Dne 25.8.2013 12:01, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): You probably haven't had an answer because there's just been a whole email thread about this. Can be found in the archives of the boinc_dev email list, starting from http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-July/020215.html On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: No one to reply this? This is quite important, I already wrote with some people and they also have undetected AVX on this type of processor which has AVX. So there is some problem in BOINC client, that it doesn't report AVX. Radim Dne 23.8.2013 11:51, Radim Vančo napsal(a): I am now testing 7.0.64 and it also doesn't detect AVX. So it propably something in source code, that it doesn't detect on that processor. Dne 23.8.2013 11:41, Radim Vančo napsal(a): Does BOINC client version 7.2.10/7.2.11 detect AVX? I just realized that mine doesn't, but it should report. Processor i5 3230i and Win 7 64bit with SP1 installed. Isn't there a bug in BOINC, that it doesn't detect it? ___
Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC 7.2.11 doesn't detect AVX
Check the 7.3 build. 7.2 is still build with VS2005. - Rom -Original Message- From: boinc_dev [mailto:boinc_dev-boun...@ssl.berkeley.edu] On Behalf Of Erik Veit Sent: Saturday, March 01, 2014 12:15 PM To: BOINC Dev Mailing List Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] BOINC 7.2.11 doesn't detect AVX Did this ever get fixed/added to boinc? If not, when? I have an IB i7, with the win7 64 and all the latest patches, and BOINC 7.2.42. But it still does not show AVX. 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Starting BOINC client version 7.2.42 for windows_x86_64 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Processor: 8 GenuineIntelIntel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz [Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9] 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM Processor features: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss htt tm pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes syscall nx lm vmx tm2 pbe 3/1/2014 6:37:23 AM OS: Microsoft Windows 7: Professional x64 Edition, Service Pack 1, (06.01.7601.00) Thanks, Erik On Aug 25, 2013, at 5:20 AM, Jord van der Elst els...@gmail.com wrote: Rom Walton, from the other thread: I've held off putting this into 7.2 for now. It turns out that detecting the CPU instruction set is only half of the problem. We are in the process of getting an updated toolchain for building on Windows which will allow us to detect if the OS is properly saving/restoring the new registers on a thread context switch. (http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-August/020264. html) Rom Walton, from the other thread: We are in the process of updating our Windows toolchain to a more recent version of Visual Studio. It isn't enough to just check if the instruction set is present, we also need to check whether the OS is saving and restoring the registers as well. That required a more recent assembler than what we are currently using. Once we have the updated toolchain we will finish up with the rest of the detection and get it ported over to the 7.2 branch. (http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-August/020316. html) On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I know but because it was another problem it the mailing than I suppose that they solved this but forgot on these new CPUs. As I said, another problem so that is why I wrote about it. Dne 25.8.2013 13:41, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): BOINC can not report parts of the CPU that it isn't programmed to report. So when for instance in 2014 there will be CPUs available with FMA3 and FMA4, you'll first need a new BOINC capable of detecting those options before that same BOINC will report them. Even having code added to the source code does not automatically mean that any of the presently available BOINC versions is capable of reporting that CPU option. The BOINC with the code in it will first have to be built be available for download. Which in this case, it hasn't. On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 1:35 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I hope so, because in that mailing part there was problem with not reporting AVX on os that doesn't support it, but it doesn't report it even on os that does support it. Dne 25.8.2013 13:14, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): That's because 'the latest version' doesn't support it yet. It'll be in a 7.2 version, AFTER 7.2.11, as soon as the developers port it to the 7.2 branch. If you can't wait, you can build a newer BOINC from Master. http://boinc.berkeley.edu/trac/changeset/9b2d0f992f6669d31d1996c4f c105ce22324445b/boinc-v2 shows that Rom added the change on the 22nd of July 2013 to the Master branch. It just hasn't been ported to the 7.0 or 7.2 branches yet. On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: I have read it, but this is another problem. The processor has AVX support and OS also. It is Win 7 with SP1 64bit but it doesn't report AVX. Even with the latest version, but it doesn't report it on these type of processors. i7 reports it ok, but i5-3230M and other 3xxx doesn't report it. Dne 25.8.2013 12:01, Jord van der Elst napsal(a): You probably haven't had an answer because there's just been a whole email thread about this. Can be found in the archives of the boinc_dev email list, starting from http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/pipermail/boinc_dev/2013-July/0202 15.html On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Radim Vančo rad...@centrum.cz wrote: No one to reply this? This is quite important, I already wrote with some people and they also have undetected AVX on this type of processor which has AVX. So there is some problem in BOINC client, that it doesn't report AVX. Radim Dne 23.8.2013 11:51, Radim Vančo napsal(a): I am now testing 7.0.64 and it also doesn't detect AVX. So it propably something in source code, that it doesn't detect on that processor.
[boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken.
The download link for the Windows 32bit Boinc 7.2.42 with VirtualBox 4.2.16 is broken on the download page: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.4239_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe Claggy ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
Re: [boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken.
You're trying to download BOINC 7.2.4239 Try http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.42_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe instead. -- Jord van der Elst. On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Maclagan stephen.macla...@hotmail.com wrote: The download link for the Windows 32bit Boinc 7.2.42 with VirtualBox 4.2.16 is broken on the download page: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.4239_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe Claggy ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
Re: [boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken.
Yes, I know, that why I'm reporting it. Claggy From: stephen.macla...@hotmail.com To: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 17:47:52 + Subject: [boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken. The download link for the Windows 32bit Boinc 7.2.42 with VirtualBox 4.2.16 is broken on the download page: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.4239_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe Claggy ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
Re: [boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken.
Yes I know, that's why I'm reporting it: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=8975 Claggy From: els...@gmail.com Date: Sat, 1 Mar 2014 18:50:08 +0100 Subject: Re: [boinc_dev] Boinc 7.2.42 download link broken. To: stephen.macla...@hotmail.com CC: boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu You're trying to download BOINC 7.2.4239 Try http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.42_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe instead. -- Jord van der Elst. On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:47 PM, Stephen Maclagan stephen.macla...@hotmail.com wrote: The download link for the Windows 32bit Boinc 7.2.42 with VirtualBox 4.2.16 is broken on the download page: http://boinc.berkeley.edu/dl/boinc_7.2.4239_windows_intelx86_vbox.exe Claggy ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
Re: [boinc_dev] Sending e-mail to a certain range of User ID...
I added this feature. -- David On 01-Mar-2014 8:43 AM, Henri Heinonen wrote: Wish list (mass_email.php): - Sending e-mail to a certain range of User IDs. - It would be cool to test the mass_email.php by sending email to all the admins. Henri. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address. ___ boinc_dev mailing list boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
