[boinc_dev] Example_app compile error in windows: boinc_win.h not found...

[m fazel]

Hello all,

I am trying to compile example_app with mingw and DEV-C++ but they give me
error:
boinc_win.h not found.

 C:\Program Files\BOINCSRC\boinc\samples\example_app\C boinc_win.h: No such
file or directory.

what should I do?

TNX.

-- 
Regards,
Fazel
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Re: [boinc_dev] Caught SIGTERM after BOINC server update

[Radim Vančo]

I have upgraded BOINC server and according to log it seems to be fine now.

Radim


Dne 24.7.2014 03:56, David Anderson napsal(a):

I may have fixed this; please upgrade and try again.
-- David

On 20-Jul-2014 5:09 AM, Radim Vančo wrote:

Hi,

after upgrading BOINC server 3 hours ago, I got this in scheduler.log

2014-07-20 11:24:02.6463 [PID=3684 ] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 11:30:25.1227 [PID=6315 ]   Incomplete request received 
(used GET method
- probably a browser) from IP 94.103.149.115, auth , platform , 
version 0.0.0
2014-07-20 11:30:25.1229 [PID=6315 ]   Sending reply to [HOST#0]: 0 
results, delay

req 7.00
2014-07-20 11:30:25.1229 [PID=6315 ]   Scheduler ran 0.000 seconds
2014-07-20 11:37:52.0740 [PID=9153 ] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 11:45:44.5160 [PID=12725]   Incomplete request received 
(used GET method
- probably a browser) from IP 94.103.149.115, auth , platform , 
version 0.0.0
2014-07-20 11:45:44.5162 [PID=12725]   Sending reply to [HOST#0]: 0 
results, delay

req 7.00
2014-07-20 11:45:44.5162 [PID=12725]   Scheduler ran 0.000 seconds
2014-07-20 11:50:32.2957 [PID=14811] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 11:54:42.8162 [PID=16514]   Incomplete request received 
(used GET method
- probably a browser) from IP 194.8.205.113, auth , platform , 
version 0.0.0
2014-07-20 11:54:42.8163 [PID=16514]   Sending reply to [HOST#0]: 0 
results, delay

req 7.00
2014-07-20 11:54:42.8164 [PID=16514]   Scheduler ran 0.000 seconds
2014-07-20 11:55:17.2621 [PID=16621] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 12:00:53.2624 [PID=19300]   Incomplete request received 
(used GET method
- probably a browser) from IP 94.103.149.115, auth , platform , 
version 0.0.0
2014-07-20 12:00:53.2625 [PID=19300]   Sending reply to [HOST#0]: 0 
results, delay

req 7.00
2014-07-20 12:00:53.2625 [PID=19300]   Scheduler ran 0.000 seconds
2014-07-20 12:01:42.4476 [PID=19539] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 12:08:56.0076 [PID=23142] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting
2014-07-20 12:15:30.5299 [PID=27477] [CRITICAL]  Caught SIGTERM (sent 
by Apache);

exiting

It seems that ti incomplete request cases the problem but why?

Radim
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.


___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.

Re: [boinc_dev] new vs existing user

[Jord van der Elst]

Yes, I think something is up with this as well, as I have also seen
multiple reports of this happening.
The latest that I so quickly can find is at
https://boinc.berkeley.edu/dev/forum_thread.php?id=9466

-- Jord van der Elst.


On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 8:16 AM, mike bader mdba...@flash.net wrote:
 I have had more then one person claim to have this problem.
 They reinstalled the BOINC client for whatever reason.
 New version, new OS, hard drive crash, another computer.
 They install BOINC then attach to SETI.
 But select new instead of exsiting user.
 They claim to proceed using the old email address.
 They claim it creats anew id (zero stats) and deleted the old.
 In the past this gave a message and did not create a new id.
 Did something change in this area?
 I assume it is user error or remembering what they really did :-)

 --

 Michael Bader kb8...@arrl.net
 http://www.lansolutions.info
 SEMCO, President presid...@semco.org
 SHCC,  Vice President v...@sterlingheightscomputerclub.org

 ___
 boinc_dev mailing list
 boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
 http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
 To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
 (near bottom of page) enter your email address.
___
boinc_dev mailing list
boinc_dev@ssl.berkeley.edu
http://lists.ssl.berkeley.edu/mailman/listinfo/boinc_dev
To unsubscribe, visit the above URL and
(near bottom of page) enter your email address.