Re: [boost] Re: Re: Deprecation/removal of libraries

2003-09-02 Thread Beman Dawes
At 05:17 PM 9/1/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:

On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:19:24 +0200, Douglas Gregor wrote:

 On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:20 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
 utility/tie was moved to tuple, so should we remove the obsolete
 docs/references in utility now?

 Please do.

Done. I also updated the Revisited ..., but there is some checksum in
the HTML-source. I have no clue what it's good for, so if I broke it,
please fix it and tell me how to avoid it next time :o)
The checksum is used by some HTML editors to automatically timestamp 
revisions. It is in a comment and it doesn't hurt to break it if you happen 
to edit the file manually. So you don't need to worry about it.

Thanks,

--Beman

___
Unsubscribe  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


[boost] Re: Re: Deprecation/removal of libraries

2003-09-01 Thread Daniel Frey
On Thu, 28 Aug 2003 16:19:24 +0200, Douglas Gregor wrote:

 On Thursday 28 August 2003 08:20 am, Daniel Frey wrote:
 utility/tie was moved to tuple, so should we remove the obsolete
 docs/references in utility now?
 
 Please do.

Done. I also updated the Revisited ..., but there is some checksum in
the HTML-source. I have no clue what it's good for, so if I broke it,
please fix it and tell me how to avoid it next time :o)

Regards, Daniel

___
Unsubscribe  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost