Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8
I don't know. The current CVS uses the Borland configuration for __BORLANDC__, __IBMC__, __IBMCPP__, __SUNPRO_CC. I assume that __SUNPRO_CC is the operative symbol here, but I don't know if it's the same compiler or not. If not, than whatever compiler it is needs to be added to the config file. Yes, it's __SUNPRO_CC, with boost-1.29.0. Thanks for the help. John Maddock http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/john_maddock/index.htm ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8
John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? Suggest that he try it with Boost.Build first. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8
- Original Message - From: John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland configuration: #define BOOST_PP_CONFIG_FLAGS() BOOST_PP_CONFIG_BCC() Paul Mensonides ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8
Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: John Maddock [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland configuration: #define BOOST_PP_CONFIG_FLAGS() BOOST_PP_CONFIG_BCC() Which is the case in current CVS, right? -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Fw: compile problems on solaris 2.8
Paul Mensonides [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: - Original Message - From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] This seems to be a problem with the PP lib and MPL, anyone any ideas? The config should never even see the BOOST_PP_CHECK_... macros. It should be using the Borland configuration: #define BOOST_PP_CONFIG_FLAGS() BOOST_PP_CONFIG_BCC() Which is the case in current CVS, right? I don't know. The current CVS uses the Borland configuration for __BORLANDC__, __IBMC__, __IBMCPP__, __SUNPRO_CC. I assume that __SUNPRO_CC is the operative symbol here, but I don't know if it's the same compiler or not. It is. The OP must've been testing with Boost 1.29.0. We've implemented a number of workarounds for Sun since then. -- David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
