Re: US voting reform idea

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 At 09:09 PM Tuesday 4/26/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:

 This would be addressed by returning to the system where every
 representative had an equal number of constituents. We would gain a
 crapload of reps, but then democracy isn't free is it?G


 IIRC, the figure of 8000+ members of the House I mentioned a few 
 days
 ago was based on each representative having the same number of
 constituents, and that number being what it was before the total
 number of representatives (or something like that: I'm sure of the
 first, anyway.  Of course, I don't happen to recall a reference . . 
 .
 )

If we used 1780 numbers you would get those kind of numbers. I'm 
thinking more along the lines of using the smallest populated district 
as the benchmark, and then you only gain a couple hundred Reps 
initially.
 The number of constituents per Rep can change, but any Rep should 
represent the same number of people as any other Rep.


xponent
Done Right Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: US voting reform idea

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
 At 09:09 PM Tuesday 4/26/2005, Robert Seeberger wrote:

 This would be addressed by returning to the system where every
 representative had an equal number of constituents. We would gain a
 crapload of reps, but then democracy isn't free is it?G


 IIRC, the figure of 8000+ members of the House I mentioned a few 
 days
 ago was based on each representative having the same number of
 constituents, and that number being what it was before the total
 number of representatives (or something like that: I'm sure of the
 first, anyway.  Of course, I don't happen to recall a reference . . 
 .

Even better!
A post I wrote last October:

The problem with the electoral college is not in the electoral
college, but in the way populations are represented in Congress. I
would think that this lack of representation on an everyday basis
would be of much greater concern.

Just to make sure my message is clear: *The Problem Is A Lack Of Fair
Representation*

Using Wyoming as a benchmark, where you have 1 congressperson per
(roughly) 500,000 people, 2 Senators (as always) and 3 Electoral
votes.

Compare to California where you have 1 Congressperson per 639,088
people, 2 Senators, and 55 Electoral votes.
That doesn't sound all that bad offhand, but if California had
representation equal to Wyomings you would get 67 Congresspersons and
69 Electoral votes. That is a net gain of 12 Congresspersons and 14
Electoral votes.

This lack of representation effects at least 48 states that I can
identify. Of those states, 25 are short one representative, and 10 are
shorted by 2. Only Iowa and DC are represented in the same proportion
as Wyoming and the rest are shorted between 3 and 14 representatives.

Law limits Congress to 435 Representatives, but if representation were
proportional there would be 549, an increase of 114 representatives.
I do not see why this number should be unwieldy or why it would cause
difficulty.

xponent
Census Data Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Permission Slips Re: Rhetorical QuestionsRE:RemovingDictatorsRe: PeacefulchangeL3

2005-04-27 Thread JDG
At 08:48 PM 4/26/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
 What is true is that in any event, the US did not impose multilateral
 sanctions on Iraq.   

In light of we have actually have done, can there be any doubt that we could 
have and would have imposed *unilateral* sanctions?

Well sure, but unilateral sanctions are far, far, less effective than
multilateral sanctions - particularly if you are interested in denying a
country any access whatsoever to particular technologies and systems.

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Permission Slips Re: Rhetorical QuestionsRE:RemovingDictatorsRe: PeacefulchangeL3

2005-04-27 Thread Nick Arnett
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 00:06:54 -0400, JDG wrote

 Yes, I am saying that the child/permission slip line is a metaphor 
 for the US seeking the consent of the UNSC on foreign policy 
 positions.

So, who is the parent and who is the child?

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Mr. Smith Goes to Hell

2005-04-27 Thread Dave Land
Folks,
If Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, he'll have to hold his tongue, at 
least if the
Republican party goes ahead with the newly-re-christened 
Constitutional Option,
formerly known as the Nuclear Option.

And christened appears to be the word, at least to hear James Dobson 
tell the
story: a filibuster against a Bush court appointment is apparently a 
filibuster
against the faithful.

Molly Ivins tells the story better than me:
http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/21873/
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Mr. Smith Goes to Hell

2005-04-27 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Apr 27, 2005, at 8:46 AM, Dave Land wrote:
Folks,
If Mr. Smith Goes to Washington, he'll have to hold his tongue, at 
least if the
Republican party goes ahead with the newly-re-christened 
Constitutional Option,
formerly known as the Nuclear Option.

And christened appears to be the word, at least to hear James Dobson 
tell the
story: a filibuster against a Bush court appointment is apparently a 
filibuster
against the faithful.

Molly Ivins tells the story better than me:
	http://www.alternet.org/columnists/story/21873/
I caught bits of that broadcast, and was ambivalent. The rhetoric used 
is pretty brutal, and profoundly arrogant; it pissed me off. However, I 
felt a strange wave of ... not hope, not relief, but something akin to 
both. Because the radical right-wing loonies are taking off their 
gloves, removing their masks and showing themselves to be the 
intolerant, bigoted, self-righteous asses they really are.

I think it was a tactical mistake: far too much far too soon. Moderates 
of any stripe are considerably more likely to galvanize against these 
people than they are to align with them, I think. Had they kept their 
attempts at string-pulling more quiet and subdued, they might have had 
a chance, but I think they've forgotten the lessons of the Moral 
Majority movement (which, as I like to say, was neither) and the 
backlash they experienced for trying far too hard to impose the 
rigorous strictures of a cultish interpretation of one religion on a 
nation that is, at its heart, surprisingly liberal and broad-minded.

The pendulum's arc might well have maximized this last weekend.
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Weekly Chat Reminder

2005-04-27 Thread William T Goodall

As Steve said,

The Brin-L weekly chat has been a list tradition for over six
years. Way back on 27 May, 1998, Marco Maisenhelder first set
up a chatroom for the list, and on the next day, he established
a weekly chat time. We've been through several servers, chat
technologies, and even casts of regulars over the years, but
the chat goes on... and we want more recruits!

Whether you're an active poster or a lurker, whether you've
been a member of the list from the beginning or just joined
today, we would really like for you to join us. We have less
politics, more Uplift talk, and more light-hearted discussion.
We're non-fattening and 100% environmentally friendly...
-(_() Though sometimes marshmallows do get thrown.

The Weekly Brin-L chat is scheduled for Wednesday 3 PM
Eastern/2 PM Central time in the US, or 7 PM Greenwich time.
There's usually somebody there to talk to for at least eight
hours after the start time.

If you want to attend, it's really easy now. All you have to
do is send your web browser to:

  http://wtgab.demon.co.uk/~brinl/mud/

..And you can connect directly from William's new web
interface!

My instruction page tells you how to log on, and how to talk
when you get in:

  http://www.brin-l.org/brinmud.html

It also gives a list of commands to use when you're in there.
In addition, it tells you how to connect through a MUD client,
which is more complicated to set up initially, but easier and
more reliable than the web interface once you do get it set up.

-- 
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/

This message was sent automatically using cron. But even if WTG
 is away on holiday, at least it shows the server is still up.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: US voting reform idea

2005-04-27 Thread Frank Schmidt

 Even better!
 A post I wrote last October:
 
 The problem with the electoral college is not in the electoral
 college, but in the way populations are represented in Congress. I
 would think that this lack of representation on an everyday basis
 would be of much greater concern.
 
 Just to make sure my message is clear: *The Problem Is A Lack Of Fair
 Representation*
 
 Using Wyoming as a benchmark, where you have 1 congressperson per
 (roughly) 500,000 people, 2 Senators (as always) and 3 Electoral
 votes.
 
 Compare to California where you have 1 Congressperson per 639,088
 people, 2 Senators, and 55 Electoral votes.
 That doesn't sound all that bad offhand, but if California had
 representation equal to Wyomings you would get 67 Congresspersons and
 69 Electoral votes. That is a net gain of 12 Congresspersons and 14
 Electoral votes.
 
 This lack of representation effects at least 48 states that I can
 identify. Of those states, 25 are short one representative, and 10 are
 shorted by 2. Only Iowa and DC are represented in the same proportion
 as Wyoming and the rest are shorted between 3 and 14 representatives.
 
 Law limits Congress to 435 Representatives, but if representation were
 proportional there would be 549, an increase of 114 representatives.
 I do not see why this number should be unwieldy or why it would cause
 difficulty.
 
 xponent
 Census Data Maru
 rob 

The difficulty is, when you have done the above and look at the new data,
you'll find another state which is better represented than any other. I
think the current system is so designed that it minimizes the difference
between the actual number of Representatives (in Wyoming 1) and the deserved
number (in Wyoming about 0.8), so your proposed change would probably make
the situation much less desireable by your standards.

I find the difference between the voters for district winners and the voters
for other candidates more of a problem. The first group has 435
Representatives, the other has none. The real problem is that the most
voters will either always be in the first group, or always be in the second
group; relatively few change between the groups. Many in the losing group
have already given up voting because of that.

-- 
Frank Schmidt
Onward, radical moderates
www.egscomics.com

+++ Sparen beginnt mit GMX DSL: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Mr. Smith Goes to Hell

2005-04-27 Thread Damon Agretto

The pendulum's arc might well have maximized this last weekend.
I can only hope. With statements from the Religious Right that the 
Republicans owe them, that sort of thing keeps me up some nights...

Damon.

Damon Agretto
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Qui desiderat pacem, praeparet bellum.
http://www.geocities.com/garrand.geo/index.html
Now Building: Italeri's M8 Greyhound

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.10.3 - Release Date: 4/25/2005
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Mr. Smith Goes to Hell

2005-04-27 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Apr 27, 2005, at 11:54 AM, Damon Agretto wrote:
The pendulum's arc might well have maximized this last weekend.
I can only hope. With statements from the Religious Right that the 
Republicans owe them, that sort of thing keeps me up some nights...
See, it's statements like that I want to see *more* of. That s 
turns off centrist Republicans, which are the real majority of the 
party, and only agitates them to toss out the power-mad in their midst. 
 I say let's hear more from the right-wingers. Much more, lots more, as 
loud as possible. Let them show their true agenda. Unlike, for 
instance, gays, they *have* one, and they're willing to use it too. ;)

--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: US Troop Levels in Iraq Re: Permission Slips Re: Rhetorical Questions RE:RemovingDictatorsRe: PeacefulchangeL3

2005-04-27 Thread Julia Thompson
Nick Arnett wrote:
On Tue, 26 Apr 2005 19:45:39 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote

the two combat
veterans in the bunch, interestingly enough - both
from Iraq, one from first Iraq, the other from the
second) vociferously disagree with me on that.

I'm pretty sure that just about any Marine will tell you that the whole job 
could be done by one platoon.  And mean it.  Marines are special.
Heck, I have a friend who didn't make it out of Marine boot camp without 
career-ending injury, and she used to deal with stress from coworkers by 
sitting back and figuring out if she could take them out if she had to. 
 :)  (There wasn't anyone she worked with at that time that she 
couldn't have)  She's also one of the most dangerous people for an 
attacker to try to attack, as *all* of her martial arts training has 
been to kill, not to disable and flee.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Robert G. Seeberger
http://www.cdbaby.com/amycd2

The album I have been helping to midwife for the last year.
With tinny sounding samples that are supposed to make you have to have 
to have this album today!

I worked my ass off to get this out. You could at least give the tinny 
samples a listen.G



xponent
Soon To Be Moderated For Shameless Self Promotion Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: US voting reform idea

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Frank Schmidt wrote:
 Even better!
 A post I wrote last October:

 The problem with the electoral college is not in the electoral
 college, but in the way populations are represented in Congress. I
 would think that this lack of representation on an everyday basis
 would be of much greater concern.

 Just to make sure my message is clear: *The Problem Is A Lack Of 
 Fair
 Representation*

 Using Wyoming as a benchmark, where you have 1 congressperson per
 (roughly) 500,000 people, 2 Senators (as always) and 3 Electoral
 votes.

 Compare to California where you have 1 Congressperson per 639,088
 people, 2 Senators, and 55 Electoral votes.
 That doesn't sound all that bad offhand, but if California had
 representation equal to Wyomings you would get 67 Congresspersons 
 and
 69 Electoral votes. That is a net gain of 12 Congresspersons and 14
 Electoral votes.

 This lack of representation effects at least 48 states that I can
 identify. Of those states, 25 are short one representative, and 10
 are shorted by 2. Only Iowa and DC are represented in the same
 proportion as Wyoming and the rest are shorted between 3 and 14
 representatives.

 Law limits Congress to 435 Representatives, but if representation
 were proportional there would be 549, an increase of 114
 representatives. I do not see why this number should be unwieldy or
 why it would cause difficulty.

 xponent
 Census Data Maru
 rob

 The difficulty is, when you have done the above and look at the new
 data, you'll find another state which is better represented than any
 other. I think the current system is so designed that it minimizes
 the difference between the actual number of Representatives (in
 Wyoming 1) and the deserved number (in Wyoming about 0.8), so your
 proposed change would probably make the situation much less
 desireable by your standards.

 I find the difference between the voters for district winners and 
 the
 voters for other candidates more of a problem. The first group has 
 435
 Representatives, the other has none. The real problem is that the 
 most
 voters will either always be in the first group, or always be in the
 second group; relatively few change between the groups. Many in the
 losing group have already given up voting because of that.

I think you miss the point by some margin here. Regardless of what 
party a Representative belongs to, that Rep is still responsible to 
everyone in his district in the sense that the Rep is the person one 
goes to with a grievence or a plan. I would have no problem asking Tom 
Delay (Ugh.my congressmanand one I would never under any 
circumstances vote for) for help with some matter, because that is 
part of his job. I don't have to like my Rep in order to apply for his 
services.

The other issue is representation. My state is unfairly represented 
when compared to Wyoming or Alaska. And that unfairness spreads even 
to representation by electors in presidential elections. Who is 
elected is irrelevent. What is relevent is that my vote is worth less 
in every way measurable than a voter in Wyoming. That is unfair and 
should be redressed.

Will it change things in a manner which I favor? Well.Bush might 
still have been elected under my proposal, but that would be OK 
because it would have been a fairer election. There is no blaming or 
finger pointing involved here actually. It took many years before our 
system got so skewed and I don't think many people realize just how 
much it could effect the wishes of the people as filtered through the 
college of electors. I have not tried to calculate (I realize this 
would be hard to make accurate in any case since I cannot predict 
electoral district boundries in states that have more electors) how 
this would have changed the most recent election. I don't think I 
would be happy (nor would the opposition) to find that a fair 
representation would have changed the results, so I have not even 
given it thought.

I have a greater interest in fairness than winning in any case.

xponent
No Taxation Yadda Yadda Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Dave Land
On Apr 27, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://www.cdbaby.com/amycd2
The album I have been helping to midwife for the last year.
With tinny sounding samples that are supposed to make you have to have
to have this album today!
I worked my ass off to get this out. You could at least give the tinny
samples a listen.G
You, sir, are a spoiled studio brat.
The samples sounded about as good as many other MP3s on iTunes on my
PowerBook via a pair of Plantronics Audio30 earbuds. Naturally, any of
us would prefer to be listening straight of the digital masters through
about 200 lbs of a Crown amplifier and some Tannoy or JBL studio
monitors, but I just don't happen to have that set up here at my desk.
There are some nice cuts on the CD. What was your role in the project?
Producer? Engineer? Or what?
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Maru Dubshinki
On 4/27/05, Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.cdbaby.com/amycd2
 
 The album I have been helping to midwife for the last year.
 With tinny sounding samples that are supposed to make you have to have
 to have this album today!
 
 I worked my ass off to get this out. You could at least give the tinny
 samples a listen.G
 
 xponent
 Soon To Be Moderated For Shameless Self Promotion Maru
 rob

Darn tootin'!  The only one supposed to be shamelessly shilling their
wares here is Brin.


~Maru
Incidentally, not too shabby. Not my favored style, but not bad.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Apr 27, 2005, at 4:54 PM, Dave Land wrote:
Naturally, any of
us would prefer to be listening straight of the digital masters through
about 200 lbs of a Crown amplifier and some Tannoy or JBL studio
monitors, but I just don't happen to have that set up here at my desk.
Pshht. Peasant.
;)
--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Dave Land wrote:
 On Apr 27, 2005, at 3:31 PM, Robert G. Seeberger wrote:

 http://www.cdbaby.com/amycd2

 You, sir, are a spoiled studio brat.

 The samples sounded about as good as many other MP3s on iTunes on my
 PowerBook via a pair of Plantronics Audio30 earbuds. Naturally, any 
 of
 us would prefer to be listening straight of the digital masters
 through about 200 lbs of a Crown amplifier and some Tannoy or JBL
 studio monitors, but I just don't happen to have that set up here at
 my desk.

They sound a bit awful over here. My Logitech micro/headphones just 
don't cut it soundwise and my Altec-Lansing speakers don't sound a lot 
better to me.


 There are some nice cuts on the CD. What was your role in the 
 project?
 Producer? Engineer? Or what?

H.to be honest, I am the guy who makes the wheels go round, I 
am the force that keeps the project organized and ongoing. I also 
print, staple, duplicate CDs, and finance the project.
Some guys go hunting and fishing. I coordinate musicians and artists 
and website creators and sell CDs.
And I do the easy job.
Creating music is hard hard hard hard hard.
I also write lyrics. The Grand Machine is the result of my writing, 
and was inspired by The Time Ships by Brin's buddy S. Baxter.

Our Humble Website:   http://www.amycd.com/


xponent
Exited maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Maru Dubshinki wrote:
 On 4/27/05, Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


 ~Maru
 Incidentally, not too shabby. Not my favored style, but not bad.

On behalf of the artists I thank you very much!


xponent
Chuckwagon Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
From another list:
 List Of Depressed Cities
   1.. Laredo, TX -- A+
   2.. El Paso, TX -- A+
   3.. Jersey City, NJ -- A+
   4.. Corpus Christi, TX -- A+
   5.. Baton Rouge, LA -- A
   6.. Honolulu, HI -- A-
   7.. Fresno, CA -- A-
   8.. San Jose, CA -- A-
   9.. Lincoln, NE -- B+
  10.. Bakersfield, CA -- B+
  11.. Buffalo, NY -- B+
  12.. Anchorage, AK -- B+
  13.. Stockton, CA -- B+
  14.. Shreveport, LA -- B+
  15.. (tie) Madison, WI -- B
   Montgomery, AL -- B
   Des Moines, IA -- B
  16.. Wichita, KS -- B
  17.. (tie) Sacramento, CA -- B
   Omaha, NE -- B
  18.. Memphis, TN -- B
  19.. New Orleans, LA -- B
  20.. (tie) Raleigh, NC -- B-
   Fort Wayne, IN -- B-
  21.. (tie) Fremont, CA -- B-
   Oakland, CA -- B-
  22.. Modesto, CA -- B-
  23.. Tacoma, WA -- B-
  24.. Toledo, OH -- B-
  25.. Boise, ID -- B-
  26.. Lubbock, TX -- C+
  27.. Little Rock, AR -- C+
  28.. Spokane, WA -- C+
  29.. Grand Rapids, MI -- C+
  30.. San Antonio, TX -- C+
  31.. (tie) Newark, NJ -- C+
   Akron, OH -- C+
   Austin, TX -- C+
  32.. Miami, FL -- C+
  33.. Richmond, VA -- C+
  34.. Lexington, KY -- C+
  35.. Jacksonville, FL -- C+
  36.. Rochester, NY -- C+
  37.. San Diego, CA -- C
  38.. Durham, NC -- C
  39.. Albuquerque, NM -- C
  40.. Charlotte, NC -- C
  41.. Tulsa, OK -- C
  42.. Providence, RI -- C
  43.. Greensboro, NC -- C
  44.. Colorado Springs, CO -- C
  45.. Chesapeake, VA -- C
  46.. (tie) Tucson, AZ -- C
   Birmingham, AL -- C
   Oklahoma City, OK -- C
   Columbus, OH -- C
  47.. Norfolk, VA -- C-
  48.. (tie) Arlington, TX -- C-
   Fort Worth, TX -- C-
   Riverside, CA -- C-
  49.. Plano, TX -- C-
  50.. (tie) Baltimore, MD -- C-
   San Francisco, CA -- C-
   Louisville, KY -- C-
  51.. Virginia Beach, VA -- C-
  52.. Orlando, FL -- D+
  53.. Las Vegas, NV -- D+
  54.. Washington, D.C. -- D+
  55.. Cincinnati, OH -- D+
  56.. Denver, CO -- D+
  57.. (tie) Boston, MA -- D
   St. Paul, MN -- D
   Seattle, WA -- D
  58.. Chicago, IL -- D
  59.. Aurora, CO -- D
  60.. Milwaukee, WI -- D
  61.. Houston, TX -- D
  62.. Minneapolis, MN -- D
  63.. (tie) Dallas, TX -- D
   Garland, TX -- D
  64.. Anaheim, CA -- D
  65.. Portland, OR -- D
  66.. (tie) Long Beach, CA -- D
   Los Angeles -- D
   Nashville, TN -- D
  67.. (tie) Yonkers, NY -- D
   Pittsburgh, PA -- D
   Kansas City, MO -- D
  68.. Atlanta, GA -- D
  69.. Salt Lake City, UT -- D-
  70.. New York, NY -- D-
  71.. Cleveland, OH -- F
  72.. (tie) Mesa, AZ -- F
   Phoenix, AZ -- F
   Scottsdale, AZ -- F
  73.. Indianapolis, IN -- F
  74.. Tampa, FL -- F
  75.. St. Louis, MO -- F
  76.. St. Petersburg, FL -- F
  77.. Detroit, MI -- F
  78.. Philadelphia, PA -- F
(Criteria for the rankings included information on antidepressant sales 
from NDC Health, suicide rates from the Centers for Disease Control and 
Prevention, and information from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor 
Surveillance System. The rankings are published in the April issue of Men's 
Health, which will be on newsstands March 15.)

-- Ronn!  :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Maru Dubshinki
I certainly hope I do not get an A or A+ on that list. :)

~Maru
Sometimes, failure is the only way to succeed.

On 4/27/05, Ronn!Blankenship [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  From another list:
 
   List Of Depressed Cities
 
 1.. Laredo, TX -- A+
 2.. El Paso, TX -- A+
 3.. Jersey City, NJ -- A+
 4.. Corpus Christi, TX -- A+
 5.. Baton Rouge, LA -- A
 6.. Honolulu, HI -- A-
 7.. Fresno, CA -- A-
 8.. San Jose, CA -- A-
 9.. Lincoln, NE -- B+
10.. Bakersfield, CA -- B+
11.. Buffalo, NY -- B+
12.. Anchorage, AK -- B+
13.. Stockton, CA -- B+
14.. Shreveport, LA -- B+
15.. (tie) Madison, WI -- B
 Montgomery, AL -- B
 Des Moines, IA -- B
16.. Wichita, KS -- B
17.. (tie) Sacramento, CA -- B
 Omaha, NE -- B
18.. Memphis, TN -- B
19.. New Orleans, LA -- B
20.. (tie) Raleigh, NC -- B-
 Fort Wayne, IN -- B-
21.. (tie) Fremont, CA -- B-
 Oakland, CA -- B-
22.. Modesto, CA -- B-
23.. Tacoma, WA -- B-
24.. Toledo, OH -- B-
25.. Boise, ID -- B-
26.. Lubbock, TX -- C+
27.. Little Rock, AR -- C+
28.. Spokane, WA -- C+
29.. Grand Rapids, MI -- C+
30.. San Antonio, TX -- C+
31.. (tie) Newark, NJ -- C+
 Akron, OH -- C+
 Austin, TX -- C+
32.. Miami, FL -- C+
33.. Richmond, VA -- C+
34.. Lexington, KY -- C+
35.. Jacksonville, FL -- C+
36.. Rochester, NY -- C+
37.. San Diego, CA -- C
38.. Durham, NC -- C
39.. Albuquerque, NM -- C
40.. Charlotte, NC -- C
41.. Tulsa, OK -- C
42.. Providence, RI -- C
43.. Greensboro, NC -- C
44.. Colorado Springs, CO -- C
45.. Chesapeake, VA -- C
46.. (tie) Tucson, AZ -- C
 Birmingham, AL -- C
 Oklahoma City, OK -- C
 Columbus, OH -- C
47.. Norfolk, VA -- C-
48.. (tie) Arlington, TX -- C-
 Fort Worth, TX -- C-
 Riverside, CA -- C-
49.. Plano, TX -- C-
50.. (tie) Baltimore, MD -- C-
 San Francisco, CA -- C-
 Louisville, KY -- C-
51.. Virginia Beach, VA -- C-
52.. Orlando, FL -- D+
53.. Las Vegas, NV -- D+
54.. Washington, D.C. -- D+
55.. Cincinnati, OH -- D+
56.. Denver, CO -- D+
57.. (tie) Boston, MA -- D
 St. Paul, MN -- D
 Seattle, WA -- D
58.. Chicago, IL -- D
59.. Aurora, CO -- D
60.. Milwaukee, WI -- D
61.. Houston, TX -- D
62.. Minneapolis, MN -- D
63.. (tie) Dallas, TX -- D
 Garland, TX -- D
64.. Anaheim, CA -- D
65.. Portland, OR -- D
66.. (tie) Long Beach, CA -- D
 Los Angeles -- D
 Nashville, TN -- D
67.. (tie) Yonkers, NY -- D
 Pittsburgh, PA -- D
 Kansas City, MO -- D
68.. Atlanta, GA -- D
69.. Salt Lake City, UT -- D-
70.. New York, NY -- D-
71.. Cleveland, OH -- F
72.. (tie) Mesa, AZ -- F
 Phoenix, AZ -- F
 Scottsdale, AZ -- F
73.. Indianapolis, IN -- F
74.. Tampa, FL -- F
75.. St. Louis, MO -- F
76.. St. Petersburg, FL -- F
77.. Detroit, MI -- F
78.. Philadelphia, PA -- F
 
 (Criteria for the rankings included information on antidepressant sales
 from NDC Health, suicide rates from the Centers for Disease Control and
 Prevention, and information from the CDC's Behavioral Risk Factor
 Surveillance System. The rankings are published in the April issue of Men's
 Health, which will be on newsstands March 15.)
 
 -- Ronn!  :)
 
 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 08:23 PM Wednesday 4/27/2005, Maru Dubshinki wrote:
I certainly hope I do not get an A or A+ on that list. :)

Oh, sorry, I guess that wasn't clear without a link to the original article 
which got snipped somewhere along the line.  The higher the number on the 
list, the more depressed the people of the city are, according to the 
study.  Here's a link to a 
summary:  http://articles.health.msn.com/id/100103843.  (I don't have a 
link to the full list.)

-- Ronn!  :)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Nick Arnett
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005 19:45:35 -0500, Ronn!Blankenship wrote
 From another list:
 
   List Of Depressed Cities

Seems to me that this is a list of cities ranked by how little they use
anti-depressants, not how depressed they are.  Could be that some are high on
the list because they have lousy medical insurance that won't pay for the
medication.  Or the people are just too dang proud to admit they need it.

But it seems to bear witness to W.C. Fields' famous line about Philadelphia.

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Dave Land
On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Robert Seeberger wrote:
They sound a bit awful over here. My Logitech micro/headphones just
don't cut it soundwise and my Altec-Lansing speakers don't sound a lot
better to me.
I have a pair of Altec-lansing computer speakers, and I have special
EQ settings called something like shitty little desktop speakers or
some such to make them sound less, well, shitty.
H.to be honest, I am the guy who makes the wheels go round, I
am the force that keeps the project organized and ongoing. I also
print, staple, duplicate CDs, and finance the project.
Yes. Right after writing my message, I went to amycd.com and saw that
you are executive producer, which often means money guy.
Some guys go hunting and fishing. I coordinate musicians and artists
and website creators and sell CDs.
Not a bad hobby. At least it keeps you off the streets.
And I do the easy job.
Creating music is hard hard hard hard hard.
I have a friend, Ted Larson, who is one of those guys who, at a church
retreat, can decide at lunch time that he's going to write a song for
the campfire that night and do it.
He also is a very good music editor -- he made a mix for his anniversary
party of Love Shack and Who Let the Dogs Out, if you happen to go
for that sort of thing.
I also write lyrics. The Grand Machine is the result of my writing,
and was inspired by The Time Ships by Brin's buddy S. Baxter.
Writing is also hard. Maybe not hard hard hard hard hard, but certainly
hard hard hard. My degree's in writing, but not lyrics. The tough part
is making it rhythmical (and maybe even rhyming) without making it
doggerel.
Keep up the hard work,
Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Dave Land
I'm happy to see that I moved up rather significantly in the '80s when 
I went from #67 Pittsburgh to #8 San Jose.

Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Brin: Romanticism vs. Modernism

2005-04-27 Thread Robert G. Seeberger
Over at rec.music.progressive the big discussion concerns romanticism 
vs. modernism in terms of progressive rock.


xponent
What Comes Around Goes Around Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Howcum (some) Texans are so happy?

2005-04-27 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:45 PM, Ronn!Blankenship wrote:
From another list:
 List Of Depressed Cities
   1.. Laredo, TX -- A+
   2.. El Paso, TX -- A+
   3.. Jersey City, NJ -- A+
   4.. Corpus Christi, TX -- A+
Well, ignorance is bliss. ;)
More seriously, it might have something to do with annual sunlight 
quantity. That's just a wild stab though.

--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Robert Seeberger
Dave Land wrote:
 On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Robert Seeberger wrote:

 I also write lyrics. The Grand Machine is the result of my writing,
 and was inspired by The Time Ships by Brin's buddy S. Baxter.

 Writing is also hard. Maybe not hard hard hard hard hard, but
 certainly hard hard hard. My degree's in writing, but not lyrics. 
 The
 tough part is making it rhythmical (and maybe even rhyming) without
 making it doggerel.

I find writing very hard. Writing posts to the list is usually quite 
difficult for me.

Writing lyrics and poetry is much easier and I seem to have some 
talent for it. (At least judging from comments by the people who use 
my lyrics) Getting started can be hard, but once I get going, I can 
find those rhythyms and twist the language into something that may 
have little or no real meaning, but evokes images and may even sound 
like it has meaning. It can be a lot of fun.



 Keep up the hard work,

Lately I've been getting credit for being someone who does a lot to 
support independent musicians. I suppose that is true, but I just 
enjoy the projects and the music. And it looks like one of our bands, 
The Naming, is going to let me issue their (IMO) wonderful album Sun 
King.  I am constantly amazed that this band could never get signed.


xponent
Sun King Maru
rob 


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Permission Slips Re: RhetoricalQuestionsRE:RemovingDictatorsRe: PeacefulchangeL3

2005-04-27 Thread JDG
At 05:32 AM 4/27/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
 Yes, I am saying that the child/permission slip line is a metaphor 
 for the US seeking the consent of the UNSC on foreign policy 
 positions.

So, who is the parent and who is the child?

Isn't it obvious?

In the child/permission slip analogy, the United States would be the child
asking for permission from the UN.

On the other hand, seriously considering the opinion of another is
typically an adult-to-adult relationship.It would be rather nonsensical
to use a child/permission slip metaphor to argue against an adult-to-adult
dynamic of seriously considering the opinions of others.

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head

2005-04-27 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: Dave Land [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 8:51 PM
Subject: Re: I am spamming your head I am spamming your head


 On Apr 27, 2005, at 5:59 PM, Robert Seeberger wrote:

  They sound a bit awful over here. My Logitech micro/headphones just
  don't cut it soundwise and my Altec-Lansing speakers don't sound a lot
  better to me.

 I have a pair of Altec-lansing computer speakers, and I have special
 EQ settings called something like shitty little desktop speakers or
 some such to make them sound less, well, shitty.

  H.to be honest, I am the guy who makes the wheels go round, I
  am the force that keeps the project organized and ongoing. I also
  print, staple, duplicate CDs, and finance the project.

 Yes. Right after writing my message, I went to amycd.com and saw that
 you are executive producer, which often means money guy.

  Some guys go hunting and fishing. I coordinate musicians and artists
  and website creators and sell CDs.

 Not a bad hobby. At least it keeps you off the streets.

  And I do the easy job.
  Creating music is hard hard hard hard hard.

 I have a friend, Ted Larson, who is one of those guys who, at a church
 retreat, can decide at lunch time that he's going to write a song for
 the campfire that night and do it.

My daughter, who's a junior at Lawrence, writes music that actually gets
played in public.  She conducts a bell choir and has written some music for
them.  She also does some music for the various parts of the service.
According to her it's no big deal. :-)  I think writing music would be
easy for me, just come up with note progressions.  It's writing music that
would not send people running and screaming to get as far away as possible
that's hard. :-)

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Brin: Romanticism vs. Modernism

2005-04-27 Thread David Brin

--- Robert G. Seeberger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
 Over at rec.music.progressive the big discussion
 concerns romanticism 
 vs. modernism in terms of progressive rock.

Give them my best.

But remember.

1. Romanticism and modernism share some themes!  BOTH
preach suspicion of authority, for example, and
respect for diversity/eccentricity.  This harkens back
to when they were allies against monarchy, before they
turned on each other.  These themes fill much
music/art/cinema.

2.  We are all deeply romantic.  The trick is to let
modernism be in charge of POLICY.  We can then try to
have a reasonable, progressive, pragmatic
civilization...

... that then lets us all hoot and holler and do
romantic things in our free time.  Or in the arts.

thrive

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l