Re: From _Science News_: Mathematical references abound on The Simpsons

2006-06-11 Thread Dave Land

On Jun 10, 2006, at 5:31 PM, Julia Thompson wrote:


Ronn!Blankenship wrote:

http://www.sciencenews.org/articles/20060610/bob8.asp


Linguists have a fun time, as well:

http://heideas.blogspot.com/2005/03/beyond-embiggens-and- 
cromulent.html


Including the term snowclone!  Yay!  And links to other Simpsons  
linguistic pages.


The linguist in me loves ths about the Simpsons...

From the page:


Episode: ‘Weekend at Burnsie’s.’ Episode # 1316, DABF11

Spelling pronunciation
Phish: reading an announcement, says ‘potheads’ as ‘po-theeds’

Backformation:
Otto says ‘They call them fingers but I never see them fing.’


In Peggy's family, a standard friendly insult is to call someone a  
far-theed (from one of the sisters' having seen farthead written  
somewhere).


And when we were having some work done on the house, I pointed to a  
board laying on the ground and called it a fent, because it is part  
of the fents that surround our yard.


Dave
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


What is this flower?

2006-06-11 Thread Gary Nunn


Has anyone seen anything like this flower before?  I did a Google search,
but didn't come up with anything. I probably wasn't using the right
terminology.
 
http://www.europastation.com/gary/flower/
 
 
Gary
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What is this flower?

2006-06-11 Thread Charlie Bell


On 11/06/2006, at 10:42 PM, Gary Nunn wrote:




Has anyone seen anything like this flower before?  I did a Google  
search,

but didn't come up with anything. I probably wasn't using the right
terminology.

http://www.europastation.com/gary/flower/


It's an arum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Araceae

I'm actually a zoologist. I feel dirty now.

Charlie
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


SCOUTED: Garrison Keillor on San Franciscophobia

2006-06-11 Thread Dave Land

Folks,

Salon is running a great piece by the inimitable Garrison Kiellor on  
the ridiculous tact that the Republican party is taking in its  
attempt to unseat Nancy Pelosi: that she is from San Francisco, where  
there are known g-a-y people! Horrors!


Here's the full text of the story, in case you'd rather not be  
subjected to their advertising... (I know that not all people think  
advertising is evil. For them, here's the link, too):


http://www.salon.com/opinion/feature/2006/06/07/keillor/

San Franciscophobia

We're stuck with a terrible war and a worse president, and all
the GOP can do is scream, Pelosi and her Nancy boys are
coming? This is pathetic.

By Garrison Keillor

June 7, 2006 | People who live in mud huts should not throw mud,  
especially if it comes from their own roofs. As Scripture says, don't  
point to the speck in your neighbor's eye when you have a piece of  
kindling in your own.


I see by the papers that the Republicans want to make an issue of  
Nancy Pelosi in the congressional races this fall: Would you want a  
San Francisco woman to be Speaker of the House? Will the podium be  
repainted in lavender stripes with a disco ball overhead? Will she be  
borne into the chamber by male dancers with glistening torsos and  
wearing pink tutus? After all, in the unique worldview of old  
elephants, San Francisco is a code word for g-a-y, and after  
assembling a record of government lies, incompetence and disaster,  
the party in power hopes that the fear of g-a-y-s will pull it  
through in November.


Running against Nancy Pelosi, a woman who comes from a district where  
there are known gay persons, is a nice trick, but it does draw  
attention to the large shambling galoot who is speaker now, Tom  
DeLay's enabler for years, a man who, judging by his public  
mutterances, is about as smart as most high school wrestling coaches.  
For the past year, Dennis Hastert has been two heartbeats from the  
presidency. He is a man who seems content just to have a car and  
driver and three square meals a day. He has no apparent vision beyond  
the urge to hang onto power. He has succeeded in turning Congress  
into a branch of the executive branch. If Mr. Hastert becomes the  
poster boy for the Republican Party, this does not speak well for  
them as the Party of Ideas.


People who want to take a swing at San Francisco should think twice.  
Yes, the Irish coffee at Fisherman's Wharf is overpriced, and the bus  
tour of Haight-Ashbury is disappointing (where are the hippies?), but  
the Bay Area is the cradle of the computer and software industry,  
which continues to create jobs for our children. The iPod was not  
developed by Baptists in Waco, Texas. There may be a reason for this.  
Creative people thrive in a climate of openness and tolerance, since  
some great ideas start out sounding ridiculous. Creativity is a key  
to economic progress. Authoritarianism is stifling. I don't believe  
that Mr. Hewlett and Mr. Packard were gay, but what's important is:  
In San Francisco, it doesn't matter so much. When the cultural  
Sturmbannfuhrers try to marshal everyone into straight lines, it has  
consequences for the economic future of this country.


Meanwhile, the Current Occupant goes on impersonating a president.  
Somewhere in the quiet leafy recesses of the Bush family, somebody is  
thinking, Wrong son. Should've tried the smart one. This one's eyes  
don't quite focus. Five years in office and he doesn't have a grip on  
it yet. You stand him up next to Tony Blair at a press conference and  
the comparison is not kind to Our Guy. Historians are starting to  
place him at or near the bottom of the list. And one of the basic  
assumptions of American culture is falling apart: the competence of  
Republicans.


You might not have always liked Republicans, but you could count on  
them to manage the bank. They might be lousy tippers, act snooty,  
talk through their noses, wear spats and splash mud on you as they  
race their Pierce-Arrows through the village, but you knew they could  
do the math. To see them produce a ninny and then follow him loyally  
into the swamp for five years is disconcerting, like seeing the  
Rolling Stones take up lite jazz. So here we are at an uneasy point  
in our history, mired in a costly war and getting nowhere, a supine  
Congress granting absolute power to a president who seems to get  
smaller and dimmer, and the best the Republicans can offer is San  
Franciscophobia? This is beyond pitiful. This is violently stupid.


It is painful to look at your father and realize the old man should  
not be allowed to manage his own money anymore. This is the discovery  
the country has made about the party in power. They are inept. The  
checkbook needs to be taken away. They will rant, they will screech,  
they will wave their canes at you and call you all sorts of names,  
but you have to do what you have to do.


- - - - - - - - - - - -


Re: What is this flower?

2006-06-11 Thread David Hobby

Gary Nunn wrote:


Has anyone seen anything like this flower before?  I did a Google search,
but didn't come up with anything. I probably wasn't using the right
terminology.
 
http://www.europastation.com/gary/flower/


Gary--

Ha-ha, good one!  Those are CGIs made by
Georgia O'Keefe.  You can't fool me.  See:

http://www.humanflowerproject.com/index.php/weblog/comments/502/

: )

---David

Plant sexual organs  Maru
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: What is this flower?

2006-06-11 Thread Kanandarqu

It's an  arum.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Araceae

I'm  actually a zoologist. I feel dirty now.

Charlie

Who would have figured something that such an outstanding 
flower was related to skunk weed (skunk cabbage) that we 
use to find during summer vacations although those plants 
had outstanding smells so perhaps it makes sense. Didn't
take long to figure out not to break a leaf :-)
 
Dee
 
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l