Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread The Fool
 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Charlie Bell wrote:
 
  ... and second, the 
  maths of evolutionary genetics is against you - while direct chromosomal 
  inheritance goes down exponentially by generation, family tree goes up 
  exponentially by generation (to within population limits). Or do you 
  really think you had 2,147,483.648 *individual* ancestors 30 generations 
  ago? No, of course not - family trees converge as well as diverge. 
 
 At the generation where you'd expect me to have 128 ancestors, I have 
 122.  (There was a first-cousin marriage at one point, and a 
 second-cousin marriage at another.  And on top of that, I know someone 
 whose closest degree of relation to me is third cousin -- but he's also 
 more closely related to me than a second cousin, because we have 
 kinship in other ways, as well.)

It's expected that the farther you go back in a geneologic tree, the more the
branches beging overlapping.  After all, at only 40 generations, you would
have to have had more than a trillion ancestors.  Assuming 25 years per
generation, that would have been roughly 1000ya.

Assumming there are 10^85 sub atomic particles in the entire universe, you
would have more ancestors than that at approxamately 283 generations.  At 25
years per generation (an exeptionally conservate estimate that is probably
twice or larger than average historical average generation times), that
generation of ancestors would have lived approxamately 7075 years ago (~5069
BCE).  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Bush: I'd rather be right than popular

2006-07-07 Thread Ronn!Blankenship

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/07/06/bush.lkl/index.html


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Nick Arnett

On 7/5/06, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


So, let me rephrase my claim. Everybody that lives now descends
from _every Eurasian person_ that lived in Year 800 and that has
at least _one_ living descendant.


We can trace my wife's ancestors back to Charlemagne, who died around
the year 813.  But as I have heard, a large percentage of people
can... and most everybody could if there were better records.  Any
family connection to European royalty does it.

Nick

--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Push for simpler spelling persists

2006-07-07 Thread Ticia

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060705/ap_on_re_us/simpl_wurdz

Those in favor of simplified spelling say children would learn faster 
and illiteracy rates would drop. Opponents say a new system would make 
spelling even more confusing.


Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.

[...]
Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.

In languages with phonetically spelled words, like German or Spanish, 
children learn to spell in weeks instead of months or years as is 
sometimes the case with English, Mole said.



Ticia ',:)
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Nick Arnett wrote:

On 7/5/06, Alberto Monteiro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


So, let me rephrase my claim. Everybody that lives now descends
from _every Eurasian person_ that lived in Year 800 and that has
at least _one_ living descendant.


We can trace my wife's ancestors back to Charlemagne, who died around
the year 813.  But as I have heard, a large percentage of people
can... and most everybody could if there were better records.  Any
family connection to European royalty does it.

Nick



I've looked at a database that claims I am descended from Charlemagne, 
but there's some fuzziness in there where I'm not sure if the database 
is accurate, sometime in the 1500s.


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Push for simpler spelling persists

2006-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Ticia wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060705/ap_on_re_us/simpl_wurdz

Those in favor of simplified spelling say children would learn faster 
and illiteracy rates would drop. Opponents say a new system would make 
spelling even more confusing.


Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.

[...]
Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.

In languages with phonetically spelled words, like German or Spanish, 
children learn to spell in weeks instead of months or years as is 
sometimes the case with English, Mole said.


Reading the phonetic spelling stuff gives me a headache.

(It doesn't help that I bumped into something this morning, either.  I'd 
better go re-ice for awhile.  Having toddler twins can be something of a 
challenge in the morning.  At least Tommy took me seriously when I told 
him the consequences of body-slamming me a third time, so there WAS no 
third time.)


Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote:

 The wikipedia had a project, wikitree, to collect all ancestors from 
 volunteers. I guess that if this was done, everybody could be linked
 to everybody :-)
 
 Do you have a link?  That would be interesting

www.wikitree.org

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote:

 The wikipedia had a project, wikitree, to collect all ancestors from 
 volunteers. I guess that if this was done, everybody could be linked
 to everybody :-)
 
 Do you have a link?  That would be interesting

www.wikitree.org

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote:

 The wikipedia had a project, wikitree, to collect all ancestors from 
 volunteers. I guess that if this was done, everybody could be linked
 to everybody :-)
 
 Do you have a link?  That would be interesting

www.wikitree.org

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Julia Thompson wrote:

 The wikipedia had a project, wikitree, to collect all ancestors from 
 volunteers. I guess that if this was done, everybody could be linked
 to everybody :-)
 
 Do you have a link?  That would be interesting

www.wikitree.org

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introductions (Was:Re: SCOUTED: Bush is Not Incompetent)

2006-07-07 Thread Nick Arnett

I guess I'll join the self-introductions...  I live in Silly, er,
Silicon Valley (Santa Clara, to be exact) with my wife and a small
white dog, with frequent visits from our adult daughter and four
grandchildren.  I'll turn 50 next month.  I grew up just outside
Pittsburgh, Pa., where I met a fellow named Dave Land almost 30 years
ago, who you may have noticed around here also.  Dave and I formed a
company about three years ago, which was acquired by Liveworld Inc.,
where we both work now.  I'm the director of business intelligence
services, doing something called advanced conversation analysis,
which involves an awful lot of databases, statistics, linguistics and
other headaches.

Prior to doing this, I had been a stockboy at a shoe store, paramedic,
radio news writer, radio and occasional tv news reporter, newspaper
reporter, magazine writer... well, lots of journalism and publishing.
I've started or helped started at least a half-dozen companies, been
on the boards of some non-profits...  These days my volunteer
activities include board membership of a Christian retreat
organization, member of the Bay Area Critical Incident Stress
Management Team (we debrief medics, cops, firefighters, dispatchers,
etc., after difficult incidents) and digital storytelling with
families of troops killed in Iraq and Afghanistan (our niece's
husband, Wes Canning, was KIA in Fallujah 11/10/04).

I've been a science fiction reader since I was very young -- it was
Tom Swift that got me started, too, but Heinlein who really grabbed
me.  A venture capitalist suggested that I read Earth many years
ago, which got me started on DB's writings.  I met David Brin about 12
years ago in a weird, ego-inflating twist -- he wrote to me to say how
much he appreciated my writing, specifically, The Internet and the
Anti-net.  And then I told him that his writing had inspired me and
we formed a small mutual admiration society.  Feel free to join.

And, as a final note... I have hosted the list for the last, ummm,
five or six years?.  Dave Land is the backup on-site sysadmin, so to
speak, but Julia is the uber-list manager because it is nigh unto
impossible to respond to list admin stuff faster than she does.

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Introductions

2006-07-07 Thread Horn, John
 On Behalf Of Jim Sharkey
 
 There are times when sharing hobbies creates a shudder 
 elsewhere in the household.  I started teaching my 
 eight-year-old son how to play Magic:the Gathering about a 
 year ago, and he's taken to it with the kind of enthusiasm 
 you'd expect from a boy his age.  My wife, while she loves 
 that we share a hobby, looks at the piles and piles of cards 
 and just shakes her head.  And of course it's not so easy on 
 me, as I have to share my cards now.  :-)

Oh, I know that full well.  My kids and I share a passion for
computer games that my wife can only watch in disbelief and envy.
She also doesn't really like card games which I've been trying to
teach to the kids.  I haven't turned my daughter on to Magic: The
Gathering yet.  Mostly because I know my son will want to
participate, and at seven, he's still a bit young to follow it all,
I think.  Mostly all the reading on the cards.  I think my daughter
will love it and I'll have an excuse to pull all those cards out of
the boxes in the closet...!  Heh-heh-heh...

 - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Push for simpler spelling persists

2006-07-07 Thread Jim Sharkey

Ticia wrote:
Eether wae, the consept has yet to capcher th publix imajinaeshun.
Lurning English reqierz roet memory rather than lojic, he sed.

I can't imagine that ever happening.  It would give every person over 
the age of about 10 a headache trying to learn.

Not to mention it makes me feel like I just wandered onto the Banks' 
list for some reason...

Jim
Feersum Gramer Maru

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introductions (Was:Re: SCOUTED: Bush is Not Incompetent)

2006-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Nick Arnett wrote:

And, as a final note... I have hosted the list for the last, ummm, 
five or six years?.  Dave Land is the backup on-site sysadmin, so to 
speak, but Julia is the uber-list manager because it is nigh unto 
impossible to respond to list admin stuff faster than she does.


Four, and it's possible to beat me if I'm on a camping trip or otherwise 
out of the house.  :)


Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Alberto Monteiro
Nick Arnett wrote:
 
 So, let me rephrase my claim. Everybody that lives now descends
 from _every Eurasian person_ that lived in Year 800 and that has
 at least _one_ living descendant.
 
 We can trace my wife's ancestors back to Charlemagne, who died around
 the year 813.  But as I have heard, a large percentage of people
 can... and most everybody could if there were better records.  Any
 family connection to European royalty does it.
 
Ok, but my claim is stronger than that. She can trace back to
Charlemagne, but she would be able to trace to Charlemagne's servants -
if records were complete.

[I can't trace back to Charlemagne, AFAIK, but I know some relatives
who are doing research, and they are struck in 1500 or 1600. But now
I don't care for this, I want to trace me back to JESUS and claim
that I must inherit the Earth and be its EVIL OVERLORD!!!]

Alberto Monteiro

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Dave Land

On Jul 7, 2006, at 1:54 PM, Alberto Monteiro wrote:


Nick Arnett wrote:



So, let me rephrase my claim. Everybody that lives now descends
from _every Eurasian person_ that lived in Year 800 and that has
at least _one_ living descendant.


We can trace my wife's ancestors back to Charlemagne, who died around
the year 813.  But as I have heard, a large percentage of people
can... and most everybody could if there were better records.  Any
family connection to European royalty does it.


Ok, but my claim is stronger than that. She can trace back to
Charlemagne, but she would be able to trace to Charlemagne's  
servants -

if records were complete.

[I can't trace back to Charlemagne, AFAIK, but I know some relatives
who are doing research, and they are struck in 1500 or 1600. But now
I don't care for this, I want to trace me back to JESUS and claim
that I must inherit the Earth and be its EVIL OVERLORD!!!]


I am with you as far as not caring for this is concerned (for certain
values of this). While my life-long friend Nick is very interested and
engaged in his and his wife's ancestry, it would be difficult for me to
work up much more than an oh, really? if a relative told me that we
were directly descended from [insert famous person's name here].

As for tracing yourself back to Jesus, I think that might be more
difficult than you might expect, Dan Brown notwithstanding. I wonder,
too, how likely it would be for such a descendant to turn out to be an
evil overlord. Finally, assuming that you take Jesus at his word, unless
you are meek (in the ancient Hebrew sense of teachable), your
inheritance of the earth is questionable.

Good luck with that,

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Roots of human family tree are shallow

2006-07-07 Thread Julia Thompson

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

Nick Arnett wrote:

So, let me rephrase my claim. Everybody that lives now descends
from _every Eurasian person_ that lived in Year 800 and that has
at least _one_ living descendant.

We can trace my wife's ancestors back to Charlemagne, who died around
the year 813.  But as I have heard, a large percentage of people
can... and most everybody could if there were better records.  Any
family connection to European royalty does it.


Ok, but my claim is stronger than that. She can trace back to
Charlemagne, but she would be able to trace to Charlemagne's servants -
if records were complete.

[I can't trace back to Charlemagne, AFAIK, but I know some relatives
who are doing research, and they are struck in 1500 or 1600. But now
I don't care for this, I want to trace me back to JESUS and claim
that I must inherit the Earth and be its EVIL OVERLORD!!!]


Can I be a minion?  PLEASE?

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l