Re: Incoming!

2008-12-20 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 10:41 PM Friday 12/19/2008, Julia Thompson wrote:


On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

  At 08:08 AM Thursday 12/18/2008, Julia Thompson wrote:
 
 
  On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
 
  At 09:02 PM Wednesday 12/17/2008, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
  On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
 
  Shoe-fly pie.
 
  Your fly is open.
 
 
 
  No it's not.  I'm not even wearing pants.
 
 
  Possibly TMI Maru
 
  Oh.  That reminds me, I need to get a couple of kilts out of the washer
  and hang them up to dry
 
  Julia
 
 
 
  Not exactly.  I was wearing sports-type shorts with an elastic
  waistband rather than a fly . . .

Well, I was in Whole Foods in Austin on No Pants Day and a certain
individual I know spotted me there and said, Way to celebrate No Pants
Day!  And I looked at him funny, and asked him when he'd last seen me in
something other than a kilt.

(Only one of the two kilts in question was mine.  We have matching black
Workman model kilts.  Probably disgustingly cute or something like that.)

 Julia



If the forecasts are correct by this time tomorrow I will need to dig 
out the winter gear again . . . though at least the week of 
almost-constant rain will be ending . . .


. . . ronn!  :-\



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Incoming!

2008-12-20 Thread Julia Thompson


On Sat, 20 Dec 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

 At 10:41 PM Friday 12/19/2008, Julia Thompson wrote:


 On Fri, 19 Dec 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

 At 08:08 AM Thursday 12/18/2008, Julia Thompson wrote:


 On Wed, 17 Dec 2008, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

 At 09:02 PM Wednesday 12/17/2008, Warren Ockrassa wrote:
 On Dec 17, 2008, at 3:05 PM, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:

 Shoe-fly pie.

 Your fly is open.



 No it's not.  I'm not even wearing pants.


 Possibly TMI Maru

 Oh.  That reminds me, I need to get a couple of kilts out of the washer
 and hang them up to dry

 Julia



 Not exactly.  I was wearing sports-type shorts with an elastic
 waistband rather than a fly . . .

 Well, I was in Whole Foods in Austin on No Pants Day and a certain
 individual I know spotted me there and said, Way to celebrate No Pants
 Day!  And I looked at him funny, and asked him when he'd last seen me in
 something other than a kilt.

 (Only one of the two kilts in question was mine.  We have matching black
 Workman model kilts.  Probably disgustingly cute or something like that.)

 Julia



 If the forecasts are correct by this time tomorrow I will need to dig
 out the winter gear again . . . though at least the week of
 almost-constant rain will be ending . . .

And -- according to my local forecast, a cold front is coming through 
sometime between this afternoon and tomorrow morning.

I wish it would just make up its mind what temperature it's going to 
be

Julia

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Incoming!

2008-12-20 Thread Bruce Bostwick
On Dec 20, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:

 If the forecasts are correct by this time tomorrow I will need to dig
 out the winter gear again . . . though at least the week of
 almost-constant rain will be ending . . .

 And -- according to my local forecast, a cold front is coming  
 through
 sometime between this afternoon and tomorrow morning.

 I wish it would just make up its mind what temperature it's going to
 be

   Julia

And the day or two of fog we get after each cold front is only  
entertaining up to a point.  The effect an actual dense fog has on  
people's driving behavior in Texas has to be seen to be believed.   
(They can mostly deal with rain, up to a point.  Snow or ice, forget  
it. :)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: What is wealth?

2008-12-20 Thread Dan M


 -Original Message-
 From: brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com [mailto:brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com] On
 Behalf Of David Hobby
 Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 7:11 PM
 To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion
 Subject: Re: What is wealth?
 
 Dan M wrote:
 ...
  O.K., let me try.  There is such a thing as concrete wealth.
  Wealth lets an individual do things that they want to do.  So
  a person's individual wealth would be roughly defined relative
  to some standard as the ratio of the utility of what they can
  do to what they could do in the standard state.
 
  I think this is closest to what I think.  But, I think that this is a
  fundamental and difficult enough concept to start slowly with some
 obvious
  examples.
 
  First, I was think of and will focus on the wealth of nations,
 communities,
  the world, more than individual wealth.
 ...
  So, historically, a richer nation would have vast areas of fertile
 farmland
  that could be harvested year after year to provide food for people.
 That
  wealth could be stolen by force, but absent of that, the wealth existed
  there.  So, Italy was far wealthier than a corresponding area in
 Siberia,
  because far more food could be grown.
 ...
  involved) is somewhat arbitrary.  But, the availability of human effort
  expended in something other than subsistence farming is not subjective;
 it
  can be objectively measured.
 ...
 
 Dan--
 
 O.K., you agreed mostly agreed with me, and I
 mostly agree with you.  Some of it is a matter
 of interpretation:  We're both taking the usual
 meaning of wealth, and trying to clarify it.
 
 I had planned to get the total wealth of a
 country but adding up the individual wealth
 of its inhabitants (and of its institutions,
 too?).  So starting with individual wealth
 made sense to me.  Do you think that the wealth
 of a (inhabited) country would be different
 than the sum of the wealths of its inhabitants?


Well, there is always the wealth in the publicly owned infrastructure, oil
and mineral wealth on public lands that need to be added.  But, my argument
for looking at the state instead of the individual was mostly the same as
Plato's reasons for writing the Republic as he did.


 I think that a country that has more than enough
 food for its people may be wealthier than a country
 where everybody has just enough.  Even if they
 can produce the same total amount of food.  Sure,
 people can be a source of a country's wealth.  But
 starving peasants may not be worth that much, wealth-wise.
 So there's more to it then just food production?

Yes, definitely.  But, I think the first step is the ability for the average
workers to produce more food than is needed to feed their family unit.  If,
for example, it takes 100 families working to feed 105 families, then there
is only 5 families that can be engaged in any trade except subsistence
farming.  If, as it is true in the US, less than 1% of the labor force is
required to produce food, then the rest of the labor force is able to
produce other things.  Clearly, the US is far wealthier when it has a 5%
surplus harvest than a country that produced a 5% surplus harvest because
there was war the previous year, and a lot of townspeople died.  

(An interesting site on this is
http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/WellBeing/farmhouseincome.htm  

Particularly the table farm household income by source.  Here you see most
farm households farm part-time, and have most of their income come from
other sources...like friends of mine who have 50 head of cattle on their
ranch, but live in town 5 days a week and hold two jobs).



 Unless you want to define free wealth and
 bound wealth.  The free wealth of a land of
 starving peasants may be almost zero.  Most of
 it being bound up in maintaining the large number
 of inhabitants.  A suitable plague could release
 the bound wealth of the country by reducing the
 population.

There are several terms that are typically used.  They are national income,
national per capita income, and disposable/discretionary income.  Clearly,
Monaco, although its citizens are wealthy, has far less economic clout than
the US.  But, clearly, the average Chinese citizen is far poorer than the
average Australian, even though China has 4x the GDP of Australia.  

Then, we have to consider disposable income.  Since China has so many
people, a significant fraction of the country is still barely above
subsistence, even with the increased GDP.  Indeed China is particularly
susceptible to global recessions because its income is so tied to exports
(only 35% of Chinese GDP is domestic consumption vs. 70% for the US).
Before the Great Depression, the US was by far the biggest exporter, as well
as the biggest holder of world debt.  It was the hardest hit country in the
Great Depression.  I've been reading articles that hint that there is
causality here, and that China (and to a lesser extent Germany and Japan)
are particularly susceptible to downturns.  The US hoped to export 

ElectricMotoUnicycle?

2008-12-20 Thread Rceeberger
http://greenupgrader.com/1307/the-uno-electric-motorcycle-or-motorunicycle/

Ingenuity!


xponent
Freeway Eyecatchers Maru
rob
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Incoming!

2008-12-20 Thread Ronn! Blankenship
At 10:13 AM Saturday 12/20/2008, Bruce Bostwick wrote:
On Dec 20, 2008, at 10:07 AM, Julia Thompson wrote:

  If the forecasts are correct by this time tomorrow I will need to dig
  out the winter gear again . . . though at least the week of
  almost-constant rain will be ending . . .
 
  And -- according to my local forecast, a cold front is coming
  through
  sometime between this afternoon and tomorrow morning.
 
  I wish it would just make up its mind what temperature it's going to
  be
 
Julia



Still in the 60s here, though I've already closed 
the windows.  Expected to be in the upper 30s by 
morning, and maybe as low as 20 (°F, for Alberto, 
et. al.) Monday or Tuesday morning . . .



And the day or two of fog we get after each cold front is only
entertaining up to a point.



Fog?  Yep, we've been having that, too . . .



The effect an actual dense fog has on
people's driving behavior in Texas has to be seen to be believed.



The worst fog I have ever seen was one night 
between Windsor and Toronto, where literally all 
that was visible was a few feet of the road right 
in front of the car.  And all the natives were flying by at 70 or 75 mph . . .



(They can mostly deal with rain, up to a point.  Snow or ice, forget
it. :)



I suspect that it's worse in Utah the first time 
it snows.  Apparently over the summer everyone 
forgets how to drive in snow.  At least here it's 
rare enough that people treat it as unusual and 
take more care.  Also, when snow is likely 
schools cancel class and other things shut down 
so there are fewer people trying to get through 
it (though for the women who go into labor during 
the storm and need to get to the hospital on the top of the hill . . . )

And to tie-in to another thread:  that is one of 
the times people around here rely on their TV-band radios . . .


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l