Dan M wrote: > > But, it also means that wind can't be counted on. In another forum I was > debating this, and was led to a website maintained by the company that has > the largest fraction of wind in its mix. They stated that they can only > count on about 5% of nameplate capacity, and that this was becoming a > limiting factor on their use of wind. > I simply can't get wind into my head as an important source of energy.
Meddlying with the natural wind systems all over the planet will cause such an horrible impact in the ecosystem that would make the AGW scenarios look like the Garden of Eden. Alberto the Hyperbolic Monteiro _______________________________________________ http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
