How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?

2008-11-01 Thread John Williams
How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122480790550265061.html?mod=article-outset-box


The most troublesome tax increases in Barack Obama's plan are not those
we can already see but those sure to be announced later, after the
election is over and budget realities rear their ugly head.

The new president, whoever he is, will start out facing a budget
deficit of at least $1 trillion, possibly much more. Sen. Obama has
nonetheless promised to devote another $1.32 trillion over the next 10
years to several new or expanded refundable tax credits and a special
exemption for seniors, according to the Urban Institute and Brookings
Institution's Tax Policy Center (TPC). He calls this a middle-class tax
cut, while suggesting the middle class includes 95% of those who work.

Mr. Obama's proposed income-based health-insurance subsidies, tax 
credits for tiny businesses, and expanded Medicaid eligibility would
cost another $1.63 trillion, according to the TPC. Thus his tax rebates
and health insurance subsidies alone would lift the undisclosed bill to
future taxpayers by $2.95 trillion -- roughly $295 billion a year by
2012.

But that's not all. Mr. Obama has also promised to spend more 
on 176 other programs, according to an 85-page list of campaign
promises (actual quotations) compiled by the National Taxpayers Union
Foundation. The NTUF was able to produce cost estimates for only 77 of
the 176, so its estimate is low. Excluding the Obama health plan, the
NTUF estimates that Mr. Obama would raise spending by $611.5 billion
over the next five years; the 10-year total (aside from health) would 
surely exceed $1.4 trillion, because spending typically grows at least
as quickly as nominal GDP.

A trillion here, a trillion there, and pretty soon you're talking about 
real money. Altogether, Mr. Obama is promising at least $4.3 trillion of
increased spending and reduced tax revenue from 2009 to 2018 -- roughly
an extra $430 billion a year by 2012-2013.

How is he going to pay for it?

.

In his acceptance speech at the Democratic convention on Aug. 28, 
Mr. Obama said, I've laid out how I'll pay for every dime -- by
closing corporate loopholes and tax havens. That comment refers
to $924.1 billion over 10 years from what the TPC wisely labels 
unverifiable revenue raisers. To put that huge figure in perspective,
the Congressional Budget Office optimistically expects a total of
$3.7 trillion from corporate taxes over that period. In other words,
Mr. Obama is counting on increasing corporate tax collections by more
than 25% simply by closing loopholes and complaining about foreign
tax havens.

Nobody, including the Tax Policy Center, believes that is remotely 
feasible. And Mr. Obama's dream of squeezing more revenue out of
corporate profits, dividends and capital gains looks increasingly
unbelievable now that profits are falling, banks have cut or eliminated
dividends, and only a few short-sellers have any capital gains left to
tax.

.

Mr. Obama has offered no clue as to how he intends to pay for his
health-insurance plans, or doubling foreign aid, or any of the other 175
programs he's promised to expand. Although he may hope to collect an
even larger share of loot from the top of the heap, the harsh reality is
that this Democrat's quest for hundreds of billions more revenue each
year would have to reach deep into the pockets of the people much lower
on the economic ladder. Even then he'd come up short.


  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?

2008-11-01 Thread John Williams
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122541237504586451.html

Only Economic Growth Can Provide Positive Change

I think the answer to Alan Reynolds's excellent question and article 
(How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?, op-ed, Oct. 24) is that
Barack Obama is not going to raise $4.3 trillion, and he is not going to
perform on his rhetoric. He excels as a rhetorician -- common to both
the great and the least of past presidents -- but performance cannot 
run on that fuel. Inevitably, I think his luster will fade even with
his most ardent supporters as that reality sets in. We also have seen 
luster fade time after time with Republican presidents. The rhetoric
of a smaller and less invasive government always leads to king-size
performance disappointments. This weakness is as central to the reality
of our political economy as are its strengths. With all its foibles, its
strengths become transparent when you compare it, not with our various
idealizations, but with the litter of human experiments in political
economy that have delivered far more suffering and murder than human
betterment to the citizens of those economies.

Of course it is entirely likely that Mr. Obama will succeed in going 
for higher business, capital gains and income taxes, but it is an
economic illusion to think for a minute that this will benefit the
poor. All our wars on poverty have been lost by failing to help the poor
help themselves. Higher business taxes, which ultimately can only be
paid by individuals anyway, will simply export more economic activity
to the world economy. Higher capital gains and income taxes will 
primarily reduce savings and investment at the expense of greater future 
productivity, which is at the heart of cross-generational reductions in
poverty. A dozen countries, including the third largest economy, already
have zero taxes on capital gains, and eight of them score high on the
Economic Freedom Index and high in gross domestic product per capita.

I favor making all individual savings and direct investments deductible 
from income for tax purposes. In that world there would be no need to
make any distinction between ordinary income and capital gains. By 
adding a negative feature to such a net consumption tax, the poor would
not only receive redistribution benefit, but have an incentive to save 
and accumulate capital. Some poor will see this as an opportunity to
help themselves.

Vernon L. Smith
Chapman University
Orange, Calif.
Dr. Smith was awarded the Nobel Prize in economic sciences in 2002.
~ 



  

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?

2008-11-01 Thread Alberto Vieira Ferreira Monteiro
 How's Obama Going to Raise $4.3 Trillion?

Who fscking cares?

AFAIK, in the past 100 years, only _two_ elected politicians proceeded
according to what they promised. The other one is bolivian Evo Morales.

Alberto Monteiro
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l