RE: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-17 Thread ChadCooper
 
 You could make a shorter catagory that includes both religion 
 and politics called Evil:.

I like Totally Gay: myself It makes me giggle!

I think we can work on entitling the title of our email messages with a
meaningful pre-title... But to get the group to standardize Never! It
took years to get people to stop using HTML... We are still very insensitive
with our reckless disregard for the metric system 
Nerd From Hell

 
 ___
 http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Horn, John
 From: Michael Harney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Anyone know of any free Windows email programs that have 
 regular expression
 support in email filtering?

Pegasus Mail does.  I use it at home.  As an added plus, no need to
worry about script viruses!

 - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Nick Arnett
Michael Harney wrote:

If it is not too much trouble to Nick, could there be a few new header
filters added to the list:
1) politics: - any discussion regarding politics, including but not
limited to posts criticizing/plauding politicians.
2) religion: - any discussion regarding religious issues, including but
not limited to criticisms/endorsements of religion(s).
3) environment: - any discussion that falls under the topic of the
environment.
That's easy enough to set up... the question is whether people will use 
'em.  Can't hurt to give it a shot.

--
Nick Arnett
Director, Business Intelligence Services
LiveWorld Inc.
Phone/fax: (408) 551-0427
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Julia Thompson
Nick Arnett wrote:
 
 Michael Harney wrote:
 
  If it is not too much trouble to Nick, could there be a few new header
  filters added to the list:
  1) politics: - any discussion regarding politics, including but not
  limited to posts criticizing/plauding politicians.
  2) religion: - any discussion regarding religious issues, including but
  not limited to criticisms/endorsements of religion(s).
  3) environment: - any discussion that falls under the topic of the
  environment.
 
 That's easy enough to set up... the question is whether people will use
 'em.  Can't hurt to give it a shot.

Given the history this group has of not changing headers when they
should be changed, I'd recommend that Michael check out John Horn's
recommendation of Pegasus Mail and see if that does the trick first.

Julia

who's had the wolf be a positive animal too much to have it be credible
as *her* nightmare
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread The Fool
 From: Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Michael Harney wrote:
 
  If it is not too much trouble to Nick, could there be a few new
header
  filters added to the list:
  1) politics: - any discussion regarding politics, including but not
  limited to posts criticizing/plauding politicians.
  2) religion: - any discussion regarding religious issues, including
but
  not limited to criticisms/endorsements of religion(s).
  3) environment: - any discussion that falls under the topic of the
  environment.
 
 That's easy enough to set up... the question is whether people will use

 'em.  Can't hurt to give it a shot.

You could make a shorter catagory that includes both religion and
politics called Evil:.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Erik Reuter
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 04:44:54PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:

 Given the history this group has of not changing headers when they
 should be changed, I'd recommend that Michael check out John Horn's
 recommendation of Pegasus Mail and see if that does the trick first.

I think you're probably right about relying on people to change
subjects.

Another possibility is something like Mozilla mail (or Thunderbird, the
same thing a la carte) which has Bayesian filtering capabilities. Just
train it with a bunch of good emails and a bunch of bad emails, and
it will filter all the emails into good and bad for you!


-- 
Erik Reuter   http://www.erikreuter.net/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Steve Sloan II
The Fool wrote:

You could make a shorter catagory that includes both
religion and politics called Evil:.
So, given your tendency to post political articles and essays,
does that make you the list's biggest source of Evil?
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pages .. http://www.brin-l.org
Science Fiction-themed online store . http://www.sloan3d.com/store
Chmeee's 3D Objects  http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee
3D and Drawing Galleries .. http://www.sloansteady.com
Software  Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links
Science fiction scans . http://www.sloan3d.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread Michael Harney

From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 Nick Arnett wrote:
 
  Michael Harney wrote:
 
   If it is not too much trouble to Nick, could there be a few new header
   filters added to the list:
   1) politics: - any discussion regarding politics, including but not
   limited to posts criticizing/plauding politicians.
   2) religion: - any discussion regarding religious issues, including
but
   not limited to criticisms/endorsements of religion(s).
   3) environment: - any discussion that falls under the topic of the
   environment.
 
  That's easy enough to set up... the question is whether people will use
  'em.  Can't hurt to give it a shot.

 Given the history this group has of not changing headers when they
 should be changed, I'd recommend that Michael check out John Horn's
 recommendation of Pegasus Mail and see if that does the trick first.


I've already installed Pegasus Mail.  I looked it up shortly after reading
John's post.  Its a matter of playing with the filters to see if it will do
what I want it to, then , if it does, porting over my mailboxes.  I like the
idea of using a program other than Outlook Express for my mail, but porting
over my boxes is quite a task as I already use a large number of message
rules in Outlook, and have a number of different folders, and have 3
different boxes/identities I use (one for personal, one for work, and one I
use as a spam target if I am asked to enter my e-mail address on sites that
I think may sell spam me or sell my email address... surprisingly the most
spam comes on my work box).  I still think the headers would be helpful
though.  I don't think that too many good messages will be lost in the
process, but you are probably right that well crafted filters would be more
effective at not filtering posts a person might want.  Even so, the header
would make it easier to filter messages if a person were to use a
multi-stage filtering process (which would be more effective at keeping a me
ssage that one might not want to filter).

 Julia

 who's had the wolf be a positive animal too much to have it be credible
 as *her* nightmare


Fenris isn't an evil character, Fenris is a character that is a culmination
of my litteral nightmares, and my nightmares aren't about boogey-men and
supervillians, they are situational.  Fenris is more of a self portrait than
a villain.  It represents me and the situations in my Nightmares.  A wolf
was chosen because I have had very bad dreams about bad things happening to
my dogs in the past.  There is much more to the character of Fenris which I
may address in the future, but not right now.  Obviously, I've put thought
into the character before, so I may as well say that I had started modeling
this character in Lightwave months ago.  I haven't finished it yet, but may
in the next couple months if I can find the time to.

Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-13 Thread William T Goodall
On 14 Feb 2004, at 12:19 am, Steve Sloan II wrote:

The Fool wrote:

You could make a shorter catagory that includes both
religion and politics called Evil:.
So, given your tendency to post political articles and essays,
does that make you the list's biggest source of Evil?
It's an inoculation :)

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
Our products just aren't engineered for security. - Brian Valentine, 
senior vice president in charge of Microsoft's Windows development 
team.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Introducing Fenris

2004-02-12 Thread Michael Harney
Hello, I am Fenris, the culmination of Michael's Nightmares.  I've come here
today to make an announcement.  Michael has no further interest in the bulk
of this discussion.  It seems that reading the constant/perpetual political
discussions (in quotes to denote sarcasm as those so-called discussions
are typically more like pissing contests and nit-picking competitions) makes
him feel ... what's a good word or phrase for it?  Emotionally unstable, for
lack of a better word/phrase.  He would rather not have the influx in his
mailbox, and has all but stopped reading any of the listmail as a
consequence.  He could filter his own mail, but feels it will probably
inadvertantly filtering posts he might want.  As an alternative, he asked
that I discuss the following possibility with the list:

If it is not too much trouble to Nick, could there be a few new header
filters added to the list:
1) politics: - any discussion regarding politics, including but not
limited to posts criticizing/plauding politicians.
2) religion: - any discussion regarding religious issues, including but
not limited to criticisms/endorsements of religion(s).
3) environment: - any discussion that falls under the topic of the
environment.

If this is not too much of an inconvenience for Nick, and the other list
members are willing to adopt these headers,  we would really appreciate it.
Even if it is inconvenient to Nick, and he is unable to assist, adopting
these headers without Nick's intervention would make things easier for
individuals (not just Michael) to filter/sort the discussions themselves,
with less fear of missing posts that they might want to recieve.

The list may not be as destablizing as mixing morphine analogues (which his
messed up metabolism makes from gluten products) and caffine to Michael, but
he is not able to cope with the list as it is.  He does not wish to leave or
filter all but brin: posts, but will probably do so if another solution is
not possible.

Best Regards,

Fenris


P.S.  No, I have not gone completely insane, I just find it easier to say
certain things in a character other than myself at times (three years of
Theater in High School will do that to you) ... besides, it makes the
discussion more interesting.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-12 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 2/12/2004 10:35:15 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Fenris
 
 
 P.S.  No, I have not gone completely insane, I just find it easier to say
 certain things in a character other than myself at times (three years of
 Theater in High School will do that to you) ... besides, it makes the
 discussion more interesting.
 

And putting Fenris in the subject line makes me think it was from the H. Beam 
Piper list.

As to the other subject matter, AOL has a nice big delete button.

William Taylor
-
All the world's a stage---
with two of the horses lame, 
the driver with three arrows in his back, 
the indians to the rear and gaining and
there's no cavalry in sight.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Introducing Fenris

2004-02-12 Thread Michael Harney
- Original Message - 
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 12, 2004 10:46 PM
Subject: Re: Introducing Fenris


 In a message dated 2/12/2004 10:35:15 PM US Mountain Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Fenris
 
 
  P.S.  No, I have not gone completely insane, I just find it easier to
say
  certain things in a character other than myself at times (three years of
  Theater in High School will do that to you) ... besides, it makes the
  discussion more interesting.
 

 And putting Fenris in the subject line makes me think it was from the H.
Beam
 Piper list.

Fenris is just a damn cool name for a wolf, and my nighmare culmination is a
wolf character.


 As to the other subject matter, AOL has a nice big delete button.

Not using AOL, and probably never will again.  It's one of my least favored
ISP's.

Deleting is easy, yes, it's knowing what to delete that is the hard part.
If I could use custom filters based on regular expressions, I could probably
catch 98% of the unwanted messages, and only lose about 2% of messages I
might actually be interested in, but the e-mail program I use (Outlook
Express, sometimes called Look Out Express) does not have support for
regular expression filters.  Considering that the Internet Explorer Browser
has Regular expression support in its implementation of Javascript, I find
it surprising that it does not have such support.

Anyone know of any free Windows email programs that have regular expression
support in email filtering?

Michael Harney
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l