Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Spellcheckers
At 11:12 AM Saturday 9/5/2009, Dan M wrote: We know that, while we cannot see trends as absolute rules when dealing with complex systems, the most persimmons model consistent within the data has the best chance of being a reasonable approximation of what we will understand as we gain a better, more detailed understanding of the system. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Spellcheckers
On Sat, Sep 5, 2009 at 3:45 PM, Ronn! Blankenship ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net wrote: At 11:12 AM Saturday 9/5/2009, Dan M wrote: We know that, while we cannot see trends as absolute rules when dealing with complex systems, the most persimmons model consistent within the data has the best chance of being a reasonable approximation of what we will understand as we gain a better, more detailed understanding of the system. At least he didn't compare apples to oranges. Parsnips must belong in here somewhere, though. Nick ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Spellcheckers
OK, my spell checker got me good. We know that, while we cannot see trends as absolute rules when dealing with complex systems, the most persimmons model consistent within the data has parsimonious the best chance of being a reasonable approximation of what we will understand as we gain a better, more detailed understanding of the system. ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com myhosting.com - Premium Microsoft® Windows® and Linux web and application hosting - http://link.myhosting.com/myhosting ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
Re: Knowledge of Complex Systems and Spellcheckers
On Sep 5, 2009, at 4:05 PM, Nick Arnett wrote: At least he didn't compare apples to oranges. Or to Ubuntu. -- W ___ http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
