Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-15 Thread John D. Giorgis
At 05:54 AM 5/4/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
 why is increased anti-poverty spending so 
 important to you?

I'm not advocating spending, 

Well, you managed to lambaste Republicans in several posts for not spending
enough

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-04 Thread JDG
At 07:33 PM 5/2/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
Over the last few decades, *nobody* has prevented poverty from increasing 
even
as the nation gains wealth.

If that's true, then why did you single out Republicans for criticism?

Moreover, if increased anti-poverty spending does not prevent poverty from
increasing, why is increased anti-poverty spending so important to you?

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-04 Thread Nick Arnett
On Tue, 03 May 2005 23:24:50 -0400, JDG wrote

 why is increased anti-poverty spending so 
 important to you?

I'm not advocating spending, I'm advocating for doing a better job at
creating a social safety net and opportunities, in a country where one out of
six children lives in poverty. Our budgets and calendars aren't just about
spending, they reveal our priorities more clearly than our words.

I'm asking what you care about, how you see our responsibilities as a nation,
with regard to the neediest.  

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-03 Thread Gary Denton
On 5/2/05, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:18:41 -0400, JDG wrote
 
  Feel free to refer to the inconvenient figures you snipped without response
  from my last message in your answer.
 
 Past figures don't address today's problems unless we're limiting ourselves to
 two ideological choices.  I'm not going to start debating that ideology.
 
 Over the last few decades, *nobody* has prevented poverty from increasing even
 as the nation gains wealth.
 
 Nick
I think I am in the odd position of disagreeing with both of you.

I need to find a source for some valid figures of poverty.  Somehow I
don't trust the ones provided earlier.

-- 
Gary Denton
Easter Lemming Blogs
http://elemming.blogspot.com
http://elemming2.blogspot.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-03 Thread Gary Denton
On 5/3/05, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5/2/05, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:18:41 -0400, JDG wrote
 
   Feel free to refer to the inconvenient figures you snipped without 
   response
   from my last message in your answer.
 
  Past figures don't address today's problems unless we're limiting ourselves 
  to
  two ideological choices.  I'm not going to start debating that ideology.
 
  Over the last few decades, *nobody* has prevented poverty from increasing 
  even
  as the nation gains wealth.
 
  Nick
 I think I am in the odd position of disagreeing with both of you.
 
 I need to find a source for some valid figures of poverty.  Somehow I
amplification
 ^^^ and Medicaid
 don't trust the ones provided earlier.
 
 --
 Gary Denton
 Easter Lemming Blogs
 http://elemming.blogspot.com
 http://elemming2.blogspot.com

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-03 Thread Dan Minette

- Original Message - 
From: Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Killer Bs Discussion brin-l@mccmedia.com
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis


On 5/3/05, Gary Denton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 5/2/05, Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:18:41 -0400, JDG wrote
 
   Feel free to refer to the inconvenient figures you snipped without
response
   from my last message in your answer.
 
  Past figures don't address today's problems unless we're limiting
ourselves to
  two ideological choices.  I'm not going to start debating that
ideology.
 
  Over the last few decades, *nobody* has prevented poverty from
increasing even
  as the nation gains wealth.
 
  Nick
 I think I am in the odd position of disagreeing with both of you.

 I need to find a source for some valid figures of poverty.

I think the census bureau's figures are pretty well trusted.

 Somehow I
amplification 
 ^^^ and Medicaid
 don't trust the ones provided earlier.

the GAO is fairly decent at that.  Medicaid spending has gone through the
roof as the result of so many elderly in nursing homes who have worked
through their savings...or have earlier passed savings on to their kids.

Dan M.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-02 Thread JDG
At 09:11 PM 5/1/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
Programs?  Medicaid (which pays for a third of all hospital births and
insures
25 million children) -- cut dramatically.  

I'm curious as to what your source is for this.

Running some quick figures on government non-veterans, non-Medicare health
spending, which I think would be a pretty good proxy for the sort of things
you seem concerned about, I have the following increases in real spending:

Bush 
90 - 15%
91 - 19%
92 - 23%

Bush/Clinton
93 - 9%

Clinton
94 - 5%
95 - 6%
96 - 1%
97 - 2%
98 - 5%
99 - 6%
00 - 7%

Clinton/Bush
01 - 9%

Bush
02 - 12%
03 - 10%
04 - 7%
05 - 5% (est.)

If you want to talk in terms of percentage of GDP:

Bush 
90 - 1.01%
91 - 1.20%
92 - 1.43%

Bush/Clinton
93 - 1.51%

Clinton
94 - 1.54%
95 - 1.58%
96 - 1.55%
97 - 1.51%
98 - 1.52%
99 - 1.55%
00 - 1.59%

Clinton/Bush
01 - 1.71%

Bush
02 - 1.89%
03 - 2.03%
04 - 2.08%
05 - 2.11% (est.)

Either way, it seems to me like the Republican record looks pretty good if
you want to measure such thing in terms of spending.

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-02 Thread Nick Arnett
On Mon, 02 May 2005 00:59:35 -0400, JDG wrote
 At 09:11 PM 5/1/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
 Programs?  Medicaid (which pays for a third of all hospital births and
 insures
 25 million children) -- cut dramatically.
 
 I'm curious as to what your source is for this.

All you have to do it look at today's news about the budget before Congress. 
Go to Google News and search on Medicaid and budget.  And of course there is
much more beyond current news.

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-02 Thread JDG
At 07:24 AM 5/2/2005 -0700, Nick Arnett wrote:
 Programs?  Medicaid (which pays for a third of all hospital births and
 insures
 25 million children) -- cut dramatically.
 
 I'm curious as to what your source is for this.

All you have to do it look at today's news about the budget before Congress. 
Go to Google News and search on Medicaid and budget.  And of course there 
is much more beyond current news.

And even if these proposed, nobinding (yet) cuts were to take effect, how
would the Republicans' overall record on social services spending compare
to that, of say, Bill Clinton's?

Feel free to refer to the inconvenient figures you snipped without response
from my last message in your answer.

JDG
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Medicaid Re: Abortion Cost-Benefit Analysis

2005-05-02 Thread Nick Arnett
On Mon, 02 May 2005 20:18:41 -0400, JDG wrote

 Feel free to refer to the inconvenient figures you snipped without response
 from my last message in your answer.

Past figures don't address today's problems unless we're limiting ourselves to
two ideological choices.  I'm not going to start debating that ideology.

Over the last few decades, *nobody* has prevented poverty from increasing even
as the nation gains wealth.

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l