Neanderthal growth rate

2004-04-29 Thread David Hobby
There have been discussions here about Neanderthals 
(not you, Mike Lee!)  So you might be interested in the following
abstract of an article in today's issue of Nature.  (If your library
access is like mine, you might get to read the article in a month.)

It is an interesting idea:  Neanderthals, though intelligent, were
adapted for a low-tech, cold weather evolutionary niche.  So maybe
they were a different species--the debate goes on.

---David


 Life-history traits correlate closely with dental growth, 
 so differences in dental growth within Homo can enable us to determine
 how somatic development has evolved and to identify developmental 
 shifts that warrant species-level distinctions. Dental growth
 can be determined from the speed of enamel formation (or extension 
 rate). We analysed the enamel extension rate in Homo
 antecessor (8 teeth analysed), Homo heidelbergensis (106), Homo 
 neanderthalensis ('Neanderthals'; 146) and Upper
 Palaeolithic-Mesolithic Homo sapiens (100). Here we report that 
 Upper Palaeolithic-Mesolithic H. sapiens shared an identical
 dental development pattern with modern humans, but that H. 
 antecessor and H. heidelbergensis had shorter periods of dental
 growth. Surprisingly, Neanderthals were characterized by having 
 the shortest period of dental growth. Because dental growth is
 an excellent indicator of somatic development, our results suggest 
 that Neanderthals developed faster even than their immediate
 ancestor, H. heidelbergensis. Dental growth became longer and 
 brain size increased from the Plio-Pleistocene in hominid
 evolution. Neanderthals, despite having a large brain, were 
 characterized by a short period of development. This autapomorphy
 in growth is an evolutionary reversal, and points strongly to a 
 specific distinction between H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Neanderthal growth rate

2004-04-29 Thread Steve Sloan II
David Hobby wrote:

 It is an interesting idea:  Neanderthals, though intelligent,
 were adapted for a low-tech, cold weather evolutionary niche.
 So maybe they were a different species--the debate goes on.
  Because dental growth is an excellent indicator of somatic
  development, our results suggest that Neanderthals developed
  faster even than their immediate ancestor, H. heidelbergensis.
  Dental growth became longer and brain size increased from the
  Plio-Pleistocene in hominid evolution. Neanderthals, despite
  having a large brain, were characterized by a short period of
  development. This autapomorphy in growth is an evolutionary
  reversal, and points strongly to a specific distinction
  between H. sapiens and H. neanderthalensis.
So Neanderthals really did live fast and die young. I guess
since their creative, neotonous childhoods were so short, they
wouldn't have had a chance to develop the kind of mental
flexibility modern humans have. I've also seen speculation that
they couldn't develop much culture, because they didn't have
enough old people for oral tradition to start. If they grew up
quickly, they may have also aged quickly, which would support
that theory.
__
Steve Sloan . Huntsville, Alabama = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brin-L list pages .. http://www.brin-l.org
Science Fiction-themed online store . http://www.sloan3d.com/store
Chmeee's 3D Objects  http://www.sloan3d.com/chmeee
3D and Drawing Galleries .. http://www.sloansteady.com
Software  Science Fiction, Science, and Computer Links
Science fiction scans . http://www.sloan3d.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l