RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-06 Thread Horn, John
 From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:j.vanbaardwijk;chello.nl]
 
 About 15 minutes ago, for an other post, I did a Google 
 search on Dan 
 Minette; there were literally dozens of links to the archives at 
 mail-archive.com and Yahoo!Groups.
 
 When I did a search on your e-mail address, the first two 
 links point to 
 mail-archive.com.

I stand corrected.  I wasn't aware that google could reach those archives.
Apparently the Hero-L mailing list I'm on also shows up.  Doh!!

  - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-04 Thread Julia Thompson
J. van Baardwijk wrote:
 
 At 14:42 01-11-2002 -0500, Jon Gabriel wrote:
 
 Can convicted felons work for the Dutch Defense Ministry, and why or why not?
[snippage]
 Of course, there will be a few variables at play then, such as what you did
 wrong and when you did it. A sentence of 40 hours of community service you
 received 10 years ago for putting some graffiti on a wall is not likely to
 cause any problems with getting a job. If your criminal record lists gun
 violence, you will probably not get a job in which you will have access to
 weapons. Someone convicted for fraud will probably not get a job with DEFAC
 (Defense Finance  Accounting) either. A criminal record will probably also
 have an effect on your Security Clearance level.

Is putting graffiti on a wall a felony there, then?  I think that that
would probably fall under the category of misdemeanor here. 
Misdemeanors don't affect your ability to vote, and probably don't
affect your ability to hold most jobs. A felony is a more serious crime.

Do you have any classification distinction between sorts of crimes like
that, or not?  Just curious.

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-04 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 09:58 04-11-2002 -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:


Is putting graffiti on a wall a felony there, then?  I think that that
would probably fall under the category of misdemeanor here.
Misdemeanors don't affect your ability to vote, and probably don't
affect your ability to hold most jobs. A felony is a more serious crime.


Putting graffiti on a wall is probably only a misdemeanour here as well. 
You are not sent to prison for it, but will be usually be sentenced to a 
number of hours of community service -- and it the case of graffiti 
artists, that usually means *removing* graffiti from walls.   GRIN

But anyway, I only used that example to point out that relatively small 
acts of wrongdoing usually do not have any really serious consequences 
later in life.


Do you have any classification distinction between sorts of crimes like
that, or not?  Just curious.


We do; the classification is pretty much similar to the classification in 
the US, although there might be a few differences wrt whether a specific 
act is considered a misdemeanour or a crime, or even a form of criminal 
behaviour at all.


Jeroen Justice for all van Baardwijk

__
Wonderful-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-03 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 19:16 02-11-2002 -0600, Ronn Blankenship wrote:


One thing I find interesting, going over this thread:  All responses
spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
town in The Netherlands, or people who live in Texas within 3 hours'
drive of each other.  Does this mean anything, or is it coincidental?
:)

Julia

waiting for a response from someone not fitting either geographical
category now



That the rest of us have decided to stay out of it?


Well, if people insist, I *could* reply to it from work (now that my PC has 
been repaired). I live but do not work in Eindhoven (which, BTW, qualifies 
as *city*, not *town*: pop. 203,000 per 01-01-2001) but work in the nearby 
town of Oirschot, so technically speaking, I would not be posting from 
either geographical category then.   GRIN


Jeroen Just a thought van Baardwijk

__
Wonderful-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 12:55 01-11-2002 -0600, Dan Minette wrote:


 If he uses that sort of  methods, he is likely to use other
 questionable reasons as well to decide whether or not to fire an
 employee (such as how often does this employee leave his desk to get
 some coffee? and I am a smoker -- is this employee opposed to
 smoking?). Not the kind of employer *I* would want to work for.

To put it bluntly, you are speaking from ignorance.


Actually, it is worse: I am speaking from experience. I have seen employers 
use literally anything to determine whether or not to fire someone. I have 
even had one employer who kept track of how often I went to the toilet...


Not everyone works for the government.


Who said anything about working for the government?



However, when someone is looking for work, they don't need a question
mark by their name.  That is usually enough to get someone in the discard
pile.


Then that person should show such behaviour that such a question mark would 
not appear in the first place. Everyone is responsible for his/her own 
actions and the consequences of those actions. I mean, if you had a 
criminal record, and an employer would decide not to hire you because of 
that criminal record, would you blame the government for your 
not-getting-the-job because they keep such records?


 Second, it would not make any difference if I would put such messages
 on a website, because those messages are already a matter of public record
 record (they are available from at least two on-line archives).


You know better than that.  Its like saying that it makes no difference,
given that a needle exists  in a haystack in the state of Kansas, that
someone offers a service to fetch the needle for someone and place it on
their desk.  After all, it was in an accessable place.


Your analogy is flawed: finding something about FREX you on the Web would 
be several orders of magnitude easier than finding a needle of which you 
only know that it is in a haystack somewhere in Kansas. Example: I just did 
a Google search on Dan Minette; Google returned 232 results and only 
needed 0.18 seconds for it.

I challenge you to find a needle in an haystack in Kansas within 0.18 
seconds...   GRIN


There are billions upon billions of bytes of information on the www. To
set things up so that negative information is selected when someone's name
is typed in a search engine is not the same as it being buried in near
100,000 messages of one of hundreds of thousands of mailing lists and
newsgroups.


Let's assume for a moment that I had put some negative information about 
you on a website; what would be the odds of an employer selecting that 
specific link from the hundreds of results a search on your name would 
generate?


Jeroen You do the crime, you do the time van Baardwijk

__
Wonderful-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread J. van Baardwijk
At 12:44 01-11-2002 -0600, John Horn wrote:


 Second, it would not make any difference if I would put such messages
 on a website, because those messages are already a matter of public
 record (they are available from at least two on-line archives).

Last time I checked, neither of those archives shows up when you do a google
search.


About 15 minutes ago, for an other post, I did a Google search on Dan 
Minette; there were literally dozens of links to the archives at 
mail-archive.com and Yahoo!Groups.

When I did a search on your e-mail address, the first two links point to 
mail-archive.com.


Jeroen Websearch van Baardwijk

__
Wonderful-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 03:56 PM 10/30/02, Deborah Harrell wrote:

--- Reggie Bautista wrote:
 Jean-Louis replied:
 I suggest drinking Halloween floats :
 
 1 part blond beer (eg. lager) with orange coloring
 1 part Guinness which should float on the lager!

 Irish bars here in KC (and presumably elsewhere)
 call this either a
 half-and-half (if the bottom half is Harp) or a
 Black and Tan (if the bottom half is Bass).

 Ahh, the memories!  A pint-sized half-and-half in my
 right hand, a
 double-shot of Bushmills Special Reserve in my left
 hand, and a bar full of
 drunks singing Irish drinking songs along with Eddie
 Delahunt... Those were *really* the days :-)

 Reggie Bautista
 Haven't even had a good glass of Mead in the past
 year Maru :-(

This reminds me of a Halloween ride in 1990: for our
pre-ride brunch we had mead, coffee with Bailey's, and
mimosas (orange juice  champagne) - with assorted
quiches/muffins/fruit to dilute the alcohol! - then
set off for the lake.  I was one of several to 'kiss
the dirt' as none of the horses had participated in a
costumed event before (no one was hurt as we were,
ahem, 'well-lubricated'), but the real problem came
later, when I was holding the reins for another woman
to re-mount.

Her mare spooked violently at her flapping cape (the
scary mask probably didn't help either :P ), reared
and leaped into the lake; not having sense enough to
drop the reins, I wound up _under_ Magnolia, and
finally let go of them when a pastern (the joint right
above the hoof) smacked my forehead.  [I didn't see it
of course, but a steel-shod hoof would have at least
cracked my soused head; those on shore said she
appeared to stumble before she leaped out of the water
- I think she sensed that I was under her and jumped
over me...]

What's that saying about watching over fools and
idiots? shudder  I haven't ridden, driven or
operated any equipment whatsoever with more than a
half-glass of wine on-board since.




I think I will refrain from making any observations about dumb animals . 
. . especially when it comes to applying that label to any particular one 
of the participants in that anecdote . . .



--Ronn! :)


When Are The Lawyers Going To Require Warning Labels On Horses Maru


I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 10:17 AM 10/31/02, Julia Thompson wrote:

Dan Minette wrote:

 - Original Message -
 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:22 AM
 Subject: Re: Some things are too good to last

  Dan Minette wrote:
  
   I hit reply on a post from Sonja, and it went to her instead of the
 list.
   That's the first time that's happend to me.  Anyway, here it is.
  
[great snippage]
   I do not see how you can ask someone to have ignored your husbands
 threats
   to people's livelihoods.
 
  I haven't seen any evidence that he's about to put that sort of negative
  information up; all he's done this week is indicate displeasure with the
  list with his .sig.

 I agree, and that's fair enough.  I know that Jeroen's recent responses to
 me have been much easier to deal with.  He has strongly pushed his points,
 but has kept the conversation on topic.  Yes, he has ignored some of my
 questions, but in my head I just assume that he doesn't have a good answer
 for those questions right now.  I've seen other posters delay answers to
 certain questions until they are happy with responses.

 But, Adam brought up an example of a past threat, and I was responding to
 Sonja's response to that, etc.  That threat no longer seems operative,
 which is very good, but it is a reasonable example of a threat that could
 not have been ignored.

Fair enough.  I just prefer not to drag up negative things from the past
if it can be avoided.

  I think that on the basis of this one .sig file change, some people are
  overreacting.

 My reaction was at the time was please let this not be the start of a
 pattern.  It doesn't appear to be, Jeroen seems to write lotsa different
 things in the .sig file.

Right.  I just took it as momentary frustration (keeping in tone with
the rest of the post!) rearing its head, and might have glossed over it
altogether if it hadn't been pointed out.

Rob, if you're going to point out stuff in Jeroen's .sig file, can you
point out the good things, too?  I'm liable to miss those, as well.  :)

 If he actually modifies content on his website to reflect
  this negativity, that's another matter entirely, but he hasn't done a
  damn thing to it this week as far as I can tell.  All he has done is
  modify his .sig file.  Lighten up, guys, would ya?

 I have no problem with the .sig. However,  I didn't respond to Sonja's
 first comment that the original protest of Gautam, myself, and others was
 just paranoia because I was willing to let things lie and because I allowed
 a bit of hyperbola by someone who was subjected to a number of rude emails.
 (That of course was wrong.)

 However, after it became a repeated theme for Sonja; I decided to respond.
 I have no problems with Jeroen put in his sig.  I have a significant
 problem with any credible threat of RL consequences.  That is not paranoia.
 Indeed, my issue is with Sonja's posts, not Jeroen's sigs.  I differ with
 them and thus write a rebuttal. No hard feelings.  Indeed, a casual perusal
 of my posting patterns indicates that I do tend to write rebuttals for
 posts I differ with, even when they are written by people I like. :-)

Yes, you do.

Actually, I expected nothing less from you when I hit send.  And I'd
like to take the opportunity to let you know that I appreciate the
cordial tone of your response to me.

One thing I find interesting, going over this thread:  All responses
spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
town in The Netherlands, or people who live in Texas within 3 hours'
drive of each other.  Does this mean anything, or is it coincidental?
:)

Julia

waiting for a response from someone not fitting either geographical
category now



That the rest of us have decided to stay out of it?


-- Ronn in Birmingham, AL  :)

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 02:48 PM 11/1/02, Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:


Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:

 .command of Ron on Jeroen's sig. And second to Adam's respons to my 
first

That should have been ... comment of Ron on  D'oh. :o)

Sonja



Who's Ron?



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l




Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-02 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message -
From: Horn, John [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 01, 2002 12:44 PM
Subject: RE: Some things are too good to last



 Last time I checked, neither of those archives shows up when you do a
google
 search.  A page on your website probably would.


I use Copernic for searches.

Using my name for a search brings up Sloan3D as the first hit and the eighth
hit.
The yahoo group comes up as the sixteenth hit and the twentysixth hit.

The twenty eighth hit is mail-archive.com as is the forty first.

But I think this gives creedence to Johns point. Regular websites give
better hits than archives.

Who is going to research the archive looking for dirt on a new hire?


xponent
A Clue Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-01 Thread Jim Sharkey

J. van Baardwijk wrote:
 And then of course there is this little thing called freedom of
 speech.

The First Amendment in the U.S. protects you from the GOVERNMENT.  If your prospective 
employer doesn't want controversy, he doesn't have to hire you if he thinks you'll 
bring it.

Jim

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-11-01 Thread Horn, John
 From: J. van Baardwijk [mailto:j.vanbaardwijk;chello.nl]
 
 First, an employer who would use a couple of e-mails as a 
 reason to not 
 hire a person, would be a lousy employer anyway. If he uses 
 that sort of 
 methods, he is likely to use other questionable reasons as 
 well to decide 
 whether or not to fire an employee (such as how often does 
 this employee 
 leave his desk to get some coffee? and I am a smoker -- is 
 this employee 
 opposed to smoking?). Not the kind of employer *I* would 
 want to work for.

I have posted the last time this comes up that this is not true.  As a
person who has done hiring, when you have a stack of resumes 6 inches high
for a position that are all basically identical you are looking for reasons
*NOT* to hire some of them.  A web search that brings up something like this
might cause that resume to go into the no pile.  I don't believe that
makes me a bad employer or change the way I'm going to deal with someone
once I do hire them.  They are completely different things.

 Second, it would not make any difference if I would put such 
 messages on a 
 website, because those messages are already a matter of 
 public record (they 
 are available from at least two on-line archives).

Last time I checked, neither of those archives shows up when you do a google
search.  A page on your website probably would.

 - jmh
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Adam C. Lipscomb
Sonja wrote:


 Robert Seeberger wrote:

 
__

   Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website:
http://www.Brin-L.com
  
 
  I suppose it was only to be expected.

 This kind of exchanges really aren't helping to restore the calm. In
fact they
 are contributing to the continuing adversity. Unfortunatly some get
more heat
 for doing so then others.

Well, who wrote Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website:?  If listmember
J uses a website to slam the list, or threatens to do so, with the
implicit threat that some members of the list may have libelous
information posted about them, are other listmembers not allowed to
say anything about it?  How are other listmembers supposed to react to
that?  Say nothing?

Threats, even implied ones, tend to get my, and others', ire up.

Adam C. Lipscomb
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Silence.  I am watching television.  - Spider Jerusalem

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten

[EMAIL PROTECTED]007c01c27ece$d058f9d0$6501a8c0@DENDRIITE
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
001801c280dc$944c8b40$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b2
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
List-Id: Discussions of the writings of science fiction/futurist authors
David Brin and Gregory Benford. brin-l.mccmedia.com
List-Post: mailto:brin-l;mccmedia.com
List-Subscribe: http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l,
mailto:brin-l-request;mccmedia.com?subject=subscribe
List-Unsubscribe: http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l,
mailto:brin-l-request;mccmedia.com?subject=unsubscribe
List-Archive: http://www.mccmedia.com/pipermail/brin-l
List-Help: mailto:brin-l-request;mccmedia.com?subject=help
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Adam C. Lipscomb wrote:

 Well, who wrote Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website:?  If listmember
 J uses a website to slam the list, or threatens to do so, with the
 implicit threat that some members of the list may have libelous
 information posted about them, are other listmembers not allowed to
 say anything about it?  How are other listmembers supposed to react to
 that?  Say nothing?

It's an idea that might perhaps work. It hasn't been tried so far and
everything else failed. But males in general, usually aren't very good at
that. So I forgive you. ;o)

 Threats, even implied ones, tend to get my, and others', ire up.

So I've noticed.

Sonja
GCU Restraint

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Julia Thompson
Dan Minette wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:22 AM
 Subject: Re: Some things are too good to last
 
  Dan Minette wrote:
  
   I hit reply on a post from Sonja, and it went to her instead of the
 list.
   That's the first time that's happend to me.  Anyway, here it is.
  
[great snippage]
   I do not see how you can ask someone to have ignored your husbands
 threats
   to people's livelihoods.
 
  I haven't seen any evidence that he's about to put that sort of negative
  information up; all he's done this week is indicate displeasure with the
  list with his .sig.
 
 I agree, and that's fair enough.  I know that Jeroen's recent responses to
 me have been much easier to deal with.  He has strongly pushed his points,
 but has kept the conversation on topic.  Yes, he has ignored some of my
 questions, but in my head I just assume that he doesn't have a good answer
 for those questions right now.  I've seen other posters delay answers to
 certain questions until they are happy with responses.
 
 But, Adam brought up an example of a past threat, and I was responding to
 Sonja's response to that, etc.  That threat no longer seems operative,
 which is very good, but it is a reasonable example of a threat that could
 not have been ignored.

Fair enough.  I just prefer not to drag up negative things from the past
if it can be avoided.
 
  I think that on the basis of this one .sig file change, some people are
  overreacting.
 
 My reaction was at the time was please let this not be the start of a
 pattern.  It doesn't appear to be, Jeroen seems to write lotsa different
 things in the .sig file.

Right.  I just took it as momentary frustration (keeping in tone with
the rest of the post!) rearing its head, and might have glossed over it
altogether if it hadn't been pointed out.

Rob, if you're going to point out stuff in Jeroen's .sig file, can you
point out the good things, too?  I'm liable to miss those, as well.  :)
 
 If he actually modifies content on his website to reflect
  this negativity, that's another matter entirely, but he hasn't done a
  damn thing to it this week as far as I can tell.  All he has done is
  modify his .sig file.  Lighten up, guys, would ya?
 
 I have no problem with the .sig. However,  I didn't respond to Sonja's
 first comment that the original protest of Gautam, myself, and others was
 just paranoia because I was willing to let things lie and because I allowed
 a bit of hyperbola by someone who was subjected to a number of rude emails.
 (That of course was wrong.)
 
 However, after it became a repeated theme for Sonja; I decided to respond.
 I have no problems with Jeroen put in his sig.  I have a significant
 problem with any credible threat of RL consequences.  That is not paranoia.
 Indeed, my issue is with Sonja's posts, not Jeroen's sigs.  I differ with
 them and thus write a rebuttal. No hard feelings.  Indeed, a casual perusal
 of my posting patterns indicates that I do tend to write rebuttals for
 posts I differ with, even when they are written by people I like. :-)

Yes, you do.

Actually, I expected nothing less from you when I hit send.  And I'd
like to take the opportunity to let you know that I appreciate the
cordial tone of your response to me.

One thing I find interesting, going over this thread:  All responses
spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
town in The Netherlands, or people who live in Texas within 3 hours'
drive of each other.  Does this mean anything, or is it coincidental? 
:)

Julia

waiting for a response from someone not fitting either geographical
category now
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Robert Seeberger

- Original Message -
From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:17 AM
Subject: Re: Some things are too good to last


 Dan Minette wrote:
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 9:22 AM
  Subject: Re: Some things are too good to last
 
  But, Adam brought up an example of a past threat, and I was responding
to
  Sonja's response to that, etc.  That threat no longer seems operative,
  which is very good, but it is a reasonable example of a threat that
could
  not have been ignored.

 Fair enough.  I just prefer not to drag up negative things from the past
 if it can be avoided.

I tend to agree with Dan. There is always potential for unexpected
consequences from normal posts (I think JDG will agree here), but when one
is angry or somewhat excited when posting those potentials increase.



   I think that on the basis of this one .sig file change, some people
are
   overreacting.
 
  My reaction was at the time was please let this not be the start of a
  pattern.  It doesn't appear to be, Jeroen seems to write lotsa
different
  things in the .sig file.

 Right.  I just took it as momentary frustration (keeping in tone with
 the rest of the post!) rearing its head, and might have glossed over it
 altogether if it hadn't been pointed out.

 Rob, if you're going to point out stuff in Jeroen's .sig file, can you
 point out the good things, too?  I'm liable to miss those, as well.  :)

I try to do so actually. If you go back and look at posts I have written
where I was critical and the post was longer than one or two lines, I
usually do try to say something positive. I want people I disagree with to
feel that I respect them and value them, and that my criticism is not an
attempt to discount them in any way.
Having said that, I am sure one could find examples where I did not do so.
Me am far from perfect. G



  If he actually modifies content on his website to reflect
   this negativity, that's another matter entirely, but he hasn't done a
   damn thing to it this week as far as I can tell.  All he has done is
   modify his .sig file.  Lighten up, guys, would ya?
 
  I have no problem with the .sig. However,  I didn't respond to Sonja's
  first comment that the original protest of Gautam, myself, and others
was
  just paranoia because I was willing to let things lie and because I
allowed
  a bit of hyperbola by someone who was subjected to a number of rude
emails.
  (That of course was wrong.)
 
  However, after it became a repeated theme for Sonja; I decided to
respond.
  I have no problems with Jeroen put in his sig.  I have a significant
  problem with any credible threat of RL consequences.  That is not
paranoia.
  Indeed, my issue is with Sonja's posts, not Jeroen's sigs.  I differ
with
  them and thus write a rebuttal. No hard feelings.  Indeed, a casual
perusal
  of my posting patterns indicates that I do tend to write rebuttals for
  posts I differ with, even when they are written by people I like. :-)

 Yes, you do.

 Actually, I expected nothing less from you when I hit send.  And I'd
 like to take the opportunity to let you know that I appreciate the
 cordial tone of your response to me.

 One thing I find interesting, going over this thread:  All responses
 spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
 the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
 town in The Netherlands, or people who live in Texas within 3 hours'
 drive of each other.  Does this mean anything, or is it coincidental?
 :)

Its coincidental I'm sure, but I noticed it too.
Maybe those who are able to deal with Texas summers are less likely to put
up with any crap? G


xponent
Boo Maru
rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Julia Thompson
Robert Seeberger wrote:
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Julia Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 10:17 AM
 Subject: Re: Some things are too good to last
 
  One thing I find interesting, going over this thread:  All responses
  spawned by that one post of Jeroen's that come through as being part of
  the thread as threaded by Netscape come either from people in Jeroen's
  town in The Netherlands, or people who live in Texas within 3 hours'
  drive of each other.  Does this mean anything, or is it coincidental?
  :)
 
 Its coincidental I'm sure, but I noticed it too.
 Maybe those who are able to deal with Texas summers are less likely to put
 up with any crap? G

Or those who have to deal with Texas summers refuse to put up with any
*other* crap?  :)

Commenting on the weather won't do any good.  Commenting on anything
else has more potential to do any good.  Biting one's tongue about the
weather may make one more itchy to put in $0.02 on any other subject. 
(ANY other subject!)

Speaking of weather, maybe the Texans were just a little uptight about
last week's weather (flash flooding everywhere, nowhere near enough
sunshine) and a little touchier as a result?

Julia

*so* glad not to have been living in Corpus Christi in the past 7 days
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-31 Thread Doug
Julia Thompson wrote:



Commenting on the weather won't do any good. 

Weather?  What weather?

Doug

¦:^)


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-30 Thread Reggie Bautista
I wrote:

 Haven't even had a good glass of Mead in the past year Maru :-(


Jean-Louis replied:

Come up north!  Mead and cider have made a big comeback in Quebec.
Lots of good stuff like, for example, ice cider : apple cider made
in the same way as icewine.


Oh, we have plenty of mead available in the area.  Most good liquor stores 
around here carry at least Chaucer's Mead and a couple of brands that are 
made and bottled in Missouri (Missouri has quite a few very good wineries; 
there's nothing quite like a drive through Missouri wine country in the 
fall).  I just don't drink very often, and one place I always get a good 
glass of mead or three is the Kansas City Renaissance Festival, which my 
wife and I did not get a chance to attend this year (last year we went four 
or five time).

But thanks for the info, I'd love to visit Quebec!

Reggie Bautista


_
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-30 Thread Ronn Blankenship
At 10:45 AM 10/29/02, Julia Thompson wrote:

Alberto Monteiro wrote:

 William Taylor wrote:
 
 P.S. A single female on our list should dress up as a large
 biologist/gardener alien in a tasteful pink dress with matching 
pillbox hat.
 Let's see how long it takes someone to figure out that she's dressed as a
 Jackie-O-Linten.
 
 No, no, no. The men and women in the list should act in an assertive
 way, showing that we abhor terrorism and those that support it.

 So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink
 alchoholic beverages during Halloween.

I'd say I'll drink to that, but by the above, I ought not be drinking,
but rather getting naked.  :)



One may well lead to the other . . .



--Ronn! :)

I always knew that I would see the first man on the Moon.
I never dreamed that I would see the last.
--Dr. Jerry Pournelle


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-30 Thread Reggie Bautista
William wrote:

 P.S. A single female on our list should dress up as a large
 biologist/gardener alien in a tasteful pink dress with matching 
pillbox hat.
 Let's see how long it takes someone to figure out that she's dressed 
as a
 Jackie-O-Linten.

Alberto replied:

 No, no, no. The men and women in the list should act in an assertive
 way, showing that we abhor terrorism and those that support it.

 So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink
 alchoholic beverages during Halloween.


Julia responded:

I'd say I'll drink to that, but by the above, I ought not be drinking,
but rather getting naked.  :)


Ronn observed:

One may well lead to the other . . .


Old Rita Rudner joke:
I think it's funny that they're putting warning labels on alchohol saying 
that it's dangerous to drink alchohol while pregnant because without 
alchohol, most women wouldn't be that way.

Reggie Bautista


_
Surf the Web without missing calls! Get MSN Broadband. 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-30 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Reggie Bautista wrote:
 Jean-Louis replied:
 I suggest drinking Halloween floats :
 
 1 part blond beer (eg. lager) with orange coloring
 1 part Guinness which should float on the lager!
 
 Irish bars here in KC (and presumably elsewhere)
 call this either a 
 half-and-half (if the bottom half is Harp) or a
 Black and Tan (if the bottom half is Bass).
 
 Ahh, the memories!  A pint-sized half-and-half in my
 right hand, a 
 double-shot of Bushmills Special Reserve in my left
 hand, and a bar full of 
 drunks singing Irish drinking songs along with Eddie
 Delahunt... Those were *really* the days :-)
 
 Reggie Bautista
 Haven't even had a good glass of Mead in the past
 year Maru :-(

This reminds me of a Halloween ride in 1990: for our
pre-ride brunch we had mead, coffee with Bailey's, and
mimosas (orange juice  champagne) - with assorted
quiches/muffins/fruit to dilute the alcohol! - then
set off for the lake.  I was one of several to 'kiss
the dirt' as none of the horses had participated in a
costumed event before (no one was hurt as we were,
ahem, 'well-lubricated'), but the real problem came
later, when I was holding the reins for another woman
to re-mount.  

Her mare spooked violently at her flapping cape (the
scary mask probably didn't help either :P ), reared
and leaped into the lake; not having sense enough to
drop the reins, I wound up _under_ Magnolia, and
finally let go of them when a pastern (the joint right
above the hoof) smacked my forehead.  [I didn't see it
of course, but a steel-shod hoof would have at least
cracked my soused head; those on shore said she
appeared to stumble before she leaped out of the water
- I think she sensed that I was under her and jumped
over me...] 

What's that saying about watching over fools and
idiots? shudder  I haven't ridden, driven or
operated any equipment whatsoever with more than a
half-glass of wine on-board since.

There But For The Grace Of God Go I Maru

__
Do you Yahoo!?
HotJobs - Search new jobs daily now
http://hotjobs.yahoo.com/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-29 Thread Reggie Bautista
Jean-Louis replied:

I suggest drinking Halloween floats :

1 part blond beer (eg. lager) with orange coloring
1 part Guinness which should float on the lager!


Irish bars here in KC (and presumably elsewhere) call this either a 
half-and-half (if the bottom half is Harp) or a Black and Tan (if the bottom 
half is Bass).

Ahh, the memories!  A pint-sized half-and-half in my right hand, a 
double-shot of Bushmills Special Reserve in my left hand, and a bar full of 
drunks singing Irish drinking songs along with Eddie Delahunt...
Those were *really* the days :-)

Reggie Bautista
Haven't even had a good glass of Mead in the past year Maru :-(


_
Get a speedy connection with MSN Broadband.  Join now! 
http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/freeactivation.asp

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Robert Seeberger

__
 Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com


I suppose it was only to be expected.


rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 10/28/2002 3:10:32 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Corrupted-World-of-Brin-L Website:   http://www.Brin-L.com
 
 
 I suppose it was only to be expected.
 
 
 rob 

You mean Hoon are having sex with Urs? Tymbrimi are selling obscene glyphs 
under the counter? Traeki are painting themselves green and posing as 
Christmas trees only to sneek out of the house after having been decorated?

William Taylor
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Julia Thompson
Steve Sloan II wrote:
 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  You mean Hoon are having sex with Urs? Tymbrimi are selling
  obscene glyphs under the counter? Traeki are painting
  themselves green and posing as Christmas trees only to sneek
  out of the house after having been decorated?
 
 Kanten are walking up to broccolli-hating George Bush Sr. and
 yelling boo? ;-)

Actually, his problem was with *eating* broccoli, not with broccoli per
se.  So Kanten might be more comfortable around him for *that* reason. 
Me, I *love* eating broccoli.  :)

Mebbe we should all go dress up as Kanten on Halloween and find George
H. W. Bush.  :)  :)

(Oh, and Barbara Bush's response to the whole broccoli thing was
something along the lines of, Any man who eats pork rinds can't be all
good.  I loved that response.)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 10/28/2002 4:32:55 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  You mean Hoon are having sex with Urs? Tymbrimi are selling
  obscene glyphs under the counter? Traeki are painting
  themselves green and posing as Christmas trees only to sneek
  out of the house after having been decorated?
 
 Kanten are walking up to broccolli-hating George Bush Sr. and
 yelling boo? ;-) 

And an insectoid race is running about with sun lamps?

They can do, the Tandu, the tan due to you.

William Taylor
-
The USPS printed a huge error on their 
stamps a few years ago. Because of a rate 
increase, for the first time ever, Daffy Duck 
had more cents that Bugs Bunny.

(Yea, it does work better verbaly.)
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 10/28/2002 4:48:27 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 Mebbe we should all go dress up as Kanten on Halloween and find George
 H. W. Bush.  :)  :)
  

Not all. If you all dress as Kanten, I'll go as a can of cheese sauce.

William Taylor

What's a jewish street punk at Christmas time?

A rebel without a Claus.
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro
William Taylor wrote:

P.S. A single female on our list should dress up as a large 
biologist/gardener alien in a tasteful pink dress with matching pillbox hat. 
Let's see how long it takes someone to figure out that she's dressed as a 
Jackie-O-Linten.

No, no, no. The men and women in the list should act in an assertive
way, showing that we abhor terrorism and those that support it.

So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink 
alchoholic beverages during Halloween.

Alberto Monteiro


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 10/28/2002 5:56:28 PM US Mountain Standard Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Jackie-O-Linten.
 
 No, no, no. The men and women in the list should act in an assertive
 way, showing that we abhor terrorism and those that support it.
 
 So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink 
 alchoholic beverages during Halloween.
  

Jackie O was a terrorist?

Oh well.

Have some Madera, m' dear
It comes from an excellent year
 (Flanders  Swann)


William Taylor
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



RE: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Gary Nunn
Alberto wrote...
 So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink
 alchoholic beverages during Halloween.


Dude! If that's Halloween in your country, I think I need to celebrate
Halloween there!

Gary

From painfully conservative Delaware Ohio


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Alberto Monteiro

Gary Nunn wrote:

 So, all women should be naked, and the men should drink
 alchoholic beverages during Halloween.

Dude! If that's Halloween in your country, I think I need to celebrate
Halloween there!

Of course not! What do you think we are? We are a 
_Christian_ country! We don't celebrate Halloween,
a Satanist holyday.

This is the way we celebrate Carnival!

Alberto Monteiro


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Deborah Harrell
--- Julia wrote:
 Steve Sloan II wrote:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   You mean Hoon are having sex with Urs? Tymbrimi
 are selling
   obscene glyphs under the counter? Traeki are
 painting
   themselves green and posing as Christmas trees
 only to sneek
   out of the house after having been decorated?
  
  Kanten are walking up to broccolli-hating George
 Bush Sr. and yelling boo? ;-)
 
 Actually, his problem was with *eating* broccoli,
 not with broccoli per
 se.  So Kanten might be more comfortable around him
 for *that* reason. 
 Me, I *love* eating broccoli.  :)
 
 Mebbe we should all go dress up as Kanten on
 Halloween and find George H. W. Bush.  :)  :)
 
 (Oh, and Barbara Bush's response to the whole
 broccoli thing was
 something along the lines of, Any man who eats pork
 rinds can't be all
 good.  I loved that response.)

A meal with food for the heart (broccoli) _and_ the
soul (pork rinds)?!  Preceded by an appetizer of good
humor...mmmMMMm. :)

VFP Chitlins

__
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: Some things are too good to last

2002-10-28 Thread Jim Sharkey

Rob wrote:
 
  http://www.Brin-L.com
 
  
  I suppose it was only to be expected.

I'm of two minds about that.  Yes, Jeroen sometimes doesn't know when to quit, and 
he's the architect of some of his difficulties.  But he does seem to get more than his 
fair share of the business over it, and despite my own feelings on his apparent need 
to police certain people's behavior, it does look like a dogpile.

Jim

___
Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com
The most personalized portal on the Web!
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l