Which political group is mainstream (was Re: The American Political Landscape Today)

2005-05-16 Thread Nick Arnett
On Sun, 15 May 2005 13:04:29 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote

 In particular, the categories are not continuous,
 obviously enough.  

Again with the tubular cured meat.

Left, middle and right are not continuous!  At what center are the centrists? 
What are the middle-of-the-road people in the middle of?  

From the report:

The Republican Party's current advantage with the center makes up for the 
fact that the GOP-oriented groups, when taken together, account for only 29% 
of the public. By contrast, the three Democratic groups constitute 41% of the 
public.

And:

At the other end of the political spectrum, Liberals have swelled to become 
the largest voting bloc in the typology. Liberals are opponents of an 
assertive foreign policy, strong supporters of environmental protection, and 
solid backers of government assistance to the poor. 

This affluent, well-educated, highly secular group is consistently liberal on 
social issues, ranging from freedom of expression to abortion. In contrast, 
Conservative Democrats are quite religious, socially conservative and take 
more moderate positions on several key foreign policy questions. The group is 
older, and includes many blacks and Hispanics; of all the core Democratic 
groups, it has strongest sense of personal empowerment.

And:

Taken together, the three Democratic groups make up a larger share of 
registered voters than do the three Republican groups (44% vs. 33%).

And how about this one?

Nearly two-thirds of Americans (64%) have a favorable opinion of Bill 
Clinton, the highest positive rating of 11 political figures tested. Six-in-
ten have a favorable opinion of former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and 
about the same number have a positive view of Sen. John McCain (59%).

Who is mainstream, according to this report?  Who, Gautam

Nick

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Which political group is mainstream (was Re: The American Political Landscape Today)

2005-05-16 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Who is mainstream, according to this report?  Who,
 Gautam
 
 Nick

Not you, Nick.  Most Americans don't think God has an
opinion on marginal tax rates, and most of those who
do don't share yours.  I am comfortable with my own
position as pretty near the median voter.  Could you
even _find_ the median voter?

Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freedom is not free
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com



__ 
Do you Yahoo!? 
Yahoo! Mail - Find what you need with new enhanced search. 
http://info.mail.yahoo.com/mail_250
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Which political group is mainstream (was Re: The American Political Landscape Today)

2005-05-16 Thread Nick Arnett
On Mon, 16 May 2005 09:00:12 -0700 (PDT), Gautam Mukunda wrote

 Not you, Nick.  Most Americans don't think God has an
 opinion on marginal tax rates, and most of those who
 do don't share yours.  

When you write stuff like this, as if I'm another God-in-my-back-pocket 
prosperity-Gospel preacher, I'm pissed off.  I'm angry when I hear you 
misrepresenting ideas that are very important to me, life and death issues.

I'm certain that you know you are way out of line.

Nick
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Which political group is mainstream (was Re: The American Political Landscape Today)

2005-05-16 Thread Gautam Mukunda
--- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 When you write stuff like this, as if I'm another
 God-in-my-back-pocket 
 prosperity-Gospel preacher, I'm pissed off.  I'm
 angry when I hear you 
 misrepresenting ideas that are very important to me,
 life and death issues.
 
 I'm certain that you know you are way out of line.
 
 Nick

Then _distinguish what you believe_ from that, Nick. 
I posted on how your use of religion makes me -
someone from a different faith - enormously
uncomfortable.  It was ignored.  Instead I just got
more appeals to the Divinity for whatever policy you
appear to favor today.  I would say that someone who
dragoons God into supporting his own policies is out
of line, not someone who is perturbed by it.

Gautam Mukunda
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Freedom is not free
http://www.mukunda.blogspot.com



Discover Yahoo! 
Find restaurants, movies, travel and more fun for the weekend. Check it out! 
http://discover.yahoo.com/weekend.html 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Which political group is mainstream (was Re: The American Political Landscape Today)

2005-05-16 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On May 16, 2005, at 10:38 AM, Gautam Mukunda wrote:
--- Nick Arnett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When you write stuff like this, as if I'm another
God-in-my-back-pocket
prosperity-Gospel preacher, I'm pissed off.  I'm
angry when I hear you
misrepresenting ideas that are very important to me,
life and death issues.
I'm certain that you know you are way out of line.
Nick
Then _distinguish what you believe_ from that, Nick.
I don't think he has to. I don't see evidence of the nasty bite of 
fundamentalism in many of Nick's comments. What I see is someone 
working to reconcile a faith, but not someone using it as a beat-stick.

I posted on how your use of religion makes me -
someone from a different faith - enormously
uncomfortable.  It was ignored.  Instead I just got
more appeals to the Divinity for whatever policy you
appear to favor today.  I would say that someone who
dragoons God into supporting his own policies is out
of line, not someone who is perturbed by it.
I don't see any evidence of Nick using any deity as a prop for 
supporting his policies, but then, maybe I missed something. It seems 
to me more that he's basing his ideas in his personal understanding of 
his faith, which -- and this is really remarkable -- is organic. Rather 
than falling back on a hardline stance that brooks no argument, Nick 
seems to be willing to discuss, concede and adapt.

Also, as an atheist, I feel I can ask you why others' discussing -- or 
even basing their views in -- their religion makes you uncomfortable. 
Do you feel they're evangelizing, and thus minimizing your perspective? 
Or do you feel they're overlooking other ideals, possibly from your own 
background, that are equally valid? If either, what would be the harm 
in pointing out the lacunae?

--
Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books
http://books.nightwares.com/
Current work in progress The Seven-Year Mirror
http://www.nightwares.com/books/ockrassa/Flat_Out.pdf
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l