[Bug ld/3149] ld 2.17 bug ( relocation R_X86_64_PC32 )
--- Additional Comments From aliens_predator at inbox dot ru 2006-08-31 06:11 --- Has as this option? Why is it not documented? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3149] ld 2.17 bug ( relocation R_X86_64_PC32 )
--- Additional Comments From aliens_predator at inbox dot ru 2006-08-31 08:58 --- And today I was tested output file and it worked correctly! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3159] New: generated code mismatches between 2.15 and 2.16
I discovered the second example when trying to correct for the first. This small program: .intel_syntax noprefix .altmacro .text .global testa .macro zzz a add rax,OFFSET \a+8 sub rax,OFFSET \a+8 .endm .macro yyy a local q .equ q, (\a+8) lea rax,[rax+(\a+8)] lea rax,[rax-q] .endm .data .align 16,0 .equ d, . .byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 .byte 0,0,0,0,0,0,0 .equ c, .-d .equ b, 14 .text .align 16,0 testa: pushrbp mov rbp,rsp add rax,OFFSET b+c+8 zzz b+c lea rax,[rax-3] yyy b+c leave ret .end generates different code on 2.16 than on 2.15. In 2.15: 32 0004 48052400 add rax,OFFSET b+c+8 32 In 2.16: 32 0004 48030425 add rax,OFFSET b+c+8 32 2400 The 2.16 object code causes a segfault. in 2.15: 37 001a 488D8024 lea rax,[rax+(b+c+8)] 37 00 37 0021 488D80DC lea rax,[rax-.LL0001] 37 FF in 2.16: 37 yyy b+c 37 37 .equ .LL0001,(b+c+8) 37 0020 488D4016 lea rax,[rax+(b+c+8)] 37 0024 488D80EA lea rax,[rax-.LL0001] 37 FF -- Summary: generated code mismatches between 2.15 and 2.16 Product: binutils Version: 2.16 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: michaelryan at mindspring dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3159 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/3015] -z relro may create PT_NULL segment
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 15:41 --- It is not fixed for all targets. -z relro doesn't work on Linux/ia64. Instead of ignoring the option, a PT_NULL segment is created. This patch should fix it: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-08/msg00263.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3015 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 15:54 --- Please provide a testcase such that I can see the problem on Linux/x86. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-08-31 16:44 --- Oh yes, if you remove the if .. ALPHA.. with X86, you can see the problem too. Redhat supports glibc and binutils, so only for x86? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-08-31 17:20 --- Well, feel free to take a look at the patch. If you haven't an alpha system, than you haven't the problem. This is a BUG in the source code from readelf, not from the input to readelf. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2006-08-31 17:25 --- I have built cross binutils for Linux/alpha. Readelf doesn't fail because of NULL pointer reference. I want to see how it fails in gdb. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
--- Additional Comments From tomri at gmx dot net 2006-08-31 17:34 --- Above the code line (see patch) there's a test for if rtype == NULL, and below this test, there´s a code sequnce using this NULL pointer. So you can test this, by setting rtype == NULL above the lines from the patch. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3146] BUG: readelf fails on ALPHA 2.16 and 2.17 due to NULL pointer
-- What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at lucon dot org| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3146 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
