[Bug ld/10858] ld generate broken PIE binaries on MIPS
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-24 14:22 --- Subject: Bug 10858 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: ni...@sourceware.org2010-02-24 14:21:51 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elfxx-mips.c Log message: PR binutils/10858 * elfxx-mips.c (mips_elf_create_dynamic_relocation): Ise SYMBOL_REFERENCES_LOCAL to exclude entries from the dynamic symbol table. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4940r2=1.4941 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elfxx-mips.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.266r2=1.267 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10858 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10858] ld generate broken PIE binaries on MIPS
--- Additional Comments From jay dot foad at gmail dot com 2010-02-24 14:24 --- Thanks Nick! -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10858 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10858] ld generate broken PIE binaries on MIPS
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-24 14:22 --- Hi Jay, Hi Aurelian, I have checked in the modified version of Alan's patch. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10858 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6773] Typo in ARM saddsubx mnemonic
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2010-02-24 15:12 --- Hi Jonas, I have checked in a patch to fix the disassembly of all of the prefixaddsubx and prefixsubaddx instructions so that they now use the UAL names. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6773 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: objdump: ARMv6 asx and sax mnemonics
Hi Nils, Hi everyone. I hope this is the correct list for this issue: It is. This is wrong:prefixaddsubx would be more correct. (See Bug binutils/6773) I have just checked in a patch to fix this bug. And while I'm at it: Is there any reason to use non-standard mnemonics for these instructions? No, it was an oversight. Cheers Nick ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/11304] ld --section-start does not work correctly if section is defined in multiple object files
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-02-25 03:49 --- Subject: Bug 11304 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2010-02-25 03:49:15 Modified files: bfd: ChangeLog elf.c ld : ChangeLog ldlang.c Log message: bfd/ PR ld/11304 * elf.c (_bfd_elf_init_private_section_data): Rename need_group to final_link and invert. For final link allow some flags to differ. Don't specially allow flags to be all zero. ld/ * ldlang.c (init_os): Remove isec param. Don't check for bfd_section already set or call bfd_init_private_section_data here. (exp_init_os): Update init_os call. (lang_add_section): Tidy. Really don't set SEC_LINK_ONCE flags. Call bfd_init_private_section_data here. (map_input_to_output_sections): Tidy. Update init_os calls. Use os-sectype to select sec flags for lang_data_statement. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.4941r2=1.4942 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.504r2=1.505 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.2113r2=1.2114 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ldlang.c.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.331r2=1.332 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11304 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/11323] New: Need representation of the offset from a label to a GOT entry
To implement the optimization described in http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43129, we need to represent the offset from a code label to a global variable's GOT entry. This can be implemented through the arm relocation R_ARM_GOT_PREL. But currently we can't represent it according to http://sourceware.org/binutils/docs-2.20/as/ARM_002dRelocations.html#ARM_002dRelocations. -- Summary: Need representation of the offset from a label to a GOT entry Product: binutils Version: 2.21 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: carrot at google dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,carrot at google dot com GCC build triplet: i686-linux GCC host triplet: i686-linux GCC target triplet: arm-eabi http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11323 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
