[Bug gas/14480] PDP11 gas generates invalid code for deferred indirect JSR with 0 index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14480 --- Comment #5 from James Patrick Conlon --- Confirming that this bug still exists in as 2.31.51.20180719. Attached is a slightly modified version of Jordi's dic.s called dic-mod.s. The output of pdp11-aout-as -a dic-mod.s is: GAS LISTING /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s page 1 1 C0151200 start:mov$ind,r0 2 0004 C809 jsr pc,(r0) 3 0006 C809 jsr pc,@(r0) 4 0008 F809 jsr pc,@0(r0) 5 000c F8090200 jsr pc,@2(r0) 6 0010 halt 7 8 9 0012 1600 ind:.WORDdest 10 0014 1800 .WORDdest2 11 12 0016 8700 dest:rtspc 13 14 0018 8700 dest2:rtspc 15 16 .END GAS LISTING /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s page 2 DEFINED SYMBOLS /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:1 .text: start /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:9 .text:0012 ind /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:12 .text:0016 dest /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:14 .text:0018 dest2 NO UNDEFINED SYMBOLS As can be seen, jsr pc,@(r0) assembles the same as jsr pc,(r0), which it shouldn't do. I created a patch, which is attached, that solves this problem. As adding a '0' would create a new string and since it already knows that it's deferred, I just replace the '@' with a '0' before sending it along. The new output: GAS LISTING /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s page 1 1 C0151400 start: mov $ind,r0 2 0004 C809 jsr pc,(r0) 3 0006 F809 jsr pc,@(r0) 4 000a F809 jsr pc,@0(r0) 5 000e F8090200 jsr pc,@2(r0) 6 0012 halt 7 8 9 0014 1800 ind:.WORD dest 10 0016 1A00 .WORD dest2 11 12 0018 8700 dest: rts pc 13 14 001a 8700 dest2: rts pc 15 16.END GAS LISTING /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s page 2 DEFINED SYMBOLS /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:1 .text: start /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:9 .text:0014 ind /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:12 .text:0018 dest /home/cptnapalm/Downloads/dic-mod.s:14 .text:001a dest2 NO UNDEFINED SYMBOLS It now does the right thing in this case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14480] PDP11 gas generates invalid code for deferred indirect JSR with 0 index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14480 --- Comment #4 from James Patrick Conlon --- Created attachment 11147 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11147=edit Patch which solves this specific problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/14480] PDP11 gas generates invalid code for deferred indirect JSR with 0 index
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14480 James Patrick Conlon changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cptjustice at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from James Patrick Conlon --- Created attachment 11146 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11146=edit Modified Assembly Program illustrating the problem Added a line to show that the current behavior does produce output matching something it shouldn't match. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #3 from Rich Felker --- I don't object to the patch as-is, but wouldn't it make more sense to make the program headers a first-class section with attribute alloc, so that they're semantically forced to be visible at runtime rather than just happening to fall into a load segment that exists due to other sections? This fix would be target-agnostic and would prevent the issue from ever arising for other targets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- A patch is posted at https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2018-07/msg00321.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23428] ld does not put program headers in a code-only load segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23428 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23078] Weak alias to a weak symbol is not resolved correctly.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23078
--- Comment #2 from Vadzim Dambrouski ---
Hello Nick,
Thank you for suggestion, I've tried weakref, and does help with the case I
have posted above, but it still doesn't do exactly what I need.
Here is updated code:
// main.c ---
void _start() {}
void DEFAULT_HANDLER() {
*((int*)0x10) = 5;
}
void BUS_FAULT() {
*((int*)0x10) = 7;
}
// foo.c
__attribute__((weak)) void DEFAULT_HANDLER() {
*((int*)0x10) = 1;
}
static __attribute__((weakref ("DEFAULT_HANDLER"))) void HARD_FAULT();
static __attribute__((weakref ("DEFAULT_HANDLER"))) void BUS_FAULT();
void (*VECTORS[])() = {
HARD_FAULT,
BUS_FAULT,
};
// --
In this new example I have created a strong symbols for both default handler
and for one of specific handlers. I expect that VECTORS table would contain
pointers to functions 5 and 7, but in practice it contains pointers to 5 and 5.
This is not what I need, unfortunately.
Regards,
Vadzim
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23431] New: Messages composed from pieces can't be properly translated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23431 Bug ID: 23431 Summary: Messages composed from pieces can't be properly translated Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: goeran at uddeborg dot se Target Milestone: --- In dwarf.c, in the function display_formatted_table, messages are composed from parts. The argument "what", "File name" or "Directory" is placed in like The %s Table is empty and Corrupt %s entries list Messages like these are hard or impossible to translate correctly. In Swedish, for example, attributive nouns should be written as one word with the main noun. It can passably be translated provided the translator is aware of the use. (Capitalisation will still get wrong in some of the cases.) In languages further removed from English, I suspect it can't be done correctly at all. These messages will have to be separated into complete messages for each case, file name or directory, to be properly translated. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23430] New: Indices misspelled in three places in readelf.c
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23430 Bug ID: 23430 Summary: Indices misspelled in three places in readelf.c Product: binutils Version: 2.31 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: goeran at uddeborg dot se Target Milestone: --- In the po file most recently distributed for translation there is the word "indicies" in three places in readelf (readelf.c:5488 readelf.c:5601 readelf.c:6846). That should be "indices" we believe (https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/indices#English). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
