[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- I asked for an **OBJECT** file, you know, the file that objcopy is operating on, not source files. That would be shell.o in this instance. I don't have clang-7 installed. If I build clang myself, the configure opions I use or those auto-detected might get me a compiler that doesn't reproduce the same object file. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 --- Comment #3 from mewbaz at gmail dot com --- And these versions are used: u@x1 ~> clang --version clang version 7.0.0 (tags/RELEASE_700/final) Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin u@x1 ~> objcopy --version GNU objcopy (GNU Binutils) 2.31.1 Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/23788] objcopy: src/steddNxf: failed to find link section for section 24
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23788 --- Comment #2 from mewbaz at gmail dot com --- Example based on SQLite3: https://sqlite.org/2018/sqlite-amalgamation-3250200.zip u@x1 ~/D/p/y/0/f/l/sqlite-amalgamation-3250200> cat foo asdf u@x1 ~/D/p/y/0/f/l/sqlite-amalgamation-3250200> clang-7 -c shell.c u@x1 ~/D/p/y/0/f/l/sqlite-amalgamation-3250200> objcopy --add-section .llvm_bc=foo shell.o objcopy: stlck9zT: failed to find link section for section 17 objcopy: stlck9zT: failed to find link section for section 17 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/23040] .uleb128 directive doesn't accept some valid expressions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23040 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2018-10-18 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Confirmed, and yes, it was the change to use deferred_expression in s_leb128 (commit ba8826a82a2, 2017-07-21 Alexandre Oliva) that introduced the regression. Some poking around in gdb shows that the value for dot in "1f-.-1" is wrong, and changes with relaxation. I think deferred_expression is probably using the final value for dot in the file, not the current value. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23078] Weak alias to a weak symbol is not resolved correctly.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23078 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- Not a linker bug, and original reporter has probably figured out what is wrong with his code by now. In an case, asking binutils developers how to use gcc features via a bug report is not appropriate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/23237] make check for ld fails
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23237 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Closing due to lack of response, and in any case these tests work for x86_64 binutils developers. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
