[Bug binutils/28588] significant performance regression in addr2line

2022-07-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28588

Alan Modra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||travis.downs at gmail dot com

--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra  ---
*** Bug 29010 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/29010] addr2line (via libbfd) has quadratic processing time for large debug info

2022-07-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29010

Alan Modra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra  ---
Dup

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 28588 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug ld/22263] -fpie -pie generates dynamic relocations in text section

2022-07-04 Thread matoro_bugzilla_glibc at matoro dot tk
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22263

matoro  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||matoro_bugzilla_glibc@mator
   ||o.tk

--- Comment #27 from matoro  ---
Hi, could this be extended to riscv please?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/28588] significant performance regression in addr2line

2022-07-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28588

Alan Modra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amodra at gmail dot com

--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra  ---
Is this performance issue still present in current mainline sources?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/29233] Memory leak in copy_relocations_in_section

2022-07-04 Thread amodra at gmail dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29233

Alan Modra  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.39

--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra  ---
Fixed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug binutils/29233] Memory leak in copy_relocations_in_section

2022-07-04 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29233

--- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org  ---
The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra :

https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=0772daccb3ebaf513badf4266e1948454b4455c1

commit 0772daccb3ebaf513badf4266e1948454b4455c1
Author: Alan Modra 
Date:   Mon Jul 4 11:24:22 2022 +0930

objcopy: bfd_alloc orelocation

This fixes an inconsequential objcopy memory leak.  I'd normally
ignore reports of leaks like this one, that are merely one block or
fewer per section processed, since objcopy soon exits and frees all
memory.  However I thought it worth providing support for allocating
memory on a bfd objalloc in objcopy and other utils.

PR 29233
* bucomm.c (bfd_xalloc): New function.
* bucomm.h (bfd_xalloc): Declare.
* objcopy.c (copy_relocations_in_section): Use it to allocate
array of reloc pointers.  Rewrite code stripping relocs to do
without extra memory allocation.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.