[Bug gprofng/29760] [collect app] Support profiling an already running application
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29760 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29760] New: [collect app] Support profiling an already running application
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29760 Bug ID: 29760 Summary: [collect app] Support profiling an already running application Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, gprofng collect app only provides meaningful results if the application is started under its control. An important range of applications is always running though. Support for these is important to have. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29759] [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29759] New: [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29759 Bug ID: 29759 Summary: [display html] Support for aarch64 is needed Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Currently, gprofng display html only supports x86_64. There should be at least some basic support for aarch64 as well. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29758] [collect app] Support hardware event counters on recent processors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29758 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29758] New: [collect app] Support hardware event counters on recent processors
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29758 Bug ID: 29758 Summary: [collect app] Support hardware event counters on recent processors Product: binutils Version: 2.39 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The support for hardware event counters has fallen behind and needs to be updated to handle more recent processors from Intel, AMD, and Arm. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 49877 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_addr2line: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc
Updates: Labels: -deadline-approaching -restrict-view-commit Deadline-Exceeded Comment #3 on issue 49877 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_addr2line: Direct-leak in bfd_malloc https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=49877#c3 This bug has exceeded our disclosure deadline. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gas/29757] New: bpf: document assembly syntax in the manual
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29757 Bug ID: 29757 Summary: bpf: document assembly syntax in the manual Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: jose.marchesi at oracle dot com Reporter: jose.marchesi at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- The syntax understood by the BPF assembler shall be documented in the GAS manual. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29728] bpf: support LLVM BPF pseudo-C assembly syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29728 --- Comment #4 from Jose E. Marchesi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3) > (In reply to Jose E. Marchesi from comment #2) > > >> Is there a specification for this syntax ? > > AFAIK, no. It is basically "what LLVM parses". > > Well that sounds bad. Can you talk to the LLVM community about this ? A > proper specification is pretty much essential for compatibility to work. I will. However, to be fair on that topic, how many of the assembly language syntax supported by GAS are formally specified? Our own BPF assembly syntax certainly isn't. (I think it may be possible to generate documentation for it using CGEN. Never tried though.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29728] bpf: support LLVM BPF pseudo-C assembly syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29728 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Jose E. Marchesi from comment #2) >> Is there a specification for this syntax ? > AFAIK, no. It is basically "what LLVM parses". Well that sounds bad. Can you talk to the LLVM community about this ? A proper specification is pretty much essential for compatibility to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29728] bpf: support LLVM BPF pseudo-C assembly syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29728 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guillermo.e.martinez@oracle ||.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/29728] bpf: support LLVM BPF pseudo-C assembly syntax
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29728 Jose E. Marchesi changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |jose.marchesi at oracle dot com --- Comment #2 from Jose E. Marchesi --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #1) > (In reply to Jose E. Marchesi from comment #0) > > > So this bugzilla is for adding support for the pseudo-C assembly BPF syntax > > to the GNU assembler. > > Is there a specification for this syntax ? AFAIK, no. It is basically "what LLVM parses". > Also - given that you are the maintainer for the BPF port, will you be > assigning this PR to yourself ? Yep I just did that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
