[Bug ld/29807] objcopy converts ELF relocatable object to PE that cause a ld segfault
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29807 --- Comment #8 from Stas Sergeev --- If only objcopy could also be fixed... Is there now any other way to create PE, rather than to install mingw? Seems like w/o working objcopy, one needs to install mingw just for that? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29785] memory bloat in version 2.39
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29785 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-11-23 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- Confirmed, one commit before b43771b045fb gives $ time binutils/addr2line -a -e /tmp/mysqld.debug a77563 0x00a77563 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0xdfdf binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1dee4 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1def2 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de3a binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de48 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de56 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de2c binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1ded6 /usr/src/debug/mariadb-10.3.35-1.module+el8.6.0+1005+cdf19c22.x86_64/storage/innobase/ut/ut0wqueue.cc:162 real0m3.454s user0m2.229s sys 0m1.224s commit b43771b045fb results: $ time binutils/addr2line -a -e /tmp/mysqld.debug a77563 0x00a77563 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0xdfdf binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1dee4 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1def2 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de3a binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de48 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de56 binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1de2c binutils/addr2line: DWARF error: could not find variable specification at offset 0x1ded6 /usr/src/debug/mariadb-10.3.35-1.module+el8.6.0+1005+cdf19c22.x86_64/storage/innobase/ut/ut0wqueue.cc:162 real0m46.450s user0m43.108s sys 0m3.336s -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29807] objcopy converts ELF relocatable object to PE that cause a ld segfault
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29807 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #7 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29820] ld x86: -r should not define _TLS_MODULE_BASE_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29820 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=04ad71937f28561ad5a2bbbc7e8f0af21e1019f8 commit 04ad71937f28561ad5a2bbbc7e8f0af21e1019f8 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Tue Nov 22 13:58:47 2022 -0800 x86: Don't define _TLS_MODULE_BASE_ for ld -r bfd/ PR ld/29820 * elfxx-x86.c (_bfd_x86_elf_always_size_sections): Don't define _TLS_MODULE_BASE_ for ld -r. ld/ PR ld/29820 * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr29820.d: New file. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/pr29820.s: Likewise. * testsuite/ld-x86-64/x86-64.ex: Run pr29820. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29820] New: ld x86: -r should not define _TLS_MODULE_BASE_
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29820 Bug ID: 29820 Summary: ld x86: -r should not define _TLS_MODULE_BASE_ Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: i at maskray dot me Target Milestone: --- cat > a.s <: 401000: 48 c7 c0 e0 ff ff ff movq$-0x20, %rax # should be $0x0 401007: 66 90 nop 401009: 64 8b 90 e8 ff ff ff movl%fs:-0x18(%rax), %edx 401010: 64 03 90 ec ff ff ff addl%fs:-0x14(%rax), %edx 401017: 48 c7 c0 e0 ff ff ff movq$-0x20, %rax # should be $0x0 40101e: 66 90 nop 401020: 64 8b 90 f8 ff ff ff movl%fs:-0x8(%rax), %edx 401027: 64 03 90 fc ff ff ff addl%fs:-0x4(%rax), %edx -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29819] New: ld testsuite of --version-script relies on -L option
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29819
Bug ID: 29819
Summary: ld testsuite of --version-script relies on -L option
Product: binutils
Version: 2.40 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: mliska at suse dot cz
CC: nickc at sourceware dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Apparently, as originally reported here:
https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/822
ld.{bfd,gold} load version scripts from paths that are specified with -L
option:
$ mkdir aaa
$ echo "FOO {};" > aaa/aaa.map
$ echo '' | gcc-12 -Wl,--version-script=aaa.map -shared -fPIC -Laaa -x c -
(OK)
Is it something documented or specified? The same behavior is mimicked by lld.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
