[Bug ld/25694] R_RISCV_TPREL_HI20 relocations cause riscv64 to add TEXTREL bit on executables
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25694 alice changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alice at ayaya dot dev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30237] strip fails on riscv with 'not enough room for program headers, stgnjAlO[.interp]: bad value'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30237 alice changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alice at ayaya dot dev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28824] relro security issues
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 alice changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alice at ayaya dot dev -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 57980 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Stack-overflow in debug_write_type
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 57980 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_objdump_safe: Stack-overflow in debug_write_type https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=57980#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug ld/30359] Create Resource-Only DLL
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30359 --- Comment #14 from Pali Rohár --- Well, if this is the way how it should be used then "fixed" linker script should be distributed with linker. Or at least described in the LD documentation. Because it is really hard to find some information or figure out how to use it. Bugzilla is not really a good place for documentation. And what about other bugs discovered in this bug report? There is a problem in LD that it can generate section to zero VMA address. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30390] Allow to specify custom stub for PE binaries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30390 --- Comment #2 from Pali Rohár --- Stub is executable code, I think it can be any valid binary in MZ format. Restrictions about alignement or size would come from the MZ format itself. About objcopy, I do not know about any way how to replace stub binary from existing PE binary. I think that replacement is harder operation because absolute offsets in PE structures needs to be adjusted when stub changes it size. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30376] windres cannot parse rc files which it itself generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30376 --- Comment #2 from Pali Rohár --- I'm not sure if I can upload that generated file here due to possible legal problems. But if you agree, you can download some other shell32.dll from the internet. For example I found different version on https://www.dll-files.com/shell32.dll.html (6.0.2900.6072 / 98f2e089891cae87147f74948f694565) for which GNU windres generates shell32.rc file with same syntax errors. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30439] [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30439 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30439] New: [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30439 Bug ID: 30439 Summary: [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- Execution terminates with the following error: [Assertion error] generate_caller_callee - 6 elements in name exceeds limit What happens is that a line with the information for a specific function has additional fields that are not expected. This is the line triggering the problem: 5:0x0002bc0d *@0x2bc0d () -- no functions found 0. The string "-- no functions found" is not expected and this results in the assertion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30438] New: [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Bug ID: 30438 Summary: [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation Product: binutils Version: 2.40 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- For a specific experiment directory, the following error is reported by "gprofng display html": [Assertion error] get_function_info - unexpected: number of fields = 10 This error indicates that the input data is not as expected, resulting in an assertion error. As a result, the execution terminates prematurely. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30437] aarch64: RELA relocations don't ignore section content as they should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30376] windres cannot parse rc files which it itself generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30376 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed||2023-05-10 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Pali, Please could you upload the shell32.rc file created in your first step ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30390] Allow to specify custom stub for PE binaries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30390 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com Last reconfirmed||2023-05-10 CC||nickc at redhat dot com Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Pali, What does this stub look like ? Is it executable code ? Are there restrictions on how big it can be, the alignment it needs and so on ? Would it be possible to use objcopy to replace the stub generated by the linker with one supplied by the user ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30437] aarch64: RELA relocations don't ignore section content as they should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437 --- Comment #2 from Michael Matz --- ld.gold gets the testcase correct: % ld.gold -pie rela.o % objdump -sRj .data a.out a.out: file format elf64-littleaarch64 DYNAMIC RELOCATION RECORDS OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0002 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00020032 00020008 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00020054 Contents of section .data: 2 32000200 54000200 2...T... The patch does the same for ld.bfd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30437] aarch64: RELA relocations don't ignore section content as they should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437 Michael Matz changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |matz at suse dot de Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from Michael Matz --- Created attachment 14872 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14872=edit patch for the problem -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30437] New: aarch64: RELA relocations don't ignore section content as they should
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30437 Bug ID: 30437 Summary: aarch64: RELA relocations don't ignore section content as they should Product: binutils Version: 2.41 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: matz at suse dot de Target Milestone: --- The aarch64 psABI prescribes that all RELA relocs are to be idempotent. Amongst other things that means they have to ignore pre-existing section content of the to-be-relocated place. The golang toolchain runs into this issue by failing the testGCData testcase as in https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39927 . Parts of this failing testcase were already fixed in the past, this is the remaining piece to be able to not force usage of gold in golang on aarch64 (see https://github.com/golang/go/issues/22040#issuecomment-1430110400 ). Creating a testcase by using only gas and ld.bfd requires the .reloc directives as otherwise the relocated places are always left zeroed and hence don't exhibit the problem. But the a testcase is, for instance: % cat rela.s .text .global _start _start: ret .data .p2align 4 l: .long 0x, 0x q: .quad 0x .reloc l, BFD_RELOC_64, q+42 .reloc q, BFD_RELOC_64, l+84 % as rela.s -o rela.o % ld -pie rela.o % objdump -dRj .data a.out a.out: file format elf64-littleaarch64 DYNAMIC RELOCATION RECORDS OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0002 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00020032 00020008 R_AARCH64_RELATIVE *ABS*+0x00020054 Contents of section .data: 2 43111311 87333533 C....353 Here it's obvious that address and addend are merely added to the existing section content. That's the bug. The problem is that since inceptions of the aarch64 backend the src_mask of all relocation descriptors in BFD were non-zero. That's always wrong for RELA relocs. I have a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30422] or1k relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 even when using -mcmodel=large
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30422 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Luca, Thanks for the bug report and patch. It seems like a nice elegant solution, so I have gone ahead and applied your patch. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30422] or1k relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 even when using -mcmodel=large
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30422 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8b7b3b2bf4357781439e5434c4a5942ea29e983d commit 8b7b3b2bf4357781439e5434c4a5942ea29e983d Author: Luca Bonissi Date: Wed May 10 12:08:28 2023 +0100 or1k relocation truncated to fit: R_OR1K_GOT16 even when using -mcmodel=large PR 30422 * elf32-or1k.c (or1k_elf_relocate_section): Prescan for R_OR1K_GOT_AHI16 relocs as they may occur after R_OR1K_GOT16 relocs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30409] mingw ar broken since binutils 2.33
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30409 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Starke --- Created attachment 14871 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14871=edit input files for step2 Please find in libkernel32-input.tgz the input files for step 2 and let me know if/how I can help to solve this issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/16566] Please provide a way to include static symbols in linker map file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16566 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. (With a couple of mistakes corrected). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/16566] Please provide a way to include static symbols in linker map file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16566 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=496917ce466c703c1ae3bf1cbbe753de1c091445 commit 496917ce466c703c1ae3bf1cbbe753de1c091445 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Wed May 10 10:29:52 2023 +0100 Add linker option to include local symbols in the linker map. PR 16566 * ldlang.c (ld_is_local_symbol): New function. (print_input_section): Add code to display local symbols in the section. * ldlex.h (enum option_values): Add OPTION_PRINT_MAP_LOCALS and OPTION_PRINT_MAP_LOCALS. * lexsup.c (ld_options[]): Add entries for --print-map-locals and --no-print-map-locals. * NEWS: Mention the new feature. * ld.h (struct ld_config_type): Add print_map_locals field. * ld.texi: Document the new command line option. * testsuite/ld-scripts/sizeof.s: Add a local symbol. * testsuite/ld-scripts/map-locals.d: New test control file. * testsuite/ld-scripts/map-address.exp: Run the new test. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/16566] Please provide a way to include static symbols in linker map file
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16566 --- Comment #12 from jon at beniston dot com --- Looks good, thanks Nick. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
