[Bug ld/29087] "non-canonical reference to canonical protected function" with protected visibility, -mno-direct-extern-access and virtual functions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29087 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Sam James --- Dave, can you reproduce this one? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30734] ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Version|2.41|2.42 (HEAD) --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- This looks the same as PR30733 to me (bad xfail pattern), so I'll send a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30734] New: ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30734
Bug ID: 30734
Summary: ld: 'relocatable with script' test fails on hppa
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
$ ld/ld-new --version | head -1
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808
$ grep -rsin ^FAIL ./*/*.sum
./ld/ld.sum:502:FAIL: relocatable with script
./ld/ld.sum:512:FAIL: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
./ld/ld.sum:1145:FAIL: ELF weak (alias)
```
Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new -z norelro
-L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -T relocatable.t -o
tmpdir/dump tmpdir/simple.o 2>&1} /dev/null dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -S --wide tmpdir/dump >
tmpdir/dump.out
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -S
--wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>dump.tmp} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
extra regexps in /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/relocatable.d
starting with "^ \[[ 0-9]+\] \.text.*[ \t]+PROGBITS[ \t]+0+80[
\t0-9a-f]+AX.*$"
EOF from tmpdir/dump.out
FAIL: relocatable with script
```
```
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ ./ld-new -z norelro
-L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -T relocatable.t -o
tmpdir/dump tmpdir/simple.o
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -S
--wide tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ cat tmpdir/dump.out
There are 6 section headers, starting at offset 0xc4:
Section Headers:
[Nr] Name TypeAddr OffSize ES Flg Lk Inf
Al
[ 0] NULL 00 00 00 0 0
0
[ 1] .text PROGBITS 34 04 00 AX 0 0
1
[ 2] .data PROGBITS0090 38 04 00 WA 0 0
1
[ 3] .symtab SYMTAB 3c 50 10 4 5
4
[ 4] .strtab STRTAB 8c 10 00 0 0
1
[ 5] .shstrtab STRTAB 9c 27 00 0 0
1
Key to Flags:
W (write), A (alloc), X (execute), M (merge), S (strings), I (info),
L (link order), O (extra OS processing required), G (group), T (TLS),
C (compressed), x (unknown), o (OS specific), E (exclude),
R (retain), D (mbind), p (processor specific)
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30733] ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- This one looks obvious - ./testsuite/ld-elf/retain7a.d has a skip for 'hppa-*-linux*' but that doesn't match 'hppa2.0-*'. I'll send a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30733] New: ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30733
Bug ID: 30733
Summary: ld: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a' test fail on hppa
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
$ ld/ld-new --version | head -1
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808
$ grep -rsin ^FAIL ./*/*.sum
./ld/ld.sum:502:FAIL: relocatable with script
./ld/ld.sum:512:FAIL: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
./ld/ld.sum:1145:FAIL: ELF weak (alias)
```
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym ALIGN=2-o
tmpdir/retain7.o /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/retain7.s
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym
ALIGN=2-o tmpdir/retain7.o
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/retain7.s 2>&1} /dev/null
dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
./ld-new -z norelro -L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -e
_start --gc-sections -o tmpdir/dump tmpdir/retain7.o
Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new -z norelro
-L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -e _start --gc-sections -o
tmpdir/dump tmpdir/retain7.o 2>&1} /dev/null dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -h tmpdir/dump >
tmpdir/dump.out
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -h
tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>dump.tmp} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
fail if no difference
FAIL: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym ALIGN=2-o
tmpdir/retain7.o /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/retain7.s
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../gas/as-new --defsym
ALIGN=2-o tmpdir/retain7.o
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf/retain7.s 2>&1} /dev/null
dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
./ld-new -z norelro -L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -o
tmpdir/dump tmpdir/retain7.o
Executing on host: sh -c {./ld-new -z norelro
-L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -o tmpdir/dump
tmpdir/retain7.o 2>&1} /dev/null dump.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -h tmpdir/dump >
tmpdir/dump.out
Executing on host: sh -c {/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -h
tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out 2>dump.tmp} /dev/null (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
```
and:
```
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ ./ld-new -z norelro
-L/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elf -r -o tmpdir/dump
tmpdir/retain7.o
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/../binutils/readelf -h
tmpdir/dump > tmpdir/dump.out
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $ cat tmpdir/dump.out
ELF Header:
Magic: 7f 45 4c 46 01 02 01 03 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
Class: ELF32
Data: 2's complement, big endian
Version: 1 (current)
OS/ABI:UNIX - GNU
ABI Version: 0
Type: REL (Relocatable file)
Machine: HPPA
Version: 0x1
Entry point address: 0x0
Start of program headers: 0 (bytes into file)
Start of section headers: 252 (bytes into file)
Flags: 0x210, PA-RISC 1.1
Size of this header: 52 (bytes)
Size of program headers: 0 (bytes)
Number of program headers: 0
Size of section headers: 40 (bytes)
Number of section headers: 8
Section header string table index: 7
~/git/binutils-gdb/ld $
```
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30732] ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- Created attachment 15048 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15048=edit bad-alias-segfault.tar.xz -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30732] New: ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30732
Bug ID: 30732
Summary: ld: 'ELF weak (alias)' tests fail on hppa
Product: binutils
Version: 2.42 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: sam at gentoo dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15047
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15047=edit
ld.log.xz
$ ld/ld-new --version | head -1
GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.41.50.20230808
$ grep -rsin ^FAIL ./*/*.sum
./ld/ld.sum:502:FAIL: relocatable with script
./ld/ld.sum:512:FAIL: SHF_GNU_RETAIN 7a
./ld/ld.sum:1145:FAIL: ELF weak (alias)
```
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -fpic -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/alias.c -o tmpdir/alias.o
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -fpic -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/alias.c -o tmpdir/alias.o
2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-fno-lto -L/usr/local/hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib
-L/usr/lib -o tmpdir/alias.so --shared -Wl,--no-as-needed tmpdir/alias.o
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/ -fno-lto
-L/usr/local/hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib
-o tmpdir/alias.so --shared -Wl,--no-as-needed tmpdir/alias.o 2>&1} /dev/null
ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/aliasmain.c -o
tmpdir/aliasmain.o
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/aliasmain.c -o
tmpdir/aliasmain.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/weakref1.c -o
tmpdir/weakref1.o
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/weakref1.c -o
tmpdir/weakref1.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/weakref2.c -o
tmpdir/weakref2.o
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-I/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak -g -O2 -fno-sanitize=all
-fno-lto -fno-lto -c
/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/weakref2.c -o
tmpdir/weakref2.o 2>&1} /dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-L/usr/local/hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib
-o tmpdir/alias -Wl,-rpath=.,--no-as-needed -fno-sanitize=all -fno-lto
tmpdir/aliasmain.o tmpdir/weakref1.o tmpdir/weakref2.o tmpdir/alias.so
Executing on host: sh -c {hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc
-B/home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/tmpdir/ld/
-L/usr/local/hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu/lib -L/usr/local/lib -L/lib -L/usr/lib
-o tmpdir/alias -Wl,-rpath=.,--no-as-needed -fno-sanitize=all -fno-lto
tmpdir/aliasmain.o tmpdir/weakref1.o tmpdir/weakref2.o tmpdir/alias.so 2>&1}
/dev/null ld.tmp (timeout = 300)
spawn [open ...]
tmpdir/alias >tmpdir/alias.out
child killed: segmentation violation
FAIL: ELF weak (alias)
```
Backtrace from running it manually:
```
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x41000600 in printf (__fmt=0x41000950 "value via psym1: %d, via psym2: %d,
strong %d\n") at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:86
86return __printf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, __va_arg_pack
());
(gdb) bt
#0 0x41000600 in printf (__fmt=0x41000950 "value via psym1: %d, via psym2: %d,
strong %d\n") at /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h:86
#1 main () at /home/sam/git/binutils-gdb/ld/testsuite/ld-elfweak/aliasmain.c:9
(gdb)
```
I've
[Bug ld/30724] cygwin ld performance regression since 014a602b86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to Achim from comment #7) > is that on Git somewhere? I can run a tests with it > the upcoming weekend most likely. No, the patch is not upstream anywhere yet, I'll wait for someone to test it on cygwin before committing. It applies with "git am" to either binutils master or binutils-2_41-branch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30724] cygwin ld performance regression since 014a602b86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #15045|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #8 from Alan Modra --- Created attachment 15046 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15046=edit revised patch (In reply to Hannes Domani from comment #6) > Because last_io is never set to bfd_io_read or bfd_io_write. Oops, yes, there needs to be an obvious fix.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30700] tmpdir/gp-collect-app_F test fails
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30700 --- Comment #13 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e0282cf1284b4d358892427a6b4f60d6f4c0580b commit e0282cf1284b4d358892427a6b4f60d6f4c0580b Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Thu Aug 3 12:56:54 2023 -0700 gprofng: 30700 tmpdir/gp-collect-app_F test fails gprofng/ChangeLog 2023-08-03 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/30700 * testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-collect-app_F.exp: Fix -name argument for sub-experiment filtering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30724] cygwin ld performance regression since 014a602b86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 --- Comment #7 from Achim --- That patch certainly looks more thorough than just reverting the change that caused the regression… is that on Git somewhere? I can run a tests with it the upcoming weekend most likely. Btw, Cygwin and MinGW are two completely different things except for the executasble format. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30702] objcopy and strip invalidate the effect of ld option --no-insert-timestamp
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30702 Jon Turney changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jon.turney at dronecode dot org.uk --- Comment #3 from Jon Turney --- I think for reproducible builds, we should really be doing whatever MS LINK's /Brepro flag does, which I believe is: * Add a IMAGE_DEBUG_TYPE_REPRO entry to the debug directory * Use a hash value for the "timestamp" I wrote some support for objdump to show these in [1], but skated out of the hard work of creating them. See https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16887 for why setting timestamps to zero should perhaps be approached with caution. [1] https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2020-January/109656.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30724] cygwin ld performance regression since 014a602b86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30724 --- Comment #6 from Hannes Domani --- (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5) > Created attachment 15045 [details] > reinstate seek optimisation Ist that the full patch? Because last_io is never set to bfd_io_read or bfd_io_write. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14512] -z nodelete should be default for shared libraries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14512 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fweimer at redhat dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/13141] Confusing error message with --no-copy-dt-needed-entries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13141 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14826] ld flag --as-needed do not remove extra link
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14826 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14603] no reloc emitted for ld generated veneers for ARM
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14603 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14512] -z nodelete should be default for shared libraries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14512 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=14511 --- Comment #1 from Sam James --- This came up in Qualys' recent OpenSSH writeup: https://www.qualys.com/2023/07/19/cve-2023-38408/rce-openssh-forwarded-ssh-agent.txt. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14512] -z nodelete should be default for shared libraries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14512 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/14424] support for "identical code folding"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14424 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27230] ld: Add DWARF v5 sections and .debug_types to ld/scripttempl/DWARF.sc
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27230 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27259] ld: Support SHF_LINK_ORDER self-link
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27259 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26105] PROTECTED in executable
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26105 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/29656] Weak link symbol results in incorrect address resulting in segfault
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29656 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30002] pr26391-5, pr26391-6 ld test failures on sparc64-unknown-linux-gnu since 496afd17055aeb7d8f45e01715c475664f2b73bd
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30002 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.41 Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #18 from Sam James --- And thus fixed. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26551] A definition referenced by an unneeded (--as-needed) shared object should be exported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26551 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/14435] use -fvisibility=hidden
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14435 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/21739] Inconsistent diagnostics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21739 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/5546] add functionality to modify DT tags in ELF ways to binutils
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5546 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/21479] strip doesn't handle lto archives
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21479 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/23401] binary size increases for ARM between 2.29.1 and 2.30
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23401 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24319] Compressed / uncompressed debug info confusion in BFD
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24319 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24400] ia64: binutils regression leads to gcc stage2/stage3 compare failure
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24400 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/28698] objdump is very slow in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28698 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/24768] Stop using __gnu_lto_slim symbol as a detection of a slim LTO object
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24768 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/28035] objcopy/strip: Don't convert SHT_REL to SHT_RELA
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28035 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/29785] memory bloat in version 2.39
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29785 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/16177] R_ARM_COPY reloc generated for reference in writable section
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16177 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30016] strip/objcopy should do atomic renames
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30016 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26119] ld: Support --reproduce
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26119 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28243] ld: Assigning a non-default symbol to a different version node should warn
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28243 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/12291] "ld -r" doesn't work with mixed IR/non-IR objects
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=27122 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/22831] ld causes massive thrashing if object files are not fully memory-resident: new algorithm needed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22831 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28045] add --warn-uncaught-exceptions to linker
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28045 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/18652] --no-allow-shlib-undefined affects loading of DT_NEEDED shared libraries
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18652 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=26551 CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27122] ld -r does not complain about LTO/non-LTO mix and silently produces invalid object files.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/gentoo-h ||askell/gentoo-haskell/issue ||s/1110, ||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=12291 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26925] x86/ld: Performance regression with execl()
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26925 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26551] A definition referenced by an unneeded (--as-needed) shared object should be exported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26551 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=18652 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26622] Support --gc-sections for SHF_MERGE sections
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26622 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/27122] ld -r does not complain about LTO/non-LTO mix and silently produces invalid object files.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27122 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/26781] ld: Suggest alternative spelling for "undefined reference" diagnostics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26781 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gold/19392] Second PT_LOAD starts before the first section in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19392 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24490] -z max-page-size=0x200000 -z separate-code creates huge binary
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24490 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30612] maxpagesize alignment after relro segment takes up space
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=24490 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/24490] -z max-page-size=0x200000 -z separate-code creates huge binary
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24490 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30612] maxpagesize alignment after relro segment takes up space
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org URL||https://gitlab.alpinelinux. ||org/alpine/aports/-/issues/ ||14126 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30612] maxpagesize alignment after relro segment takes up space
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28824] relro security issues
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28824 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
