[Bug ld/30791] Do not merge sections with same name and SHF_LINK_ORDER, but different sh_link value
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30791 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=a422bb9db1a432f6094a186e243717512d50eec9 commit a422bb9db1a432f6094a186e243717512d50eec9 Author: Alan Modra Date: Wed Aug 30 10:45:03 2023 +0930 Re: readelf/objdump: Handle DWARF info with mixed types of range section PR 30791 * dwarf.c (free_debug_information): Free range_versions. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30612] maxpagesize alignment after relro segment takes up space
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30612 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song --- Unfortunately, I believe this is nearly infeasible to fix, as long as the alignment still follows max-page-size, as switching to a two-RW-PT_LOAD layout in GNU ld is very difficult. I have a short summary of different design choices: https://maskray.me/blog/2020-11-15-explain-gnu-linker-options#z-relro > GNU ld uses one RW PT_LOAD program header with padding at the start. The > first half of the PT_LOAD overlaps with PT_GNU_RELRO. The padding is added so > that the end of PT_GNU_RELRO is aligned by max-page-size. (See ld.bfd > --verbose output.) Prior to GNU ld 2.39, the end was aligned by > common-page-size. GNU ld's one RW PT_LOAD layout makes the alignment increase > the file size. max-page-size can be large, such as 65536 for many systems, > causing wasted space. > > lld utilitizes two RW PT_LOAD program headers: one for RELRO sections and the > other for non-RELRO sections. Although this might appear unusual initially, > it eliminates the need for alignment padding as seen in GNU ld's layout. I > implemented the current layout in 2019 (https://reviews.llvm.org/D58892). > > The layout used by mold is similar to that of lld. In mold's case, the end of > PT_GNU_RELRO is padded to max-page-size by appending a SHT_NOBITS > .relro_padding section. This approach ensures that the last page of > PT_GNU_RELRO is protected, regardless of the system page size. However, when > the system page size is less than max-page-size, the map from the first RW > PT_LOAD is larger than needed. > > In my opinion, losing protection for the last page when the system page size > is larger than common-page-size is not at all an issue. Protecting .got.plt > is the main purpose of -z now. Protecting a small portion of .data.rel.ro > doesn't really make the program more secure, given that .data and .bss are so > huge and full of attach targets. If users are really anxious, they can set > common-page-size to match their system page size. > > I am unsure whether lld's hidden assumption about common-page-size <= system > page-size is an issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 61822 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_dwarf: Stack-buffer-overflow in coff_bigobj_swap_aux_in
Updates: Labels: -restrict-view-commit Comment #3 on issue 61822 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_dwarf: Stack-buffer-overflow in coff_bigobj_swap_aux_in https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=61822#c3 This bug has been fixed. It has been opened to the public. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gprofng/30491] mttest failed on aarch64 / OL9
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30491 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30575] gprofng cannot profile application with clone3()
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30575 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/29987] bfd/archive.c:1447: undefined reference to `filename_ncmp'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29987 Kurt Goebel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kurt.goebel at oracle dot com Priority|P2 |P3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30703] bfd doc doesn't build anymore with makeinfo 4.12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703 --- Comment #7 from Tom Tromey --- Oh never mind, they were here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-March/126468.html Given the state of BFD doc stuff, I think it's best to just back out my patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30703] bfd doc doesn't build anymore with makeinfo 4.12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at sourceware dot org --- Comment #6 from Tom Tromey --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #0) > As was pointed out on the list, commit 8bb23cdbb498 raises the minimum > makeinfo version required, yet top-level configure.ac continues to be happy > with 4.7, thus causing the build to fail with (in my case) 4.12 Can you please post the error messages? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30808] gprofng tests failed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30808] New: gprofng tests failed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 Bug ID: 30808 Summary: gprofng tests failed Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- 1. 3 tests failed without --enable-shared: % mkdir x86_64-linux-gnu % cd x86_64-linux-gnu % ../configure --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-gdb --disable-sim % make -j 20 % (cd gprofng/; make check) ... Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/display.exp ... Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-archive.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/gp-archive Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-collect-app_F.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/gp-collect-app_F Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/setpath_map.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/setpath_map === gprofng Summary === # of expected passes3 # of unexpected failures3 2. All tests failed with --enable-shared: % rm -rf * % ../configure --target=x86_64-linux-gnu --disable-gdb --disable-sim --enable-shared % make -j 20 ERROR: compilation of test program in jsynprog failed ERROR: compilation of test program in mttest failed ERROR: compilation of test program in synprog failed Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-archive.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/gp-archive Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/gp-collect-app_F.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/gp-collect-app_F Running /ws/gprofng-dev-backedup/vmezents/GPROF/binutils-gdb.git/gprofng/testsuite/gprofng.display/setpath_map.exp ... FAIL: tmpdir/setpath_map === gprofng Summary === # of unexpected failures3 # of unresolved testcases 3 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30703] bfd doc doesn't build anymore with makeinfo 4.12
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30703 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton --- Right - I have proposed a patch and asked for comments: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2023-August/129261.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30805] readelf: typos in user messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30805 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Nicolas, Thanks for pointing out these typos and providing a fix. I have checked in your corrections. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30806] New: CPPFLAGS are missing for bfd/chew, syslex_wrap and sysinfo
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30806
Bug ID: 30806
Summary: CPPFLAGS are missing for bfd/chew, syslex_wrap and
sysinfo
Product: binutils
Version: 2.41
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: nicolas at debian dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 15094
--> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15094=edit
patch
Hello.
The attached patch fixes this.
It does not refresh {bfd,binutils}/Makefile.in.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30805] readelf: typos in user messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30805 nicolas at debian dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30805] New: readelf: typos in user messages
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30805 Bug ID: 30805 Summary: readelf: typos in user messages Product: binutils Version: 2.42 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: nicolas at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 15093 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15093=edit patch Hello. A trivial patch is attached for two typos. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28231] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.text'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28231 Jan Beulich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Jan Beulich --- Thanks for confirming. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28231] relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_32S against `.text'
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28231 --- Comment #3 from Markus Fischer --- (In reply to Jan Beulich from comment #2) > Your testcase doesn't match anything in the referenced source; the closest I > can see there is > > "leaq 1f(%%rip), %%rax" "\n\t" > > yet the difference (whether or not (%%rip) is appended to 1f) is what I > would expect to make things work. In fact that code was changed in this very > way almost three years ago. > > I'm inclined to conclude: Not an issue anymore with the code brought into > proper shape. Please confirm. Thank you for pointing that out. With (%%rip) appended to 1f the TK code links without error. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/28441] [RISCV] ld linker relaxation is really slow
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28441 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
