[Bug ld/30924] ld testsuite: 'Version' pattern grabs 'Version5 EABI', breaking test on arm-linux-musleabihf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30925] ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30925 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30918] ld testsuite: non-PIC shared tests fail on powerpc-linux-musl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30918 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30917] ld testsuite: glibc-specific DT_RELR tests should not be run on musl systems
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30917 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30916] addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30916 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30905] ld: Test case pr28158 fails on x86_64-linux-musl when index is > 19
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30905 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |2.42 CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30894] bison should be no hard dependency
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30894 Vladimir Mezentsev changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Vladimir Mezentsev --- Update status as resolved/fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30940] alpha: ld segfaults in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30940 --- Comment #2 from Michael Cree --- Thanks, tried with the patch. Linking succeeds with no warning messages. Built package went on to complete test suite with no failure so resultant executable appears to work. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30376] windres cannot parse rc files which it itself generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30376 --- Comment #13 from Pali Rohár --- Ok, if it is not possible to fix this particular case then it would be useful to document this incompatibility with MS RC format. I can understand that rewriting the whole parser is not something which is going to happen just because of this issue. Also it could be useful if instead of the generic message "syntax error" is printed some more describing message like "MS-style double quotes are not supported" but I can imagine that the whole error message processing is part of the parser and hence even this is not possible to fix. So documentation change is the best fix there. And what about other issues described in comment #6? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30894] bison should be no hard dependency
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30894 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e5b3bfa519a9704288219d09fef1a792663351c0 commit e5b3bfa519a9704288219d09fef1a792663351c0 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Tue Oct 3 23:53:01 2023 -0700 gprofng: 30894 bison should be no hard dependency When running from a distribution tarball, bison should not be necessary. The generated files (QLParser.tab.cc, QLParser.tab.hh) should be distributed. configure.ac should not abort if bison is missing. configure.ac should remove temporary files (dummy.c, Simple.class). bison must be run once to create QLParser.tab.cc and QLParser.tab.hh. gprofng/ChangeLog 2023-10-03 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/30894 * configure.ac: Don't abort if bison is missing. Remove temporary files. * src/Makefile.am: Distribute QLParser.tab.cc and QLParser.tab.hh. * Run bison once to create QLParser.tab.cc and QLParser.tab.hh. * configure: Rebuild. * src/Makefile.in: Rebuild. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30944] LoongArch linker relaxation support in GAS breaks .balign
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30944 Icenowy Zheng changed: What|Removed |Added Component|gas |ld --- Comment #1 from Icenowy Zheng --- Sorry for disturbance here, the misaligned symbols in the .o file is expected; however ld is expected to re-align it, which failed in the case of libglvnd. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30930] ld-2.41 links mame in a way which gets stuck on aarch64
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30930 Szabolcs Nagy changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-10-05 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #22 from Szabolcs Nagy --- i can confirm the issue, not yet sure what's going on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30903] nm: heap-buffer-overflow at bfd/bfd.c:2677 in bfd_demangle
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30903 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Hi 曾信彥 , This bug has already been fixed. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30904] nm: SEGV at bfd/elf.c:2267 in _bfd_elf_get_dynamic_symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30904 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Hi 曾信彥 Thanks for reporting this bug. There was a silly typo in the sources where a check was meant to catch an allocation requires for an array returning NULL, but instead it tested an already allocated pointer. Fixed with a simple patch. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30904] nm: SEGV at bfd/elf.c:2267 in _bfd_elf_get_dynamic_symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30904 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=345309aadd64b701426fe3b4f4184ae689feef06 commit 345309aadd64b701426fe3b4f4184ae689feef06 Author: Nick Clifton Date: Thu Oct 5 15:27:47 2023 +0100 Fix: nm: SEGV at bfd/elf.c:2267 in _bfd_elf_get_dynamic_symbols PR 30904 * elf.c (_bfd_elf_get_dynamic_symbols): Fix typo when checking to see if the gnuchains array has been successfully created. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30905] ld: Test case pr28158 fails on x86_64-linux-musl when index is > 19
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30905 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch approved and applied - thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30905] ld: Test case pr28158 fails on x86_64-linux-musl when index is > 19
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30905 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=1499719e6d7a556025b5c95956434f9047b8b83c commit 1499719e6d7a556025b5c95956434f9047b8b83c Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 15:05:15 2023 +0100 Fix: ld: Test case pr28158 fails on x86_64-linux-musl when index is > 19 PR 30905 * testsuite/ld-elf/pr28158.rd: Adjust regexp to allow for section indicies larger than 9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30916] addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30916 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied - thanks. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30916] addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30916 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c4e0d285cfccc6c7d90c34441cbe52a4c471e4c0 commit c4e0d285cfccc6c7d90c34441cbe52a4c471e4c0 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 14:49:51 2023 +0100 Fix: addr2line testsuite fails when targeting PowerPC 64 big-endian with ELFv2 ABI PR 30916 * testsuite/binutils-all/addr2line.exp: Do not use PowerPC specific options when working with a MUSL target. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30944] New: LoongArch linker relaxation support in GAS breaks .balign
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30944 Bug ID: 30944 Summary: LoongArch linker relaxation support in GAS breaks .balign Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: icenowy at aosc dot io Target Milestone: --- The following assembly code: ``` .text .balign 256 func1: la.global $a0,exit nop nop nop .balign 256 func2: la.global $a0,exit nop nop nop ``` Surely we expect func1 @ 0x0 and func2 @ 0x100, however when assembled with no extra options with GAS 2.41, func1 is @ 0xfc and func2 0x20c. Add `-mno-relax` option to GAS could workaround this. This leads to miscompilation of https://github.com/NVIDIA/libglvnd/blob/master/src/GLdispatch/vnd-glapi/entry_loongarch64_tsd.c (which emits thousands of function thunks .baligned to 256B, and referenced by the index at runtime), and leads to broken GL and thus broken desktop. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30917] ld testsuite: glibc-specific DT_RELR tests should not be run on musl systems
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30917 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied - thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30917] ld testsuite: glibc-specific DT_RELR tests should not be run on musl systems
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30917 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8838ac1c9e05baa269fb50ebaa3318925b4df55b commit 8838ac1c9e05baa269fb50ebaa3318925b4df55b Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 14:26:32 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: glibc-specific DT_RELR tests should not be run on musl systems PR 30917 * testsuite/ld-elf/dt-relr.exp: Skip for MUSL targets. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30896] gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30896 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30896] gprofng display text: please provide a way (or document how) to include the object name next to the called functions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30896 --- Comment #4 from Ruud van der Pas --- This is indeed confusing. The keyword "name" in a metrics definition is different than the "-name" option. As was pointed out in Bugzilla 30898, this is the correct way to include the object name: $ gprofng display text -name short:soname -metrics e.%totalcpu:name For example: $ gprofng display text -name short:soname -metrics e.%totalcpu:name -functions experiment.2.thr.er Current metrics: e.%totalcpu:name Current Sort Metric: Exclusive Total CPU Time ( e.%totalcpu ) Functions sorted by metric: Exclusive Total CPU Time Excl. TotalName CPU sec. % 1.861 100.00[] 1.771 95.16 mxv_core [] 0.050 2.69 drand48 [] 0.020 1.08 erand48_r [] 0.020 1.08 init_data [] 0. 0. @0x1de20 [] 0. 0. __libc_start_call_main [] 0. 0. __libc_start_main_impl [] 0. 0. main [] 0. 0. start_thread [] $ I will add a clarification and example to the documentation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 Assignee|ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c ||om --- Comment #4 from Ruud van der Pas --- I think there are several issues brought up in this RFE. It will be cleaner and easier to submit patches for, if we split this RFE into several others. This is why I have created two RFEs for "display html" and cross referenced them: 30942 and 30943. We can then keep this one for the "display text" related performance issues mentioned. I have also changed this RFE from P2 to P3, and re-assigned it to Vladimir, since he is the lead maintainer for "display text". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30943 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30943] [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30943 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | Priority|P2 |P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- I'm not sure that this is the right approach. Most performance analysts will want to look at the disassembly at some point. Instead, it will be better to explore opportunities to improve the performance. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30943] New: [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30943 Bug ID: 30943 Summary: [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- In Bugzilla 30898, John Doe reports the following: "Maybe the default for "gprofng display html" should be to NOT include disassembly (this may be a separate issue though)?" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- Apologies. The reference in the first comment should be to #30898. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30918] ld testsuite: non-PIC shared tests fail on powerpc-linux-musl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30918 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch approved and applied - thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30898] consider multi-threading for gprofng display text
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30898 Assignee|vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot c |ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com |om | Priority|P2 |P3 CC||ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com --- Comment #1 from Ruud van der Pas --- Since "display html" is written in Perl, the code may not be as efficient as "display text", which has been written in C/C++ and heavily optimized by the compiler. This does not mean there may not be room for source level performance improvement(s). This case needs to be investigated and where possible, improved. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30918] ld testsuite: non-PIC shared tests fail on powerpc-linux-musl
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30918 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=99b06f8a80cf81f34c5f9b3f8c0e69246f792317 commit 99b06f8a80cf81f34c5f9b3f8c0e69246f792317 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 13:52:56 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: non-PIC shared tests fail on powerpc-linux-musl PR 30918 * testsuite/ld-shared/shared.exp: Add XFAILs for tests that fail with the MUSL library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30942] New: [display html] Improve the performance
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Bug ID: 30942 Summary: [display html] Improve the performance Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: ruud.vanderpas at oracle dot com Target Milestone: --- In Bugzilla 30989, John Doe reports the following: "recording a sample program that uses lots of shared object files (most loaded with dlopen) using "gprofng collect app" is quite fast; doing the "gprofng display html" afterwards was... unexpected. The first process took several minutes and wrote hundreds of MBs (mostly disassembly) to disk /tmp/install/bin/gp-display-text -limit 100 -viewmode machine -compare off -script display.2.html/gp-script /tmp/binutils-2.41/build/test.2.er The second process ran even much longer (actually I've killt it after taking a single complete core for over 2 hours) perl /tmp/install/bin/gp-display-html --whoami=gprofng display html test.2.er Both processes ran on a single core, so the main question here is: is it possible to use multiple cores for those tasks?" -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30923] ld testsuite: Thumb PLT and GOT tests should be skipped on musl armhf targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30923 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied - thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30923] ld testsuite: Thumb PLT and GOT tests should be skipped on musl armhf targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30923 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8023a054649541dfce3be99a5f84c8afb66f2c62 commit 8023a054649541dfce3be99a5f84c8afb66f2c62 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 12:51:53 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: Thumb PLT and GOT tests should be skipped on musl armhf targets PR 30923 * testsuite/ld-arm/thumb-plt-got.d: Skip test for configurations using the MUSL library. * testsuite/ld-arm/thumb-plt.d: Likewise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30940] alpha: ld segfaults in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30940 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30925] ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30925 --- Comment #1 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=693ac69b4d41453f8876512780c35ba485f7c4a1 commit 693ac69b4d41453f8876512780c35ba485f7c4a1 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 12:38:40 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86 PR 30925 PR 22001 * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Skip the pr22001 test with TEXTREL relocations enabled on configurations using the MUSL library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/22001] -z nocopyreloc doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22001 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/22001] -z nocopyreloc doesn't work right
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22001 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=693ac69b4d41453f8876512780c35ba485f7c4a1 commit 693ac69b4d41453f8876512780c35ba485f7c4a1 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 12:38:40 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86 PR 30925 PR 22001 * testsuite/ld-i386/i386.exp: Skip the pr22001 test with TEXTREL relocations enabled on configurations using the MUSL library. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30925] ld testsuite: pr22001-1 test segfaults on musl/x86
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30925 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton --- Patch applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30924] ld testsuite: 'Version' pattern grabs 'Version5 EABI', breaking test on arm-linux-musleabihf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Patch approved and applied. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30924] ld testsuite: 'Version' pattern grabs 'Version5 EABI', breaking test on arm-linux-musleabihf
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30924 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nick Clifton : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=41ef7afa97212aa219b90b72c4f363eac0aaae40 commit 41ef7afa97212aa219b90b72c4f363eac0aaae40 Author: A. Wilcox Date: Thu Oct 5 12:13:08 2023 +0100 Fix: ld testsuite: 'Version' pattern grabs 'Version5 EABI', breaking test on arm-linux-musleabihf PR 30924 * testsuite/ld-elfvers/vers.exp (objdump_emptyverstuff): Handle EABI version information in objdump's output. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30915] ld testsuite: visibility incorrectly marked XFAIL on musl targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915 --- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15155 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15155=edit Proposed patch -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30915] ld testsuite: visibility incorrectly marked XFAIL on musl targets
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30915
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |nickc at redhat dot com
CC||nickc at redhat dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2023-10-05
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to A. Wilcox from comment #0)
> #if defined (__GLIBC__) && (__GLIBC__ > 2 \
> || (__GLIBC__ == 2 \
> && __GLIBC_MINOR__ >= 2))
> That is.. not a very helpful test for musl targets. I don't know the best
> way forward for this. There is no preprocessor macro test for musl targets,
Still ? I would have thought that they had realized the problems that this
causes and changed their minds by now.
> so I would suggest something akin to changing the first line from:
> [...]
Given the other problems you found with making this change, I would suggest
that it would be safer to patch vsb.exp instead. I am uploading a possible
fix, although you may need to to tweak it in order to get it to work. (I do
not actually have a muscl installation with which I can test it).
> Similarly, for armv7, we have lines 104-111 testing whether non-PIC tests
> should XFAIL:
[This would have been better filed as a separate PR, even though it refers to
code in the same file. But since you have filed it here...]
>
> The unsupported relocation does happen but is not a fatal error so the test
> finds the matching regex line ("undefined reference to `visibility'") and
> XPASSes.
So if we make the warnings fatal then the test will work ?
So if you change:
if [run_host_cmd_yesno "$CC_FOR_TARGET" "$CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET -c
$tmpdir/movw-detect.c -o $tmpdir/movw-detect.o"] {
to:
if [run_host_cmd_yesno "$CC_FOR_TARGET" "$CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET
-Wl,--fatal-warnings -c $tmpdir/movw-detect.c -o $tmpdir/movw-detect.o"] {
then the test should now work ?
Cheers
Nick
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30940] alpha: ld segfaults in
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30940 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Created attachment 15154 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15154=edit Proposed patch Hi Michael, Please try this patch. It should stop the segfault, but it will not fix the underlying problem of the linker being unable to apply a relocation because it is being made against a local symbol in a shared library. That problem - I suspect - is due to how the shared library is built. I would expect that it needs to export that symbol as a global symbol. Of course this is just a guess as I have no way of actually investigating in depth. Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/30376] windres cannot parse rc files which it itself generated
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30376 --- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton --- (In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #10) > (In reply to Pali Rohár from comment #7) > I think the point that you are trying to make however is that the MS > resource compiler actually includes the double quote characters as part of > the resource names, correct ? I am sorry, I do not think that there is any way for windres to support MS style quoted names without completely rewriting the parser. It is possible to have double quotes in names, but I suspect that the method is windres specific: """this_name_starts_and_ends_with_quotation_marks""" Ie if you put "" inside a string that is enclosed in "..." marks, then the "" is converted into a single " character and taken to be part of the name. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
