[Bug gprofng/31109] gprofng not built and installed in a combined binutils+gcc build

2023-12-21 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31109

--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Mezentsev  
---
I prepared a patch for the releases/gcc-13 branch.
Richard Biener  rejected my patch for this branch.
Which branch should I use? master, trunk or something else?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug ld/31179] RISC-V: The SET/ADD/SUB fix breaks ABI compatibility with 2.41 objects

2023-12-21 Thread nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31179

--- Comment #8 from Nelson Chu  ---
Created attachment 15270
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15270&action=edit
proposed solution with the tag to keep compatible

Updated to have a tag, this patch should be applied after the proposed v1
patch.

The object which marked by the tag means it won't have any non-zero ddend in
SUB_ULEB128 from .uleb128 directives, so we don't need to ignore them to get
the
correct calculation in linker.

Since the tag is non-standard in riscv psabi, so need use
elf_other_obj_attributes_proc rather than elf_known_obj_attributes_proc api to
access.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug gprofng/30195] [display text] Source code location can not be found

2023-12-21 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30195

Vladimir Mezentsev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||robertjenssen at ozemail dot 
com.a
   ||u

--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Mezentsev  
---
*** Bug 31121 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug gprofng/31121] gprofng does not recognise source in a shared object

2023-12-21 Thread vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31121

Vladimir Mezentsev  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

--- Comment #19 from Vladimir Mezentsev  
---
It is a duplicate of 30195.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 30195 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


[Bug gprofng/30779] gprofng: fails to build with musl-1.2.4 (gprofng/src/Data_window.h:56:3: error: 'off64_t' does not name a type; did you mean 'off_t'?)

2023-12-21 Thread kurt.goebel at oracle dot com
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779

--- Comment #7 from Kurt Goebel  ---
    Thank you for responding to musl issues!

     Good to let them know where we are

     I'm sure they appreciate your explanation

     Kurt


On 12/21/23 1:40 AM, vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com wrote:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30779__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!K8Dln1WWQeCCQikDkZ4YfU3DWeoY0g0f8XOHvICdnaL4Erz9EFGO4EsNZ38vVxWPFab06Fkq_ttgUVKBML7aVmprh5kKeByd$
>
> Vladimir Mezentsev  changed:
>
> What|Removed |Added
> 
>   Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
> See Also|
> |https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/bugz__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!K8Dln1WWQeCCQikDkZ4YfU3DWeoY0g0f8XOHvICdnaL4Erz9EFGO4EsNZ38vVxWPFab06Fkq_ttgUVKBML7aVmprhwhmEanT$
> ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=29477,
> |
> |https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://sourceware.org/bugz__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!K8Dln1WWQeCCQikDkZ4YfU3DWeoY0g0f8XOHvICdnaL4Erz9EFGO4EsNZ38vVxWPFab06Fkq_ttgUVKBML7aVmprhwhmEanT$
> ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=29593
>
> --- Comment #6 from Vladimir Mezentsev  
> ---
> We have the other bugs against gprofng-musl:
> 29477 Build failure on musl: collector_module.h:78:13: error: duplicate member
> ‘pwrite’
> 29593 error: '__u64' undeclared (first use in this function) for
> aarch64-linux-musl host
> 30893 gprofng uses syscall + perf_event (hwcdrv) and ptrace (gpcollect) 
> without
> any check and doc
>
> I can fix build issues.
> But I cannot fix the run time problem before 2.42.
> The known problem is getcontext() is absent in libc on musl.
>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.