[Bug gprofng/31252] gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30824] internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|--- |2.42 Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #9 from Alan Modra --- Fixed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30824] internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_42-branch branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8532b62c9bf088727a37c3627f3882a69631bb39 commit 8532b62c9bf088727a37c3627f3882a69631bb39 Author: Alan Modra Date: Tue Jan 16 11:06:23 2024 +1030 PR30824 internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs This corrects a counting problem, where prior to relocate_section relr encoded relative relocs were allowed when it was known they were on even boundaries, but relocate_section can only put relative relocs (non-relr) on eight byte boundaries. PR 30824 * elf64-ppc.c (RELR_ALIGN): Define, use throughout. (maybe_relr): New function, use throughout. (cherry picked from commit f91074ebd8dc8077c9c778a42360e77a636dce5e) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30824] internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f91074ebd8dc8077c9c778a42360e77a636dce5e commit f91074ebd8dc8077c9c778a42360e77a636dce5e Author: Alan Modra Date: Tue Jan 16 11:06:23 2024 +1030 PR30824 internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs This corrects a counting problem, where prior to relocate_section relr encoded relative relocs were allowed when it was known they were on even boundaries, but relocate_section can only put relative relocs (non-relr) on eight byte boundaries. PR 30824 * elf64-ppc.c (RELR_ALIGN): Define, use throughout. (maybe_relr): New function, use throughout. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30943] [display html] Do not generate disassembly by default
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30943 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- I will investigate this further, but upfront I'm not sure this is a good approach to improve the performance. It will also complicate the code, since there won't be any links to the html files with the disassembly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30942] [display html] Improve the performance
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30942 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Ruud van der Pas --- I identified an opportunity to improve the performance in the part that generates the caller-callee information. This has a noticeable positive impact. Especially on applications with a larger number of functions. The fix is in binutils 2.42. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30439] [display html] Assertion error in caller-callee structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30439 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- The fix is in binutils 2.42. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30438] [display html] Assertion error in function structure creation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30438 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Ruud van der Pas --- The fixe is in binutils 2.42. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25602] Unclear documentation about .altmacro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25602 seanga2 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seanga2 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from seanga2 at gmail dot com --- To expand on this, .altmacro is a global setting applied at macro invocation, not at macro definition. This is not documented anywhere. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31255] New: keyword arguments do not work with .altmacro
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31255 Bug ID: 31255 Summary: keyword arguments do not work with .altmacro Product: binutils Version: 2.41 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: seanga2 at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Consider the following program: .macro foo bar=1, baz=2 .print "\bar \baz" .endm foo baz=3 when assembling, it prints $ as macro.S 1 3 However, if .altmacro is added, then it prints $ as altmacro.S baz=3 2 This behavior is not documented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31252] gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=29107, ||https://sourceware.org/bugz ||illa/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31252] New: gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 Bug ID: 31252 Summary: gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again) Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gprofng Assignee: vladimir.mezentsev at oracle dot com Reporter: xry111 at xry111 dot site Target Milestone: --- PR 29107 has came back after PR 30808 fix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30824] internal error with -z pack-relative-relocs
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30824 --- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton --- Hi Alan, (In reply to Alan Modra from comment #5) > Created attachment 15305 [details] > increase relr alignment requirement > > untested That patch does work. At least as far as building FreeRDP goes. Please could you apply it to the 2.42 branch as well as the mainline ? Cheers Nick -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
