[Bug gprofng/30808] gprofng tests failed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 --- Comment #8 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=883df8a8c0afef2e1d0a17083d95001251f7d3f6 commit 883df8a8c0afef2e1d0a17083d95001251f7d3f6 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. (cherry picked from commit 26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31252] gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_41-branch branch has been updated by Sam James : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=883df8a8c0afef2e1d0a17083d95001251f7d3f6 commit 883df8a8c0afef2e1d0a17083d95001251f7d3f6 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. (cherry picked from commit 26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug libsframe/31108] combined binutils+gcc build fails to install (libbfd installed before libsframe)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31108 --- Comment #5 from Indu Bhagat --- I proposed a backport at gcc-patches mailing list https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-December/639444.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30914] ld: "SFrame simple link" test fails on x86_64-linux-musl due to PC offset
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30914 Indu Bhagat changed: What|Removed |Added CC||indu.bhagat at oracle dot com --- Comment #1 from Indu Bhagat --- I am not able to reproduce this for the said target. Can you confirm the configure command ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31277] building binutils targeting x86_64-linux-gnu on s390x-linux-gnu doesn't enable i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux-gnu Host||s390x-linux-gnu -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31277] building binutils targeting x86_64-linux-gnu on s390x-linux-gnu doesn't enable i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277 Matthias Klose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Andreas.Krebbel at de dot ibm.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/31277] New: building binutils targeting x86_64-linux-gnu on s390x-linux-gnu doesn't enable i686-linux-gnu
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31277 Bug ID: 31277 Summary: building binutils targeting x86_64-linux-gnu on s390x-linux-gnu doesn't enable i686-linux-gnu Product: binutils Version: 2.42 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: doko at debian dot org Target Milestone: --- seeing this on the 2.42 branch. did't see this building gcc-12 or gcc-13 cross compilers, however a gcc-14 build (trunk) failed. the x86_64-linux-gnu build is biarch by default, so building for 32bit as well, however building a binutils on s390x-linux-gnu targeting x86_64-linux-gnu dails in the 32bit subdir in libgcc that it doesn't understand 32bit x86. This is working on host architectures like arm64, ppc64el, and probably others, but not on s390x. explicitly adding i686-linux-gnu to --enable-targets seems to do the job. so why do I have to do that on s390x? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
Issue 63702 in oss-fuzz: binutils:fuzz_as: Out-of-memory in fuzz_as
Updates: Labels: Deadline-Approaching Comment #2 on issue 63702 by sheriffbot: binutils:fuzz_as: Out-of-memory in fuzz_as https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/detail?id=63702#c2 This bug is approaching its deadline for being fixed, and will be automatically derestricted within 7 days. If a fix is planned within 2 weeks after the deadline has passed, a grace extension can be granted. - Your friendly Sheriffbot -- You received this message because: 1. You were specifically CC'd on the issue You may adjust your notification preferences at: https://bugs.chromium.org/hosting/settings Reply to this email to add a comment.
[Bug gprofng/30808] gprofng tests failed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 --- Comment #7 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_42-branch branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034 commit 26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31252] gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 --- Comment #2 from Sourceware Commits --- The binutils-2_42-branch branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034 commit 26f557af696726a8556bff12f54e4d05cd7a5034 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/30808] gprofng tests failed
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30808 --- Comment #6 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c37ad9ea1618969273b3a3b75278b0e96bb63a78 commit c37ad9ea1618969273b3a3b75278b0e96bb63a78 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31252] gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail (again)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31252 --- Comment #1 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Mezentsev : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=c37ad9ea1618969273b3a3b75278b0e96bb63a78 commit c37ad9ea1618969273b3a3b75278b0e96bb63a78 Author: Vladimir Mezentsev Date: Fri Jan 19 18:40:21 2024 -0800 Fix 31252 gprofng causes testsuite parallel jobs fail Before running our tests, we made a fake installation into ./tmpdir. This installation changes libopcodes.la in the build area. Gas testing may fail if gas and gprofng tests are run in parallel. I create a script to run gprofng. Inside this script, LD_LIBRARY_PATH, GPROFNG_SYSCONFDIR are set. putenv_libcollector_ld_misc() first uses $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS to create directories for SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH ($SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH is used to set up LD_PRELOAD). gprofng/ChangeLog 2024-01-19 Vladimir Mezentsev PR gprofng/31252 PR gprofng/30808 * src/envsets.cc (putenv_libcollector_ld_misc): Use $GPROFNG_PRELOAD_LIBDIRS first to build SP_COLLECTOR_LIBRARY_PATH. * testsuite/config/default.exp: Create a script to run gprofng. * testsuite/lib/display-lib.exp: Fix typo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21033] Large (C++) debug libraries using COFF linker take large amounts of time to build (30 minutes)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21033 Nick Clifton changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||nickc at redhat dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton --- Fixed by commit: 6aadf8a04d162feb2afe3c41f5b36534d661d447 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/31270] New: Unknown instructions in the instruction table (RISCV assembler
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31270
Bug ID: 31270
Summary: Unknown instructions in the instruction table (RISCV
assembler
Product: binutils
Version: 2.16
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
Reporter: jacob at jacob dot remcomp.fr
Target Milestone: ---
RISCV assembler
The instructions th.ipop and th.ipush are not documented in the T-Head
documentation and nowhere in the net.
I do not know what it is, and would like to know why it appears in the
instruction table. When I assemble this, it produces 0x5b
My T-Head machine doesn't boot (corrupt disk) so I can't test this. What do
this instructions do?
These are the entries in the instruction table:
/* Vendor-specific (T-Head) XTheadInt instructions. */
{"th.ipop",0,INSN_CLASS_XTHEADINT,"",MATCH_TH_IPOP,MASK_TH_IPOP,match_opcode,0},
{"th.ipush",0,INSN_CLASS_XTHEADINT,"",MATCH_TH_IPUSH,MASK_TH_IPUSH,match_opcode,0},
Thanks in advance
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/30944] LoongArch linker relaxation support breaks .balign
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30944 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at xry111 dot site --- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao --- It should be fixed with 2.42. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
