[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Andre Vieira --- I believe it has now been backported to all relevant branches. Closing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 --- Comment #4 from Andre Vieira --- I'll wait a week or so before backporting to affected branches. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/26858] [arm] unsupported vmul instruction for vfp5-sp-d16 + armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfirmed||2020-11-12 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- Confirmed this, typo in the ARM_VARIANT minimum requirement used the double precision feature bit instead of the single precision one. Testing a patch. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 --- Comment #14 from Andre Vieira --- Oh doh... I was looking at the Tag_CPU_arch instead of arch_profile. Sorry Alexander. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 --- Comment #11 from Andre Vieira --- Nick were you able to reproduce this locally? I have tried a bunch of different arm targets and branches but could not reproduce this behaviour, which is weird... Might be there is some other issue masking this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25992] Wrong Tag_CPU_arch_profile for armv8-r
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25992 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- Hi Alexander, I can't seem to reproduce this with trunk. What version is this based on and how are you configuring binutils? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25863] MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25863 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Andre Vieira --- Closing as I believe this has been fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25863] MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25863 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25863] New: MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25863 Bug ID: 25863 Summary: MVE: Issue with scalar vmul inside an it block Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- When parsing the following with -march=armv8.1-m.main+mve.fp, GAS currently wrongfully rejects it. .syntax unified .text it lt vmullt.f32 s0, s1, s2 In my original code I only tested this still worked for non-mve assembly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25376] Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- Fixed in master, 2.34 and 2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25660] Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25660 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Andre Vieira --- Fixed in master 2.34 and 2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25660] New: Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25660 Bug ID: 25660 Summary: Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled Product: binutils Version: 2.33 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following assembly will be wrongly rejected if mve is enabled: .syntax unified .text itt lt vsublt.f32 s0, s1, s2 vaddlt.f32 s0, s1, s2 This is because I forgot to allow for single precision register parsing for vsubl/vaddl which is what gets matched when MVE is enabled as 't' is stripped as a potential true lane predication suffix. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25660] Failing to parse vsublt in an it block with MVE enabled
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25660 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25472] [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25472 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Andre Vieira --- Fixed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25472] [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25472 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25472] New: [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25472 Bug ID: 25472 Summary: [Arm] +mve does not enable DSP instructions Product: binutils Version: 2.33 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- MVE architecturally demands the implementation of the DSP extensions, so +mve should also enable DSP instructions like uadd8 r0, r1, r2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25376] Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-none-eabi Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Build||2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/25376] New: Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25376 Bug ID: 25376 Summary: Setting FPU reset's MVE feature bits but FPU can't set MVE feature bits Product: binutils Version: 2.33 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- GAS -mfpu command-line option and .fpu assembler directive reset the MVE feature bits but can't set it. I.e. -mfpu or .fpu will disable mve but aren't able to set it. It would be more natural if -mfpu and .fpu would only reset the set of bits they can set. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 --- Comment #3 from Andre Vieira --- Backported this to 2.32, not planning any other backports. OK To close ticket? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/24460] bfd/elf32-arm.c: get_value_helper, uninitialized value used
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24460 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED CC||avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #2 from Andre Vieira --- I messed up the commit message for bfd/ChangeLog in https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commit;h=e6f65e7573a317ac4efff26fe0e49fe1b9e7a596 But that commit fixes this issue, so closing as RESOLVED - FIXED. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 --- Comment #1 from Andre Vieira --- Patch up for review on the mailing list https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2019-05/msg00201.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Build||2.27, 2.28, 2.29, 2.30, ||2.31, 2.32, 2.33 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |avieira at gcc dot gnu.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/24559] load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Andre Vieira changed: What|Removed |Added Target||arm-* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/24559] New: load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24559 Bug ID: 24559 Summary: load pseudo-operation handling bug with Armv8-M Baseline Product: binutils Version: 2.33 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org Reporter: avieira at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Hello, When trying to assemble a load pseudo-operation for Cortex-M23 gas currently incorrectly errors out: $ cat t.s ldr r0, =(0x30) $ arm-none-eabi-as -mcpu=cortex-m23 t.s t.s: Assembler messages: t.s:1: Error: cannot honor width suffix -- `ldr r0,=(0x30)' The same works for Cortex-M0: $ arm-none-eabi-as -mcpu=cortex-m0 t.s $ arm-none-eabi-objdump -dr a.out: file format elf32-littlearm Disassembly of section .text: <.text>: 0: 4800ldr r0, [pc, #0]; (4 <.text+0x4>) 2: .short 0x 4: 0030.word 0x0030 I have found the issue to lie with the inst.size_req check that is there to make sure we do not end up with T32 instructions for Thumb-1 targets. However, in the case of Armv8-M Baseline the T32 MOVW instructions are allowed. I have a patch for this that I will be sending to the mailing list soon. This patch will lead to the following behavior: $ cat t.s ldr r0, =(0x30) $ arm-none-eabi-as -mcpu=cortex-m23 t.s $ arm-none-eabi-objdump -dr a.out: file format elf32-littlearm Disassembly of section .text: <.text>: 0: f240 0030 movwr0, #48 ; 0x30 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
