[Bug gas/5543] New: Assembler crashes on .set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ cat y.s .globl foo .setfoo,(%eax) [EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ as --32 -o y.o y.s as: BFD (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.0.4.20071229 assertion fail /net/gnu-13/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/bfd/elf.c:6405 as: BFD (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.18.50.0.4.20071229 internal error, aborting at /net/gnu-13/export/linux/src/binutils/binutils/bfd/elfcode.h line 221 in bfd_elf32_swap_symbol_out as: Please report this bug. Is .setfoo,(%eax) valid? -- Summary: Assembler crashes on .set Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5543 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5534] New: XXX PTR isn't checked properly in Intel syntax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] memory-5]$ cat y.s .text .intel_syntax noprefix movq xmm1, XMMWORD PTR [rsp] movq xmm1, DWORD PTR [rsp] movq xmm1, WORD PTR [rsp] movq xmm1, BYTE PTR [rsp] movq XMMWORD PTR [rsp],xmm1 movq DWORD PTR [rsp],xmm1 movq WORD PTR [rsp],xmm1 movq BYTE PTR [rsp],xmm1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] memory-5]$ as -o y.o y.s y.s: Assembler messages: y.s:6: Error: `xmm1' not allowed with `movqb' y.s:11: Error: `xmm1' not allowed with `movqb' [EMAIL PROTECTED] memory-5]$ There are 2 problems: 1. All those instructions should be invalid. 2. There is `movqb' in input. -- Summary: XXX PTR isn't checked properly in Intel syntax Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5534 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5530] New: Linux/ia64 linker is broken
I think this patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00171.html breaks Linux/ia64 linker: tmpdir/tlspic1.o:(.IA_64.unwind+0x0): warning: unsupported reloc tmpdir/tlspic1.o:(.IA_64.unwind+0x8): warning: unsupported reloc tmpdir/tlspic1.o:(.IA_64.unwind+0x10): warning: unsupported reloc /export/build/gnu/binutils-cross/build-ia64-linux/ld/ld-new: final link failed: Nonrepresentable section on output FAIL: TLS -fpic -shared It is reproducible with a cross linker. -- Summary: Linux/ia64 linker is broken Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5530 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5530] Linux/ia64 linker is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-31 19:26 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-12/msg00121.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5530 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5524] ld: I/O error, file /xxx/gnu/binutils/objdir/opcodes/../bfd/.libs/libbfd.so: No such file or directory
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-31 19:33 --- It must be an HP-UX specific issue. I have no problems with --enable-shared on Linux/Intel64. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5524 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5526] eh support is broken
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5526 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5522] Section contents partially overwritten with zero
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-26 14:27 --- Confirmed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|WORKSFORME | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5522] Section contents partially overwritten with zero
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-26 15:06 --- This regression was introduced by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2007-05/msg00158.html -- What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at bigpond dot net ||dot au http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5522] Section contents partially overwritten with zero
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-27 01:12 ---
There are
/* An instruction to the linker to not output the section
even if it has information which would normally be written. */
#define SEC_NEVER_LOAD 0x200
`NOLOAD'
The section should be marked as not loadable, so that it will not
be loaded into memory when the program is run.
case noload_section:
flags = ~SEC_LOAD;
flags |= SEC_NEVER_LOAD;
What happens when an output section is marked as NOLOAD? From the linker
manual, it seems implies that the output section won't be loaded into
memory, but may still occupy space in file. But linker comments say that
the output section is ignored. But we got
[Nr] Name TypeAddr OffSize ES Flg Lk Inf Al
[ 0] NULL 00 00 00 0 0 0
[ 1] .text PROGBITS00400090 90 00058c 00 AX 0 0 16
[ 2] .bs.required PROGBITS0040061c 00061c 04 00 0 0 1
[ 3] .bs.server.name PROGBITS00400620 000620 0e 00 W 0 0 1
[ 4] .bs.server.servic PROGBITS0040062e 00062e 17 00 W 0 0 1
[ 5] .rodata NOBITS 00400645 00061c 03 00 WA 0 0 1
[ 6] .trampoline PROGBITS00401000 000645 0004c0 00 X 0 0 1
[ 7] .data.server NOBITS 00400648 00061c 0c 00 WA 0 0 1
[ 8] .stab PROGBITS 000b08 0018b4 0c 9 0 4
[ 9] .stabstr STRTAB 0023bc 007404 00 0 0 1
[10] .shstrtab STRTAB 0097c0 81 00 0 0 1
[11] .symtab SYMTAB 009a4c 001da0 10 12 419 4
[12] .strtab STRTAB 00b7ec 000ed0 00 0 0 1
./ld-next -m elf_i386 -o next -T bss.lds attention.o libbss.a
objdump -s -j .bs.server.name attention.o
attention.o: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section .bs.server.name:
41747465 6e74696f 6e536967 6e00 AttentionSign.
objdump -s -j .bs.server.name next
next: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section .bs.server.name:
400620 6e536967 6e00 nSign.
objdump -s -j .data.server attention.o
attention.o: file format elf32-i386
Contents of section .data.server:
That is linker writes out the .data.server section marked with SHT_NOBITS
and overrides the next section.
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5522] Section contents partially overwritten with zero
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-27 01:26 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00150.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5522] Section contents partially overwritten with zero
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-25 22:37 --- It works with binutils in CVS as of 2007-12-25: ./ld -m elf_i386 -o x -T bss.lds attention.o libbss.a objdump -s -j .bs.server.name attention.o attention.o: file format elf32-i386 Contents of section .bs.server.name: 41747465 6e74696f 6e536967 6e00 AttentionSign. objdump -s -j .bs.server.name x x: file format elf32-i386 Contents of section .bs.server.name: 400620 41747465 6e74696f 6e536967 6e00 AttentionSign. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME Version|2.18|2.19 (HEAD) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5522 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5488] strip doesn't handle PT_NOTE segment properly
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-24 17:16 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5488 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5449] strip/objcopy doesn't work on ia64/hpux
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-24 17:17 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5488] strip doesn't handle PT_NOTE segment properly
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-20 15:11 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00119.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5488 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5492] unable to boot linux kernel 2.6.23.9 on R2D+ SH7751 board using binutils 2.18 based SH-Linux toolchain
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-17 16:47 --- Can you try the current binutils from CVS? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5492 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5494] No source debugging information with relative path by objdump
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5494 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5449] strip/objcopy doesn't work on ia64/hpux
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-17 16:50 --- (In reply to comment #8) Maybe I broke the patch during backport to 2.18, but now 'strip' does not break a.out any more, but its size is reduced only slightly compared to 2.16.1: original size: 68632 with 2.16.1: 5692 with this patch: 67132 And if I redo this patched 'strip' again on the 5692-sized one, it's size is increased to 67132. That is because 2.16.1 uses 4K maximum page size and my patch changes to 64K maximum page size. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5449] data not in region 1 for SHARE_MAGIC after strip with 2.18
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-13 16:48 --- Please provide outputs of readelf -Sl on a.out and a.out stripped by strip-2.16.1. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5449] data not in region 1 for SHARE_MAGIC after strip with 2.18
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-14 00:35 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-12/msg00082.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5449] data not in region 1 for SHARE_MAGIC after strip with 2.18
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 02:00 --- Please provide the original executable so that I can reproduce it on Linux. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5449 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5448] Weak functions support is broken.
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 01:57 --- From gABI: When the link editor searches archive libraries [see ``Archive File'' in Chapter 7], it extracts archive members that contain definitions of undefined global symbols. The member's definition may be either a global or a weak symbol. The link editor does not extract archive members to resolve undefined weak symbols. Unresolved weak symbols have a zero value. The behavior of weak symbols in areas not specified by this document is implementation defined. Weak symbols are intended primarily for use in system software. Applications using weak symbols are unreliable since changes in the runtime environment might cause the execution to fail. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5448 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
-- What|Removed |Added OtherBugsDependingO||5453 nThis|| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5453] objcopy does not seem to work for absolute addresses on i386 OSes installed on x86_64 hardware
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-12-07 01:49 --- This is a dup of PR 5059. -- What|Removed |Added BugsThisDependsOn||5059 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5453 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5303] splay-tree doesn't support 64bit value on 32bit host
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-14 16:31 --- 2 patches are posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00145.html http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00158.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5307] objcopy PE-EFI doesn't work when both PE/EFI are enabled
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-13 20:18 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5307 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5307] objcopy PE-EFI doesn't work when both PE/EFI are enabled
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 14:12 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00115.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5307 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5299] Duplicated sections for COFF/PE
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 14:37 --- The updated patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00116.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5299 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5299] Duplicated sections for COFF/PE
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-12 22:02 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5299 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5279] objdump SEGFAULT in bfd_getl16
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 14:50 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5278 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5278] objdump SEGFAULT in _bfd_pe_print_private_bfd_data_common
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 14:50 --- *** Bug 5279 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5278] objdump SEGFAULT in _bfd_pe_print_private_bfd_data_common
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-11 17:02 --- The problem is PE backed processes header data without checking if they are valid. For example: 1476 fprintf (file, 1477%s\n, data + edt.name - adj); in pe_print_edata. edt.name - adj is invalid here. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5278 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5307] New: objcopy PE-EFI doesn't work when both PE/EFI are enabled
bash-3.2$ ./objdump -p /tmp/a.exe ... Subsystem 0003(Windows CUI) ... bash-3.2$ ./objcopy -O efi-app-ia32 /tmp/a.exe /tmp/a.efi bash-3.2$ ./objdump -p /tmp/a.efi ... Subsystem 0003(Windows CUI) ... -- Summary: objcopy PE-EFI doesn't work when both PE/EFI are enabled Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5307 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5299] Duplicated sections for COFF/PE
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-10 15:53 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg00100.html -- What|Removed |Added GCC build triplet|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | GCC host triplet|x86_64-pc-linux-gnu | GCC target triplet|--enable-targets=all (but | |connected with pei-i386 ==| |efi-app-i | Summary|[bfd] after |Duplicated sections for |bfd_check_format_matches() |COFF/PE |we can have duplicated | |sections| http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5299 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-09 13:21 --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #4) Can you verify that -fPIC or -mlarge-data is used: http://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2003-August/msg00039.html Only -fPIC is in use. No -msmall-data or -fpic... It sounds like a compiler bug. When -fPIC is used, GPREL32 should be generated, instead of GPREL16. I suggest you open a gcc bug report with nsSVGScriptElement.o as testcase. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5303] New: splay-tree doesn't support 64bit value
There are
#ifndef _WIN64
typedef unsigned long int libi_uhostptr_t;
typedef long int libi_shostptr_t;
#else
typedef unsigned long long libi_uhostptr_t;
typedef long long libi_shostptr_t;
#endif
...
/* Use typedefs for the key and data types to facilitate changing
these types, if necessary. These types should be sufficiently wide
that any pointer or scalar can be cast to these types, and then
cast back, without loss of precision. */
typedef libi_uhostptr_t splay_tree_key;
typedef libi_uhostptr_t splay_tree_value;
However, arange-set.c in BFD uses splay-tree on bfd_vma:
/* Get the low VMA address of a node. */
static bfd_vma
arange_set_node_low (splay_tree_node node)
{
return (bfd_vma) node-key;
}
It doesn't work on 32bit host with 64bit VMA.
--
Summary: splay-tree doesn't support 64bit value
Product: binutils
Version: 2.19 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: critical
Priority: P1
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5303] splay-tree doesn't support 64bit value
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-09 20:54 --- Created an attachment (id=2083) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2083action=view) This patch works for me. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5303] splay-tree doesn't support 64bit value
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-10 00:01 --- One way to fix it is to provide both long and long long interfaces for splay-tree with the old interface as default. Applications can choose which one to use. We can skip the long long one if compiler doesn't support long long. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5303 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 14:33 --- Can you verify that -fPIC or -mlarge-data is used: http://www.redhat.com/archives/axp-list/2003-August/msg00039.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5276] relax is not yet perfect. fails linking large c++
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 04:51 --- Can you try binutils 2.18? -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5276 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5279] objdump SEGFAULT in bfd_getl16
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-07 04:53 --- Please provide testcases. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5279 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5233] objcopy won't change section flags on zero file-size sections
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-04 16:02 --- The Linux binutils 2.18.50.0.3 is released with this patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-11/msg3.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5233 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-11-05 00:19 --- (In reply to comment #30) It still spots the same error: *** failure in ../src/addr2line loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable *** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so FAIL: run-elflint-self.sh I think it is a bug in elflint. But you have to verify it with elflint developers. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5233] objcopy won't change section flags on zero file-size sections
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5233 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5233] objcopy won't change section flags on zero file-size sections
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-30 18:54 --- The bug was introduced by this patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-12/msg00165.html The linker check is correct. Otherwise, you will get a bogus binary Elf file type is EXEC (Executable file) Entry point 0x0 There are 1 program headers, starting at offset 64 Program Headers: Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSizMemSiz Flags Align LOAD 0x0020 0xfffe 0x 0x0162 0x0162 RWE20 Section to Segment mapping: Segment Sections... 00 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5233 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5232] New: readelf regression on Linux/ia64
Hi Nick, Your patch http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00374.html causes FAIL: readelf -wi: missing: .*DW_TAG_compile_unit.* FAIL: lns-duplicate on Linux/ia64. -- Summary: readelf regression on Linux/ia64 Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com GCC target triplet: ia64-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5232 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-29 01:10 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] New: .pushsection is broken
When building Linux kernel 2.6.23, I got pageattr.s: Assembler messages: pageattr.s:219: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:219: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:239: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:239: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:502: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:502: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:519: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:519: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:540: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:540: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:594: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:594: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:619: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:619: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' pageattr.s:641: Error: bad expression pageattr.s:641: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' It may be introduced by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00178.html -- Summary: .pushsection is broken Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,nickc at redhat dot com http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
-- What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical Priority|P2 |P1 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 06:56 --- bash-3.2$ cat x.s .text movl(%rbx), %eax 1: ud2 .pushsection __bug_table,a 2: .quad 1b, .LC0 .word 136, 0 .org 2b+24 .popsection .L21: jmp .L21 bash-3.2$ gcc -c x.s x.s: Assembler messages: x.s:4: Error: bad expression x.s:4: Error: junk at end of line, first unrecognized character is `a' bash-3.2$ -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
-- What|Removed |Added GCC target triplet||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 13:01 --- For ELF, you can specify flags, type and others with .section NAME [, FLAGS[, @TYPE[,FLAG_SPECIFIC_ARGUMENTS]]] .subsection also should support them. The previous assembler did. The previous manual had 7.81 `.pushsection NAME , SUBSECTION' = This is one of the ELF section stack manipulation directives. The others are `.section' (*note Section::), `.subsection' (*note SubSection::), `.popsection' (*note PopSection::), and `.previous' (*note Previous::). This directive pushes the current section (and subsection) onto the top of the section stack, and then replaces the current section and subsection with `name' and `subsection'. I believe it should be .pushsection NAME [, SUBSECTION[, FLAGS[, @TYPE[,FLAG_SPECIFIC_ARGUMENTS -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5221] .pushsection is broken
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-26 17:28 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00364.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5221 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-23 13:28 --- (In reply to comment #20) http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00308.html Can you attach the patch here as well in a 'downloadable' format? You can use raw text: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/get-raw-msg?listname=binutilsdate=2007-10msgid=2007103109.GA14599%40lucon.org -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-23 14:32 --- (In reply to comment #23) Message spotted by elfutils is still the same of course: loadable segment GNU_RELRO applies to is executable *** failure in ../libelf/libelf.so What is wrong with GNU_RELRO? It could be an elfutils bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5205] linker fails with
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 21:04 --- I can't reproduce it: ./ld -Bstatic -T u-boot.lds -Ttext 0xfffc -n start.o resetvec.o -Map u-boot.map -o u-boot start.o: In function `_start_cont': /share/home/clemens/work/u-boot/u-boot-1.3.0-rc3/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S:326: undefined reference to `cpu_init_f' /share/home/clemens/work/u-boot/u-boot-1.3.0-rc3/cpu/mpc85xx/start.S:327: undefined reference to `board_init_f' -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5205 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 22:31 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00308.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
-- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5205] linker fails with section .bootpg can't be allocated in segment 1
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-22 22:35 --- (In reply to comment #3) ld seems to fails before it starts to resolve the external (in the testcase _not_ included) references. I'll have to check more in detail. Any hints? Without a testcase, I can't tell for sure. It can be anything from bad hardware, bad libc, bad gcc, ... -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5205 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4424] Can't link in Linux object files on FreeBSD
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-18 01:31 --- The current patch is at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00257.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4424] Can't link in Linux object files on FreeBSD
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-16 17:56 --- A new patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00240.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4799] Common symbols not given type STT_COMMON
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-16 18:22 --- The current assembler just ignores .type common,%common by default: [EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ cat x.s .common foo, 1 .type foo,%common [EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ ./as-new -o x.o x.s [EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ ../binutils/readelf -s x.o Symbol table '.symtab' contains 5 entries: Num:Value Size TypeBind Vis Ndx Name 0: 0 NOTYPE LOCAL DEFAULT UND 1: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT1 2: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT2 3: 0 SECTION LOCAL DEFAULT3 4: 0001 1 OBJECT GLOBAL DEFAULT COM foo [EMAIL PROTECTED] gas]$ I am expecting COMMOM type for foo. I think we should add BSF_COMMON to support STT_COMMON. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4799 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 16:33 --- *** Bug 5176 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||oliver at linux-kernel dot ||at http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5176] elfutils don't pass testsuite on alpha
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 16:33 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 5149 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5176 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4424] Can't link in Linux object files on FreeBSD
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 --- An updated patch for i386/FreeBSD is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00215.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4424] Can't link in Linux object files on FreeBSD
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 --- *** Bug 5179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- What|Removed |Added CC||uberlord at gentoo dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4424 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5179] bintuils-2.18 does not recognise i386 firmware built on Linux when using another OS
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-15 17:13 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 4424 *** -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5179 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-11 15:49 --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] tmp]$ gcc -v x.o ... /usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/collect2 --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_x86_64 --hash-style=gnu -dynamic-linker /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crt1.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crti.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2 -L/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64 -L/lib/../lib64 -L/usr/lib/../lib64 x.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/crtend.o /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/4.1.2/../../../../lib64/crtn.o It shows all linker input files. I need all of them. You add -Wl,-verbose to see which files are used by linker. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 18:05 --- If you can provide a testcase, I will look into it. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 18:12 --- I don't have a Sparc. I can build a cross linker. I need all linker inputs to reproduce it. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5149] PT_GNU_RELRO having PF_R|PF_E even when no section in it needs exec is a ld bug
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-10 22:04 --- (In reply to comment #5) Created an attachment (id=2039) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2039action=view) ld bits that make strange sparc file which fails elfutils test That is not enough. Please use gcc -v to see all linker inputs and double check them by running linker by hand. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5149 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/4476] readelf -s -D doesn't support --hash-style=gnu
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-09 14:03 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4476 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5109] New: Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode
[EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ cat x.s .intel_syntax noprefix comisd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] cvtdq2pd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] cvtps2pd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] movhpd QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1 movhpd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] movhps QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1 movhps xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] movlpd QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1 movlpd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] movlps QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678],xmm1 movlps xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] ucomisd xmm1,QWORD PTR [rip+0x12345678] cmpeqsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] cvtpi2pd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] cvtpi2ps xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] cvtps2pi mm0,QWORD PTR [rax] cvtsd2ss xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] divsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] maxsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] movntsd QWORD PTR [rax],xmm0 movsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] movsd QWORD PTR [rax],xmm0 mulsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] sqrtsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] subsd xmm0,QWORD PTR [rax] [EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ gcc -c x.s [EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ objdump -dw x.o | sed -e s/[ \t]*#.*$// x.o: file format elf64-x86-64 Disassembly of section .text: .text: 0: 66 48 0f 2f 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W comisd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 9: f3 48 0f e6 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W cvtdq2pd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 12: 48 0f 5a 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W cvtps2pd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 1a: 66 48 0f 17 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhpd %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip) 23: 66 48 0f 16 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhpd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 2c: 48 0f 17 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhps %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip) 34: 48 0f 16 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movhps 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 3c: 66 48 0f 13 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlpd %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip) 45: 66 48 0f 12 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlpd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 4e: 48 0f 13 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlps %xmm1,0x12345678(%rip) 56: 48 0f 12 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W movlps 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 5e: 66 48 0f 2e 0d 78 56 34 12 rex.W ucomisd 0x12345678(%rip),%xmm1 67: f2 48 0f c2 00 00 rex.W cmpeqsd (%rax),%xmm0 6d: 66 48 0f 2a 00 rex.W cvtpi2pd (%rax),%xmm0 72: 48 0f 2a 00 rex.W cvtpi2ps (%rax),%xmm0 76: 48 0f 2d 00 rex.W cvtps2pi (%rax),%mm0 7a: f2 48 0f 5a 00 rex.W cvtsd2ss (%rax),%xmm0 7f: f2 48 0f 5e 00 rex.W divsd (%rax),%xmm0 84: f2 48 0f 5f 00 rex.W maxsd (%rax),%xmm0 89: f2 48 0f 2b 00 rex.W movntsd %xmm0,(%rax) 8e: f2 48 0f 10 00 rex.W movsd (%rax),%xmm0 93: f2 48 0f 11 00 rex.W movsd %xmm0,(%rax) 98: f2 48 0f 59 00 rex.W mulsd (%rax),%xmm0 9d: f2 48 0f 51 00 rex.W sqrtsd (%rax),%xmm0 a2: f2 48 0f 5c 00 rex.W subsd (%rax),%xmm0 [EMAIL PROTECTED] simd]$ -- Summary: Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode Product: binutils Version: 2.19 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: hjl at lucon dot org CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5109 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5109] Extra REX byte generated in Intel mode
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 02:26 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-10/msg00079.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5109 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 02:29 --- Does # ld.exe -r --whole-archive ..\target\x86_64-pc-mingw32\lib\libmingw32.a work? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/5105] x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-05 04:48 --- (In reply to comment #5) Subject: Re: x86_64-pc-mingw32 native ld.exe randomly failed to read the archive file your command works. I add some log in bfd_seek() and bfd_pread(), it seems that the file offset suddenly minus by 1, this is not caused by a seek(), it seem like some call return -1 and then add to position. It may be an interface or mingw issue. Please check if types used in bfd_seek and bfd_bread are correct. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5105 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-10-01 16:56 --- (In reply to comment #13) Thanks, so i tried following action. root:/sources/grub-0.97# vi +1852 stage2/asm.S -and $0x, %rsi +and $0x, %rsi -and $0x, %rdi +and $0x, %rdi I don't think they are correct. The correct ones may be and $0x, %esi and $0x, %edi root:/sources/grub-0.97# make ... boot.c: In function load_image: boot.c:80: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size boot.c:80: warning: cast from pointer to integer of different size Those warnings have nothing to do with binutils. We can't help you here. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-30 18:19 --- (In reply to comment #11) I rebuild whole system with lfs, binutils testcase seems fine. But i want to know the reason why grub-0.97 has been failed. Still got asm.S:1852: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `and' asm.S:1854: Error: suffix or operands invalid for `and' It looks like that assembly sources in grub-0.97 are 32bit, not 64bit. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5080] Error: Incorrect register `eax' used with `q' suffix
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-30 21:27 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00443.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5080 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5072] The x86 disassembler failed to dectect invalid 64bit opcode
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-29 23:19 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00413.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5072 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5072] The x86 disassembler failed to dectect invalid 64bit opcode
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |hjl at lucon dot org |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5072 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-25 13:52 --- (In reply to comment #9) need to rebuild all gcc toolchain again, something is wrong.. Your system is corrupted. Binutils 2.18 should have no problems on Linux/x86-64. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-24 13:31 ---
Please provide a testcase. Objcopy works for me:
bash-3.2$ cat x.c
void
cmain (void)
{
*((int *) 0x1000) = 2;
}
bash-3.2$ make
cc -O2 -c -o x.o x.c
./ld -o x x.o -N -Ttext 0x100
./ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 0100
./objcopy x y
cmp x y
bash-3.2$
--
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-24 13:32 --- (In reply to comment #5) What is wrong with .eh_frame? then linker is not working? or binutils works fine? i am not sure, so tried following action. callEXT_C(stop) ^^ This is invalid assembly code. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5059] absolute objcopy not working on amd64?
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-23 23:31 --- I have no idea what grub is trying to do. Please extract a testcase from grub. -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5059 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5034] Error: `QWORD PTR __CTOR_END__-8[rip]' is not a valid base/index expression
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-17 14:48 --- According to http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00213.html it is invalid MASM assembly code. The fix has been reverted. -- What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED | http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3281] objcopy changes PT_GNU_RELRO when there is PT_TLS
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:35 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00229.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3281 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5037] strip shrinks PT_GNU_RELRO on PIE objects
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:36 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00229.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5037] strip shrinks PT_GNU_RELRO on PIE objects
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:37 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5035] x86_64-pc-mingw32-as.exe failed to work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-18 00:37 --- Fixed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5037] strip shrinks PT_GNU_RELRO on PIE objects
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 19:56 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00208.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5035] x86_64-pc-mingw32-as.exe failed to work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 22:14 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00209.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5035] x86_64-pc-mingw32-as.exe failed to work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 22:15 --- (In reply to comment #6) [EMAIL PROTECTED] /c/temp/tmingw $ /c/tools/target/bin/as.exe t2.s -o t2.o t2.s: Assembler messages: t2.s:67: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.hidden' ../../src/gas/config/obj-coff.c line 780 seems to be binutils's bug. but for unknown pseudo-op: `.hidden', it seems that g++ generate wrong asm, This is a gcc problem, not a gas problem. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5035] x86_64-pc-mingw32-as.exe failed to work
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 20:37 --- (In reply to comment #0) I compile a cross compiler --host=x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu --target=x86_64-pc-mingw32, Then use this cross compiler to compile a native binutils and gcc, Then I run the native x86_64-pc-mingw32-g++.exe which call native as.exe under winxp x64. It produce such error : C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccMH.s C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccMH.s: Assembler messages: C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccMH.s:2: Internal error! Assertion failure in obj_coff_endef at ../../binutils/gas/config/obj-coff.c line 780. Please report this bug. Please provide an assembly code to reproduce the problem. You can use gcc -S to generate the .s file. C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccQL.s C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccQL.s: Assembler messages: C:/DOCUME~1/drangon/LOCALS~1/Temp/ccQL.s:107: Error: unknown pseudo-op: `.hidden' I don't think .hidden works work on Windows. Why does your gcc generate it? -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5035 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5034] Error: `QWORD PTR __CTOR_END__-8[rip]' is not a valid base/index expression
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5026] Displaying Truncated Values Incorrectly
-- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5026] Displaying Truncated Values Incorrectly
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 20:58 --- The current binutils in CVS shows [EMAIL PROTECTED] big-1]$ cat x.s .word 0x1234567890 [EMAIL PROTECTED] big-1]$ make ./as -o x.o x.s x.s: Assembler messages: x.s:1: Warning: bignum truncated to 2 bytes [EMAIL PROTECTED] big-1]$ on Linux/i386. -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME Version|unspecified |2.19 (HEAD) http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/5034] Error: `QWORD PTR __CTOR_END__-8[rip]' is not a valid base/index expression
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-15 22:10 --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00202.html -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5034 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5037] strip shrinks PT_GNU_RELRO on PIE objects
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 01:35 --- Does it with the current Linux binutils? -- What|Removed |Added CC||hjl at lucon dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/5037] strip shrinks PT_GNU_RELRO on PIE objects
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-16 03:19 --- (In reply to comment #4) current 2.18 branch as well as CVS head exhibit same bug as the 2.18 release In Linux binutils source tree, there is a patch for bug 3281 under patches You can try it on binutils from CVS and binutils 2.18. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5037 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4986] gas emits duplicate .loc directive from gcc 3.4.6
--- Additional Comments From hjl at lucon dot org 2007-09-01 06:51 --- I checked in my patch. But it doesn't work on ia64 with gcc 3.4 and 4.1. I got Line Number Statements: Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x0 Special opcode 12: advance Address by 0 to 0x0 and Line by 7 to 8 Copy Special opcode 230: advance Address by 16 to 0x10 and Line by 1 to 9 Special opcode 6: advance Address by 0 to 0x10 and Line by 1 to 10 Special opcode 4: advance Address by 0 to 0x10 and Line by -1 to 9 Special opcode 229: advance Address by 16 to 0x20 and Line by 0 to 9 Copy Special opcode 34: advance Address by 2 to 0x22 and Line by 1 to 10 Advance PC by 30 to 0x40 Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence We wind up with line 10 instead of line 9. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4986 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
