[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-09 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2010-09-09 10:12 
---
Hi Andrew,

  The code I looked at already allows i[34]86 targets to see[1] these features.
 Where exactly were you thinking that changes needed to be made ?

Cheers
  Nick

[1] I said see rather than work with because I do not believe that the
functionality of the SHF_ORDERED, SHF_EXCLUDE, SHN_BEFORE and SHN_AFTER flags
are actually implemented.  They are merely accetped and do not cause the linker
(or readelf) to complain.

-- 


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11938

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-09 Thread andyjstormont at googlemail dot com

--- Additional Comments From andyjstormont at googlemail dot com  
2010-09-09 12:35 ---
The binutils sources I grabbed from Debian doesn't :\  I must have an old copy.

-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution||INVALID


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11938

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils


[Bug binutils/11938] Support for linking with Solaris libraries is only enabled on SPARC!

2010-09-08 Thread nickc at redhat dot com

--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com  2010-09-08 16:49 
---
Hi Andrew,

  I am not quite sure what you have in mind here, so please could you generate a
patch.

  Please keep in mind that tools like readelf ought to be able to process
Solaris libraries even if they were not built on a Solaris or Sparc system. 
Thus I suspect that using #ifdef __sun is not the right thing to do.

Cheers
  Nick


-- 
   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING


http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11938

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils