[Bug gas/30449] gas riscv: support pseudo-instruction "lga"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30449 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #3 from Nelson Chu --- Marked as resolved and fixed since the pended patch committed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30449] gas riscv: support pseudo-instruction "lga"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30449 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org --- The master branch has been updated by Nelson Chu : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ec2260af61501798d00e41c3180c63d25b11439c commit ec2260af61501798d00e41c3180c63d25b11439c Author: Jim Wilson Date: Thu Jun 1 12:10:16 2023 +0800 RISC-V: PR30449, Add lga assembler macro support. Originally discussion, https://github.com/riscv/riscv-isa-manual/pull/539 Added new load address pseudo instruction which is always expanded to GOT access, no matter the .option rvc is set or not. gas/ PR 30449 * config/tc-riscv.c (macro): Add M_LGA support. * testsuite/gas/riscv/la-variants.d: New. * testsuite/gas/riscv/la-variants.s: New. include/ PR 30449 * opcode/riscv.h (M_LGA): New. opcodes/ PR 30449 * riscv-opc.c (riscv_opcodes): Add lga support. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30449] gas riscv: support pseudo-instruction "lga"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30449 Nelson Chu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nelsonc1225 at sourceware dot org --- Comment #1 from Nelson Chu --- Thanks for the information. I remember Jim already had a patch to support this in GNU long time ago, but I cannot find it from my current email box, so let me find it later. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/30449] gas riscv: support pseudo-instruction "lga"
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30449 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added Target||riscv*-*-* -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
