[Bug binutils/19716] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 10021
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19716 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/19715] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 10374
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19715 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/19713] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 11412
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19713 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Alan Modra --- patch applied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/19717] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 7956
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19717 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/19718] bfd/elflink.c does not handle octets_per_byte properly, line 7923
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19718 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20259] Regresion on binary for ARM when targetting Cortex-M, data alignment error
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20259 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- I think this has been fixed. If not, well, 2.26 is obsolete anyway. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/20427] Solaris rtld on SPARC does not allow R_SPARC_UA64 or R_SPARC_64 relocations in 32-bit executables
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20427 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/19871] description of --pie, --pic-executable options contains wrong-looking statement
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19871 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- . -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20026] Inconsistent parsing of linker scripts
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20026 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Parsing of included scripts was fixed some time ago -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/20088] Can not supported architectures armv7m(arm-none-eabi-objdump)
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20088 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- patch applied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20070] LLVM gold plugin(LLVMgold.so) report Unexpected resolution failure on ld when LTO, but pass on gold
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20070 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #13 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #4. Comment #7 patch was committed too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/19871] description of --pie, --pic-executable options contains wrong-looking statement
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19871 --- Comment #3 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=d5c5b27095e3ba5bf589ee3ecf1d22c7ba9212ab commit d5c5b27095e3ba5bf589ee3ecf1d22c7ba9212ab Author: Alan Modra Date: Fri Mar 1 09:00:27 2024 +1030 PR19871, description of --pie Say why we even mention shared libraries here (ET_DYN), and clarify symbol resolution. There are of course many other ways that PIEs resemble PDEs more closely than shared libraries. PR 19871 * ld.texi (-pie): Clarify. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/19901] 2.26+ is not available for translation at the translation project.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19901 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- 2.26 is obsolete -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/20330] spanish translation in addr2line inaccurate
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20330 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This should probably have been reported to the translation project. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20475] Linking PIC executables with a linker script that does not place _GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ results in incorrect relocation
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20475 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #11 from Alan Modra --- I think this has been fixed, if not a report against 2.25 is way too old. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/20552] Binutils: bad relocation with arm cortex-M toolchains.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20552 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- This is presumably a problem with the toolchain used to build binutils-2.25, which itself is too old to investigate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28351] aarch64 ".xword :dtprel:t" is not supported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21677] ld 2.27 has unexplained 10x performance improvement in some cases
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21677 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- no reason to keep this one open -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/21739] Inconsistent diagnostics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21739 --- Comment #5 from Sourceware Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Alan Modra : https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f757c5cae97b1437f4fcf2e25c53376775ea541f commit f757c5cae97b1437f4fcf2e25c53376775ea541f Author: Alan Modra Date: Thu Feb 29 21:03:12 2024 +1030 PR21739, Inconsistent diagnostics PR 21739 cpu/ * mep.opc (parse_lo16, parse_unsigned7): Mark %function message as no-c-format. opcodes/ * mep-asm.c: Regenerate. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/21739] Inconsistent diagnostics
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21739 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Fixed. The "invalid %function" is not used as a format string. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/21700] powerpc-ibm-aix6.1.0.0 fails with unresolved symbols
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21700 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED --- Comment #15 from Alan Modra --- Fixed then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/22037] Fuzz binutils on OSS-Fuzz
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22037 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- oss-fuzz does poke at binutils nowadays -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/21816] Gnu Assembler for aarch64 injecting alignment bytes for aligned data
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21816 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE Status|WAITING |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- no testcase, and too old -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/21252] -shared/-pie create RWE LOAD segment
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21252 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1) > Works for binutils 2.40: Not for hppa64-linux. The RWE load segment is due to placing .dynamic at the start of the text segment. .dynamic is read/write. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/20842] Crash of AS on invalid data
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20842 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- Current assembler doesn't crash. pr20842.s: Assembler messages: pr20842.s:1: Error: data size prefix invalid with `vpcmpgtd' -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gas/28351] aarch64 ".xword :dtprel:t" is not supported
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28351 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://github.com/llvm/llv ||m-project/issues/83466 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gprofng/31390] [display html] Undefined subroutine ::hex
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31390 Ruud van der Pas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Ruud van der Pas --- A patch has been tested and submitted. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug binutils/21505] objcopy fails --prefix-symbols on armv7
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21505 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- As per comment #2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20796] m68k binutils produce R_68K_NONE relocations in .rela.plt. Causes glibc to fail to load binaries.
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20796 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- The testcase doesn't produce NONE relocs with current tools. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20797] m68k binutils produce R_68K_NONE relocations
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20797 --- Comment #1 from Alan Modra --- NONE relocs not seen on the testcase with current binutils -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug ld/20688] [2.27 Regression] Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init!
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20688 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra --- 2.27 is too old -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Bug gold/20529] Gold [powerpc] - relaxing loop never ends
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20529 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED --- Comment #3 from Alan Modra --- patch applied -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
