[Bug admin/31881] binutils-gdb Git repository is flooded by automatic commits

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31881

--- Comment #26 from Andreas Schwab  ---
That does not work with snapshots created with git archive.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug binutils/13360] --keep-only-debug keeps non-debug sections.

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13360

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  2011-10-29 15:59:12 
UTC ---
The only non-debug section in main.debug are the two note sections and the
comment section.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/13470] ld's powerpc32 relocation/dynsym output changed in many bad ways with 2.22 (e.g. textrel added)

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sch...@linux-m68k.org

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  2011-12-02 20:39:18 
UTC ---
ppc64 appears to be unaffected.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/13470] ld's powerpc32 relocation/dynsym output changed in many bad ways with 2.22 (e.g. textrel added)

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13470

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Target|ppc/ppc32, possibly also|powerpc-*-*
   |ppc64   |
   Host|all |
  Build|all |

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/13891] Binutils is impossible to static link due to broken libtool behavior

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13891

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-03-22 08:27:47 
UTC ---
Just don't use --enable-shared.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/13891] Binutils is impossible to static link due to broken libtool behavior

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13891

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  2012-03-22 08:52:57 
UTC ---
Please ignore the last comment, I misread.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/14066] nopw istruction return signal 4 - Illegal instruction- on cpu VIA Nehemiah

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14066

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|libc|gas
Version|2.15|unspecified
Product|glibc   |binutils

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  2012-05-07 10:14:33 
UTC ---
Moving to binutils.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14088] Strange addend from readelf

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14088

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-05-10 08:00:19 
UTC ---
Displaying it as a decimal number would be much less useful.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/14193] mov3q.l followed by movem.l generates illegal instruction on Coldfire 5480 (or -march=cfv4e)

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14193

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-06-01 18:21:42 
UTC ---
Fixed on HEAD.

commit 0590075
Author: Julian Brown 
Date:   Mon Oct 24 16:36:48 2011 +

opcodes/
* m68k-opc.c (m68k_opcodes): Fix entries for ColdFire moveml.

gas/testsuite/
* gas/m68k/all.exp (movem-offset): Add test.
* gas/m68k/movem-offset.s: New test.
* gas/m68k/movem-offset.d: New.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14416] .eh_frame section not copied correctly by --only-keep-debug

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14416

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-07-29 11:56:31 
UTC ---
.eh_frame is not a debug section.  It is a loaded section so it will never be
stripped from the original object.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14416] .eh_frame section not copied correctly by --only-keep-debug

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14416

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  2012-07-29 13:10:21 
UTC ---
.eh_frame is handled like all other non-debug sections.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14541] Wrong entry point computation using cross binutils linux amd64->arm-linux-gnueabihf

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-09-03 08:57:17 
UTC ---
How did you configure it?

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/14718] ld crashes on ARMv5 due to unaligned memory access

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14718



--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-10-14 17:08:37 
UTC ---

Why is objalloc_alloc returning unaligned memory?



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/14718] ld crashes on ARMv5 due to unaligned memory access

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14718



--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  2012-10-14 20:34:17 
UTC ---

You cannot pass a pointer for an integral argument.  How did you manage to

suppress the warning?



It'll be simpler to just allocate each array separately.



-- 

Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email

--- You are receiving this mail because: ---

You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14663] strip --only-keep-debug doesn't remove .text, etc.

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14663

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab  2012-10-26 22:30:05 
UTC ---
It already says it:

`--only-keep-debug'
 Strip a file, removing contents of any sections that would not be
   ^
 stripped by `--strip-debug' and leaving the debugging sections
 intact.  In ELF files, this preserves all note sections in the
 output.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14875] Disassembling m68k shows scales which the m68000 does not support

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14875

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2012-11-25 14:29:33 
UTC ---
That's not "Memory Indirect Preindexed" (the 68000 does not support memory
indirect at all) but "Address Register Indirect with Index (8-Bit
Displacement)".

Just because the 68000 ignores the scale should not be a reason for objdump to
ignore it.  It should be visible that the encoding is non-canonical.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug admin/12094] Errors found while checking this document as HTML 4.01 Transitional!

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12094

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
 Resolution||FIXED

--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab  2012-12-03 16:51:49 
UTC ---
Looks like bugzilla is clean now.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/15393] .string with hex should be parsed differently

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15393

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  2013-04-24 10:03:39 
UTC ---
This is consistent with the C string parsing rules and matches the
documentation.

-- 
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/15602] .word L2-L1 fails to diagnose offsets larger than 16 bits, resulting in broken jump tables on m68k

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
The problem is that the jump table itself is bigger than 32K, which is not
handled by BROKEN_DOT_WORD.  All entries are supposed to be pointing to 20008.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/15602] .word L2-L1 fails to diagnose offsets larger than 16 bits, resulting in broken jump tables on m68k

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15602

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
In the real world the offset is signed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/15728] binutils fails to build with clang and --enable-targets=all on Mac OS

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15728

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
"extern" is implict for function decarations.  The problem are the inline
definitions, which assume -fgnu89-inline.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/15780] .gnu.warning.SYMBOL section treatment needs improvement

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15780

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
>From libc/include/libc-symbols.h:

/* Tacking on "\n\t#" to the section name makes gcc put it's bogus
   section attributes on what looks like a comment to the assembler.  */
#ifdef HAVE_SECTION_QUOTES
# define __sec_comment "\"\n\t#\""
#else
# define __sec_comment "\n\t#"
#endif
#define link_warning(symbol, msg) \
  __make_section_unallocated (".gnu.warning." #symbol) \
  static const char __evoke_link_warning_##symbol[]\
__attribute__ ((used, section (".gnu.warning." #symbol __sec_comment))) \
= msg;

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/15818] objdump does not work with /proc/kcore

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15818

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed for 2.24.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14768] Checklist: Binutils Migration To Git

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14768

--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab  ---
There should be an empty line after the subject line.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/15920] not suitable as a general-purpose header

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15920

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
libbfd is not a general-purpose library, but intented to be embedded into the
sources of the consuming applications (like GDB and binutils).

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/15920] not suitable as a general-purpose header

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15920

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
BFD has no ABI nor API stability.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16252] New: readelf -wF mishandles DW_CFA_restore_state

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16252

Bug ID: 16252
   Summary: readelf -wF mishandles DW_CFA_restore_state
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.23
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org

readelf -wF loses the state of the saved registers after DW_CFA_restore_state.

$ readelf -wf nptl/pthread_cond_timedwait.os
Contents of the .eh_frame section:

 001c  CIE
  Version:   1
  Augmentation:  "zPLR"
  Code alignment factor: 1
  Data alignment factor: -4
  Return address column: 8
  Augmentation data: 9b ed ff ff ff 1b 1b

  DW_CFA_def_cfa: r4 (esp) ofs 4
  DW_CFA_offset: r8 (eip) at cfa-4
  DW_CFA_nop
  DW_CFA_nop

0020 0058 0024 FDE cie= pc=..0570
  Augmentation data: cf ff ff ff

  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0001
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 8
  DW_CFA_offset: r5 (ebp) at cfa-8
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0002
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 12
  DW_CFA_offset: r7 (edi) at cfa-12
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0003
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 16
  DW_CFA_offset: r6 (esi) at cfa-16
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0004
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 20
  DW_CFA_offset: r3 (ebx) at cfa-20
  DW_CFA_advance_loc1: 114 to 0076
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 52
  DW_CFA_remember_state
  DW_CFA_advance_loc2: 440 to 022e
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 20
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 7 to 0235
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 16
  DW_CFA_restore: r3 (ebx)
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0236
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 12
  DW_CFA_restore: r6 (esi)
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0237
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 8
  DW_CFA_restore: r7 (edi)
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0238
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 4
  DW_CFA_restore: r5 (ebp)
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 1 to 0239
  DW_CFA_restore_state
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 9 to 0242
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 20
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 63 to 0281
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 52
  DW_CFA_advance_loc1: 84 to 02d5
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 20
  DW_CFA_advance_loc1: 64 to 0315
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 52
  DW_CFA_advance_loc1: 244 to 0409
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 20
  DW_CFA_advance_loc: 28 to 0425
  DW_CFA_def_cfa_offset: 52
  DW_CFA_nop
  DW_CFA_nop

$ readelf -wF nptl/pthread_cond_timedwait.os
Contents of the .eh_frame section:

 001c  CIE "zPLR" cf=1 df=-4 ra=8
   LOC   CFA  ra  
 esp+4c-4   

0020 0058 0024 FDE cie= pc=..0570
   LOC   CFA  ebx   ebp   esi   edi   ra  
 esp+4u u u u c-4   
0001 esp+8u c-8   u u c-4   
0002 esp+12   u c-8   u c-12  c-4   
0003 esp+16   u c-8   c-16  c-12  c-4   
0004 esp+20   c-20  c-8   c-16  c-12  c-4   
0076 esp+52   c-20  c-8   c-16  c-12  c-4   
022e esp+20   c-20  c-8   c-16  c-12  c-4   
0235 esp+16   u c-8   c-16  c-12  c-4   
0236 esp+12   u c-8   u c-12  c-4   
0237 esp+8u c-8   u u c-4   
0238 esp+4u u u u c-4   
0239 esp+4c-20  u u u c-4   
0242 esp+20   c-20  u u u c-4   
0281 esp+52   c-20  u u u c-4   
02d5 esp+20   c-20  u u u c-4   
0315 esp+52   c-20  u u u c-4   
0409 esp+20   c-20  u u u c-4   
0425 esp+52   c-20  u u u c-4   

There is a DW_CFA_restore_state at 0239 that restores the state at
0076, but readelf -wF displays u for the saved registers.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16318] New: Objcopy loses EI_OSABI

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16318

Bug ID: 16318
   Summary: Objcopy loses EI_OSABI
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: binutils
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: matz at suse dot de

Of all the ELF bfd targets only elf32-arm and elfnn-aarch64 copy over the
EI_OSABI field in a bfd_copy_private_bfd_data hook.  It should either be
recomputed or copied generically in _bfd_elf_copy_private_bfd_data.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/14289] bfd_pef_xlib_read_header reads beyond array bounds

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14289

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|bfd_pef_xlib_read_header|bfd_pef_xlib_read_header
   |overwrites stack memory |reads beyond array bounds

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Just create a script that wraps around objdump and handles the redirection.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16373] new option -o for objdump

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16373

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
How is adding the -o option not a kludge?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16395] Can't get address、filenameline number on aix 6.1 by addr2line

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16395

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16395] Can't get address、filenameline number on aix 6.1 by addr2line

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16395

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 16396 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16396] Can't get address、filename、line number on aix 6.1 by addr2line!

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16396

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
*** Bug 16395 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16403] New: Spurious undefined reference with --as-needed

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16403

Bug ID: 16403
   Summary: Spurious undefined reference with --as-needed
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.24
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: matz at suse dot de
Target: i386-*-*

Created attachment 7339
  --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7339&action=edit
Linker test case

$ ld --build-id --eh-frame-hdr -m elf_i386 -shared -o
libkdeinit_kaddprinterwizard.so -L. --as-needed --no-undefined crti.o
crtbeginS.o kaddprinterwizard.o --rpath /opt/kde3/lib --rpath /usr/lib/qt3/lib
libkdeprint_management.so libkdeprint.so libkparts.so libkio.so libkdeui.so
libkdesu.so libkwalletclient.so libkdecore.so libDCOP.so -lresolv -lutil
-lart_lgpl_2 -lidn libkdefx.so libqt-mt.so -lXi -lXrandr -lXcursor -lXinerama
-lXft -lfreetype -lfontconfig -ldl -lpng -lXext -lX11 -lSM -lICE -lpthread
-lXrender libfam.so -lrpcsvc -lacl -lattr -lz -lstdc++ -lm -lc -lgcc_s
crtendS.o crtn.o -soname libkdeinit_kaddprinterwizard.so
libc_nonshared.a(stack_chk_fail_local.oS): In function
`__stack_chk_fail_local':
/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/glibc-2.18.90/debug/stack_chk_fail_local.c:45:
undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/16403] Spurious undefined reference with --as-needed

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16403

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
IMHO the behaviour of GROUP should not depend on --as-needed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16528] Binutils fails to build with CONFIG_SHELL=dash

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16528

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This is an autoconf bug, please report it there.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/16856] avr-size missing avr format option and mcu option

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16856

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
--format=avr and --mcpu= were never valid options for size.  Must be some local
patch.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/16931] FTBFS in gas/config/tc-m68k.c with gcc 4.9

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16931

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This is a gcc bug.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17169] argument list too long error

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17169

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This is most likely a qemu problem.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17323] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17323

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
*** Bug 17324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17324] ld -r not generate cantunwind records in .ARM.exidx section

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17324

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17323 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17419] build failure: bfd.texinfo has missing node references

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17419

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
The nodes are part of bfdt.texi, make sure it is correctly generated.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17483] ar is limited to open only 256 files on i386-solaris2.11

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17483

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Please make sure this limit isn't imposed by stdio on your system.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17510] strings: crash when given a truncated ELF

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17510

--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This should fix it:

diff --git a/bfd/srec.c b/bfd/srec.c
index 9ed2080..0c473b2 100644
--- a/bfd/srec.c
+++ b/bfd/srec.c
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@ srec_scan (bfd *abfd)
 case 'S':
   {
 file_ptr pos;
-char hdr[3];
+unsigned char hdr[3];
 unsigned int bytes, min_bytes;
 bfd_vma address;
 bfd_byte *data;

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17558] ld will follow DT_NEEDED when it is not necessary

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17558

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
ld.gold defaults to --allow-shlib-undefined, ld.bfd defaults to
--no-allow-shlib-undefined, when creating executables.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17742] New: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

Bug ID: 17742
   Summary: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0
output
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.25
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
Target: powerpc64-*-*

$ echo 'int x;' > foo.c
$ gcc -shared -o foo.so foo.c
$ gcc -c foo.c
$ readelf -h foo.o | grep Flags:
  Flags: 0x0
$ readelf -h foo.so | grep Flags:
  Flags: 0x1, abiv1
$ ld -shared --eh-frame-hdr foo.o foo.so 
ld: foo.so: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output
ld: failed to merge target specific data of file foo.so

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amodra at gmail dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||matz at suse dot de

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
This is strange.  The error is coming from

and I can reproduce the problem with the binutils used there for building
(which was cut from commit 89e0345), but I cannot reproduce it when I try it
with the exact same binutils sources built locally.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17742] ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17742

--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab  ---
$ ld -shared --eh-frame-hdr --as-needed foo.o foo.so 
ld: foo.so: ABI version 1 is not compatible with ABI version 0 output
ld: failed to merge target specific data of file foo.so

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17767] Multiple (>8) buffer overruns due to incorrect value

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17767

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
pe.h also redefines E_FILNMLEN.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17800] regression -l:path/lib.so

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17800

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
dup

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17606 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17606] -l:/absolute/path/to/lib.so broken

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17606

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||sourceware at jochen dot 
sprickerh
   ||of.de

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
*** Bug 17800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/17877] bad opcodes for coldfire m5307

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17877

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Probably fixed by
.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/17914] Correct typos in cpu-w65.c license notice.

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17914

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
A clbuttic mistake.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/17954] New: error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954

Bug ID: 17954
   Summary: error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.25
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gold
  Assignee: ccoutant at google dot com
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
Target: powerpc64-*-*

Created attachment 8117
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8117&action=edit
libsystemd_la-catalog.o

$ gold/ld-new -shared -gc-sections libsystemd_la-catalog.o
libsystemd_la-sd-journal.o 
gold/ld-new: error: hidden symbol 'catalog_hash_func' is not defined locally

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/17954] error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Created attachment 8118
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8118&action=edit
libsystemd_la-sd-journal.o

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/17954] error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||rguenther at suse dot de

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/17954] error: hidden symbol '...' is not defined locally

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17954

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||amodra at gmail dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |WAITING

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
You failed to attach the assembler input.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Which part of the file is mishandled by the assembler?  What is the assembler
command line?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/18108] possible coldfire gas bug on frame pointer

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18108

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |INVALID

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab  ---
If you want to report a compiler bug you are wrong here.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/17606] -l:/absolute/path/to/lib.so broken

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17606

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||4xrsJCr9 at createability dot 
com.
   ||au

--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab  ---
*** Bug 18172 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18172] --library with NAMESPEC of the form :FILENAME returns an error

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18172

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
You need to add "-L." since -l searches the library path.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 17606 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18344] ld emits unnecessary line breaks that pollute the output of compilers.

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18344

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.26

--- Comment #21 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed for 2.26.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18344] ld emits unnecessary line breaks that pollute the output of compilers.

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18344

--- Comment #23 from Andreas Schwab  ---
They are handled by the same state.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] New: FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

Bug ID: 18354
   Summary: FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: ld
  Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: hjl.tools at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-*

tmpdir/normal.out tmpdir/gnunormal.out differ.
FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

--- tmpdir/normal.out   2015-04-28 21:33:33.668537097 +0200
+++ tmpdir/gnunormal.out2015-04-28 21:33:57.804523964 +0200
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ Contents of the .debug_aranges section:
   Segment Size: 0

 AddressLength
-004004e0 0015 
+004004d8 0015 
 004006c4 0004 
   
   Length:   28
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@ Contents of the .debug_aranges section:
   Segment Size: 0

 AddressLength
-004004f5 0005 
+004004ed 0005 
 004006c8 0005 
   

@@ -1745,14 +1745,14 @@ Raw dump of debug contents of section .d
   11   0   0   crti.S

  Line Number Statements:
-  [0x00bd]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004e0
+  [0x00bd]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004d8
   [0x00c8]  Advance Line by 63 to 64
   [0x00ca]  Copy
-  [0x00cb]  Special opcode 63: advance Address by 4 to 0x4004e4 and Line
by 2 to 66
-  [0x00cc]  Special opcode 104: advance Address by 7 to 0x4004eb and Line
by 1 to 67
-  [0x00cd]  Special opcode 48: advance Address by 3 to 0x4004ee and Line
by 1 to 68
-  [0x00ce]  Special opcode 34: advance Address by 2 to 0x4004f0 and Line
by 1 to 69
-  [0x00cf]  Advance PC by 5 to 0x4004f5
+  [0x00cb]  Special opcode 63: advance Address by 4 to 0x4004dc and Line
by 2 to 66
+  [0x00cc]  Special opcode 104: advance Address by 7 to 0x4004e3 and Line
by 1 to 67
+  [0x00cd]  Special opcode 48: advance Address by 3 to 0x4004e6 and Line
by 1 to 68
+  [0x00ce]  Special opcode 34: advance Address by 2 to 0x4004e8 and Line
by 1 to 69
+  [0x00cf]  Advance PC by 5 to 0x4004ed
   [0x00d1]  Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence

   [0x00d4]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4006c4
@@ -1986,11 +1986,11 @@ Raw dump of debug contents of section .d
   11   0   0   crtn.S

  Line Number Statements:
-  [0x040f]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004f5
+  [0x040f]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4004ed
   [0x041a]  Advance Line by 39 to 40
   [0x041c]  Copy
-  [0x041d]  Special opcode 62: advance Address by 4 to 0x4004f9 and Line
by 1 to 41
-  [0x041e]  Advance PC by 1 to 0x4004fa
+  [0x041d]  Special opcode 62: advance Address by 4 to 0x4004f1 and Line
by 1 to 41
+  [0x041e]  Advance PC by 1 to 0x4004f2
   [0x0420]  Extended opcode 1: End of Sequence

   [0x0423]  Extended opcode 2: set Address to 0x4006c8
@@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@ Contents of the .debug_ranges section:

 Offset   BeginEnd
    (base address)
- 004004e0 004004f5 
+ 004004d8 004004ed 
  004006c4 004006c8 
  
 0040 00400540 00400555 
@@ -2135,7 +2135,7 @@ Contents of the .debug_ranges section:
 0060 00400683 004006a6 
 0060 
 00b0   (base address)
-00b0 004004f5 004004fa 
+00b0 004004ed 004004f2 
 00b0 004006c8 004006cd 
 00b0 

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
I've just run the testsuite.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.8/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/bin/ld:
/home/andreas/src/binutils/test/zlib/libz.a(libz_a-compress.o): relocation
R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared
object; recompile with -fPIC

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab  ---
FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |NEW

--- Comment #8 from Andreas Schwab  ---
What do you mean with "unmodified GCC"?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab  ---
@@ -1,180 +1,175 @@

-ld/tmpdir/gnunormal: file format elf64-x86-64
+ld/tmpdir/normal: file format elf64-x86-64


 Disassembly of section .init:

-004004d8 <_init>:
-  4004d8:  48 83 ec 08 sub$0x8,%rsp
-  4004dc:  48 8b 05 15 05 20 00mov0x200515(%rip),%rax#
6009f8 <_DYNAMIC+0x1f0>
-  4004e3:  48 85 c0test   %rax,%rax
-  4004e6:  74 05   je 4004ed <_init+0x15>
-  4004e8:  e8 43 00 00 00  callq  400530
<__libc_start_main@plt+0x10>
-  4004ed:  48 83 c4 08 add$0x8,%rsp
-  4004f1:  c3  retq   
+004004d0 <_init>:
+  4004d0:  48 83 ec 08 sub$0x8,%rsp
+  4004d4:  48 8b 05 ed 04 20 00mov0x2004ed(%rip),%rax#
6009c8 <_DYNAMIC+0x200>
+  4004db:  48 85 c0test   %rax,%rax
+  4004de:  74 05   je 4004e5 <_init+0x15>
+  4004e0:  e8 3b 00 00 00  callq  400520
<__libc_start_main@plt+0x10>
+  4004e5:  48 83 c4 08 add$0x8,%rsp
+  4004e9:  c3  retq   

 Disassembly of section .plt:

-00400500 :
-  400500:  ff 35 02 05 20 00   pushq  0x200502(%rip)# 600a08
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x8>
-  400506:  ff 25 04 05 20 00   jmpq   *0x200504(%rip)# 600a10
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x10>
-  40050c:  0f 1f 40 00 nopl   0x0(%rax)
-
-00400510 :
-  400510:  ff 25 02 05 20 00   jmpq   *0x200502(%rip)# 600a18
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x18>
-  400516:  68 00 00 00 00  pushq  $0x0
-  40051b:  e9 e0 ff ff ff  jmpq   400500 <_init+0x28>
-
-00400520 <__libc_start_main@plt>:
-  400520:  ff 25 fa 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004fa(%rip)# 600a20
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x20>
-  400526:  68 01 00 00 00  pushq  $0x1
-  40052b:  e9 d0 ff ff ff  jmpq   400500 <_init+0x28>
+004004f0 :
+  4004f0:  ff 35 e2 04 20 00   pushq  0x2004e2(%rip)# 6009d8
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x8>
+  4004f6:  ff 25 e4 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004e4(%rip)# 6009e0
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x10>
+  4004fc:  0f 1f 40 00 nopl   0x0(%rax)
+
+00400500 :
+  400500:  ff 25 e2 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004e2(%rip)# 6009e8
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x18>
+  400506:  68 00 00 00 00  pushq  $0x0
+  40050b:  e9 e0 ff ff ff  jmpq   4004f0 <_init+0x20>
+
+00400510 <__libc_start_main@plt>:
+  400510:  ff 25 da 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004da(%rip)# 6009f0
<_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_+0x20>
+  400516:  68 01 00 00 00  pushq  $0x1
+  40051b:  e9 d0 ff ff ff  jmpq   4004f0 <_init+0x20>

 Disassembly of section .plt.got:

-00400530 <.plt.got>:
-  400530:  ff 25 c2 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004c2(%rip)# 6009f8
<_DYNAMIC+0x1f0>
-  400536:  66 90   xchg   %ax,%ax
+00400520 <.plt.got>:
+  400520:  ff 25 a2 04 20 00   jmpq   *0x2004a2(%rip)# 6009c8
<_DYNAMIC+0x200>
+  400526:  66 90   xchg   %ax,%ax

 Disassembly of section .text:

-00400540 :
-  400540:  48 83 ec 08 sub$0x8,%rsp
-  400544:  bf da 06 40 00  mov$0x4006da,%edi
-  400549:  e8 c2 ff ff ff  callq  400510 
-  40054e:  31 c0   xor%eax,%eax
-  400550:  48 83 c4 08 add$0x8,%rsp
-  400554:  c3  retq   
-
-00400555 <_start>:
-  400555:  31 ed   xor%ebp,%ebp
-  400557:  49 89 d1mov%rdx,%r9
-  40055a:  5e  pop%rsi
-  40055b:  48 89 e2mov%rsp,%rdx
-  40055e:  48 83 e4 f0 and$0xfff0,%rsp
-  400562:  50  push   %rax
-  400563:  54  push   %rsp
-  400564:  49 c7 c0 c0 06 40 00mov$0x4006c0,%r8
-  40056b:  48 c7 c1 50 06 40 00mov$0x400650,%rcx
-  400572:  48 c7 c7 40 05 40 00mov$0x400540,%rdi
-  400579:  e8 a2 ff ff ff  callq  400520 <__libc_start_main@plt>
-  40057e:  f4  hlt
-  40057f:  90  nop
-
-00400580 :
-  400580:  b8 3f 0a 60 00  mov$0x600a3f,%eax
-  400585:  55  push   %rbp
-  400586:  48 2d 38 0a 60 00   sub$0x600a38,%rax
-  40058c:  48 83 f8 0e cmp$0xe,%rax
-  400590:  48 89 e5mov%rsp,%rbp
-  400593:  77 02   ja 400597

-  400595:  5d  pop%rbp
-  400596:  c3  retq   
-  400597:  b8 00 00 00 00  mov$0x0,%eax
-  4005

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab  ---
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

-ld/tmpdir/gnunormal: file format elf64-x86-64
+ld/tmpdir/normal: file format elf64-x86-64

 Program Header:
 PHDR off0x0040 vaddr 0x00400040 paddr
0x00400040 align 2**3
@@ -7,42 +7,43 @@
   INTERP off0x01c8 vaddr 0x004001c8 paddr
0x004001c8 align 2**0
  filesz 0x001c memsz 0x001c flags r--
 LOAD off0x vaddr 0x0040 paddr
0x0040 align 2**21
- filesz 0x07e4 memsz 0x07e4 flags r-x
-LOAD off0x07e8 vaddr 0x006007e8 paddr
0x006007e8 align 2**21
- filesz 0x0250 memsz 0x0258 flags rw-
- DYNAMIC off0x0808 vaddr 0x00600808 paddr
0x00600808 align 2**3
- filesz 0x01f0 memsz 0x01f0 flags rw-
+ filesz 0x07ac memsz 0x07ac flags r-x
+LOAD off0x07b0 vaddr 0x006007b0 paddr
0x006007b0 align 2**21
+ filesz 0x0258 memsz 0x0260 flags rw-
+ DYNAMIC off0x07c8 vaddr 0x006007c8 paddr
0x006007c8 align 2**3
+ filesz 0x0200 memsz 0x0200 flags rw-
 NOTE off0x01e4 vaddr 0x004001e4 paddr
0x004001e4 align 2**2
  filesz 0x0020 memsz 0x0020 flags r--
STACK off0x vaddr 0x paddr
0x align 2**4
  filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rw-

 Dynamic Section:
-  NEEDED   tmpdir/libgnufoo.so
+  NEEDED   tmpdir/libbarfoov.so
+  NEEDED   tmpdir/libfoov.so
   NEEDED   libdl.so.2
   NEEDED   libc.so.6
-  INIT 0x004004d8
-  FINI 0x004006c4
-  INIT_ARRAY   0x006007e8
-  INIT_ARRAYSZ 0x0010
-  FINI_ARRAY   0x006007f8
+  INIT 0x004004d0
+  FINI 0x004006a4
+  INIT_ARRAY   0x006007b0
+  INIT_ARRAYSZ 0x0008
+  FINI_ARRAY   0x006007b8
   FINI_ARRAYSZ 0x0008
   HASH 0x00400208
-  STRTAB   0x00400388
+  STRTAB   0x00400370
   SYMTAB   0x00400250
-  STRSZ0x00ce
+  STRSZ0x00dd
   SYMENT   0x0018
   DEBUG0x
-  PLTGOT   0x00600a00
+  PLTGOT   0x006009d0
   PLTRELSZ 0x0030
   PLTREL   0x0007
-  JMPREL   0x004004a8
-  RELA 0x00400490
+  JMPREL   0x004004a0
+  RELA 0x00400488
   RELASZ   0x0018
   RELAENT  0x0018
-  VERNEED  0x00400470
+  VERNEED  0x00400468
   VERNEEDNUM   0x0001
-  VERSYM   0x00400456
+  VERSYM   0x0040044e

 Version References:
   required from libc.so.6:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

--- Comment #12 from Andreas Schwab  ---
ld/tmpdir/normal was overwritten by other tests.

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@

-ld/tmpdir/gnunormal: file format elf64-x86-64
+ld/tmpdir/normal: file format elf64-x86-64

 Program Header:
 PHDR off0x0040 vaddr 0x00400040 paddr
0x00400040 align 2**3
@@ -18,10 +18,10 @@
  filesz 0x memsz 0x flags rw-

 Dynamic Section:
-  NEEDED   tmpdir/libgnufoo.so
+  NEEDED   tmpdir/libfoozlib.so
   NEEDED   libdl.so.2
   NEEDED   libc.so.6
-  INIT 0x004004d8
+  INIT 0x004004e0
   FINI 0x004006c4
   INIT_ARRAY   0x006007e8
   INIT_ARRAYSZ 0x0010
@@ -30,19 +30,19 @@
   HASH 0x00400208
   STRTAB   0x00400388
   SYMTAB   0x00400250
-  STRSZ0x00ce
+  STRSZ0x00cf
   SYMENT   0x0018
   DEBUG0x
   PLTGOT   0x00600a00
   PLTRELSZ 0x0030
   PLTREL   0x0007
-  JMPREL   0x004004a8
-  RELA 0x00400490
+  JMPREL   0x004004b0
+  RELA 0x00400498
   RELASZ   0x0018
   RELAENT  0x0018
-  VERNEED  0x00400470
+  VERNEED  0x00400478
   VERNEEDNUM   0x0001
-  VERSYM   0x00400456
+  VERSYM   0x00400458

 Version References:
   required from libc.so.6:

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/18354] FAIL: Link with zlib-gnu compressed debug output

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18354

--- Comment #14 from Andreas Schwab  ---
All tests PASS.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/18599] Use .strtab section for section names in ELF object files

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18599

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
You can save much more by stripping the object.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19042] New: unsupported reloc 311/312

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19042

Bug ID: 19042
   Summary: unsupported reloc 311/312
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gold
  Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*

$ make check-gold
[...]
`echo gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite -I.. 
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite -I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/..
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/../../include
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/../../elfcpp -I..
-DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\""   -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-fmerge-constants -O2 -g | sed -e 's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9[0-9]]*//'` -c
-fPIC -o ifuncmain7pic.o ../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/ifuncmain7.c
`echo gcc -W -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wshadow
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -O2 -g
-fno-use-linker-plugin   -o ifuncmain7picstatic | sed -e
's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Bgcctestdir/ -static ifuncmain7pic.o
gcctestdir/ld: error: ifuncmain7pic.o: unsupported reloc 311 against local
symbol
gcctestdir/ld: error: ifuncmain7pic.o: unsupported reloc 312 against local
symbol
gcctestdir/ld: error: ifuncmain7pic.o: unsupported reloc 311 against local
symbol
gcctestdir/ld: error: ifuncmain7pic.o: unsupported reloc 312 against local
symbol
gcctestdir/ld: internal error in relocate, at
../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:5669
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:5571: recipe for target 'ifuncmain7picstatic' failed
make[4]: *** [ifuncmain7picstatic] Error 1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19041] New: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549/551

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19041

Bug ID: 19041
   Summary: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549/551
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gold
  Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*

$ make check-gold
[...]
`echo g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite -I.. 
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite -I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/..
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/../../include
-I../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/../../elfcpp -I..
-DLOCALEDIR="\"/usr/share/locale\""   -W -Wall-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE
-D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -O2 -g | sed -e
's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -MT tls_test.o -MD -MP -MF
.deps/tls_test.Tpo -c -o tls_test.o
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc
[...]
`echo g++ -W -Wall-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-fmerge-constants -O2 -g -fno-use-linker-plugin   -o tls_test_shared_nonpic.so
| sed -e 's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Bgcctestdir/ -shared
tls_test.o tls_test_file2.o tls_test_c.o -Wl,-z,notext
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 549 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc 551 in shared code.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test_c.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc type 549 in shared
objects.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test_c.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc type 551 in shared
objects.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test_c.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc type 549 in shared
objects.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test_c.o: unsupported TLSLE reloc type 551 in shared
objects.
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 549 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:87: error: unexpected opcode while
processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 551 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:87: error: unexpected opcode while
processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_LO12_NC
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 549 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:95: error: unexpected opcode while
processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 551 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:95: error: unexpected opcode while
processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_LO12_NC
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 549 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:103: error: unexpected opcode
while processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 551 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:103: error: unexpected opcode
while processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_LO12_NC
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 549 in non-static TLSLE
mode.
../../../binutils/gold/testsuite/tls_test.cc:111: error: unexpected opcode
while processing relocation R_AARCH64_TLSLE_ADD_TPREL_HI12
gcctestdir/ld: error: tls_test.o: unsupported reloc 551 in non-s

[Bug binutils/1298] m68k-dis.c:1348: warning: argument 'info' might be clobbered by 'longjmp' or 'vfork'

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1298

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE

--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab  ---
The gcc bug is fixed in all supported gcc versions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/1198] Segfault when executing objdump on a special file...

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1198

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Does that still happen with the latest version?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/4897] [regression] failing testcases on m68k-linux-gnu

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4897

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|unassigned at sources dot redhat.c |unassigned at 
sourceware dot org
   |om  |

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
None of these tests fail any more, closing as fixed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/11030] Missing opcode for assembly instruction 'stldsr' in isa aplus of m68k assembler

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11030

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.23

--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed in 2.20.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/14193] mov3q.l followed by movem.l generates illegal instruction on Coldfire 5480 (or -march=cfv4e)

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14193

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.23

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed in 2.23.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/19109] Cannot configure default flag_compress_debug

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19109

--- Comment #10 from Andreas Schwab  ---
I'd expect the option's default to be os-dependent, not arch-dependent.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.

___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19200] New: error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200

Bug ID: 19200
   Summary: error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.26 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gold
  Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*

$ make check-gold
[...]
`echo g++ -W -Wall-Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64
-fmerge-constants -O2 -g -fno-use-linker-plugin   -o
icf_virtual_function_folding_test | sed -e
's/-Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=[0-9][0-9]*//'` -Bgcctestdir/ -Wl,--icf=all
icf_virtual_function_folding_test.o -pie
gcctestdir/ld: error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:5149: recipe for target 'icf_virtual_function_folding_test' failed
make[4]: *** [icf_virtual_function_folding_test] Error 1

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19200] error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||19119


Referenced Bugs:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119
[Bug 19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||19200


Referenced Bugs:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200
[Bug 19200] error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19200] error: unrecognised output emulation: aarch64linux

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19200

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends on||19172


Referenced Bugs:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172
[Bug 19172] gold is missing emulations, at least on aarch64-linux,
arm-linux-gnueabi, powerpc-linux
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19172] gold is missing emulations, at least on aarch64-linux, arm-linux-gnueabi, powerpc-linux

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19172

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||19119


Referenced Bugs:

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19119
[Bug 19119] Gold accepts bogus target emulation
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/19222] Undefined behavoour in tc-arm.c:encode_arm_immediate with Xcode 7.1

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19222

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.26

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed by d840c08.

2014-11-20  Richard Earnshaw  

* config/tc-arm.c (rotate_left): Avoid undefined behaviour when
N = 0.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug binutils/19343] make configure-host fails when $PWD contains space

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19343

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|critical|normal

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Don't do that then.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19353] New: ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353

Bug ID: 19353
   Summary: ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at
../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418
   Product: binutils
   Version: 2.27 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
  Severity: normal
  Priority: P2
 Component: gold
  Assignee: ccoutant at gmail dot com
  Reporter: sch...@linux-m68k.org
CC: ian at airs dot com
  Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-*-*

Created attachment 8840
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8840&action=edit
testcase.tar.xz, Part 1

When building webkitgtk-2.10.4:

$ LD=gold/ld-new ./link
gold/ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at
../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353

--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Created attachment 8841
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8841&action=edit
testcase.tar.xz, Part 2

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gold/19353] ld-new: internal error in relocate_tls, at ../../binutils/gold/aarch64.cc:7418

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Created attachment 8842
  --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8842&action=edit
testcase.tar.xz, Part 3

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/13050] move.b (2,a0,d0.l),1(%a1) should fail for all ColdFire targets

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13050

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |RESOLVED
 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Target Milestone|--- |2.27

--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab  ---
Fixed for 2.27.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/19520] [2.26 regression] R_386_GOT32X relocation breaks gcc bootstrap with non-gld/gold linker

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19520

--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab  ---
They won't be new for long.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/19526] Using "gcc -o /dev/null" gives "ld: final link failed: File truncated" error

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19526

--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab  ---
I think ld should error out if the output isn't a regular file.  There are
probably other cases where the linker needs to reread what it has written out.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug ld/19526] Using "gcc -o /dev/null" gives "ld: final link failed: File truncated" error

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19526

--- Comment #7 from Andreas Schwab  ---
The linker should not allow writing the output to a non-regular file in the
first place.  Changing the behaviour depending on the type of output file would
be wrong.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils

[Bug gas/15393] .string with hex should be parsed differently

[sch...@linux-m68k.org]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15393

Andreas Schwab  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|FIXED   |INVALID

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils