Re: [parted-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Do not automatically update GPT label in interactive mode

2009-02-19 Thread Jim Meyering
Petr Uzel wrote:
 On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:55:35PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
 Petr Uzel petr.u...@suse.cz wrote:
 ...
  +test_expect_success \
  +'save a copy of the original primary GPT table' \
  +'dd if=$dev of=before count=1 skip=1'
 
  isn't bs=512 missing here ^^^ ?

 It's fine to omit it, since bs=512 is the default.

 I can confirm that it defaults to 512 on my system. However, I can't
 find any reference about default bs value in the dd documentation
 (more precisely, it is referenced in BSD and HPUX manpages, but not in
 linux).

Thank you for mentioning that.

Here's a proposed patch.
Feedback welcome.
Any language lawyers around? ;-)

From 0c91ae335d45250ed9024ededd36aac40e071d7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering meyer...@redhat.com
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:35:58 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] doc: dd: document that the default block size is 512 bytes

* src/dd.c (usage): Document the default block size.
* doc/coreutils.texi (dd invocation): Document that the default
block size (bs, ibs, obs) is 512 bytes.
Reported by Petr Uzel.
---
 THANKS |1 +
 doc/coreutils.texi |2 ++
 src/dd.c   |6 +++---
 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/THANKS b/THANKS
index bedb01a..f2fcd01 100644
--- a/THANKS
+++ b/THANKS
@@ -446,6 +446,7 @@ Peter Moulder   rei...@netspace.net.au
 Peter O'Gorman  bug-coreut...@mlists.thewrittenword.com
 Peter Samuelson psamu...@sampo.creighton.edu
 Peter Seebach   se...@taniemarie.solon.com
+Petr Uzel   petr.u...@suse.cz
 Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com
 Phelippe Neveu  pne...@pcigeomatics.com
 Phil Richards   phil.richa...@vf.vodafone.co.uk
diff --git a/doc/coreutils.texi b/doc/coreutils.texi
index 42234d3..8d496ad 100644
--- a/doc/coreutils.texi
+++ b/doc/coreutils.texi
@@ -7605,6 +7605,7 @@ dd invocation
 @cindex input block size
 Set the input block size to @var{bytes}.
 This makes @command{dd} read @var{bytes} per block.
+The default is 512 bytes.

 @item o...@var{bytes}
 @opindex obs
@@ -7612,6 +7613,7 @@ dd invocation
 @cindex output block size
 Set the output block size to @var{bytes}.
 This makes @command{dd} write @var{bytes} per block.
+The default is 512 bytes.

 @item b...@var{bytes}
 @opindex bs
diff --git a/src/dd.c b/src/dd.c
index 4604ced..6837b7b 100644
--- a/src/dd.c
+++ b/src/dd.c
@@ -463,16 +463,16 @@ Usage: %s [OPERAND]...\n\
   fputs (_(\
 Copy a file, converting and formatting according to the operands.\n\
 \n\
-  bs=BYTESread and write BYTES bytes at a time\n\
+  bs=BYTESread and write BYTES bytes at a time (also see ibs=,obs=)\n\
   cbs=BYTES   convert BYTES bytes at a time\n\
   conv=CONVS  convert the file as per the comma separated symbol list\n\
   count=BLOCKScopy only BLOCKS input blocks\n\
-  ibs=BYTES   read BYTES bytes at a time\n\
+  ibs=BYTES   read BYTES bytes at a time (default: 512)\n\
 ), stdout);
   fputs (_(\
   if=FILE read from FILE instead of stdin\n\
   iflag=FLAGS read as per the comma separated symbol list\n\
-  obs=BYTES   write BYTES bytes at a time\n\
+  obs=BYTES   write BYTES bytes at a time (default: 512)\n\
   of=FILE write to FILE instead of stdout\n\
   oflag=FLAGS write as per the comma separated symbol list\n\
   seek=BLOCKS skip BLOCKS obs-sized blocks at start of output\n\
--
1.6.2.rc1.241.g7bf82


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: [parted-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] Do not automatically update GPT label in interactive mode

2009-02-19 Thread Petr Uzel
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 08:55:35PM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
 Petr Uzel petr.u...@suse.cz wrote:
 ...
  +test_expect_success \
  +'save a copy of the original primary GPT table' \
  +'dd if=$dev of=before count=1 skip=1'
 
  isn't bs=512 missing here ^^^ ?
 
 It's fine to omit it, since bs=512 is the default.

I can confirm that it defaults to 512 on my system. However, I can't
find any reference about default bs value in the dd documentation
(more precisely, it is referenced in BSD and HPUX manpages, but not in
linux).

-- 
Best regards / s pozdravem

Petr Uzel, Packages maintainer
-
SUSE LINUX, s.r.o.  e-mail: pu...@suse.cz
Lihovarská 1060/12  tel: +420 284 028 964
190 00 Prague 9 fax: +420 284 028 951
Czech Republic  http://www.suse.cz


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Timezone handling in date command

2009-02-19 Thread Burba, Viktor
Dear guys,
 
I have expierenced the following unexpeted behaviour by using the date
command on SuSE SLES10(x86_64):
 
I have timezone setup to Asia/Dubai (GMT+4), which has short name GST
(Gulf Standart time) 
 
#date
Thu Feb 20 20:00:00 GST 2009
#date --utc -d now
Thu Feb 20 16:00:00 UTC 2009  - OK  UTC+4
#date --utc -d Thu Feb 20 20:00:00 GST 2009
Thu Feb 20 10:00:00 UTC 2009  - ???  UTC+10
 
I think here some name problems with GST. Because there are four
timezones with the same short name GST
 
Guam Standart Time UTC+10
Gulf Standart Time UTC+4
Greenland Standart Time UTC-3
South Georgia Time UTC-2
 
Here looks like date uses UTC+10 for name GST, which is also timezone
GST but Guam Standart time and not Gulf Standart time.
How can I force date to use another time offset for GST name?
 
 
Best regards,
Viktor Burba
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: Hello

2009-02-19 Thread Robert Wamala

Thx for advise
can you please help me as per my question.

Rgds

Robert


 


On Thu, 2009-02-19 at 05:54 -0700, Eric Blake wrote:
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1
 
 [Please consider using a more descriptive subject line, so your mail won't
 be rejected as spam]
 
 According to Robert Wamala on 2/19/2009 2:17 AM:
  Hello can you please help 
  to do with automatic logins with curl
 
 You have reached the GNU Coreutils mailing list.  The GNU Coreutils
 are the basic file, shell and text manipulation utilities of the GNU
 Operating System.  You can learn more about GNU Coreutils here:
 
   http://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/
 
 The GNU Coreutils are part of the GNU Operating System.  You can learn
 more about the GNU Project here:
 
   http://www.gnu.org/
 
 But you are asking about 'curl'.  I am sorry but this is the wrong
 mailing list.  We do not maintain 'curl' here.  It is not
 part of the GNU Coreutils project.  We are unable to help you.
 
 You may want to try the 'curl' home page for more appropriate resources:
 http://curl.haxx.se/
 
 - --
 Don't work too hard, make some time for fun as well!
 
 Eric Blake e...@byu.net
 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
 Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Cygwin)
 Comment: Public key at home.comcast.net/~ericblake/eblake.gpg
 Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
 iEYEARECAAYFAkmdVpoACgkQ84KuGfSFAYBwqwCgkk4IZPuQ55k4gnGmKsbpuMXF
 iRgAn3Bs7+hYEOofgMrdGkQlyA2J6h5w
 =HUPm
 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
-- 
Robert Wamala rob...@rcs-communication.com



___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: Hello

2009-02-19 Thread hggdh
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:29:15 +0300
Robert Wamala rob...@rcs-communication.com wrote:

 Thx for advise
 can you please help me as per my question.

No, we cannot. As Eric stated in the previous email:

  But you are asking about 'curl'.  I am sorry but this is the wrong
  mailing list.  We do not maintain 'curl' here.  It is not
  part of the GNU Coreutils project.  We are unable to help you.
  
  You may want to try the 'curl' home page for more appropriate
  resources: http://curl.haxx.se/

Regards,


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: ls -s documentation misleading

2009-02-19 Thread vcaputo
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 08:04:46AM +0100, Jim Meyering wrote:
 ...
  Clearly the ls help and manual should instead say:
  Size of space allocated for each file, in blocks
 
  Perhaps with a notice in the manual further explaining potential for
  difference between the file size and size in blocks?
 
 The description in info coreutils ls has more detail:
 (and is usually referred to by the last paragraph of the man page)
 
 `-s'
 `--size'
  Print the disk allocation of each file to the left of the file
  name.  This is the amount of disk space used by the file, which is
  usually a bit more than the file's size, but it can be less if the
  file has holes.
 
  Normally the disk allocation is printed in units of 1024 bytes,
  but this can be overridden (*note Block size::).
 
  For files that are NFS-mounted from an HP-UX system to a BSD
  system, this option reports sizes that are half the correct
  values.  On HP-UX systems, it reports sizes that are twice the
  correct values for files that are NFS-mounted from BSD systems.
  This is due to a flaw in HP-UX; it also affects the HP-UX `ls'
  program.


Thanks for the quick response, that's great the info file is accurate,
unfortunately I never looked at it.

The source was my next reference after seeing behavior not matching
--help and the manual.  Surely those should still be corrected, they
don't need to contain as much as the info page just something indicating
specifically an allocated size.

Cheers,
Vito Caputo


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: [md5sum]

2009-02-19 Thread Matthew Woehlke

Pedro Henrique Marques wrote:

But the output shows the verification only from the 3� to last file:


To clarify, the problem is that the first and last file were apparently 
ignored?



My md5sum version is  5.2.1
Is this a bug ?


The latest version of coreutils is 7.0. I recommend trying a newer version.

--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an 
undocumented feature. -- Unknown (from fortune's bofh-excuses)



___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: [md5sum]

2009-02-19 Thread Micah Cowan
Matthew Woehlke wrote:
 Pedro Henrique Marques wrote:
 But the output shows the verification only from the 3� to last file:
 
 To clarify, the problem is that the first and last file were apparently
 ignored?

And second, I think.

It would've been helpful to see the exact invocation of md5sum...

-- 
Micah J. Cowan
Programmer, musician, typesetting enthusiast, gamer.
GNU Maintainer: wget, screen, teseq
http://micah.cowan.name/


___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


Re: ls -s documentation misleading

2009-02-19 Thread Matthew Woehlke

vcap...@pengaru.com wrote:

The ls -s argument is documented as such:

 ls --help output: 
  -s, --size print the size of each file, in blocks


 LS(1) man page:
   -s, --size
  print the size of each file, in blocks

This leads one to expect some sort of relationship between the size
colum in ls -l output, perhaps with rounding to the nearest block, but
this is not the case.


I know the info is preferred, but would it be okay to simply 
s/blocks/allocated blocks/? (or used blocks, or something along those 
lines?) I think it should be possible to make this a bit clearer in a 
way that has an acceptable impact on the length of --help.


--
Matthew
Please do not quote my e-mail address unobfuscated in message bodies.
--
We are Microsoft. What you are experiencing is not a problem; it is an 
undocumented feature. -- Unknown (from fortune's bofh-excuses)




___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils


pr and indentation

2009-02-19 Thread hggdh
Original Ubuntu bug:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/coreutils/+bug/331817

original bug description

While the pr command recognizes the --indent (-o) option, page headers are 
printed without indentation.

Expected results (for example, version 5.2.1 from CentOS 4):
$ ls /usr/bin | pr --indent 5 | head

 2009-02-19 17:43 Page 1

 [
 4odb
 4rdf
 4ss
 4ssd

Actual results (in 8.04/ pr version 6.10):
$ ls /usr/bin | pr --indent 5 | head

2009-02-19 17:45 Page 1

 [
 411toppm
 a2p
 a2ps
 a2ps-lpr-wrapper

original bug description

I have tested with git 'pr', and the same happens:

hg...@xango2:/usr/src/buildd/libpst/libpst-0.6.25 $ ls /usr/bin | pr --indent 5 
| head
 

2009-02-19 22:08  Page 1


 [
 2to3-2.6
 2to3-3.0
 404main
 411toppm
hg...@xango2:/usr/src/buildd/libpst/libpst-0.6.25 $ pr --version
pr (GNU coreutils) 7.0.188-0e40e-dirty

Although it is not clear what would be the expected behaviour, it seems
intuitive that if --indent is provided, all output should be indented.

Regards,



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Bug-coreutils mailing list
Bug-coreutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-coreutils