bug#40173: libgen.me browser extension
Thank you Johannes. I'm updating my gitlab project. On 21/03/20 20:51, Johannes Marbach wrote: > Unfortunately, Mozilla has recently disabled the extension based on > alleged copyright infringements against LibGen itself (full message at > the bottom). Can someone please remove the extension from the 68 branch > of IceCat as well? > > Thanks > Johannes > > > Original message from Mozilla: > > Dear contributor, > > We received a notification under Mozilla’s Digital Millennium Copyright > Act (“DMCA”) and Trademark policy > (https://www.mozilla.org/about/legal/report-infringement/) complaining > of allegedly infringing activity by you on our service at > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/librifyjs-libgen-me. We > have removed or disabled access to your add-on identified by the > claimant as infringing the claimant's copyright. > > The notice included the following report: > > From DeVore & DeMarco LLP: > > We are litigation counsel for Elsevier Inc., a leading publisher of > scientific, engineering, and medical books and journals. Elsevier > provides , among other things, the ScienceDirect platform, through which > it distributes scientific journal articles in which it holds the > copyright. In order to protect its copyright interest in those articles, > Elsevier brought a civil action against a number of websites commonly > known as "Sci-Hub" and "LibGen" or "Library Genesis" and their > respective mirrors which engage in the large-scale infringement of those > copyrights. On June 21, 2017, Elsevier obtained a judgement against > those websites which, among other things, enjoined the websites, their > operators, and anyone acting in concert with them, from infringing > Elsevier' s copyrighted works or assisting others in doing so. > > We write to inform you of the presence of a number of add-ons for the > Firefox web browser which are designed specifically to assist their > users in infringing Elsevier 's (and other publisher') copyrights > through the websites operated by the defendants in the above-mentioned > civil action. We request that these extensions be removed from the > Firefox Browser Add-Ons website (addons.mozilla.org) because they (1) > violate the DMCA, including Section 1201 (circumvention of copyright > protection systems); (2) operate in concert with the defendants in the > above-mentioned civil action to violate Elsevier's copyrights in > violation of the court 's order enjoining such conduct; and (3) are > manifestly in violation of Mozilla's Conditions of Use > (https://www.mozilla.om:/enUS/about/legal /acceptable-useD which > expressly prohibit, among other things, illegal content and content > which violates the copyright or other intellectual property rights of > others. We therefore request that the following add-ons be promptly removed. > > > ... > > > • LibrifyJS: Libgen.me > o https :// addons.mozi l la.erg/ en-US/firefox/addon/li brifvj s-libgen-me > o Published by "h3nn3s" > o Last updated Nov. 7, 2019 > o Javascript fix for the Libgen.me site > > > > If you believe your content was removed or disabled as a result of a > mistake or misidentification of the material to be removed or disabled > (e.g., you have permission to post it or you believe it is a fair use), > you may submit a counter notification to us at dmcanot...@mozilla.com. > We refer you to our DMCA and Trademark policy page at > https://www.mozilla.org/about/legal/report-infringement/ for the > requirements for a valid counter notification and more information. > > We remind you of our repeat infringer termination policy. Under our > policy, we may terminate, at our discretion, a user’s account if under > appropriate circumstances they are determined to be a repeat infringer. > > Sincerely, > Mozilla Legal Team > > > On 11/8/19 8:03 PM, Johannes Marbach wrote: >> Hello everyone, >> >> This might not be the best place to post this but in lack of awareness >> of other options: I recently put together a browser extension for making >> the libgen.me website work in IceCat with LibreJS enabled. I didn't >> spend much time on polishing the UI but functionally search, item >> details and item link list work - at least in my testing. >> >> If anyone is interested in using or contributing to this, you can find >> the extension on AMO: >> >> https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/librifyjs-libgen-me >> >> and the code on GitLab: >> >> https://gitlab.com/cherrypicker/librifyjs---libgen.me >> >> Best, >> Johannes > > > > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bug#40147: HTTPS-everywhere 2020-03-16 released
Hello everyone. A new release of HTTPS-everywhere is available: 2020.3.16 * EASE HTTP Once CSS fix * Allow users to whitelist hosts from the option page * EASE mode fixes for locale issue * Fetch Test Prep, TLS 1.2 update * Fetch Test Prep, Updated check rules script * Fix options page appearance on Firefox when dark mode is on * Dark mode adjustments -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bug#39766: Security-Problems, probably known
@Mark, do you why the binary releases are not spread? On 10/03/20 18:31, i...@dantalion.nl wrote: > Current binary release is 60.7.0 which is vulnerable and that is the > problem, see: https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/?C=M;O=D > > On 3/10/20 6:24 PM, Antonio Trande wrote: >> These issues have been fixed with Firefox ESR 68.4.1; current IceCat >> release on 68 branch is the 68.6.0. So, what's the problem? >> >> On 10/03/20 10:29, i...@dantalion.nl wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> It seems no one has replied to this. I think IceCat should no longer be >>> recommended to users until this issue is resolved especially since >>> IceCat is advertised as a browser with "Privacy protection features". >>> Suffice to say such protection features are no good if the browser >>> itself is vulnerable to the types of vulnerabilities as eluded to before. >>> >>> I understand that there aren't sufficient developers to maintain IceCat >>> but that does not mean the GNU website should offer the browser without >>> at least clearly addressing it's potential vulnerabilities on the >>> appropriate webpages. >>> >>> As of now, users might download, install and subsequently use IceCat >>> with the understanding that they have downloaded a browser with enhanced >>> privacy protection features while not being aware that it is potentially >>> susceptible to recently discovered vulnerabilities. >>> >>> This is precisely the sort of situation that free software, and free and >>> open information should prevent. >>> >>> I hope we can resolve this quickly. >>> >>> Kind regards, >>> Corne >>> >>> On 2/24/20 7:05 PM, i...@dantalion.nl wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I was also really wondering about this as the current version of IceCat >>>> is a version of Firefox that was affected. >>>> >>>> On 24-02-2020 12:09, Arne Wichmann wrote: >>>>> Good day tou you! >>>>> >>>>> I see here some security problems referenced for Firefox, which are >>>>> probably applicable to Icecat, too: >>>>> >>>>> CVE-2019-17026 - IonMonkey type confusion with StoreElementHole and >>>>> FallibleStoreElement >>>>> CVE-2019-17017 - Type Confusion in XPCVariant.cpp >>>>> >>>>> More less critical ones are referenced, too. >>>>> >>>>> Are there plans to adress these? >>>>> >>>>> cu >>>>> >>>>> AW >>>>> >> >> -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
bug#39766: Security-Problems, probably known
These issues have been fixed with Firefox ESR 68.4.1; current IceCat release on 68 branch is the 68.6.0. So, what's the problem? On 10/03/20 10:29, i...@dantalion.nl wrote: > Hello, > > It seems no one has replied to this. I think IceCat should no longer be > recommended to users until this issue is resolved especially since > IceCat is advertised as a browser with "Privacy protection features". > Suffice to say such protection features are no good if the browser > itself is vulnerable to the types of vulnerabilities as eluded to before. > > I understand that there aren't sufficient developers to maintain IceCat > but that does not mean the GNU website should offer the browser without > at least clearly addressing it's potential vulnerabilities on the > appropriate webpages. > > As of now, users might download, install and subsequently use IceCat > with the understanding that they have downloaded a browser with enhanced > privacy protection features while not being aware that it is potentially > susceptible to recently discovered vulnerabilities. > > This is precisely the sort of situation that free software, and free and > open information should prevent. > > I hope we can resolve this quickly. > > Kind regards, > Corne > > On 2/24/20 7:05 PM, i...@dantalion.nl wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I was also really wondering about this as the current version of IceCat >> is a version of Firefox that was affected. >> >> On 24-02-2020 12:09, Arne Wichmann wrote: >>> Good day tou you! >>> >>> I see here some security problems referenced for Firefox, which are >>> probably applicable to Icecat, too: >>> >>> CVE-2019-17026 - IonMonkey type confusion with StoreElementHole and >>> FallibleStoreElement >>> CVE-2019-17017 - Type Confusion in XPCVariant.cpp >>> >>> More less critical ones are referenced, too. >>> >>> Are there plans to adress these? >>> >>> cu >>> >>> AW >>> -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x7B30EE04E576AA84 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Icecat versioning
Hi Andrew. Those scripts are modified every time that Firefox release changes. On 25/10/19 04:28, Andrew Kaminski wrote: > Hello, the page at https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ indicates that > "IceCat is generated from Firefox with the scripts available at > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git.; Does this mean that > Icecat can be built against Firefox 68+? > > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 68.0.*
Hi all. Anyone is working on release 68*? I'm looking to resolve missing about:home page and some Gnuzilla addons unrecognized/unverified... -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] 'gnu' line in About window
Hi all. How i can modify the line "gnu - 1.0" in About window of Icecat? Image: https://ibb.co/8g3qHNw -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] The patch of extensions & themes installation error
Missing extension ID should be an a bug of the addon, not of IceCat; or not? https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Add-ons/WebExtensions/WebExtensions_and_the_Add-on_ID#When_do_you_need_an_add-on_ID On 11/07/19 02:12, Kiryuu Sakuya wrote: > >> mailing list thread about the problem > > Here: > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnuzilla/2018-12/msg4.html > > For themes, I document the issue here: > https://git.251.sh/Build/Debian/Icecat/issues/1 > > Basically, Icecat think the extension or theme is corrupt, which is not. > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.openpgp.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Installer doesn't recognize new manifest files
"Unknown manifest directive:" errors are fixed by last changes of Ruben: +find extensions -name cose.manifest -delete +find extensions -name cose.sig -delete (https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git/diff/data/update-extensions.sh?id=7859a9131fcda359265dc16ef55933e5ed218119) It may be related to this bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1545836 -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Installer doesn't recognize new manifest files
Hi all. Newer 'https-everywhere' addon contains new manifest files in META-INF directory (cose.manifest, cose.sign) unrecognized by IceCat installer: BUILDSTDERR: Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-60.6.3/objdir/dist/bin/browser/extensions/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/META-INF/cose.manifest:1: Unknown manifest directive: Manifest-Version: BUILDSTDERR: Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-60.6.3/objdir/dist/bin/browser/extensions/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/META-INF/cose.manifest:3: Unknown manifest directive: Name: BUILDSTDERR: Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-60.6.3/objdir/dist/bin/browser/extensions/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/META-INF/cose.manifest:4: Unknown manifest directive: Digest-Algorithms: BUILDSTDERR: Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-60.6.3/objdir/dist/bin/browser/extensions/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/META-INF/cose.manifest:5: Unknown manifest directive: SHA1-Digest: BUILDSTDERR: Error: /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-60.6.3/objdir/dist/bin/browser/extensions/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/META-INF/cose.manifest:6: Unknown manifest directive: SHA256-Digest: Do you know how to fix this behavior? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Updating to Icecat x86_64 60.5.1-1.fc28 forces Install of 11 new Dependencies
I assume you're using Fedora 28. They are pipewire's dependencies: https://mastransky.wordpress.com/2018/10/09/firefox-on-wayland-update/ On 25/02/19 09:47, t...@tutanota.com wrote: > Why? I don't even use the DVD on this machine. > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x6e0331dd1699e4d7 GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 60 in development
News about IceCat 60? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] How to update IceCat?
Icecat's source archives are generated by script hosted on http://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/gnuzilla.git On 23/03/2018 20:05, Ruchi Gaur wrote: > Hi, > > How to update IceCat? > > Thanks > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Spectre mitigation for IceCat
On 07/01/2018 04:46, Mark H Weaver wrote: > FYI, Mozilla has included two mitigations for Spectre in Firefox 57.0.4. > They are described here: > > > https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2018/01/03/mitigations-landing-new-class-timing-attack/ > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/advisories/mfsa2018-01/ > > The blog post notes that one of the mitigations, disabling > SharedArrayBuffer, is not applicable to Firefox 52 ESR because that > version doesn't support SharedArrayBuffer. > > The other mitigation reduces the resolution of performance.now() to 20 > microseconds. This change is included in Firefox 57.0.4, and will > eventually be included in Firefox 52.6 ESR due to be released on Jan 23. > > I didn't want to wait that long, so I backported this second mitigation > to GNU IceCat, which was quite easy. It's now included in the IceCat > package in GNU Guix, along with 100 other fixes cherry-picked from > upstream. I've attached the patch to this email in case it is of > interest. > > I also recommend that you install NoScript and avoid running Javascript > code from the network whenever you can avoid it. Even with this > mitigation applied, there are probably other ways to exploit these flaws > using Javascript. > > Mark > > Great! Thank you Mark. -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] icecat maintenance
I'm trying to get 'icecat' tarball archives by myself. If someone wishes to test it, you can find the sources here: https://fedorapeople.org/cgit/sagitter/public_git/icecat.git/ -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] icecat maintenance
Hi Mark. On 26/12/2017 03:15, Mark H Weaver wrote: > Gammel Holte <gammel.ho...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Antonio Trande <anto.tra...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> Will Icecat be upgraded still? >> >> I was wondering the same thing. As much as I dislike the latest moves >> by Mozilla [1] and as much as I like GNU and IceCat, I'm a bit worried >> by the lack of maintenance of the project. >> >> IceCat is quite lagging behind Firefox ESR now. HEAD is 52.3.0, >> whereas Firefox ESR is already at 52.5.2. > > I agree that this is a very serious problem. GNU IceCat is my primary > web browser, and I worry a *lot* about computer security. > > As defacto maintainer of the IceCat package in GNU Guix, I have a > solution for myself and for other GNU Guix users. Whenever Mozilla > issues a security advisory, I search for the associated fixes in the > upstream mozilla-esr52 source repository, and apply them to our packages > in GNU Guix. At the time of this writing, we include 69 patches > cherry-picked from upstream Firefox ESR, including all fixes from 52.5.2 > that I deemed to be possibly relevant to security. > Where do you find all release related patches? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] icecat maintenance
Hi all. Will Icecat be upgraded still? -- --- Antonio Trande Fedora Project mailto 'sagitter at fedoraproject dot org' GPG key: 0x5E212EE1D35568BE GPG key server: https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] jenkins.trisquel.inf/icecat/ gone?
On 10/19/2017 08:20 PM, Reid Fleming wrote: > What happened to http://jenkins.trisquel.info/icecat/ ? It used to contain > the source and binaries for icecat, but now I get a 403 Forbidden when I > try to go there. Has it moved somewhere else? > > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > It's explicit: "You don't have permission to access /icecat/ on this server." -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] icecat source archive on trisquel.info
Hello. What's the difference between IceCat source archives hosted on http://jenkins.trisquel.info/icecat/ and http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/ ? I see Ruben Rodriguez spreading IceCat on http://jenkins.trisquel.info/icecat/ too: http://jenkins.trisquel.info/icecat/icecat-52.1.2/Changelog.IceCat -- -- Antonio Trande sagitter AT fedoraproject dot org See my vCard. <> signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] non-free code on IceCat
Icecat looks included non-free code. Please, remove the file ./dom/system/gonk/tests/marionette/ril_jshint/jshint.js Bad license: > * JSHint, by JSHint Community. > * > * This file (and this file only) is licensed under the same slightly > modified > * MIT license that JSLint is. It stops evil-doers everywhere: > * > * Copyright (c) 2002 Douglas Crockford (www.JSLint.com) > * > * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person > obtaining > * a copy of this software and associated documentation files > (the "Software"), > * to deal in the Software without restriction, including without > limitation > * the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, > sublicense, > * and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to > whom > * the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following > conditions: > * > * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be > included > * in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > * > * The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil. > * > * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY > KIND, EXPRESS OR > * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF > MERCHANTABILITY, > * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO > EVENT SHALL THE > * AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES > OR OTHER > * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR > OTHERWISE, ARISING > * FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR > OTHER > * DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. > * > */ Bug on Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1334543 Bug on Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=813054 Bug on Fedora: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1421409 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0xD5C73C16131EEDF8948AA719C05E8F07B96A706C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] NSS update on Fedora
Hi all. Important bug-fix for IceCat-45.5.1 on Fedora 24/25. Please, test if you use Fedora as main system. Update: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-e42b513012 Thanks. -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Mozilla bug1329272
Hi all. IceCat is affected by the Mozilla bug #1329272; please, update IceCat including it. Bug: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1329272 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat security updates
On 10/03/2016 01:36 PM, Alejandro Hernández wrote: > Hi, > > I am using 'icecat'. I have read that 'firefox' have fixed some security > issues recently. > https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox/#firefox49 > > > Are they fixed on 'icecat' too? > > > Thanks. > > -- > http://gnuzilla.gnu.org IceCat is based on Firefox ESR. Next release should be the 45.4: https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox-esr/#firefoxesr45.4 -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat 45.2 urgently needed
Hi all. What's the status of this issue today? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat-38.8.0 does not work on Fedora 24
Hi all,
currently IceCat-38.8.0 does not work on Fedora 24; we have open a
related bug report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332926
Crash report from GDB:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1332926#c8
0x74873bb3 in nsLayoutUtils::GetLastSibling
(aFrame=0xe5e5e5e5e5e5e5e5) at
/usr/src/debug/icecat-38.8.0/layout/base/nsLayoutUtils.cpp:1586
1586 if (!aFrame) {
That's the code where the crash happens:
// static
nsIFrame* nsLayoutUtils::GetLastSibling(nsIFrame* aFrame) {
if (!aFrame) {
return nullptr;
}
nsIFrame* next;
while ((next = aFrame->GetNextSibling()) != nullptr) {
aFrame = next;
}
return aFrame;
}
It looks lke icecat crashes, because it tries to access uninitialised
memory (0xe5e5e5e5e5e5e5e5) and checks the memory against NULL
(!aFrame), that must crash.
But I don't know the cause might be gcc6 related.
Any help is welcome.
--
---
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] FF-38.7 esr
Hi all, Firefox 38.7.0 is released since some days. https://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/firefox/releases/38.7.0esr/ When IceCat will be updated ? -- --- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x6CE6D08A Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi all. Latest IceCat-38.6.0 does not compile with GCC-6.0: ... In file included from ../../dist/include/mozilla/MathAlgorithms.h:15:0, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/nsTArray.h:14, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/nsStringAPI.h:25, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/nsStringGlue.h:21, from ../../dist/include/mozilla/AppData.h:12, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/xpcom/glue/AppData.cpp:7, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/icecat-objdir/xpcom/glue/Unified_cpp_xpcom_glue0.cpp:2: /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:615:11: error: '::isinf' has not been declared using ::isinf; ^ /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/cmath:640:11: error: '::isnan' has not been declared using ::isnan; ^ /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/config/rules.mk:930: recipe for target 'Unified_cpp_xpcom_glue0.o' failed Do you know how to fix this issue? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWq0HxAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8QE8H/RZf8zEl2qnCsKj4lBwJ47J5 jlDUzq6G4ja2nLoqkyxXDsoIqj3jWaUtBXjR/PW574DWp+wgLA4ErNN+kqliXQOQ MkFUdgXqAmB5t993h7G8iaYqSoDUHOZsVZpYAGYeo72Oub9Xydq2MgaMSulGT0Kv EJQXXk1fe5/4iHtq2njUFlX5K2knprEL4lObWEsZN32Dage0wNege9nD3LeVDpTo ywCLXP6SO0xhvaUJ8PUKVKElG5Qiaj8j6/MXZh0Yj4+Ag8VFJzjsLahBGGLQDW44 0XsOkludxkNNDMyMDDqexLXbiUq0s8DUVfphL4z8epBIyvcSE+6JGMLQVW/6c+Q= =rwcB -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat-38.6 and GCC-6.0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 There is a bug that prevents IceCat compilation with GCC-6.0 (currently used in the Fedora development branch): In file included from ../../../dist/system_wrappers/stdlib.h:3:0, from ../../../dist/include/mozilla/mozalloc.h:15, from ../../../dist/stl_wrappers/cstdlib:39, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/gfx/graphite2/src/inc/Main.h:29, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/gfx/graphite2/src/Bidi.cpp:27, from /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-38.6.0/icecat-objdir/gfx/graphite2/src/Unified_cpp_gfx_graphite2_src0.cpp:2: /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/stdlib.h:37:12: error: 'std::abort' has not been declared using std::abort; ^ /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/stdlib.h:38:12: error: 'std::atexit' has not been declared using std::atexit; ^~ /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/stdlib.h:39:12: error: 'std::exit' has not been declared using std::exit; ^~~~ /usr/include/c++/6.0.0/stdlib.h:42:14: error: 'std::at_quick_exit' has not been declared using std::at_quick_exit; It seems due to incompatible system libraries like 'stdlib.h' and 'cstdlib', provided in the source archive of IceCat. See also https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69383 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWq54SAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU80L0IAKIKYyKuAyo8Vxbl59OQOIJ2 mlAzJnULtGy7W2sahRuhfUt23BcGmZNPNYwxfp4ZigtwTS8dBI8bcyWeEK31Allh Z71hnLVslcFjDNUw/Fdu5jmFD/aWqchMOIFOY4wuyCnJGvf43/6dtDMY6LAgKdal ZoPIpusSw5DMcvEt/y0M68RnmhGJlGTp3xbEr+eOXy/G4GHsC1bXU6PbzM3MqqwP wy0r7SwaGjirq33biZrPsUqkw1UbiHszg2qHFr4gix2CTuXYiNZCDTqG9rp7Zbr2 /0gEZZzk8A5nF/TVRpgne88Ky+LZU1Ilo0X86D9jKkMWZf924/XateIGGLMiWvE= =oGkt -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat appearance in dark mode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/10/2016 02:52 AM, Jon Kristensen wrote: > Hi, Antionio! > > Here are the screenshots of Firefox and IceCat: > > http://jonkri.com/temp/dark-browser/firefox.png > http://jonkri.com/temp/dark-browser/icecat.png > > Thanks! > > Best, Jon > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Antonio Trande > <anto.tra...@gmail.com <mailto:anto.tra...@gmail.com>> wrote: > > On 01/08/2016 02:30 AM, Jon Kristensen wrote: >> Hi! > >> I was delighted to see that IceCat is in Fedora 23 - thanks for >> making that happen! :) > >> I have a problem, though, that I wanted to ask about. > >> I'm using dark mode (as configured in GNOME Tweak Tool) in GNOME >> 3 (to alleviate eye-strain). Firefox, as of Fedora 23, has a >> dark toolbar when using dark mode. However, when I opened IceCat, >> I immediately noticed that the window title bar was bright. I >> suspect that this depends on IceCat being compiled against GTK+, >> version 2. > >> Would it perhaps be possible to update IceCat (on Fedora, or in >> general) so that it looks better for GNOME 3 users using dark >> mode? > >> Does anyone have any thoughts about this? > >> Thanks! > >> Warm regards, Jon > It's not a great problem in my opinion, I don't know if it's really a packaging issue because Thunderbird-38.5.0 is has same title bar. Warm regards. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWkj3FAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU81dUH/2NmZo/x8NnBP1OMcAGUUMiN 4yNIgUuyyy0t17TF16q2RlioBOxEEldtDnxvuHYt4GqStGRa9Ir3xc2nYwgvGkEf cXuEm/PC8HASNrkZruzwbUsLJCoAF6cOxPFxLEXHizkAZR9lavIqbTm+K8IvDaaW NCvO3Eh1R4gO9KuaGdnWxDw23Bxw2CCHqoCv4ygLoJwhybQpcY0KenI1bDDuba+F dYx39yUrO2Rwjqhwo+CgXuu//Fcrn9ocAvpIQdIDJZJwS2azK7pRTzvfA2PVBYBw 4M6S8+wrQ0HyOwE2GBpgfhZQ4bA0/ksIJxijrLNjtLZ0K+8kBqpXGLzoo9NRUKU= =APUr -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat appearance in dark mode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/08/2016 02:30 AM, Jon Kristensen wrote: > Hi! > > I was delighted to see that IceCat is in Fedora 23 - thanks for > making that happen! :) > > I have a problem, though, that I wanted to ask about. > > I'm using dark mode (as configured in GNOME Tweak Tool) in GNOME 3 > (to alleviate eye-strain). Firefox, as of Fedora 23, has a dark > toolbar when using dark mode. However, when I opened IceCat, I > immediately noticed that the window title bar was bright. I > suspect that this depends on IceCat being compiled against GTK+, > version 2. > > Would it perhaps be possible to update IceCat (on Fedora, or in > general) so that it looks better for GNOME 3 users using dark > mode? > > Does anyone have any thoughts about this? > > Thanks! > > Warm regards, Jon > > Hi Jon, please, make a screenshot of the window; let me see it. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWj8LZAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8dqMH/jT7WBISnqjrgGCLxJYISQz9 e5Q1UD85HSSLSgyG+JQTOJ0smG82eWdwzPhbq3/CiLIiS160Hl+SQciSnwBXG0nX H7wD4ZdK3Iy3029BWJrjUQOEjUsLxMRZ2NNoudlkpwujfPRQGdrXWsa8O6P/0P4e PeXtYl0zd/M4VFT4cSvajZRKPgtDzbhF/OH99KSR5gXPgPIwsx1GHLhVhniS2YwC 3iEh6rEK7002d7tC4RtOdEmp3kpCgLCtIpF5HALrDgMgHGSgBy74ynzF4RwbyaFo D6ipu0VhFkx30quAmU/T7KG9DrCKWma/H0DmvKUDhiNJw4yR9sQjYHebCKIXMe4= =UgVa -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat crashes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/03/2016 05:12 PM, Stuart T Rogers wrote: > Having managed to get Icecat working using the Fedora build I now > find that on Fedora 23 version 38.5.0 crashes every time I try to > use Twitter, the page displays and then after a second or two it > just terminates Icecat. I have tried in safe mode but it does the > same thing. My Fedora 21 system running Icecat 38.3.0 (Fedora > build) works just fine on the same twitter account. > > Is this a a known issue? > > Stuart Hi Stuart, I use IceCat on Fedora 23 without crash. Are you using IceCat from repository or manually compiled? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWiUrcAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8qa0H+gKo4moEljrEjBCIgP5nzXZn 7sUPzvfzroqs+8zQTDJwYZcW41U9XOmXtSKBHaKLFyvkg5nbtXAb6END4VNRO50G Vnvt7BGlJpVR20sIfMgmjBfQ3mBCXB7dakPUdSaPttqro9xX73G1c79Xa/tk3ENB vdTQLFsTd9v5Hpj34u+YGx5TLEu8f3ljXAA7XA4F5j+UQsCe26QkPxPOXsZE2Yhw 6EMGvpI3UyI6AljxhXo+IN/hcQfz/B43pMAZTeVboIAdNvXFjDienzCjwV6D5/BX GfMGIaLcJgVBMCdIZsvd+lKDfZW6wIrMSJ3xbY0ivciwpxrXfXWV9eZZmZmZxAA= =fYOc -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat crashes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/03/2016 05:40 PM, Stuart T Rogers wrote: > As I pointed out I am using the Fedora build (rrepositories) not > manual build. So far it only happens on twitter and would seem to > be in libcairo.s0.2.11400.4 aborting which shows if I start it from > Console. There is a mozilla bug for this apparently. > What mozilla bug ? I have recently built IceCat-38.5.2 if you wish try it. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=708334 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWiVG4AAoJEF5tK7VWXmU89bIIAIOcGJ2ev5Ka5xOaT1DiKZL6 4N/RB5rF3rvMQkOOYWOcWekRFeK9Xa1lG/lLPmm1q4EV1LZA1IGXIV7euEuH3leW EwuVNG8DX89Bvy4F4CI1WCgPtqpA/IiJMWuIezdYTU3kMotaACX0Zuu+BOhxmqan s8vJEUeI6+lZbH/4yiEn9ie+BSpER0cfEvFtj4WTnDdw1F4qYRu4cCfCAfvuw4Al 5hXtXH78LrRMTHxGGWvDK6oMokN+YZMPNLPCMQjrGNtvrkhMxfY6W8DY1M0JPTWj YI8EreGcINlPKDYzO9gEcWYncyTfYMBtZ6zOp6i1tlq/WKJJNZZx7Uq4qszjjvs= =0d7k -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Urgent: "The page cannot be found" - Net iD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 11/18/2015 01:31 AM, David Hedlund wrote:
> I cannot see this page in IceCat 38.3.0 with all add-ons disabled
> https://cve.trust.telia.com/TeliaElegNG/ ("The page cannot be
> found") but it works in Abrowser 41.0.2.
>
> This is the official link to Net iD, a eID software that reverse
> engineer so we can make it free. I've already talked with some
> interested developers that working on a free eID software, they
> need this page to work. Please make it visible!
>
> I'm suprised that it is not working at all, what is wrong and why
> are certain pages blocked in IceCat at all?
>
> -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Tested on Icecat-38.3.0: unreachable
Tested on Icecat-38.4.0 (compiled Icecat source code from Trisquel
repository): it works
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x565E653C
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWTJueAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8tTwIALqpXFAsXSfMigk2TT8I4foB
vCB3s+qqkcO7ypng3SW0I7sb2JZMq8Nr+ZJFlNDsyyayfQN+R8JDfI4MS5LmX2/n
V/45UoTGG0QVtBV7ZOwXjoyEiMisxnzWevmgOgLrNfGYYfXtOlPq5BdB8cw2l35R
sHiMr4Zy+LdgEvAIJkLtg0KxvkqGRFOKaszpZpSOhr/4qnhUelQiPCpxxFhgN78D
NgNzVYmNc1/1tgEYKvPzWjHFM38M6VGi4hXLJidMVMh6SlbcMOXQnVMWRlqP+4ls
I3ohX6quBaJqWsspeB2amhurW6LIsN4ES0mKsKwhzCZGXuAsjnPUIw2zO423uCY=
=vJPg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Unpatched security flaws in IceCat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/02/2015 02:25 PM, Henry Jensen wrote: > I have security concerns as well. However, the Parabola GNU/Linux > Distro offers Icecat 38.2.0 [1] Where does Icecat-38.2.0 source archive come from ? > > On Thu, 01 Oct 2015 20:45:40 +0200 Milan Zamazal <p...@zamazal.org> > wrote: > >> I've also switched back to Iceweasel from IceCat for security >> reasons a few months ago. The question is whether IceCat offers >> any real advantage over properly configured Iceweasel with some >> add-ons? If not then all I need is an Iceweasel freedom/privacy >> setup guide. Is something like that already available somewhere >> or do you think it would be a good idea to make one? > > > Note that the plain Iceweasel from Debian has the same issues > regarding offering non-free plugins as the original firefox. The > main advantage is, that Iceweasel hasn't not the > copyright-protected artworks und trademarks as Mozilla Firefox > (Mozilla Foundation owns the trademark "Firefox" and claims the > right to deny the use of the name and other trademarks to > unofficial builds.) > > However, there are libre builds of Debians versions of Mozilla > programs: Parabola has Iceweasel libre and Icedove libre [2],[3]. > ConnoachetOS slack-n-free repo has those as well and additionally a > libre version of Iceape (Debians and Mageias version of > Seamonkey). > > [1] https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/i686/icecat/ [2] > https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/i686/iceweasel/ [3] > https://www.parabola.nu/packages/libre/i686/icedove/ > > [4] https://connochaetos.org/slack-n-free/ > > Regards, > > Henry > > -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org > - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWDqQ3AAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8N3kH/AoeOKqNgnwUiIIV0Uqa4eVz jMqKLywZ8Y6iOfG9Lk469LwX3hIYDVIdjQKk8GRLlrBD/i71GBnbuQYn6YFTVXjd aOfC9c8Bv5+Tb7nZ6dcAm2vpj1BRPNEPeL0ckQHsgqveRIETLhrjblinPhhv6duv IpMhbr+k3jZZZh8k6PgB6UJ2kDzjFU32zG2lzxHjKuWEQkcBlWUZVOL0ZXjc3IQf UbvRAGk6ThNC4XmZE2FV7WoUd0ZMz/CIVIvG2jOf+kx5pPVM/5pvMMiwmZPF/ezp wwBaNe+0FByLMYOa/bRNTUtJ8ASaSO4xa8Kmj45v6Ek/1/rXQ0gmGyJOZJErE0I= =4csJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Unpatched security flaws in IceCat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/12/2015 06:48 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: Since the last GNU IceCat release, there have been 12 security advisories from Mozilla addressing 18 CVEs and associated releases of Firefox ESR 38.1.1 (on August 6) and ESR 38.2 (yesterday). https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox-esr/ CVE-2015-4473, CVE-2015-4474, CVE-2015-4475, CVE-2015-4478, CVE-2015-4479, CVE-2015-4480, CVE-2015-4481, CVE-2015-4482, CVE-2015-4484, CVE-2015-4485, CVE-2015-4486, CVE-2015-4487, CVE-2015-4488, CVE-2015-4489, CVE-2015-4491, CVE-2015-4492, CVE-2015-4493, CVE-2015-4495 Hi and thanks. Many of these tickets are not reachable in https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/ for me (permission denied). - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVzJ0FAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8KegIAKMEXPh4BgEqKyQYzAklmftn /DD1WtC8LsrVmP1y2zr8+k86xfnP65NbLju7JGB3K0NjD81/U2+KHqx+gkcMGZAY XeTCYuVn7jvLVLeHxSjn8+l6Y3EUcUkVZ9qrB1Do8oahLGvg08QKAgKwsK+iRXE+ 6LeSYHuxBHKSdfVbUX2oXNMOJKr8RaTPma6z7SwswFjS9MgcqumL3buVIyt0BCyi g8RTejWGaJHpEKHWFMmZ4Xv1ihqiqy93PVi18BnGoEtyl5Zd5b2XuAfRGVyR90qc SCk2NTJoNG6UwOZIV6vnn+BZjH764bJ+N/42OSo84+UsQZJtTXaz+thFBdXc1ek= =JEvN -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Can't Compile Icecat-31.8.0 Source
::VP8TrackEncoder::PrepareRawFrame(mozilla::VideoChunk)': /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:300:32: error: 'PLANE_Y' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_Y] = data-mYChannel; ^ /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:301:32: error: 'PLANE_U' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_U] = data-mCbChannel; /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:302:32: error: 'PLANE_V' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_V] = data-mCrChannel; ^ /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:358:32: error: 'PLANE_Y' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_Y] = y; ^ /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:359:32: error: 'PLANE_U' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_U] = cb; ^ /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/content/media/encoder/VP8TrackEncoder.cpp:360:32: error: 'PLANE_V' was not declared in this scope mVPXImageWrapper-planes[PLANE_V] = cr; ^ /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/config/rules.mk:1001: recipe for target 'VP8TrackEncoder.o' failed make[3]: *** [VP8TrackEncoder.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory '/mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/obj/content/media/encoder' /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/config/recurse.mk:95: recipe for target 'content/media/encoder/compile' failed make[2]: *** [content/media/encoder/compile] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory '/mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/obj' /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/config/recurse.mk:39: recipe for target 'compile' failed make[1]: *** [compile] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/obj' /mnt/extra/compile/build/icecat/src/config/rules.mk:592: recipe for target 'default' failed make: *** [default] Error 2 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVpsknAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8c/cIALPNaIYg1AsiCP9VBir9V7c4 TK9kD5hDXg0Y2NIqqseJBX9FcH8zScXd6Xh7wRExE4k09c/RHbiLzfEJoecf74Iw FP9cWFG0XFas2YgvhOe7HrwWRplIohItzjSsrUPjbJmD9Ba/Eper9gNkFBQjYVNF zuOwMSnENdxfQYcGFuCikL9q4tiq3eKaPQUeuLJ1nSpx9cX3O2+nCaVFjMH+tcal ymqSSODY63uLJaIBpkvuIRCtaQntGdfPXfRRHWmUlTQkin5APAiW7FKt6aBt1hoJ sUfpUL0hnM2aQDZ7L7DCP4+7+2gxJrZ1lioOJ4uvEA2BSvxvNdCfwr+ctvRNKMk= =fizl -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] URGENT: Development advice for IceCat 38
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/24/2015 08:10 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: El mié, 24-06-2015 a las 19:57 +0200, David Englund/Hedlund escribió: For the next release of GNU IceCat, please base it on Firefox ESR 38.0.2 and not 38.0. Firefox 38.0.2 will contain the fix that disables ephemeral Diffie-Hellman cipher suites that are vulnerable to the logjam attack. Read https://github.com/martinthomson/disable-dhe/issues/2 Noted, thanks. Hi Ruben. Do you think that IceCat-38.0.2 will be the next release? -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVivZTAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8a0MH+wdkpbpqiTeTaxnmoT1VDY9Z Q/fdc8+wN/KuutIhs77ad/XOKnsv+VQ8zSaG+/jk2VKWM4soXJysqtGqUc2UUAM5 XjlushgUOFdKpNYjo4ZIsz40cGJ6FDo0Ps/fIChl1oBST9FU5mFwRUBC+orLbKVH yEfNa9ohHx45e3QI4QMhW6mLuUup1yoxrY44lDM2e2XGQ92MTeUy/Ki1fdIKC/fm 1d6RkyFfTIzNszTK1O6IRx3QdowqwvkA5haTiKhdkhuBSRuf/thXPwehRUD1MDmI dFoepeYckQzyYZ5agn4tW2WUCyXEoFtnIBMGY7jkQImvAeHEpO0J/wSYWEMBmrQ= =9uQY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 31.7.0 release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 06/05/2015 07:18 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: GNUzilla is the GNU version of the Mozilla suite, and GNU IceCat is the GNU version of the Firefox browser. Its main advantage is an ethical one: it is entirely free software. While the Firefox source code from the Mozilla project is free software, they distribute and recommend non-free software as plug-ins and addons. Also their trademark license restricts distribution in several ways incompatible with freedom 0. https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ The user manual pages are at http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:IceCat/ You can contribute by joining the wiki and editing the manuals. Source tarballs, binaries for generic GNU/Linux systems and translations are available at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/31.7.0/ http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/31.7.0/ does not exist. GPG key ID:D7E04784 GNU IceCat releases Fingerprint: A573 69A8 BABC 2542 B5A0 368C 3C76 EED7 D7E0 4784 https://savannah.gnu.org/project/memberlist-gpgkeys.php?group=gnuzilla == Changes since v31.6.0 == Other than applying the upstream fixes listed here https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefox-esr/ the changes for this version were to fix the build process to make the translation packages work properly. --- On a personal note, I have to apologize for the delay on this release which comes from the fact that I spent most of the last couple of months preparing to move to the United States -which happened last week- and get married -which will happen in 3 hours! -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVce9OAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8K+AH/A82ji0FXvF1zsdqGyP2RvKV wqCj5L90YjQUFgDCUHIInlQk8GJc0G+GgOfH54wVCyOJi07jB/+uAA6lI4POsfUy JS80yBfQ04/3tvOxJKoHxkl2iiMSwoXru4R2rRVJT1K6FWTnvh+Mzw0Mw+FOVZYB NKnadBc3M7rIVsKmTCerYSJi1YjnoAyq6Tzwbw4WTOdi5dfajryVSzV8cjqt6BC/ gyffSYwY+C2CrcBOLBG5lKxPVpLHp2r6whSjmU8312pEu/8SHKVFCGy7NweL+UCw BW8Wug9ZabtXB04tP5jb5RsIVR7EjrNp89FuxbaIRaeRg0+rJsXmv/Qqzg9gjWk= =ZJ8F -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Frustrated with IceCat installation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 05/17/2015 01:50 PM, hyazin...@emailn.de wrote: Hi, since Firefox 38.0.1 Firefox contains DRM. That's why I want to change my browser and bumped into IceCat. IceCat sounds very promising and I'm eager to use it, but I have installation problems. I want to verify my IceCat download before installation, but I can't. I find the necessary .sig file for it, but I can't find the key and the keyserver ! That's what is frustrating me ! Have you already read this wiki ? http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:IceCat/Compile_and_package/build_31.4.0_on_debian_ubuntu#Prepare_the_building_environment When you download TOR browser, the sig is right below the download button and the 'what's This' link next to the sig leads to an official site, naming the key of TOR browser and the keyserver: https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures.html.en So... I've found the IceCat file, I've found it's .sig file - https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/31.6.0/ On what official website do I find the necessary key for verifying the signature of this download? And what keyserver suggests me an official website to use for verifying the signature of this download? Greetings, Torben Lechner -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVWIoLAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8V78IAIOE1chSJaQMH95BObggBz8t LXWJIt65nW9fQ+oNMQFf5u94psbd32Fy75ssYJeuz1JmHI462eYd6fosF5rrX4IP EhTKoLNCl9zSCBX4NKvFwxgL6hm1NADEmiFJ7sJGl7wkUo36lcJ2ByzCrzP5L61y suTJd3QG75UWyI/gb+ePL4YaWtAcBYzzkXZbhH2biHygXbT5Bs3lbuQ4xLO8MIzo ExWgKzaSv3vJiOCqiLf3M5vBrq88Gmi7OTc0u5leVdEP9AAwC8sXwjgsonkOrGye gYu1kQUzW06CNl5h8UTkUbVqy1aN41y8d7luuqhOw/NccfkHPnVHRxw8FcwTLzw= =ahnK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [icecat-31.6.0] Build Install failure on ARM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This problem seems related to the optimization flags settings with '--with-optimize' option. By using --disable-optimize allows to complete file's installation during IceCat compilation. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVJrwxAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8B3AIAJ+rhZTjPng4RzEdhekkMYAn MvJEkfkMBQNb6eNveOxviiZ98KxQ6lAFfALfvDGUX+TnBvjpzmjHb0Q9/iSqycbQ eZjrqLo3uZJZr4fZcY1f1RuZLhd1PKufWRpQ+htXjiwfMhJUZ4pnRU60dm6ls3O7 FVwBqIuKR2i4tY7HSSMEOH90Z+6EHJ6JRMprhcYiWBg54+qwfmJx4LZM7BdQoC50 adJ5qJBCb/U3YoFGJFHkJJv5i6JxB2KwHd6UzpTMDCMIDdSqqvqnCXGCpAmBPOeX wKgrAjbnZio3fUTcs/XDGScuD+KsvvLPhFnB94WJ9e2gn4gTDcm/odpJlvIeai0= =Bza+ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Minor update fixes profile path and missing translations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/15/2015 07:32 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: I have pushed a small change that fixes a problem with profiles being stored at ~/.gnu/icecat instead of ~/.mozilla/icecat I have also reverted a change that made the retrieval of translation files faster, but prone to failure. This release should have all the translations that where missing in the previous release. Version number is 31.5.0-gnu2, files are available at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/31.5.0-gnu2/ Please repackage for distros again. -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org Could you provide us only the patch? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVBdKaAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8YlEH/21A6OlUwp4dSn94N66pFkX6 Tl2iW7X9R4IMhewG/2QVr4S+VTnDenubESo3aDSEBFUGwsdLAvQVuJZ1U9Jekpru Mam85MwvSj6K6LR9OWmrxWe3rtVJPSPAp6KyUGPo5QCqav/hBcQUWlN4C81UxrfX df/akvyOuBGJfshGXPepgXvKiBOHVuqIVclGtW4O3lHJjmU8UXjlFrqzDivA2TlJ e15Oy7zmSYPJgv9ASv/JQZcimQGb5lxzVy5raZKpCXJN/AbbYnevwlm6mP0PH2j+ oEKcpvzcSGE6h1hflx2U/tKTe1MU+kUakg0q7VJ0hoJ0pJpKHuAX0U4/mQqLpVM= =PaPQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [IceCat-31.5.0] undefined reference to mozalloc_abort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/2015 11:21 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: El mié, 11-03-2015 a las 17:58 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió: Hi all. Have someone bumped this error with latest IceCat-31.5.0 building? /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-31.5.0/icecat-objdir/toolkit/crashreporter/client/tmphJ57_E.list: INPUT(crashreporter.o) You should disable the crashreporter, I'm going to remove it completely in future versions, seems like there are some licensing problems. Okay. crashreporter disabled to bypass this problem. To disable: add ac_add_options --disable-crashreporter to .mozconfig and pass the option --disable-crashreporter to 'configure'. Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAaVKAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU874QH/3Wk2N2A7fsq38+R7FLW9cs6 /bRgsbXp96Lu1enX/zJd9NyZ2J4fW9pHpmCxL5BVnnY+Xv5gLgHPtXpA/hAuSOtI /RN0JAgUuzAKjvtZO+E+o92HQx16YTi8UFtCAENTjUDm0wLcGUox37pkcxUYgPS3 9bVxYXJ3b/8X56t6cASvtEd//n17Ng++qgwVz37Y++uvT9lLBJRLwe8agaCO4vLm Ye8iLke+BOhpKrZE5rdXyOPwW0xOCRGNsPxTBeiSpnYqOvIWyM3Bn1e41gjjNL2N wO/HtTRJWIPM2mLutxVZcJqf6rLAaFhILTPf4dmxnmJXMB0ZqOy04pOG2Dt5ZJo= =pceQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] [IceCat-31.5.0] undefined reference to mozalloc_abort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/11/2015 11:21 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: El mié, 11-03-2015 a las 17:58 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió: Hi all. Have someone bumped this error with latest IceCat-31.5.0 building? /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-31.5.0/icecat-objdir/toolkit/crashreporter/client/tmphJ57_E.list: INPUT(crashreporter.o) You should disable the crashreporter, I'm going to remove it completely in future versions, seems like there are some licensing problems. It's not so immediate to do. - --disable-crashreporter seems not work; same configuration works by building IceCat in Fedora 21, but does not in Fedora 23 (development branch). IceCat built fine in Fedora 21: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1338/9191338/build.log IceCat building fails in Fedora 23: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7431/9197431/build.log Recently, GCC-5 debuted in Fedora development branch; may this influence the crashreporter building? Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAX8AAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8Wh4H/3UXjf/XAouv+Z6qKG7Fg8Zr 0D4e7V86mnOeWHPlaMlrRRzX2K+QPro1uVZmW1rbRoZbCohNXKokxpriSaBGeh+I ReNgihCHg17+bXcbqwe2q19gmtYNM6oVOsEkCxsxGBkXXRM5f0OPH3+tREgyuiYf 2tymhWG6HjTKW4Kcw2lwfx60y8Uu1g536UUNaUMNPwul8WWD8/toccbFZOIX9To+ eX+OEXzCWFmzeJLhnZRq1en2OSgoXyrP6ECUrIRZeyEVx96kDycuTw8bHDeF+SO/ RvN5gRYjKzD3Aso/ZEFOmCpgCMAie8Ovt+henIZ1nSzNmc+7pZH3RJRZ0SSESxk= =dI+u -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] [IceCat-31.5.0] undefined reference to mozalloc_abort
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Have someone bumped this error with latest IceCat-31.5.0 building? /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-31.5.0/icecat-objdir/toolkit/crashreporter/client/tmphJ57_E.list: INPUT(crashreporter.o) INPUT(crashreporter_gtk_common.o) INPUT(crashreporter_linux.o) INPUT(crashreporter_unix_common.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/file_id.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/elfutils.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/guid_creator.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/http_upload.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/linux_libc_support.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/memory_mapped_file.o) INPUT(../google-breakpad/src/common/linux/safe_readlink.o) ../../../../../../dist/include/mozilla/throw_gcc.h:73: error: undefined reference to 'mozalloc_abort(char const*)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status Full log: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7431/9197431/build.log Dependencies involved: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/7431/9197431/root.log - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x565E653C Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVAHQyAAoJEF5tK7VWXmU8yHIH/311stw2piVS8vCailcLZmsk sJWDHVQ2ltpAq9Fnp2eZTVaPcHtkno6QTsMpfb9H+fDSxGXab8Wj0Lh20ijT38l5 3jsY5BS2AfA7b7D5E7oYlHCRBv9WaEP0BsbcIwv2awKB5Uz84CQMOy1VuVy9L8PJ iR4wuJfPzMvQkGdla+CJHk2HhRZWTUoW4zvidFBR1n9NDv2VLKAFK15kz8YwALG0 J7t1MZlfsvMjI88UPAeDis6E80s4+WiN2J/899hg6kYKCHXUFPIViHByaTFvLudN Fm99MfOk1yuKQkEOtLD362Pa4ldb18yY6STYTnH7qf90ugBZneMls7akuFr0tiI= =bn+Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] IceCat 31.4.0 release
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/28/2015 10:08 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: GNUzilla is the GNU version of the Mozilla suite, and GNU IceCat is the GNU version of the Firefox browser. Its main advantage is an ethical one: it is entirely free software. While the Firefox source code from the Mozilla project is free software, they distribute and recommend non-free software as plug-ins and addons. Also their trademark license restricts distribution in several ways incompatible with freedom 0. https://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/ Source tarballs, binaries for generic GNU/Linux systems and translations are available at http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/31.4.0/ GPG key ID:D7E04784 GNU IceCat releases Fingerprint: A573 69A8 BABC 2542 B5A0 368C 3C76 EED7 D7E0 4784 The most noticeable change for the users in this release would be the addition of the html5-video-everywhere, that allows video playback from several popular services without either Flash or JavaScript. The user manual pages are at http://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:IceCat/ You can contribute by joining the wiki and editing the manuals. == Changes since v31.2.0 == * Updated to v31.4.0ESR * Search form in about:icecat now searches in default search engine * Disabled accessibility.blockautorefresh * Replaced references to Open Source with Free Software where applicable * Added html5-video-everywhere v0.1.1 extension: https://github.com/lejenome/html5-video-everywhere * Updated LibreJS to 6.0.8 * Updated https-everywhere to 4.0.3 Thanks Ruben for this new release. I take the chance to remember that IceCat 31.4.0 has just been packaged and available on Fedora 20 and Fedora 21 (updates-testing repos). HTTPS-everywhere and RequestPolicy extensions can be installed separately because packaged aside from IceCat. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUzPaxAAoJEFyovWBm4V0AJtgP/0H7QhmHtTxUXrcPojSg96Wx k8gxI0arakBhPzPKG18lLzSyGTdilhPknqjX/bZkeLlslfZCy5jLGgdFe3yAzWzc fxKtnNEflJn78FbMDQlLxQbydrgkhvQJUfIDC/QHBw/tfLzdoOXd3x19UWdsRXwB jhbkvMtMf1RamKItwBgA9zdsUA7Bs4GDcpjjHLOtnrTgKbGq2IanhiNyYzudMtM2 6iFZCSZnhvIdxsNER2EoV3MiPOLwYtDQyiae36L39NXRu9nUzJN/8CwoU9kFK+1C rFJ2toF0+9C63D4HwkuPC8LKz6skfMEcFLwNvONV1yF5LtWzdTBHnTl37Iz8546R tLIip/TI1e6nQ3iHQ8gdEjwBuGkm16nXnFYOJUgl9bwvizRBMPurm5YMLNnIrzWC L56fWQHUUQQzuk/UOHxDJftw4wLzUVg9Lxp6WR/vzTj3HbH329Aoxq3VDVnJvYn3 XhP/boz5SOaVBtSlfuXDPR62Cj98u+nHVzAJJ2EfSrPzMr53M9guEkfQLerFT8qn BtwCbnDbeOwzpoP4Cy1qQi8URpX2+6vkNkyfVFjgBjhhrBkXSidgUOsAlfPC59L4 LOLjurW6QWjeNCWgFvZINbgEbB5HmwQ7VqAyK4+6RP4Z6zeGUo102WK3Ss6TUTpn p8G1J2CvAUjnIXusdWmE =5BkY -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] User-agent string on Fedora 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/31/2015 06:52 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: El sáb, 31-01-2015 a las 18:42 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió: The Fedora package of IceCat contains altered user-agent string which has Fedora 21 in it. Such information can be easily used to identify a user (since very tiny portion of the Internet population using Fedora 21). Please, consider changing it. I presume that who uses IceCat from Fedora then uses a Fedora system. However I think it's better use the Firefox User Agent Strings (http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Firefox/), just changing Firefox with IceCat. IceCat uses a spoofed UA string to improve on privacy. Please do not modify it on redistribution, as it defeats the purpose of the feature. The string should be: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/31.0 It also matches the TorBrowser UA string. This is a point of view that i hadn't considered. I will fix. @List Who needs to open a bug report about IceCat packaging on Fedora, please go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/icecat/bugs and use Open A New Bug (Fedora) (it's necessary a login in RedHat Bugzilla). Or mail to this list. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUzRgtAAoJEFyovWBm4V0AVIMQAKXcFhsCmGcPrBn6uiCZTmFz 1MoWEpDsFybydAa0h+ZCVPCAUdssVS5sOoSnUniQgyrBbb3M5rqgsVz5aC+49/8u X9OmjZBbE0rUUJxoJamuXuv7x/DkO5BGFqELbpscM5snQ7AZCck8XYVDbdLev5q0 nGWLB2iNNYj+HCj5lqSdMXT4YtXBOWgrdLj24m6BQnCXoUYItkgfBtfhkRSJbFnz ZMi3kaMwdhguuLCSzxGqACsxaYoy41+8rwMXIEnkYO6v3e3EbP0u2SkRlma1rwhU oUUAfedyI6LnRDSsTAwJuPWUGkSagzDVicGKDH1cXyHDnPD1ijmGPvcX6KvkKX3n i3KYpaSZtP/bNdIJwCxBtoQ+hCOzczdniKxK9RHYBqbTD5BKsm7EPcwSyDVgiRZk NfYeyzN4L8cMWzevecGN3BlSo2bDfogQ2zoNfXOPOxeB1DHO4hfwfIDzyieT0yku eaH3qDW9187ajHphSOmLIn6mOsDHyhNr+o8RXkdelBRaQhF1VIlaypkPwxhOk34p 2V8ljYpPBFS6oCSA80ClvSu1vr4akunTlaF00E+Sc48Y5EJDTKgw/oZjKtSDL84f epT0AT7HOrid4j1FtorKlzYEIaQ4nobvExIlGB33uzffmg/sSLiY+nfF0d91FjcP Mo4798Z9snN+0ShAbBc0 =bfMu -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] User-agent string on Fedora 21
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The Fedora package of IceCat contains altered user-agent string which has Fedora 21 in it. Such information can be easily used to identify a user (since very tiny portion of the Internet population using Fedora 21). Please, consider changing it. I presume that who uses IceCat from Fedora then uses a Fedora system. However I think it's better use the Firefox User Agent Strings (http://www.useragentstring.com/pages/Firefox/), just changing Firefox with IceCat. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUzRQIAAoJEFyovWBm4V0ADiUP/A1JOwzhdq2jmFLQO1VAHPOL S3w4+gkD2eKIEBR/J8DBwxjveIr4y/GU4l/UZy+ekHZy2usqPx7Oho/P85Mc2A3O a8zT7GTsNlcUkHu4ZhDaxrKw+RtF839f7aOWVn/mRO1U+iMwfsuvYRIQDdNBYhZF Ck1lcES309TdJE6hmje6IGfhObpDHzWf53k676pb8ibI5rL3SMp83ExdOwiGNo3K fOoORuesr75O+dMeXE+I+xXIAL8anc0QXcGKzqXo30A/Fc/ELx6A8eXSROUFSU6I 6SbUoClEPSn3Ed1sF4Dlr/0entXce8gJ5K+CzNYOBpa4xDbsZ9tbR0NtgQNsTqrD 51n7T/LRBWnuL3wM/CdbzVXXsUkGQlu0zYcAy77IQOE4+iE1eCGbGW9FbKeBDing xS3z1E6JiILtgADI+Vf3NKBTMpRBiO8nn5v8Z91Ez+FPUvmUftdzOPL7Ntl0vyA+ 55RMX8wjsZCNSRf17/mKqVaFuZGP71Cy0hQgDdWqoHTPUYHntCe+f12ZhCEZ5QMZ iFpkI8uR+CGZVUg9VznICMGfNaVfn3ck3AE6/JZwVvo0XtHTdCT60m4Zw8W9Gz3K AOs2D6P9qJiy0fQEB1It2eH5W/CfXvo+LZMX41Bxz7XqoudN0kI4M1ywImNHZ64S hGo+J2muFjIvIJaqLF4B =ClKn -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] addons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/27/2014 06:31 AM, Svetlana Tkachenko wrote: How do I write an add-on for IceCat, which would not be available for Firefox (until people manually force the install)? Do we want to run our own instance of Addons.mozilla.org, or to get IceCat added as a product there? I'm thinking probably the latter, but I would like to know what past work and plans exist in this direction. -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org Hi Svetlana. Here you can find development guidelines by Mozilla https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Building_an_Extension. As reported by gnu.org (http://www.gnu.org/software/gnuzilla/addons.html), the majority of these addons are not developed directly by Mozilla but by third party developers, those with a Free license can be ported in Icecat. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUnpEoAAoJEFyovWBm4V0AlDwQAIZMxT65am4078JJxnnNchcl KuWOgl2kUPfYNDLljE0t0tfpCeItPm1NCdVIUt05Jq0XYxV8KWzgXWxdB34bzsmT VA5MvNQ5eelm/QJZHOaDBQFiBKzSY1WsYrKlJ89QBBNJjKJA/Zg7epySinS7gnl5 8XcoRgDX4P4BiNte5xSDUaoq/waG2rjwRf+zrww1MHdrhBkl6lHuWc4aGjRnlVe5 cKOEBbw5qyX0Hg7RQKLUqpobigj00VWMF3SXCWAmw0M+yL0jtC8VEjQMTR3wcqZ3 wwRQMIWGn+yXMofBK6k6gb7f+TOFeBh1yXS6qv/Dkz6j3/BBetNZu9UbwpQGtzG1 0yVoVg6bAxca3hdpi3SB+JH3axPoO1mBmqsVAvORBBWHvUz/J2b9+qJjZFBRpkbc aSGFFE0le07e9eULisugsiE8w9h19AVXgjpTvG4TnwB3kM8UXGWQNr7lGC3z3PFy li0TUcTwP+LQVLtZCkOxAzVCf+rPoSRjdXaXbcZmsjN030fZNmgVBBypAGQR+7Un 8vZz5wZ3b+f2NsayjmPuga203O5Y+RTZg79PVdmkz76oCZQEMqbWGDbIbH49ZkLX y6x4H7jTWHM7Z1SVelk3MACf0RF33fznEOfDWMCpizyrux/RSsUSp/0WkZjORVBg p1SlgABkxmxOBX1K5u50 =YHIH -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Hello on IceCat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Is there any chance to get an Icecat release based on Firefox 34 beta? I wish to test new WebRTC Hello feature http://www.thewindowsclub.com/firefox-hello-make-video-calls. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUjvFgAAoJEFyovWBm4V0AJBcP/RTewWhuohsTJbCVqPi20fuX 9bf8YqNmZIJdZ7cfTotncJuyilYW6xgyCEjuVKv3AVnm+cfd7UxbPiyyg/AZ+VFN ODFCTSJIcwnHncsk1I80N/HHd0av0fPYoII3el0RGtEzds6njpoj2paoNcN6pj8R CwzksilUWFUfMwlpSbNekPp3owyz5m2gkoWlw5U0gR6tHwOyiDGUtOPRl9U06e0R 7BtPSTFg3MgBLU+tlMDeSSyZibes9ksOEfp/98FdaFqIjN668aRLroNf0Y6eSAbG 1D8wiFBJz7ZbFjhvZVsCKa1cw7WI0VnKpjxLDSNnI1b1724xrq4XqxRw6fdblDem XEg2TPplPmz6woGgobKtKJ6aErMZ3UiyaYZRRs/RsqtF9BVZ7Y8SOAYyLR87S7n3 1N6q5jIMDuYqFzEb0TyR0dusxbxmitHi7KqcpdKAP5t4iVahnr5d1AYidhONCmZd BL5wUa3LD/FANi3bzcUQNAZPWcY6US9cxIsaCLQvJrnFPjqkHk4utwMLipxPtODn qPLyz8UQW6n2p2lk0P6zVXJ3Lhq5WyvRa8x/0wFIk66ErTFd8ZuwF4U4KjcaFz1T KXu1VWVAvAFngN0jRc/MmBSsYM85kFcUtYMzvUsmUPOHc8WraVPKO6L+04UJVxx9 tNa1CqmOrjSmMm3AeM59 =O1Gd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Detection of broken compilers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/01/2014 06:45 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: El sáb, 01-11-2014 a las 13:00 +0100, Antonio Trande escribió: Hi all. I'm stumbling on an error because of a bad compiler on ARM: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4168/7994168/build.log These lines could indicate the problem checking for gcc PR49911... yes --- checking for gcc pr39608... no checking for llvm pr8927... yes --- that are not same if IceCat code is compiled on a no-ARM systems, like here: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/icecat/31.2.0/4.fc22/data/logs/x86_64/build.log Both builds use same compiler (GCC 4.9.1). I can build IceCat on ARM only if are used default compiler flags; see here https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/icecat/31.2.0/4.fc22/data/logs/armv7hl/build.log What's the problem ? I don't touch any of that when making IceCat from Firefox, all the changes are settings and interface related. Whatever works for compiling Firefox should work for IceCat. In case I inadvertently changed that somehow, please try with the upstream tarball: ftp://ftp.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/firefox/releases/31.2.0esr/source/firefox-31.2.0esr.source.tar.bz2 Hi Ruben. I didn't mean that it could be something caused by you. I don't know if there are options which interfere with compiler check during compilation. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: 0x66E15D00 Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUVVcnAAoJEFyovWBm4V0A25gP/jmKomLZP2Si/47B9LdZsyAO Men6B+aHpXLvMyhGh3iilgZh00GlkQbaCef1rHVwG1GwjNOVjmekRSpi0ilRmTVI lSbx025DiO0Gyq2Gxavb8Khqbt8CBcwFAHSnfBq2gTIMyO8A9Wb0Iy2tO5bb5UeG Y19jJuhD7Rvk+JuNWuWVNBMCzQUnqiXkkgXD6YZYjqHg9G1T1JxdT9AIy8KGRvbt lRu8mtM1I9LVJ/XqKxV7aztVRrEu889qm6n1qcxCHnEGxQG6pJFN73v/xV8/xi+u mEcle3MYGucVWN3YCiHk3OkVu9NnGyx0d+eYWU3Gg49g2Oh47q3m+dtV/Khi7ypc Fg/SYFbBoA1fp4URcxXy54gg/8myiQuVbbnl/fjSU4qTLmfl5z0sr4wtBbQvFb9A ck4u7/lttt7NQjkIjHNmjve4k4RG4SwssieBSpEAGNPnzHPRgEeXGYzgnMzntyxZ Z6/laIIzdy004rcQn9Xb9XDxAfFEloBqkxRNisNRFpmVRAif5nZGfxCswPuyUMc8 p+6iW0lduEX/eI03JOScrrmoPwRI6YAGnlA6z1ChBJZQ58t/yxQUCi74qQdDXnJh vOBh/8h97mhez2kM9n31CEg/mvyRWzs1xyzKzuT25+y/TUS6JfaCAi+MdL2LRq80 eRgw+Cwa6p7qU8wH/UAE =PIW4 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] (Icecat 31.1.1 pre-release) js/src/configure rerun request
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all.
Compiling Icecat 31.1.1 on Fedora 20 (during a RPM building process),
I obtain this fatal error:
..
STOP! /home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/js/src/configure
has changed and needs to be run again.
Please rerun it.
To ignore this message, touch
/home/sagitter/rpmbuild/BUILD/icecat-31.1.1/build/js/src/config.status,
but your build might not succeed.
Compilation commands which I use are:
#*Add configure options
echo mk_add_options MOZ_OBJDIR=@TOPSRCDIR@/obj-icecat .mozconfig
echo mk_add_options MOZ_BUILD_PROJECTS='browser xulrunner' .mozconfig
echo ac_add_app_options browser --enable-application=browser
.mozconfig
echo ac_add_app_options xulrunner --enable-application=xulrunner
.mozconfig
echo ac_add_options --enable-optimize='$MOZ_OPT_FLAGS' .mozconfig
echo ac_add_options --disable-compile-environment .mozconfig
echo ac_add_options --disable-shared-js .mozconfig
echo ac_add_options --disable-official-branding .mozconfig
export PREFIX='%{_prefix}'
export LIBDIR='%{_libdir}'
MOZ_LINK_FLAGS=-Wl,--no-keep-memory -Wl,--reduce-memory-overheads
MOZ_SMP_FLAGS=-j1
export LDFLAGS=$MOZ_LINK_FLAGS -Wl,-rpath,%{mozappdir}
make -f client.mk build STRIP=/bin/true MOZ_MAKE_FLAGS=$MOZ_SMP_FLAGS
Same commands have been used to compile preview release 24.0 without
problem. What's the problem here in you opinion?
Here the full log: http://fpaste.org/140274/
- --
Antonio Trande
mailto: sagitter 'at' fedoraproject 'dot' org
http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter
GPG Key: 0x66E15D00
Check on https://keys.fedoraproject.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1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=5EJp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] New maintainer, new release coming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ruben. On 09/11/2014 04:15 PM, Rubén Rodríguez wrote: Hi everybody, this is Ruben Rodriguez. I recently became the maintainer for the IceCat package and I've been working to make a new release based on the current upstream code. Development packages can be found at http://devel.trisquel.info/icecat/ The toutatis repo should work on Trisquel 6, Debian Stable and Ubuntu Precise, while the belenos one should work on Trisquel 7 (beta), Debian Testing and Ubuntu Trusty. The current packages are based on v31, and v32 ones should be ready today. I plan to release new versions following upstream ones with about a week delay or less. Can you leave us Icecat-31 source code archive, please? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUKY2jAAoJED2vIvfUANbEVuwQAL17FeeQiAImTZzJqS0Eb2BL iOkEVVxJM0A2Tg/xwCwOQ29toReUU7eLpFvHJuZysuhx0RcQ74yPWEVcxr/fAoWa THzrXBZukEFyOwc29RZ52m4GAfZA6Oa9Fxg/qfsrpQqKLw8jTlw/V55nJA/jw6S4 ljJow7wQbRwS6T3mHZv1dHx9Df+EJTqtd01EMkZDBseIXC0ihI54JI3/APsxk999 GZZN9vLXTA9uAg57NungQRbUiYO1d0nTn5NbkO8l2B7BSTxvNv7hIsmKknNn2GqB 8niGAbjyA/IgoZ7TI3uTxQPDgmTojrgTAQWq+szIJJ7xhaVsC2XhsbYKJdLDIuLM xEpKhTO630OGSQffFEoAxZj5tlVkcYMe12ZWcwkFOrBfzWmFXxWTi2VPDffUPQZd f42Y7S+OjIWjGL5D0TSBhfDpRsPxolNPTB+gtevAjAuA6j3vXjMCeQsyAjl0Yd37 WzhA14ntXu92k8PrcthusfHtF2SsE5ka0ONkdatonZIoEj+JXApKdtjXXQv0ktP4 lZgAW3BUE5fCaF0b/9i9cQ65ls6Uo4+tSaQOQt//+ohV1zO/HF+ajvlQs3mS3Zzr OW145qHn0tYCBWsw2ZWW2Xc60Rw3fKfdWTOEXhiqxCXMbt2V0/K6a3mw6QgFRGSe wJYEfIXwgTrrDdlTztPv =4cqw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] New maintainer, new release coming
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/15/2014 02:17 AM, Ivan Zaigralin wrote: Hi! I am a bit confused. We used to download sources from http://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gnuzilla/ Is that still true? Yes, I think. Also, I am trying to build icecat_31.0+gnu3.tar.gz, and README.IceCat says, run .configure to make, but there is no .configure. I am doing something wrong? You can build 'configure' and 'make' files by using 'autoconf' tool but you will encounter problems if 'autoconf' version is too recent ( v2.13) because of incompatibilities. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUFsa7AAoJED2vIvfUANbE3KkQAK34UplwriWUtA3KMW83JzzM ufRApYfOtMWT5OCp3STSbredp1WTqOzJVdkdm9lvL+N8Mwh7oIkWAcnTrd3vfKm5 0V+xkXmDCgeCIpFPZ/Dy5qGgExlDmzVuKmuMy7+zzB2XnL+knKqq1KUgs03KElYy 2csdsjNgRfOeo2MRiV6hfaxirO3Uu7yDjExFI/npMdF0ixC8AyDy7giOVDg+Ulh5 o283C22j/ld5AExhYU9QQetzjQQGRi3GyBWDtPwBWqIPhs0O29p+J4x9syblDQ3a HDKax11/QHiiXbvVZ+aYSi/P62DA7eGiwv4MEk+FeUR/IJ+tFi9SjDouHq6H6gJb 6ywtJ12GsXsX22pXP++lBZUBaozdhSJe92T73c1ZZZ4e7Wn0fqldeGesKsXCXNVt IfeGZCy1B05yOBuQV1lx7yvoPaHFHEBfGfR9DsbcDu+DMAN+UKYsPzPo4Sly/MP2 W7lCYqjMejgOjxNyTxvvGt38PXGNYK3ZpR3/TtqQBI2F2yedJ2IMqJFaNrAGvTkc GyiZmyGjKdN+o733tfeuKud2FNxEvFz8HkrsA3wWJ8WRRAuLtLFIigvOhq64l604 NjL8HHKEaJDIPlql8aAN3MpwP695V4P4qHCF1HR/AdMjksr0+YuVQRoa8aQjoLkG ZAtQJye2ttLGuc5eYsSm =gW8T -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat VCS Checkout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Is CVS repo on https://directory.fsf.org/wiki/GNU_IceCat#tab=Overview updated in order to be used with latest Firefox release? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJUECxnAAoJED2vIvfUANbEUJMP/1VzuXG+uR0WiRp4u/2RTZIH /LXuKVi1/5QVLmwmfzHyphOfW49jZ0pWkQd4hg3OP1pq9IhOgrczm1IY3VZRJwt7 d1QIU9tQoSA0P/2KUbRxs7TTY6SPTLmBVR3S/IO3HwjS8PS4Zd6b3vuha4BpklQy zFDpxbTfnck6x/43ARbHACg1lhz1jm57JJigWZRYpXam7uZEG0axGxc9QQPyvE2R PGS2XpXfJlit+FaalqSK4wcPXm+dGAw1UAr3jaIaUdZOj1EscvnjZXSzzz8MDyBk LZD8BwjnKpAK44muZcN0+yBpXVI8jadroWLJJX/l8EiIA9958th+Ue+Kw+nbj/1R 3AcdYpI7a58TPA+XVEoPYn251o66r8KzHyAoDkhnmadc98y8ZEaE+wC5PbFcidcf zYhiuqC0CF4ZoJ/QVlXpwXieH9pbxCLQwBZxyi6SO9rCIZvWcX4dIuZqE1+R/P6d yvjRaJpM7OT9f2giJ1o8R5frYc2oFmfj+o2JAqxieb33I9PwDtYmUALIb+0h0i9o C1ZDk2vXlj5F81HMr2axkY8Rlpkt+i5feq62dzSFX4zEdGtEQ2vi2VTW2y+j2iBZ jFBe7ivm2+R8RTXPYBAhgRMxmTrXv74bhBrrA/Qn3mbslrpgs+nDJR+CNBcJkayk qCSIqCSHmGv+fk9FLTvN =adi7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] bug-gnuzilla Digest, Vol 94, Issue 1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 These Icecat RPMs will not provide HTTPS-everywhere and RequestPolicy extensions expected with source archive. HTTPS-everywhere is already packaged in Fedora; user just needs to install it from official repository. RequestPolicy extension RPM is under review like Icecat. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1128754 - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT7P/dAAoJED2vIvfUANbEiqkQAIObj5m37buDvfd5SKkqf5JD Pn6y/xhtlbJt16vS6XjciJENilVV30xlF/BGl0VLUUG6gPSCcfnXVixmnE+jl4IM +0IcieZwdNLcLCo5XbND8yWBQ4xhLLDecYdggzPyj32eVjQJtUGs9BEaQOsP30Xs N66zuua+SP8BZPaTFUiBlaIuxSzdRhPnrdlWy9LBsHtt8OPxYuhhotjvkBPMx1sS sAY01owXr2gir2XsZ8SvwLly0Cl89AUaLx1kxCg9U6q+A2KfrFfMchfbzh0tmtGg PgqH8Gz6nYAz2NPwZuj2zsDzoHr217JTkwSioT0hnJF1uM5nXrAM449pdt2SUmxO eYOaCn8DxooEaqXIb5veZrZlSmsZ0/sP+3hJFe7nvCP+IGJkrpRxn2Ob/J657ogh ZM9dmupu4PGCTEFQzMPTzE9Cvr1U6iLd0gNBUknF6eXFBElLUCLZihS7Bm32Nu07 h8Ye8xdK7RA9vu8qpy1YVG11iGmrwXoKK2zUNq3ZgT/OPiNs6nfDz002PoUWwz/b 0Gy6NGFdoHszZCtr50swhSkLTfIlstfIeVZ22m4m70nK5pReSRPqBZjWWgQRQdor POhcjVYkbzxJye83EPzXWOUQYJ1VPMyG7vBXrtqxFjUZpS17JAaPWNmPy18kmPIv cKW0cSw9rBSzYe7JKe/L =oB4j -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] bug-gnuzilla Digest, Vol 94, Issue 1
On 07/27/2014 12:34 AM, adam.bogacki wrote: Muchas Gracias, Antonio. I stuffed it up, the last time I tried - kept getting strange error msgs .. Adam. adam.boga...@clear.net.nz Tried recently? Please, let me see the error. -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat 24.0 - Copr project for Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Icecat 24.0 RPM package is currently under review in Fedora [1]. In the meantime, I'm maintaining various separated Icecat RPM packages for Fedora =19 on a 'Fedora Project' build system named Copr [2]. If someone is interested, for info about how to install Icecat 24.0 RPMs, please read this post [3]. Warm regards. [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048493 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Copr [3] http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/2014/07/23/icecat-the-big-absent/ - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://fedoraos.wordpress.com/ https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJT0rg+AAoJED2vIvfUANbEVBsP/imwXWNagcN2Y6pIY9u4aL4R szTvYXEOjl7E3yK1MRJAfevosSn0I3s0Jl6fJ7Svi6bIO2sw/EPO3HYHTHaEayOS 4LhUmHdL1I/icQ4SMnuGVPtKl2wrJvGi2A8jxjzCmMIbkC9zwuhYUNFtaqh9a07G oUdf3YfHhVDuYAlOAS+EpJ/qIwh95oGmf5jrluIjcF1T09PRUpOrib+D/jmDv8G5 d0xSXkFruseuIyRDamVXGBUwGqTUztZ8GgkXuhVadmVp4mDGejLaEABL3YM6G11T PTIZi55WDpcPWybnwUINN0anG8sRS1GrF1RtTLpD5Z+4Ypw/HAVICQsfM5L54Xuf 7j6xU4g6nFZiHhODKv8QfCiC0EUmckR6vKc2GpKq5TteMepH0uj3f6NT/a0p6KU4 R3XLwQsZNXORYhVh/CF9kHjithGYdGWwFjIpdXOi5laY9/PpUz+AtieceY9y3gIu FKzgpaf9cWFt1v2+NRGftzFqMQhSBpYYyWf2bPdhtTbwDQr+C1HoJiQC/BLuqRxe DyiTXwc+PikMi1868zHIwjdZPd+GdQjz1Zk/azMmSaI/FzrlARIqyZm3biy54XbA 56NSI2FI1Q2Qgxcp+jKeme1MbqVqngIo5S8LUSUu8JmQQD3DPWx+2EQVE/xtbDKT LFVdlgQ0ZbHadKfRSvZX =M3lQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/07/2014 01:17 AM, Loic J. Duros wrote: Sure, send it to me when you have this ready, no rush until IceCat 27 is released (weekend or mid next-week or afterwards.) Do you have a more or less precise date of release? I'm packaging it for Fedora and i wish to get ready my tasks about it. Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTNx5EAAoJED2vIvfUANbE26gP/RZ0lyd0PKiPVaevvG+zeXiF HluGktdbhin2RFYgGbUUfunxKYm1rbjEyeS0HaTIb0ZwioSyS0CwYwPAfG7jQAii fdq8nT+W/D/MnQslZszjsEcMO9YDGPenR94I1035Xftl1F9IquWhGOe0DWdHh/ds uQjzV5lj1LjpZkexHVi1PKptUb6zV91rXqHC+JfPqq5qhd2+jZ2caMt4WLR1z+d4 aj5rol/E599Z5btDOfa78FPujr10DrNWLvYyt/Dwz/iflmDD6LzWXTCyCt6D/y1v 09FagSgNeW1P9ZvnglHarK/e/Q3nE2kM03EiorS2aaomHBLjFIC0F2IWyYjq0xVg GkRDDQSRNdY8KbfeiMwSpLQ7I3LN+ktxokcbkgnQbamBZ66Olzzdz+6vqAvUve1P e0GSj6Hzz3b4KaP6kglrGTEOkV/2/C++KbM8AaE424DeYeiW2BsfBqK0+Z0ceP6e AmXH/geg+SjBaabi2f973Femzoo3N32oAjfFQwv4uUMwMAMpqvWLEYG11S5reErJ xPA+xRfZY/11d916tAoadYfBJeLnzUWKne38G6HVCE/cvGt5JX1evLBXt9FrdvPW TKNw9jPyCrg/ziAGmipQCelGTaSpL/+wBcP6EVO11f1u08In3BwupopqpMdFp4VK +DD5/dTyJ11GBU0XIL7a =dHz0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
Re: [Bug-gnuzilla] Is IceCat 24.0 secure?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/03/2014 09:28 PM, Loic J. Duros wrote: We're working on the release of IceCat based off 27.0.1, actually. Mauricio Fernandez Vitri mfernandezvi...@gmail.com writes: Hello, I've done some research and found that there are security updates which fix more than 14 critical bugs for Firefox ESR [1]. Aren't those critical bugs important enough to update IceCat? Would you please consider updating it to the latest ESR? Thanks for your work, Mauricio [1] http://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/firefoxESR.html I glad to see that this mailing list is populated since I wrote some mails without a reply. When you think will Icecat 27 be ready? - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJTFcIaAAoJED2vIvfUANbEAHgQAJ+PpuKoI8F+VVpq3pd4MiSh b0Ryq2OXvTExBqCWx4X9f6aYUj6DJ6ZvjckT7+pN76KCMu4+sHq5UcFqEwOIUIH7 amjorpgjYTqhGpDDkQGniHiKGEzSyzywTspyVekzFajc8ZuGMcRilryUN0YHIAfT BSxPcbQ1vbT/DvtuEqRfRSHW8lL9MJRnRbZ4spt3xsb7dImoR8VsmwzWXhXqlcWI dIRNEFuKkGbhC2Fof7I1+mMDkKWgfRt815lJbmDIlFmVURL2HFekKv4NoU2TbPFR UXi7WF2+C0D5qmC9ZDe58I+wsOeee00SINtxOv4/zcqBV8Ld54QJldTDi0VJxmmL 8kibFXuuABg1LuVIs/QYqKgsy09trSxrLJioumRI+EiPvYgooFzf1YQUh/4TRUv0 wycVUR9SuqA30lhPqZkG8fIZQ5k2RYXI5Oa5+kIHM0NbuSMr5qsHQlYx9zczEJoR 1CE9rVT+75y+C2KFaLu0o8derhUsDuFnfxjgmJUbAVniJ2eu+nkBoDA/UqrxxTSs hcTtffW5TrxoxJLj/Ug5+jGgh0DcaacMy8coHtio3XnnNs4u7c6n0Vn3p/KEDFx6 TRUQb8KERz8W8SILKrZPb7WP451MEE1fYMusDuWgin/Hn7PgtDmqoSxdL80O0mEo 9xFIsD2TgK6n1wpHbHDT =q9fy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Bundled libraries in Icecat 24
If someone is interested, there is a patch from Mozilla: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=517422#c11 It must be adapted to Icecat. -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Bundled libraries in Icecat 24
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. As you know, most of bundled libraries provided in Icecat source archive are already packaged in various GNU/Linux systems, but not all can be overlooked during the compilation, some of them are libogg, libtheora, opus or libvorbis. Does exist any chance to use, for instance, system's 'libogg' libraries when I compile Icecat ? I need to avoid bundled files as much as possible. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJS+S8qAAoJED2vIvfUANbE9q8P/1z635w6CMKBwTuVmy9dLrxr yLVzg1oizx7KY/fxeGiStu5j9cnNBLoO61i/d1vN5iwmdqUmImn0SFJoyzRszwFG rQ8Ckhl341pEFGZ56mvlBRtYHnAxPx4F84SzwALKc12oUsJC6XNlTGogRdqFJIdq fiehHbV8fMQEPVru1JoCEe/M3V+APq4JGOg0Tk/qA0V+fNiHwQHXhBVJC9WLc9fV dyhFDCYbk8qNHOboZbVQyzPRIiUAc0PUfMOghubLehizXnBMXgaw71xQu4Z4uB0C l4Jbf4ugcX7EygJPe5GM1FZpQAST+5kFrRHtA4bjkWwR6KBebwGSl+Q5YeMvj41z fEvZJFr0BgfXLR99DTBtc09Kbnzqyk0Uu6PhnawvSbWPGhkK3bIxeXNlpVvnpu/C AduzpuUK1Gk/p4SemAsRFn/+6IF/moNHjp/f3fLiF0XTnFwc1+DWQOwDd7H9REZW ABz/UQYtgLSQns2fKWIxwMu4dpOfaAjOOOrdTNOwJTjfAoBPaqdB4RaotTHrVj1w HwGdomM+a/DIJoTEhzpc9y+P/GsaoDAEbRq4FRTL6zPazz7Q0ECZ0W47FBc816nE jnzhhN2fQG/sKq+VcHAKs3Sw/AenDuJWTklPob9snfdufQ9dI2llkSxZpz8amA+b wXeUpGC/sg3kTRbQq1wD =BVpp -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
[Bug-gnuzilla] Icecat-24.0 compilation error in ARMv7hl arch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. I need help for this compilation error of Icecat-24.0: make[6]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0/obj-icecat/xulrunner/toolkit/library' make[5]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0/obj-icecat/xulrunner' make[4]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0/obj-icecat/xulrunner' make[3]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0/obj-icecat/xulrunner' make[2]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0' make[1]: Leaving directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0' RPM build errors: ../../gfx/ycbcr/ycbcr_to_rgb565.o: In function `mozilla::gfx::ConvertYCbCrToRGB565(unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*, unsigned char*, int, int, int, int, int, int, int, mozilla::gfx::YUVType)': /builddir/build/BUILD/icecat-24.0/gfx/ycbcr/ycbcr_to_rgb565.cpp:629: undefined reference to `mozilla::gfx::yuv42x_to_rgb565_row_neon(unsigned short*, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*, unsigned char const*, int, int)' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[6]: *** [libxul.so] Error 1 make[5]: *** [libs_tier_platform] Error 2 make[4]: *** [tier_platform] Error 2 make[3]: *** [default] Error 2 make[2]: *** [realbuild] Error 2 make[1]: *** [realbuild] Error 2 make: *** [build] Error 2 You can find the complete log at http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4715/6344715/build.log. In this particular case, I used these options in .mozconfig: + echo 'ac_add_options --with-arch=armv7-a' + echo 'ac_add_options --with-float-abi=hard' + echo 'ac_add_options --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16' + echo 'ac_add_options --disable-elf-hack' Thanks. - -- Antonio Trande mailto: sagitterATfedoraproject.org http://www.fedoraos.worpress.com https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sagitter GPG Key: D400D6C4 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJSwz3jAAoJED2vIvfUANbE8rQP/0wepRjflDhM3vaZykzDSqw8 +bIhne1k6Z6h9u5dXPk4VMGDP3T8w82ERqueLM9nWFXa/h6lUvC0+Ta05oSIWbnc 2bOT1y7bTkrcA3gqxJxOtaoUeS25L8VAsVsHiqnrEfES7Vp6VvR5ScU9rZu3td4C 4VgsHZ1ZMjxUwveblrqasf+xeAFbia6VhSdOxfEEiPSyUQFQJWSwSFcPKgQo543m N8xzPyc9ys/7XBgq3pW+pLHOSt1NK105j6PcMSnSO/3r7SnullH4qYx5ObWBbMuK sRAL8bEF/eu0bFgFkH/ZjzChWVNlPjUf84L9I75Hq+Rxe4+8lVshx0hJzN4r+PJS yogvLYdgAKIj+bngFO8HsQxGlLljbc1EadeqD7gtqJ+YmnSETG/juXLFPrbyrptu q+SbzXicQWQaukyjIsBwb0kq3eH1/dtVYE5PofQJpZ3ifoPdnjEcOmwXtMVeX5I5 /nLcwbKLFsLyPmx8Q88o+Px0eO2kt0EmkjdRpPyb6V+mMF20uglF6bNjUTHUOw9v w6YVabmGdblVCcgtl62xaE3gYna3INwsnzbSO6Vk9h/nhnPK+bf07unjoJ2Qsxd9 9McLQsOvD0YiEY8V9Hj6w/eTMWcUAVz2YmTA7p1ilZ534WwROELLVIspWDCc28hx x3/onl782qgBSC/quxgN =NuE0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- http://gnuzilla.gnu.org
